The verdict via the second US Circuit Courtroom of Appeals in New york rejected claims that Pass judgement on Brian Cogan made rulings permitting a jury to listen to erroneous proof at Guzman’s 2019 trial.
Cogan “carried out the three-month trial with diligence and equity, after issuing a sequence of meticulously crafted pretrial rulings,” the ruling via the panel concluded.
Guzman, 64, used to be sentenced to existence at the back of bars for a large drug conspiracy that unfold homicide and mayhem for greater than 20 years.
On attraction, his attorneys had argued that the in charge verdict used to be tainted as a result of some jurors reportedly sought out information accounts about intercourse abuse allegations towards him that have been barred from the trial, and that Cogan erred via no longer ordering a listening to at the studies.
“The verdict turns out adore it used to be determined and written earlier than the argument even took place,” certainly one of Guzman’s attorneys, Jeffrey Lichtman, mentioned in a remark Tuesday. “How can there be justice right here when the jury used to be uncovered to scurrilous claims towards Mr. Guzman which have been no longer a part of the federal government’s case?”
The appeals courtroom discovered that Cogan used to be right kind to find “that the jury used to be no longer prejudiced via any extraneous data to which they may had been uncovered.” It added: “Any imaginable prejudice used to be innocuous in view of the overpowering proof of Guzman’s guilt.”
Earlier than the trial in federal courtroom in Brooklyn, Guzman had attained near-mythical standing via escaping from jail two times in Mexico, the second one time via a tunnel dug into the bathe of his cellular. He used to be recaptured and despatched in 2017 to the US and installed solitary confinement.
At trial, Guzman the protection argued he used to be the autumn man for different kingpins who have been higher at paying off most sensible Mexican politicians and cops to give protection to them.
