Nike sues Lululemon for patent infringement over at-home Reflect health club and health apps

Nike on Wednesday filed a lawsuit accusing Lululemon of patent infringement over the attire maker’s at-home Reflect health tool and similar cell programs.

Nike claims that during 1983, it invented and filed a patent utility on a tool for figuring out a runner’s pace, distance traversed, elapsed time and energy expended. It has additionally since introduced a spread of well-liked cell apps akin to Nike Run Membership and Nike Coaching Membership.

The corporate stated it holds various different health apparatus patents that Lululemon is infringing on through promoting Reflect, a wall-mounted tool that guides customers via a lot of high-intensity aerobic categories and different workout routines.

Lululemon purchased Reflect for $500 million in 2020 amid a hurry amongst customers to exercise at domestic all through the Covid pandemic. The tool places Lululemon in festival with competitors akin to Peloton, Hydrow and Tonal.

Previous to submitting the lawsuit, Nike stated, it notified Lululemon on Nov. 3 of the alleged infringement and that the leggings maker pushed aside Nike’s claims. The swimsuit was once filed in New york federal court docket.

A spokesperson for Lululemon stated in an emailed observation, “The patents in query are overly huge and invalid. We’re assured in our place and look ahead to protecting it in court docket.”

Lululemon stocks closed Wednesday down 4.8%. Nike stocks fell 2.5% amid a broader marketplace sell-off.

Lululemon is recently embroiled in some other felony fight, with Peloton. In past due November, it filed a patent lawsuit in opposition to the attached health corporate in a feud over the designs of its sports activities bras and leggings.

Peloton had previous sought a court docket’s declaration that it has no longer infringed on any of Lululemon’s patents. The corporate has maintained that its personal athletic attire products is straightforward to decipher from Lululemon’s. Lululemon, despite the fact that, is looking for damages and different financial reduction.