Epstein Probe: Clinton Says ‘Knew Nothing,’ Trump Demands Answers

Former US President Bill Clinton has publicly refuted any involvement or knowledge concerning Jeffrey Epstein, following a directive from President Donald Trump for the Department of Justice to investigate their alleged connections. Clinton’s spokeswoman, Angel Ureña, issued a statement on X asserting, “These emails prove Bill Clinton did nothing and knew nothing. The rest is noise meant to distract from election losses, backfiring shutdowns, and who knows what else.” Trump had previously told reporters aboard Air Force One that “You’re gonna find out what he knew, with respect to Bill Clinton, with respect to the head of Harvard, with respect to all those people he knew, including JP Morgan Chase.” Trump described his own history with Epstein as unfavorable, attributing Epstein’s perceived interest in him to his presidential status. U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi confirmed she tasked Jay Clayton, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, with investigating Epstein’s connections to Trump’s political adversaries, such as Clinton. This investigation is being launched after Congress recently unsealed thousands of pages of Epstein-related records amid sustained bipartisan demands for greater transparency. Online discussion intensified significantly after an email attributed to Mark Epstein, Jeffrey Epstein’s brother, surfaced. The email allegedly questioned if Russian President Vladimir Putin possessed photographs of Trump involved in illicit activities, using the nickname ‘Bubba’. Many users on X interpreted ‘Bubba’ as a reference to Bill Clinton, whose nickname is widely recognized, although the email’s original intent is not definitively known. The term ‘Bubba’ can mean an elder brother, a term of endearment, or, in some parts of the American South, serve as a pejorative descriptor for a white man from a lower social stratum, alluding to Clinton’s background. The DOJ’s investigation into Epstein’s relationships with high-profile politicians has reignited widespread public debate regarding the objectivity of federal investigations, the influence of political considerations, and the persistent calls for full accountability concerning Epstein’s extensive network.