Attorneys for a Jeffrey Epstein sufferer requested a federal pass judgement on on Friday so they can take new testimony from JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon and others as a part of a lawsuit towards the financial institution over its dealings with intercourse predator Epstein.
The legal professionals, who deposed Dimon for the go well with final month, alleged in a Big apple District Court docket submitting that JPMorgan has “strategically” did not promptly flip over paperwork to them as a part of the case, as required by means of Pass judgement on Jed Rakoff.
That avoided the accuser’s legal professionals from asking questions on the ones paperwork on the time Dimon and different key witnesses have been deposed, in step with the submitting by means of lawyer Sigrid McCawley.
The submitting says that when Dimon’s deposition, JPMorgan “produced 1,500 paperwork, a few of which got here from the custodial recordsdata of witnesses whose depositions had lengthy handed.”
The accuser, who’s suing beneath the pseudonym Jane Doe, in her go well with claims that JPMorgan facilitated and financially benefited from Epstein’s intercourse trafficking of her and different younger ladies for years when he used to be a buyer of the financial institution.
Jamie Dimon, chairman and leader govt officer of JPMorgan Chase & Co., proper, at the USA Capitol following a gathering with Senate Majority Chief Chuck Schumer in Washington, DC, US, on Wednesday, Might 17, 2023.
Sarah Silbiger | Bloomberg | Getty Pictures
The federal government of the U.S. Virgin Islands alleges the similar declare in a separate lawsuit pending in the similar courthouse.
JPMorgan denies any wrongdoing however has mentioned it regrets having had Epstein as a shopper.
Along with Dimon, the accuser’s legal professionals wish to reopen the depositions of Mary Erdoes, who’s CEO of JPMorgan’s asset and wealth control department; Mary Casey, who used to be Epstein’s banker for roughly a decade at JPMorgan; and a fourth particular person, best known within the submitting as JPMorgan’s “consultant.”
All 4 could be requested about paperwork became over best after their preliminary depositions, the submitting mentioned.
One such report, became over after Dimon’s deposition used to be taken Might 26, “seems to seek advice from a 2019 inner evaluate of [redacted] digital communications with Jeffrey Epstein, carried out after Epstein’s 2019 arrest and dying,” in step with the submitting.
One late-produced report used to be a timeline that amongst different issues referenced emails through which a then-top financial institution govt Jes Staley asks Epstein a query.
“Those paperwork exhibit that JPMC used to be absolutely in a position to studying the total extent of Epstein and Staley’s private courting … and but waited to take action till 2019 regardless of the myriad pink flags and public stories about Epstein’s habits through the years,” the submitting mentioned.
“Plaintiff would have faced JPMC’s CEO, Mr. Dimon,
with this report all through his deposition had it been produced in a well timed method,” the submitting mentioned.
McCawley famous that Rakoff in Might had admonished JPMorgan for turning over paperwork to the plaintiff’s felony crew “at an inexplicably sluggish fee.”
“Regardless of the Court docket’s transparent caution, JPMC nonetheless did not expeditiously produce paperwork from the custodial recordsdata of key witnesses, a few of whom had already been deposed, for strategic causes,” the legal professional wrote.
“As an example, the weekend previous to the shut of reality discovery, and instantly after the Might 26 deposition of its CEO Jamie Dimon, JPMC produced 1,500 paperwork, a few of which got here from the custodial recordsdata of witnesses whose depositions had lengthy handed,” McCawley wrote.
“This development of manufacturing paperwork from the custodial recordsdata of witnesses after their depositions has continued all through the invention duration.”
Joseph Evangelisti, a spokesman for JPMorgan, in an electronic mail to CNBC mentioned, “Plaintiffs just like the headlines, however no period of time at the file will trade the truth that Jamie by no means met the person, by no means labored with the person, and desires in hindsight the person had by no means been a shopper of the company.”
— CNBC’s Eamon Javers contributed to this file.