The World Opinion

Tag: UPSC

  • UPSC Success Story: He Failed 35 Times, Then Cracked Civil Services Exam Twice To Become IPS, Then IAS With AIR… |

    They say that those who win after facing defeat are the true champions. Such is the story of Vijay Vardhan from Haryana. Despite failing to clear any government job (Sarkari Naukri) exams, he succeeded in passing the country’s toughest exam, the UPSC. Even after numerous failures, he kept his spirits high and stood up to achieve success. He believed in himself, and his determination paid off. Today, he is an IAS officer.

    35 Failures in Government Job Exams

    Vijay Vardhan, an IAS officer, was born and raised in Sirsa, Haryana. He completed his studies in Electronics Engineering from Hisar and then moved to Delhi to prepare for the UPSC exams. Vijay faced failure in every exam he took. He appeared for government job exams 35 times but couldn’t clear even one. He also faced multiple setbacks in the UPSC exams. However, his optimism kept him going. Finally, in 2018, he passed the UPSC exam and secured the 104th rank.

    Cracking UPSC Twice

    In 2018, Vijay Vardhan’s 104th rank in the UPSC exam led to his selection as an IPS officer. However, he was not satisfied as his ultimate goal was to become an IAS officer. Undeterred, he appeared for the UPSC exam again in 2021 and successfully achieved his dream of becoming an IAS officer by ranking in top 70. Vijay Vardhan passed the UPSC exam twice, in 2018 and 2021.

    Story Of Preservance

    Vijay Vardhan’s story is one of true perseverance, demonstrating that failures are stepping stones to success. His journey from repeated failures to achieving his dream is a powerful source of inspiration for everyone.

  • UPSC Cancels IAS Officer Puja Khedkar’s Provisional Candidature, Bans Her From Future Exams |

    The Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) has cancelled the selection of Puja Khedkar as a trainee IAS officer. Additionally, Khedkar has been permanently barred from taking any future UPSC exams after being found guilty of identity fraud.

    The UPSC has officially stated that Puja Khedkar violated the Civil Services Examination (CSE) rules by falsely availing more attempts than permitted. According to the commission, a Show Cause Notice (SCN) was issued to Khedkar on July 18, 2024, for her fraudulent actions. She was found to have faked her identity to circumvent the attempt limits set by the examination rules.

     Failure To Respond to Show Cause Notice

    The 34-year-old was initially given until July 25 to respond to the SCN but requested an extension until August 4. The UPSC granted an extension until July 30, emphasizing that this would be her final opportunity to present an explanation. Despite this extension, Khedkar failed to submit any response within the prescribed time.

    Upon careful examination of the available records, the UPSC determined that Khedkar had indeed violated the CSE-2022 rules. As a result, her provisional candidature for the CSE-2022 was cancelled, and she has been permanently debarred from all future UPSC examinations and selections.

    Examination of Past Candidates

    In the aftermath of this incident, the UPSC conducted a thorough review of data from over 15,000 candidates who cleared the IAS screening process between 2009 and 2023. This extensive investigation revealed that, apart from Khedkar, no other candidate had exceeded the permissible number of attempts under the CSE rules.

    The UPSC acknowledged that Khedkar’s case slipped through their Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) due to her changing not only her name but also her parents’ names. In response, the UPSC is working to further strengthen its SOPs to prevent such incidents in the future.

    The UPSC clarified that it performs only a preliminary scrutiny of the candidates’ certificates, generally accepting them as genuine if issued by a competent authority. The commission highlighted that it lacks the mandate and resources to verify the authenticity of thousands of certificates submitted annually. The scrutiny and verification of certificates’ genuineness are typically carried out by the mandated authorities.

  • UPSC contemplates felony motion towards two applicants for claiming variety in civil services and products 

    Via PTI

    NEW DELHI: The Union Public Carrier Fee (UPSC) is thinking about felony and disciplinary penal motion towards two applicants for allegedly claiming variety within the civil services and products exam, the result of which have been declared on Tuesday, consistent with an reputable commentary.

    The case pertains to Aysha Makrani (from Madhya Pradesh) and Tushar (from Bihar) who fraudulently claimed that they have got been after all beneficial by way of the Fee within the civil services and products exam 2022 towards two roll numbers of really beneficial applicants, it mentioned.

    “The claims of each people are pretend. They’ve cast the paperwork of their favour to buttress their claims,” mentioned the commentary issued on Friday.

    Via doing so, each Makrani and Tushar have acted in contravention of the provisions of the Laws of the Civil Products and services Exam, 2022 notified by way of the federal government of India (Division of Team of workers and Coaching), it mentioned.

    Due to this fact, in response to the provisions of the Exam Laws, the UPSC is considering each felony in addition to disciplinary penal motion towards the 2 applicants for his or her fraudulent acts, the commentary mentioned.

    “The machine of the UPSC is powerful in addition to foolproof and such mistakes don’t seem to be imaginable,” it added.

    The UPSC conducts civil services and products exam every year in 3 phases, initial, primary and interview to make a choice officials of Indian Administrative Carrier (IAS), Indian Overseas Carrier (IFS) and Indian Police Carrier (IPS), amongst others.

    NEW DELHI: The Union Public Carrier Fee (UPSC) is thinking about felony and disciplinary penal motion towards two applicants for allegedly claiming variety within the civil services and products exam, the result of which have been declared on Tuesday, consistent with an reputable commentary.

    The case pertains to Aysha Makrani (from Madhya Pradesh) and Tushar (from Bihar) who fraudulently claimed that they have got been after all beneficial by way of the Fee within the civil services and products exam 2022 towards two roll numbers of really beneficial applicants, it mentioned.

    “The claims of each people are pretend. They’ve cast the paperwork of their favour to buttress their claims,” mentioned the commentary issued on Friday.googletag.cmd.push(serve as() googletag.show(‘div-gpt-ad-8052921-2’); );

    Via doing so, each Makrani and Tushar have acted in contravention of the provisions of the Laws of the Civil Products and services Exam, 2022 notified by way of the federal government of India (Division of Team of workers and Coaching), it mentioned.

    Due to this fact, in response to the provisions of the Exam Laws, the UPSC is considering each felony in addition to disciplinary penal motion towards the 2 applicants for his or her fraudulent acts, the commentary mentioned.

    “The machine of the UPSC is powerful in addition to foolproof and such mistakes don’t seem to be imaginable,” it added.

    The UPSC conducts civil services and products exam every year in 3 phases, initial, primary and interview to make a choice officials of Indian Administrative Carrier (IAS), Indian Overseas Carrier (IFS) and Indian Police Carrier (IPS), amongst others.

  • 22 PCS might be promoted in UP, officials of this batch will develop into IAS

    22 PCS officials of Uttar Pradesh might be promoted. 3 batches of PCS officials had been incorporated on this. They’re going to be promoted to the publish of IAS.

  • Circle of relatives of Jharkhand lady who claimed cracking UPSC apologises for ‘inadvertent error’

    By way of PTI

    RAMGARH: The circle of relatives of Divya Pandey, 24, who claimed she had cracked the civil services and products exam in her maiden strive, on Friday apologised to the district management and Central Coalfields Ltd (CCL), either one of which felicitated her, in addition to media for furnishing misguided data of her good fortune and mentioned it was once an “inadvertent error”.

    Conveying apologies on behalf of Divya Pandey (24), her members of the family in addition to her neighbours mentioned that it’s in fact one Divya P of South India and no longer Divya Pandey who cracked the UPSC exam securing 323rd rank.

    Priyadarshni Pandey, elder sister of Divya Pandey mentioned her sister was once knowledgeable via her buddy in Uttar Pradesh that she had cracked UPSC securing AIR 323rd rank and “we attempted to test consequence on UPSC site however web was once no longer running. It was once an inadvertent error.”

    The circle of relatives’s claims of Divya Pandey’s cracking of UPSC with the assistance of smartphone and web with none skilled training in her first strive had ended in the Central Coalfields Ltd Chairman cum Managing Director, PM Prasad and different senior officers felicitating Divya Pandey as her father was once a retired crane operator from CCL.

    The claims had were given well-liked media protection.

    Deputy Commissioner, Ramgarh, Madhavi Mishra who too had felicitated Divya Pandey at her workplace within the district collectorate termed it a “human error”.

    The Ramgarh officers assist they’d no longer taken any motion towards the lady or her circle of relatives on this connection.

    The members of the family claimed that there was once no goal of spreading pretend information or false claims and added that once studying the reality Divya, a resident of Rajrappa colony below Chitarpur block of Jharkhand’s Ramgarh district has left for Delhi.

    “We apologise for this blunder,” they mentioned.

    Chandreshwar Singh, house secretary of Coalfields Majdoor Union affiliated to Hind Majdoor Sabha and Divya’s neighbour mentioned that because of web failure the circle of relatives may no longer test the ideas given via a UP-based buddy of the lady and her good fortune tale went viral.

    Divya, who had graduated from Ranchi College in 2017 had claimed: “I installed round 18 hours of research every day and skim a large number of Nationwide Council of Training Analysis (NCERT) books.”

    Her father Jagdish Prasad Pandey, who retired in 2016 as a crane operator of Central Coalfields Ltd (CCL) had claimed that the good fortune and difficult paintings of his daughter had paid off.

  • No provision for containing re-assessment in case candidate fails to seem in examination, UPSC tells SC

    Through PTI

    NEW DELHI: The UPSC has advised the Superb Courtroom that there’s no provision for containing re-assessment in case a candidate fails to seem within the take a look at at the scheduled date for any causes, together with ailment or twist of fate incapacitating him to take the examination.

    The Union Public Provider Fee (UPSC) has filed a testimony within the apex courtroom which is listening to a plea via 3 aspirants who had cleared the UPSC-2021 prelims examination however may no longer seem in all papers of the primary examination after trying out sure for COVID-19 and at the moment are looking for an additional try to seem within the checks.

    The UPSC mentioned that any choice relating to age leisure and compensatory/further try within the civil products and services exam is a “coverage topic” which falls beneath the area of the Division of Group of workers and Coaching (DoP&T).

    “The Fee generally holds 13 examinations except for a number of recruitment assessments all through a yr. In appreciate of those examinations, there’s no provision for containing re-assessment in case a candidate(s) fails to seem within the exam at the agenda date(s) for any explanation why together with any ailment/twist of fate incapacitating her or him to take the exam,” it mentioned.

    “In previous, the Fee has no longer held any re-assessment beneath equivalent instances,” it mentioned.

    The affidavit mentioned the UPSC conducts the civil products and services exam strictly according to the foundations of exam framed once a year via the Govt of India within the DoP&T.

    It mentioned through the years, a cycle has developed involving recruitment, coaching and ultimate appointment making sure that the federal government will get its needful manpower on time and any disruption at any level has the potential for frightening all the cycle no longer just for as soon as however more likely to have “cascading results in long run as neatly”.

    The Fee mentioned the topic of compensatory/ further try has been adjudicated via the apex courtroom previously towards the plea of hardships confronted via the aspirants because of the COVID-19 pandemic, however the similar was once no longer granted.

    It mentioned the civil products and services primary (written) exam 2021 was once effectively carried out at 24 centres (towns/cities) at the agenda dates from January 7, 2022 to January 16, 2022 all over the rustic following due COVID-19 protocols, which failed to mandate making any separate association for COVID inflamed applicants.

    The Fee mentioned so as to carry out its constitutional responsibilities to provide manpower to the federal government in a well timed method to fill the vacancies within the a very powerful positions, it’s crucial that the UPSC follows its agenda of examinations that are ready neatly prematurely.

    “If the Fee is to make a provision for re-assessment, it’ll hardly ever be imaginable for it to finish its any exam on time. This will likely entail entire derailment of the agenda of post-examination actions of a selected exam however can even have cascading results at the schedules of different ongoing examinations in addition to different checks to practice,” the affidavit mentioned.

    “If truth be told, accommodating such requests will result in a chaotic state of affairs the place no exam will also be finished on agenda, because of which vacancies in govt will stay unfilled for an indefinite duration and the aspirants of the Fee’s examinations can even stay in limbo as to when the effects will likely be declared or when the following commercial for recruitment will likely be issued,” the UPSC mentioned.

    It mentioned the prayers made within the petition pertain to core facets of eligibility that are neatly delineated within the laws framed via the DoP&T in session with the UPSC.

    “Within the instances, DoP&T may be a stake holder within the means of habits of civil products and services examination. In consequence, the perspectives and stand of the DoP&T additionally is also thought to be within the hobby of justice at the problems raised in writ petition,” it mentioned.

    The Centre had on Monday advised the apex courtroom that the decision relating to further try to seem within the UPSC exam should be taken via the DoP&T. The highest courtroom is scheduled to listen to the topic on March 25.

    Whilst two of the 3 petitioners needed to depart the primary examination, held from January 7 to 16, in-between after showing in some preliminary papers, the 3rd aspirant may no longer seem in any of the papers because of COVID.

    The petitioners, of their plea filed via suggest Shashank Singh, have mentioned that they examined sure for COVID-19 within the RTPCR take a look at stories dated January 13, 14 and January 6.

    The plea has mentioned the petitioners may no longer take the UPSC mains exam after trying out sure for COVID-19 and owing to the constraints imposed beneath the stern quarantine pointers of the federal government.

    “Additionally, there was once absence of any more or less coverage of UPSC which might supply preparations for such petitioners who had been COVID sure all through the span of mains exam or sooner than it,” it mentioned.

    “The petitioners are coming near this courtroom beneath Article 32 and looking for a route to the Respondent/ UPSC to increase them an extra (further) try to seem within the exam or in change, make some association to seem in the remainder of papers which the petitioners may no longer give sooner than the e-newsletter of results of civil provider mains exam 2021,” the plea mentioned.

    It claimed that absence of coverage and no association to house COVID-19 sure petitioners to seem within the civil provider mains exam 2021 have violated their rights, together with that of beneath Article 14 (equality sooner than legislation) of the Charter of India.

  • COVID-19: Factor referring to additional try to seem in checks very difficult, UPSC tells SC

    By way of PTI

    NEW DELHI: The UPSC Monday informed the Excellent Court docket that factor raised in a petition filed by way of 3 aspirants, who had cleared the UPSC 2021 prelims examination however may just now not seem in all papers of the primary examination after checking out certain for COVID-19 and at the moment are in the hunt for an additional try to seem within the checks, is “very difficult”.

    The petitioners have sought a path to the Union Public Carrier Fee (UPSC) to increase them an extra try to seem within the examination or within the change make some association to look in remainder of the papers which they might now not give, sooner than the e-newsletter of consequence.

    The suggest showing for the UPSC informed the apex court docket that he must take directions and position on document the entire sides sooner than any resolution is taken at the factor.

    “I believe this is a matter which may be very, very difficult. I believe I would like directions and position on document the entire sides sooner than your lordships, sooner than any resolution is taken,” the UPSC’s suggest informed a bench of Justices A M Khanwilkar and C T Ravikumar.

    The bench posted the topic for listening to on March 21 and stated that affidavits be filed by way of the events sooner than the following date.

    Whilst two of the 3 petitioners needed to go away the primary examination, held from January 7 to 16, in-between after showing in some preliminary papers, the 3rd aspirant may just now not seem in any of the papers because of COVID.

    Throughout the listening to on Monday, senior suggest Gopal Sankaranarayanan, who used to be showing for the petitioners, informed the bench that they’d served the replica of the petition to the suggest for the respondents — the Centre and UPSC.

    Whilst in the hunt for two weeks to take directions within the topic, the suggest showing for the fee informed the bench that interviews are slated to start out best in April.

    On February 28, the bench had requested the petitioners to serve the replica of the petition to the status suggest for the involved respondents.

    The petitioners, of their plea filed thru suggest Shashank Singh, have stated that they have been examined certain for COVID-19 within the RTPCR take a look at reviews dated January 13, 14 and January 6.

    The plea has stated the petitioners may just now not give the UPSC mains exam after checking out certain for COVID-19 and owing to the constraints imposed beneath the stern quarantine pointers of the federal government.

    “Additionally, there used to be absence of any roughly coverage of UPSC which might supply preparations for such petitioners who have been COVID certain all through the span of mains exam or sooner than it,” it stated.

    “The petitioners are coming near this court docket beneath Article 32 and in the hunt for a path to the Respondent/ UPSC to increase them an extra (additional) try to seem within the exam or in change, make some association to look in the remainder of papers which the petitioners may just now not give sooner than the e-newsletter of results of civil provider mains exam 2021,” the plea stated.

    It claimed that absence of coverage and no association to deal with COVID-19 certain petitioners to look within the civil provider mains exam 2021 have violated their rights, together with that of beneath Article 14 (equality sooner than regulation) of the Charter of India.

  • Will listen appearing Maharashtra DGP Sanjay Pandey over plea for everlasting appointment: Bombay HC

    By means of PTI

    MUMBAI: The Bombay Top Courtroom on Friday mentioned it is going to have to listen to senior IPS officer and present appearing Director Normal of Police (DGP) of Maharashtra, Sanjay Pandey ahead of passing an order on a petition looking for everlasting appointment of an officer to the submit.

    A department bench of Leader Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice MS Karnik mentioned that whilst previous this week it had closed the subject for judgment noting that there used to be no want to listen Pandey, it has later come to the courtroom’s understand that there are some direct allegations towards the IPS officer within the petition.

    “Whilst dictating our judgment within the case, we got here throughout a couple of paragraphs within the petition the place there are particular direct allegations made towards Sanjay Pandey. In view of this, we deem it suitable and vital to implead Sanjay Pandey as a birthday party respondent within the petition. We will be able to listen him first after which move our judgment,” the courtroom mentioned.

    The courtroom recalled its January 25 order booking the subject for judgment. The bench on Friday directed Pandey to record his affidavit based on the petition by means of February 4. The Maharashtra executive and the UPSC shall additionally record affidavits in the event that they want to, the bench mentioned, posting the subject for additional listening to.

    The courtroom used to be listening to a public hobby litigation filed by means of a city-based recommend Datta Mane looking for instructions to the state executive to make an enduring appointment to the submit of the Director Normal of Police (DGP).

    Mane’s recommend Abhinav Chandrachud had argued that as in keeping with a judgment handed by means of the Splendid Courtroom, the submit of the state’s best police officer may just now not be an appearing one and that an officer with the minimal tenure necessities as in keeping with the 2006 ruling should be appointed.

    The petition sought that the state executive should appoint a DGP as in keeping with the advice made by means of the choice committee of the UPSC in November 2021.

    Recommend Normal Ashutosh Kumbhakoni, showing for the state executive, had informed the courtroom that Pandey, lately the senior maximum IPS officer within the state, were appointed because the appearing DGP ultimate 12 months after the then DGP Subodh Jaiswal vacated the submit midterm following his switch to the CBI.

    Within the November 1 assembly of the UPSC variety committee, of which the state’s then Leader Secretary Sitaram Kunte used to be a birthday party, the names of IPS officials Hemant Nagrale, Rajnish Seth and Ok Venkatesham have been really helpful for the submit of Maharashtra DGP.

    Kunte signed off at the 3 names on the time, however on November 8, he wrote to the UPSC announcing that it had erred in now not recommending the present appearing DGP Sanjay Pandey’s title and that it could rethink the similar.

    The courtroom had previous this week famous that Kunte’s habits used to be now not correct and now not in line with any criminal rules. The bench had famous that it didn’t behove Kunte to have now not raised a criticism or identified the mistake dedicated, if any, by means of the committee ahead of signing off at the 3 names.

    Further Solicitor Normal Anil Singh, showing for the Union executive, had informed the courtroom that when the 3 names were really helpful, there used to be no query for the UPSC to rethink the similar.