Sen. Steve Daines (R-Mont.) attracted ridicule this week after he in comparison ladies and fetuses to sea turtles, eagles and their eggs as he argued towards a invoice proposed by way of Democrats that might ensure the appropriate to abortion beneath federal legislation.
In line with Daines’ analogy, which used to be delivered at the Senate flooring entire with a visible assist, the regulation would give fetuses fewer protections than turtle and eagle eggs.
“When you had been to take or break the eggs of a sea turtle, now I mentioned the eggs. No longer the hatchlings, that’s additionally a [unintelligible], the legal consequences are critical. As much as $100,000 nice and a yr in jail. Now why?” Daines mentioned. “Why do we have now regulations in position that give protection to the eggs of a sea turtle or the eggs of eagles? As a result of whilst you break an egg, you’re killing a preborn child sea turtle or a preborn child eagle.”
The regulations he’s referring to offer protection to sea turtle and bald eagle nests from people since the species are endangered. There are not any regulations combating feminine natural world from doing as they please with their very own eggs.
Democrats offered the Girls’s Well being Coverage Act to be able to safeguard abortion get right of entry to for tens of millions of girls, following the leak of a draft majority opinion that confirmed the Splendid Court docket used to be poised to overturn the landmark 1973 abortion rights case, Roe v. Wade, and roll again ladies’s rights by way of 5 a long time.
Daines’ argument used to be torn aside on social media: