Tag: Ram Sethu

  • Excellent Courtroom rejects plea to build wall at ‘Ram Sethu’; publicizes it as ‘nationwide monument’

    Through Categorical Information Provider

    NEW DELHI: The Excellent Courtroom on Tuesday brushed aside a plea searching for a course to claim the ‘Ram Sethu’ as a countrywide monument and to build a wall on the website within the sea for a couple of meters or kilometres, in order that it may be open for lots of to have ‘Darshan’.

    The general public pastime litigation (PIL) was once taken up ahead of a bench of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Sudhanshu Dhulia and therefore rejected through the apex courtroom.

    Within the plea, petitioner Hindu Private Legislation Board, via its president Ashok Pandey, prayed for stating Sri Ram Setu/ Nalahin Setu/Setu Bandh as a countrywide monument inside the provisions of Historic Monuments, Archaeological Websites and Stays Act 1958.

    ‘Ram Sethu’, often referred to as Adam’s bridge, is a series of limestone shoals between Pamban Island, off the south-eastern coast of Tamil Nadu, and Mannar Island, off the north-western coast of Sri Lanka.

    “In case this Setu is available in open, it’s going to give approach to folks internationally to come back to Dhanuskoti (Rameshwaram) for the Darshan of the bridge built underneath the orders of Lord Ram. In case it’s completed, the average guy will be capable of stroll in this bridge for a couple of meters. It’ll fulfil the will of crores of individuals just like the petitioner to stroll, take a seat and sleep at the bridge in which Ram together with his military went to Lanka to kill Rawan and to ascertain Ram Raj in Lanka,” the plea stated.

    ..it’s certainly excellent that Sri Nitin Gadkari, the minister given the price of this division declared within the Parliament that Sri Ram Setu might not be destructed and with out destruction of the similar, the Setu Samudram Transport Canal Challenge (SSSCP) will probably be finished, it stated additional.

    NEW DELHI: The Excellent Courtroom on Tuesday brushed aside a plea searching for a course to claim the ‘Ram Sethu’ as a countrywide monument and to build a wall on the website within the sea for a couple of meters or kilometres, in order that it may be open for lots of to have ‘Darshan’.

    The general public pastime litigation (PIL) was once taken up ahead of a bench of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Sudhanshu Dhulia and therefore rejected through the apex courtroom.

    Within the plea, petitioner Hindu Private Legislation Board, via its president Ashok Pandey, prayed for stating Sri Ram Setu/ Nalahin Setu/Setu Bandh as a countrywide monument inside the provisions of Historic Monuments, Archaeological Websites and Stays Act 1958.googletag.cmd.push(serve as() googletag.show(‘div-gpt-ad-8052921-2’); );

    ‘Ram Sethu’, often referred to as Adam’s bridge, is a series of limestone shoals between Pamban Island, off the south-eastern coast of Tamil Nadu, and Mannar Island, off the north-western coast of Sri Lanka.

    “In case this Setu is available in open, it’s going to give approach to folks internationally to come back to Dhanuskoti (Rameshwaram) for the Darshan of the bridge built underneath the orders of Lord Ram. In case it’s completed, the average guy will be capable of stroll in this bridge for a couple of meters. It’ll fulfil the will of crores of individuals just like the petitioner to stroll, take a seat and sleep at the bridge in which Ram together with his military went to Lanka to kill Rawan and to ascertain Ram Raj in Lanka,” the plea stated.

    ..it’s certainly excellent that Sri Nitin Gadkari, the minister given the price of this division declared within the Parliament that Sri Ram Setu might not be destructed and with out destruction of the similar, the Setu Samudram Transport Canal Challenge (SSSCP) will probably be finished, it stated additional.

  • SC to imagine listening to PIL in search of declaration of Ram Sethu as nationwide heritage monument

    By way of PTI

    NEW DELHI: The Ideally suited Court docket Thursday agreed to checklist for listening to a PIL filed by means of former Rajya Sabha lawmaker Subramanian Swamy in search of a course to the Centre to claim the Ram Sethu as a countrywide heritage monument.

    A bench comprising Leader Justice D Y Chandrachud and Justice P S Narasimha took be aware of the submissions of the BJP chief that thus far no resolution has been taken at the factor and therefore, the PIL be indexed for listening to now. “We will be able to checklist it after the Charter bench issues recover from,” the CJI stated.

    A five-judge charter bench headed by means of the CJI is seized of quite a lot of issues, together with the Delhi-Centre row over keep watch over of services and products within the nationwide capital.

    The highest court docket, previous on January 19, used to be instructed by means of Solicitor Basic Tushar Mehta that the Centre used to be having a look into the problem relating stating the Ram Sethu as a countrywide heritage monument.

    The court docket had requested the Centre to take a choice at the factor and granted Swamy the freedom to transport ahead of it once more if he’s upset and disposed of his period in-between utility at the factor.

    “Realized Solicitor Basic states {that a} procedure is these days underway within the Ministry of Tradition. He states that the petitioner (Swamy) would possibly post further conversation if he would possibly so want,” the bench had stated.

    “I don’t wish to meet any one. We’re in the similar celebration, it used to be there in our manifesto. Allow them to come to a decision in six weeks or no matter,” Swamy had stated. “I can come once more,” the BJP chief had stated.

    Swamy had stated that during 2019, the then Tradition Minister Prahlad Patel had known as a gathering at the factor and had made a advice for stating the Ram Sethu as a countrywide heritage monument.

    “The problem is that they’ve to say– ‘sure’ or ‘no’,” he had stated. The legislation officer had stated that the federal government used to be having a look into it.

    Previous to this, the highest court docket had stated it could absorb the plea of Swamy in the second one week of February.

    Ram Sethu, sometimes called Adam’s bridge, is a sequence of limestone shoals between Pamban Island, off the south-eastern coast of Tamil Nadu, and Mannar Island, off the north-western coast of Sri Lanka.

    The BJP chief had submitted that he had already gained the primary spherical of the litigation through which the Centre authorised the life of Ram Sethu.

    Swamy had raised the problem of stating the Ram Sethu a countrywide monument in his PIL towards the debatable Sethusamudram Send Channel challenge, initiated by means of the UPA-I govt.

    The subject reached the apex court docket, which in 2007 stayed paintings for the challenge at the Ram Sethu.

    The Centre later stated it had regarded as the “socio-economic disadvantages” of the challenge and used to be keen to discover any other path to the delivery channel challenge with out destructive the Ram Sethu.

    “That the Executive of India intends to discover a substitute for the sooner alignment of the Sethusamudram Send Channel challenge with out affecting/destructive the Adam’s Bridge/Ram Sethu within the pastime of the country,” the affidavit filed by means of the ministry had stated.

    The court docket then requested the federal government to report a contemporary affidavit.

    The Sethusamudram delivery channel challenge has been going through protests from some political events, environmentalists and likely Hindu spiritual teams.

    Beneath the challenge, an 83 km water channel used to be to be created, linking Mannar with Palk Strait, by means of intensive dredging and removing of limestone shoals.

    On November 13, 2019, the apex court docket had granted the Centre six weeks to elucidate its stand at the Ram Sethu.

    It had additionally granted Swamy liberty to way the court docket if the reaction of the Centre used to be no longer filed.

    NEW DELHI: The Ideally suited Court docket Thursday agreed to checklist for listening to a PIL filed by means of former Rajya Sabha lawmaker Subramanian Swamy in search of a course to the Centre to claim the Ram Sethu as a countrywide heritage monument.

    A bench comprising Leader Justice D Y Chandrachud and Justice P S Narasimha took be aware of the submissions of the BJP chief that thus far no resolution has been taken at the factor and therefore, the PIL be indexed for listening to now. “We will be able to checklist it after the Charter bench issues recover from,” the CJI stated.

    A five-judge charter bench headed by means of the CJI is seized of quite a lot of issues, together with the Delhi-Centre row over keep watch over of services and products within the nationwide capital.

    The highest court docket, previous on January 19, used to be instructed by means of Solicitor Basic Tushar Mehta that the Centre used to be having a look into the problem relating stating the Ram Sethu as a countrywide heritage monument.

    The court docket had requested the Centre to take a choice at the factor and granted Swamy the freedom to transport ahead of it once more if he’s upset and disposed of his period in-between utility at the factor.

    “Realized Solicitor Basic states {that a} procedure is these days underway within the Ministry of Tradition. He states that the petitioner (Swamy) would possibly post further conversation if he would possibly so want,” the bench had stated.

    “I don’t wish to meet any one. We’re in the similar celebration, it used to be there in our manifesto. Allow them to come to a decision in six weeks or no matter,” Swamy had stated. “I can come once more,” the BJP chief had stated.

    Swamy had stated that during 2019, the then Tradition Minister Prahlad Patel had known as a gathering at the factor and had made a advice for stating the Ram Sethu as a countrywide heritage monument.

    “The problem is that they’ve to say– ‘sure’ or ‘no’,” he had stated. The legislation officer had stated that the federal government used to be having a look into it.

    Previous to this, the highest court docket had stated it could absorb the plea of Swamy in the second one week of February.

    Ram Sethu, sometimes called Adam’s bridge, is a sequence of limestone shoals between Pamban Island, off the south-eastern coast of Tamil Nadu, and Mannar Island, off the north-western coast of Sri Lanka.

    The BJP chief had submitted that he had already gained the primary spherical of the litigation through which the Centre authorised the life of Ram Sethu.

    Swamy had raised the problem of stating the Ram Sethu a countrywide monument in his PIL towards the debatable Sethusamudram Send Channel challenge, initiated by means of the UPA-I govt.

    The subject reached the apex court docket, which in 2007 stayed paintings for the challenge at the Ram Sethu.

    The Centre later stated it had regarded as the “socio-economic disadvantages” of the challenge and used to be keen to discover any other path to the delivery channel challenge with out destructive the Ram Sethu.

    “That the Executive of India intends to discover a substitute for the sooner alignment of the Sethusamudram Send Channel challenge with out affecting/destructive the Adam’s Bridge/Ram Sethu within the pastime of the country,” the affidavit filed by means of the ministry had stated.

    The court docket then requested the federal government to report a contemporary affidavit.

    The Sethusamudram delivery channel challenge has been going through protests from some political events, environmentalists and likely Hindu spiritual teams.

    Beneath the challenge, an 83 km water channel used to be to be created, linking Mannar with Palk Strait, by means of intensive dredging and removing of limestone shoals.

    On November 13, 2019, the apex court docket had granted the Centre six weeks to elucidate its stand at the Ram Sethu.

    It had additionally granted Swamy liberty to way the court docket if the reaction of the Centre used to be no longer filed.