Tag: Rahul Narwekar

  • Will take suitable motion on NCP’s disqualification plea towards Ajit Pawar: Maha Speaker

    Requested what number of NCP MLAs have supported Ajit Pawar, Narvekar mentioned, “I haven’t any details about it.”

    MUMBAI: Maharashtra Meeting Speaker Rahul Narwekar on Monday mentioned he’ll take suitable motion at the NCP’s plea in search of disqualification of Ajit Pawar and different 8 birthday celebration MLAs, who’ve taken oath as ministers within the Eknath Shinde-led executive.

    State NCP president Jayant Patil on Sunday mentioned his birthday celebration has moved the disqualification petition towards Ajit Pawar and 8 others. He mentioned an electronic mail has additionally been despatched to the Election Fee of India informing that the rank and record of the NCP is with birthday celebration leader Sharad Pawar.

    Chatting with newshounds on Monday, Narwekar mentioned, “I’ve won the petition filed through Jayant Patil in search of disqualification of the 9 NCP MLAs. I can learn it moderately. I can find out about the issues discussed and take suitable motion at the petition.”

    READ | Ajit joined fingers with BJP to interchange Shinde, claims Uddhav Sena mouthpiece

    Requested what number of NCP MLAs have supported Ajit Pawar, Narvekar mentioned, “I haven’t any details about it.”

    The Speaker additionally mentioned it’s his prerogative to come to a decision at the appointment of a brand new opposition chief within the Meeting.

    The NCP on Sunday appointed Jitendra Awhad because the chief of opposition within the state Meeting after incumbent LoP Ajit Pawar joined the Eknath Shinde executive as deputy leader minister.

    Awhad, who’s the MLA from Mumbra-Kalwa in Thane district, mentioned NCP state unit president Jayant Patil had appointed him leader whip of the birthday celebration and LoP within the Meeting.

    READ MORE:

    BJP all set for Maha ‘Pawar’ play in 2024 elections

    BJP’s ‘washer’ has resumed operation: Opposition on Ajit’s mutiny

    After Ajit Pawar’s mutiny, concern over an identical destiny in Opposition-ruled states

  • ‘Most effective Speaker can make a decision on participants’ disqualification’

    By way of Categorical Information Carrier

    Maharashtra and state legislators had been witnessing traditionally extraordinary eventualities, says Speaker of the Maharashtra Legislative Meeting Rahul Narwekar, an suggest, on this unique interview with TNIE correspondent Sudhir Suryawanshi. Narwekar says the disqualification of MLAs can be determined via the Speaker of the Space and now not the Splendid Court docket. He says the Shiv Sena is the ruling occasion within the Decrease Space, but in addition the primary opposition occasion within the Higher Space. The participants say that the occasion is divided, however there is not any such declare within the Space.

    What’s your view at the petitions and hearings within the Splendid Court docket at the disqualification of 16 Shiv Sena MLAs?
    The problem sooner than the apex courtroom is easy methods to interpret the provisions and articles given within the Charter, Agenda 10 and raised problems. Probably the most problems is whether or not disqualification must be at once determined via the SC. However the legislation is obvious. Disqualification of elected participants is the prerogative of the Meeting Speaker. I believe, in hearings within the Splendid Court docket, the similar perspectives had been expressed. As soon as the Speaker comes to a decision, the opposite occasion can workout its remedial choices given within the Charter.

    There was once additionally an issue within the courtroom whether or not we will rewind the clock and produce again the Uddhav Thackeray govt and erstwhile presiding officer Narhari Zirwal as Deputy Speaker within the Meeting…
    Sure, there was once a requirement that the Deputy Speaker, who was once the presiding officer, must be allowed to listen to the petitions and take selections over the disqualification of 16 MLAs, however as in keeping with my wisdom, it’s not legally tenable. The Deputy Speaker simplest plays the obligation of presiding officer when the Speaker’s put up is vacant. You can not retrospectively ask any person and make a decision just because when a question was once filed, he was once the presiding officer. There are a number of events when the subject is filed sooner than any person and the petitions are held via different one that was once within the presiding officer’s chair. 

    There aren’t any data of this type of complicated and extraordinary state of affairs within the Maharashtra Meeting… 
    The location we’re witnessing within the legislature is more or less extraordinary. Shiv Sena is the ruling occasion within the Decrease Space, however additionally it is the primary opposition within the Higher Space. Then, there may be the declare of a cut up within the occasion out of doors the Space. However there is not any such document at the lawsuits of the Space. Neither factions nor any people have claimed that there’s a cut up within the occasion. However having mentioned that, parliamentary democracy and the techniques are robust and ever-evolving. Many a time, we see eventualities as first-time occurrences and this can be a roughly studying that ends up in just right rules and strengthens our device. So, legislation and, for that subject, higher legislation all the time evolves. 

    The Splendid Court docket has requested to not take selections over disqualification of MLAs of the Uddhav Thackeray faction which were got rid of via the Eknath Shinde faction over anti-party actions. Now, the funds consultation is on and the whip via the Shinde faction has already been issued. In the event that they transfer disqualification petitions towards MLAs of the Uddhav faction, how do you care for the location?
    I as a Speaker have now not won any letter or intimation. Even the state regulation has now not were given one of these paper, pronouncing the injunctive order has been handed via the Splendid Court docket. Alternatively, I learn in media stories that the occasion that represents the faction has made an assurance that they wouldn’t factor the whip and start up the disqualification movements for a definite time frame. However I’m really not conscious in regards to the factual positions on the subject of this building. 

    Maharashtra and state legislators had been witnessing traditionally extraordinary eventualities, says Speaker of the Maharashtra Legislative Meeting Rahul Narwekar, an suggest, on this unique interview with TNIE correspondent Sudhir Suryawanshi. Narwekar says the disqualification of MLAs can be determined via the Speaker of the Space and now not the Splendid Court docket. He says the Shiv Sena is the ruling occasion within the Decrease Space, but in addition the primary opposition occasion within the Higher Space. The participants say that the occasion is divided, however there is not any such declare within the Space.

    What’s your view at the petitions and hearings within the Splendid Court docket at the disqualification of 16 Shiv Sena MLAs?
    The problem sooner than the apex courtroom is easy methods to interpret the provisions and articles given within the Charter, Agenda 10 and raised problems. Probably the most problems is whether or not disqualification must be at once determined via the SC. However the legislation is obvious. Disqualification of elected participants is the prerogative of the Meeting Speaker. I believe, in hearings within the Splendid Court docket, the similar perspectives had been expressed. As soon as the Speaker comes to a decision, the opposite occasion can workout its remedial choices given within the Charter.

    There was once additionally an issue within the courtroom whether or not we will rewind the clock and produce again the Uddhav Thackeray govt and erstwhile presiding officer Narhari Zirwal as Deputy Speaker within the Meeting…
    Sure, there was once a requirement that the Deputy Speaker, who was once the presiding officer, must be allowed to listen to the petitions and take selections over the disqualification of 16 MLAs, however as in keeping with my wisdom, it’s not legally tenable. The Deputy Speaker simplest plays the obligation of presiding officer when the Speaker’s put up is vacant. You can not retrospectively ask any person and make a decision just because when a question was once filed, he was once the presiding officer. There are a number of events when the subject is filed sooner than any person and the petitions are held via different one that was once within the presiding officer’s chair. googletag.cmd.push(serve as() googletag.show(‘div-gpt-ad-8052921-2’); );

    There aren’t any data of this type of complicated and extraordinary state of affairs within the Maharashtra Meeting… 
    The location we’re witnessing within the legislature is more or less extraordinary. Shiv Sena is the ruling occasion within the Decrease Space, however additionally it is the primary opposition within the Higher Space. Then, there may be the declare of a cut up within the occasion out of doors the Space. However there is not any such document at the lawsuits of the Space. Neither factions nor any people have claimed that there’s a cut up within the occasion. However having mentioned that, parliamentary democracy and the techniques are robust and ever-evolving. Many a time, we see eventualities as first-time occurrences and this can be a roughly studying that ends up in just right rules and strengthens our device. So, legislation and, for that subject, higher legislation all the time evolves. 

    The Splendid Court docket has requested to not take selections over disqualification of MLAs of the Uddhav Thackeray faction which were got rid of via the Eknath Shinde faction over anti-party actions. Now, the funds consultation is on and the whip via the Shinde faction has already been issued. In the event that they transfer disqualification petitions towards MLAs of the Uddhav faction, how do you care for the location?
    I as a Speaker have now not won any letter or intimation. Even the state regulation has now not were given one of these paper, pronouncing the injunctive order has been handed via the Splendid Court docket. Alternatively, I learn in media stories that the occasion that represents the faction has made an assurance that they wouldn’t factor the whip and start up the disqualification movements for a definite time frame. However I’m really not conscious in regards to the factual positions on the subject of this building. 

  • Eknath Shinde govt clears Maharashtra Speaker ballot take a look at, consider vote on Monday

    Categorical Information Carrier

    MUMBAI:  Maharashtra Leader Minister Eknath Shinde on Sunday received the primary spherical of his combat in opposition to the Uddhav Thackeray faction of the Shiv Sena within the state Meeting when his govt controlled to get the ruling coalition’s candidate elected as Speaker. 

    The federal government is scheduled to take its self assurance vote on Monday. BJP’s candidate Rahul Narwekar received by means of 57 votes in opposition to Maha Vikas Aghadi’s joint candidate Rajan Salvi.

    Narvekar used to be supported by means of the Shinde staff. He were given 167 votes in opposition to Salvi’s 107. SP and MIM participants abstained. But even so, seven NCP MLAs have been absent, together with Nawab Malik and Anil Deshmukh, who’re in prison. Two participants each and every from BJP and Congress failed to turn up.

    Thackeray’s Sena requested appearing speaker Narhari Zirwal to tackle document that 39 Sena MLAs within the Shinde camp cross-voted in opposition to the birthday celebration whip. Parallelly, the Shinde camp placed on document that 16 Sena MLAs crossed-voted. Deepak Kesarkar, spokesperson of the Shinde camp, stated its leader whip Bharat Gogawale had requested all Sena MLAs to vote Narwekar, who has change into the youngest Speaker of Maharashtra. 

    Constitutional mavens stated since each camps have complained in opposition to cross-voting, the Speaker will listen the topic and provides his verdict. “Best after that may they may be able to method a court docket in opposition to the Speaker’s resolution, if important,”

    In the meantime, Shiv Sena MP Arvind Sawant on Sunday puzzled whether or not the correct Constitutional process used to be adopted to elect the brand new Speaker of the Maharashtra Meeting and stated questions are raised referring to how the Shiv Sena rebellion faction is making an attempt to suitable the unique birthday celebration.

    Rahul Narvekar of the BJP used to be on Sunday elected Speaker at the first day of its particular consultation with MLAs from the Eknath Shinde faction additionally balloting in his favour.

    Narvekar, who polled 164 votes, defeated Uddhav Thackeray-led Shiv Sena candidate Rajan Salvi, who were given 107 votes.

    “The dispute between the 39 rebellion MLAs of Shiv Sena and 16 legislators who stayed with the unique birthday celebration might be resolved simplest within the Best Courtroom. There are a number of questions of legitimacy the way in which the Eknath Shinde govt got here to energy (in alliance with BJP) and performed the Speaker’s election. Did all the process happen inside the framework of the Charter?” Sawant, additionally leader spokesperson of Shiv Sena, puzzled.

    He stated the Uddhav Thackeray-led Shiv Sena had even issued a whip (asking the entire MLAs to vote in favour of Salvi) however the rebellion MLAs didn’t budge.

    “We have now complained in opposition to them to the Speaker,” he stated.

    Commenting on Shinde-led Sena MLAs’ stand, Sawant stated, “This can be the primary such case during which the rebels are calling their faction as the unique birthday celebration.”

    Shiv Sena factions led by means of Maharashtra Leader Minister Eknath Shinde and his predecessor Uddhav Thackeray, who heads the birthday celebration, had issued separate whips to the birthday celebration legislators to vote in favour in their respective applicants all over the state Meeting Speaker’s election.

    (With PTI Inputs)