The World Opinion

Tag: Prince Andrew

  • Meat Loaf As soon as Threatened To Push ‘Jealous’ Prince Andrew Into A Moat

    Meat Loaf as soon as had a showdown with Prince Andrew that noticed the singer threatening to push the royal right into a moat.

    The mythical singer, who died Thursday on the age of 74, claimed he advised the Duke of York “I don’t give a shit who you’re” after Andrew allegedly attempted to push him into the water whilst they filmed the “It’s A Royal Knockout” TV display in combination in 1987.

    Meat Loaf additionally claimed the Queen “hated” him after the incident, which he mentioned was once sparked by means of Andrew seeking to shove him within the moat as a result of his then-wife Sarah Ferguson had it seems that been “paying consideration” to the musician.

    Richard E. Aaron by means of Getty Pictures

    Talking concerning the TV particular in an interview with The Mother or father in 2003, which resurfaced following his dying, Meat Loaf mentioned of the display: “It was once nice amusing. I had a good time.”

    “Fergie wasn’t precisely flirting with me, however she was once being attentive to me, and I believe Andrew were given a bit, I may well be improper, I’m simply studying into this, I believe he were given a bit jealous,” he recalled. “Anyway, he attempted to push me within the water. He attempted to push me within the moat.”

    The celebrity persevered: “So I became round and I grabbed him and he is going, ‘You’ll be able to’t contact me. I’m royal.’ I mentioned, ‘Smartly you attempt to push me within the moat, Jack, I don’t give a shit who you’re, you’re goin’ within the moat.’”

    Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson pictured at Alton Towers for "It's A Royal Knockout" in 1987
    Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson pictured at Alton Towers for “It is A Royal Knockout” in 1987

    Mike ForsterMike Forster/ANL/Shutterstock

    Meat Loaf was once joined by means of different stars, together with actor John Travolta, England football legend Gary Lineker and Welsh singer Tom Jones, within the star-studded charity sport display filmed on the Alton Towers amusement park.

    The 4 groups had been captained by means of Prince Andrew, who ultimate week was once stripped of his army titles and royal patronages after a pass judgement on denied his movement to drop a sexual abuse lawsuit towards him, his then-wife Ferguson and his siblings Prince Edward and Princess Anne, all bedecked in pantomime-esque royal gowns.

  • Prince Andrew should face intercourse abuse accuser’s lawsuit: US pass judgement on

    A U.S. pass judgement on has rejected a bid via Britain’s Prince Andrew to push aside Virginia Giuffre’s lawsuit accusing the Duke of York of sexually abusing her when she was once 17 and being trafficked via the past due financier Jeffrey Epstein.

    In a choice made public on Wednesday, U.S. District Pass judgement on Lewis Kaplan in Long island mentioned it was once untimely to imagine the prince’s efforts to solid doubt on Giuffre’s claims that he battered her and deliberately brought about her emotional misery, regardless that he could be allowed to take action at a tribulation.

    Kaplan mentioned it was once additionally too quickly to come to a decision whether or not Giuffre and Epstein meant to free up other people like Andrew from a 2009 agreement of Giuffre’s lawsuit in opposition to the past due financier.

    Attorneys for Andrew and Giuffre didn’t in an instant reply to requests for remark.The verdict clears the best way for Giuffre’s case in opposition to Andrew to stick on target for a tribulation that Kaplan has mentioned may just start past due this 12 months.

    Whilst the prince isn’t accused of felony wrongdoing, his ties to Epstein have broken his recognition and value him many royal tasks.

    Andrew has denied Giuffre’s accusations that he pressured her to have intercourse greater than 20 years in the past on the London house of former Epstein affiliate Ghislaine Maxwell, and abused her at two different Epstein houses.

    Kaplan mentioned the “muddled” language in Giuffre’s and Epstein’s 2009 agreement means that they are going to have arrived at “one thing of a center floor” on whether or not Andrew or others in identical positions could be protected against long run proceedings.

    “We have no idea what, if anything else, went during the events’ minds,” Kaplan wrote.

    “The events have articulated a minimum of two cheap interpretations of the important language. The settlement due to this fact is ambiguous.”Agreement agreements can prohibit plaintiffs like Giuffre from pursuing additional litigation, even in opposition to 3rd events.

  • Pass judgement on Refuses To Drop Civil Case Towards Prince Andrew

    Prince Andrew’s movement to get the civil case in opposition to him dropped has been pushed aside through a New York federal pass judgement on.

    Within the civil case, Virginia Giuffre accuses the Duke of York of getting intercourse along with her when she was once 17 – and due to this fact a minor – in 2001.

    Andrew has constantly denied the allegations.

    Giuffre additionally alleges that she was once trafficked to the royal through the overdue convicted intercourse wrongdoer Jeffrey Epstein and his companion Ghislaine Maxwell between 2000 and 2002.

    The pass judgement on’s determination adopted a listening to closing Tuesday, the place Andrew’s prison workforce advised a newly-released record courting again to 2009 in reality avoided Giuffre from making any claims about Andrew.

    Within the confidential settlement, Giuffre gave up her proper to make a prison declare “in opposition to some other individual or entity who may have been incorporated as a possible defendant from all, and all way of motion and movements of Virginia Roberts” in alternate for $500,000 (£371,722).

    The record added: “As a subject material attention in settling, First Events and 2d Events agree that the phrases of the Agreement Settlement don’t seem to be meant for use through some other individual nor be admissible in any continuing or case in opposition to or involving Jeffrey Epstein, both civil or prison.”

    Andrew’s attorneys argued that this supposed Giuffre may just now not document a lawsuit in opposition to him, particularly as she had discussed “royalty” in other places within the 2009 case.

    Then again, Giuffre’s workforce claimed this was once a confidential settlement between Epstein and Giuffre – now not Andrew.

    On Wednesday, the pass judgement on mentioned: “The 2009 settlement can’t be mentioned to exhibit, obviously and unambiguously, the events meant the tool ‘immediately,’ ‘essentially’ or ‘considerably’ to learn Prince Andrew.”

    Giuffre filed the lawsuit again in August 2021 and Andrew was once served together with his papers round September. She is looking for unspecified damages from the royal.

    There’s no indication that Andrew is underneath a prison investigation, and he has now not been charged with any prison offenses, vehemently denies the allegations in opposition to him.

    The civil trial will likely be held between September and December.