Tag: mayawati bahujan samaj party

  • UP Election End result 2022: Base vote financial institution minimize, Mayawati’s Bahujan Samaj Celebration in worst segment

    Lucknow: The results of the UP meeting election is stunning for the Bahujan Samaj Celebration (BSP). There are 22 % Dalit citizens within the state. The BSP were given round 13% of the overall votes this time and is the bottom determine since 1993. On the identical time, with one seat, the BSP reached its worst segment ever. It’s transparent from this that the bottom voter of the birthday celebration has grew to become clear of him. In this kind of scenario, the street forward for BSP can also be very tricky. It’s going to lose the standing of a countrywide birthday celebration and the birthday celebration’s illustration within the Legislative Council to the Parliament is at risk.

    The life of BSP has been because of its base voter Dalits. After Kanshi Ram hooked up the backward magnificence with the Dalits, then the BSP reached energy. In 2007, when Brahmins and different higher castes joined, BSP got here to energy with an absolute majority. When the higher castes separated, the birthday celebration was once out of energy in 2012 and because then its graph has been falling. Progressively the massive OBC faces were given out of the BSP, in order that vote financial institution additionally went away. Within the 2014 Lok Sabha elections, the BSP were given 19.60% votes and the birthday celebration may just no longer get a unmarried seat. Within the 2019 Lok Sabha elections, the vote proportion of BSP didn’t build up, however the alliance with SP were given the ease. BSP gained 10 seats. Within the 2017 Vis Elections, the BSP was once lowered to simply 19 seats with 22.24% of the votes. This time the vote proportion was once lowered to 13 with one seat.

    BSP supremo Mayawati casts her vote in Lucknow, appeals to all citizens to vote

    Many causes for this
    Outdated Leaders Long past: The birthday celebration didn’t alternate its modus operandi consistent with the days. The resentment grew some of the outdated leaders and so they left the birthday celebration. In this kind of scenario, the birthday celebration didn’t have large faces.

    Again in marketing campaign: This time the command of election marketing campaign was once passed over to Satish Chandra Mishra handiest. BSP leader Mayawati herself got here out to carry conferences on the remaining minute. BSP additionally lagged in the back of in virtual marketing campaign. On the identical time, there have been allegations of promoting tickets. On the identical time, many applicants modified on the remaining minute and they didn’t get a possibility to marketing campaign.

    Improper message: There have been statements praising each and every different from Amit Shah and Mayawati. This despatched a message to the citizens that BJP and BSP are combating in combination. The outcome was once that in spite of giving massive collection of tickets to Muslims, no longer a unmarried Muslim candidate may just win.

    The bottom citizens had been bring to a halt: The BJP began creating a dent within the Dalit citizens from 2014 itself. He left no stone unturned to carry particularly the non-Jatav Dalits into his fold. Excluding the reserved seats, tickets had been additionally given to Dalits. BJP additionally introduced many beneficiary schemes. On this election, BJP campaigned extra for those schemes.

    Bhupesh Chaubey Video: When BJP MLA Bhupesh Chaubey did oil therapeutic massage to woo aged voter, watch video

    BSP might be 0 in Rajya Sabha
    Mayawati had resigned from the Rajya Sabha club in July 2017. Since then handiest Satish Chandra Mishra and Ashok Siddhartha are Rajya Sabha contributors. Now BSP has just one MLA. Within the upcoming Rajya Sabha elections, now BSP won’t be able to win a unmarried member by itself. There may be a disaster of illustration within the Legislative Council in long term.

    The graph of BSP rose and fell like this

    YearSeats Vote Percentage1993 67 11.12p.c1996 67 19.64p.c2002 98 23.08p.c2007 206 30.43p.c2012 80 25.95p.c2017 19 22.24%