Tag: marvin gaye

  • Jury reveals Ed Sheeran did not replica Marvin Gaye vintage

    By way of Related Press

    NEW YORK: British singer Ed Sheeran did not scouse borrow key elements of Marvin Gaye’s vintage Seventies music “Let’s Get It On” to create his hit music “Pondering Out Loud,” a jury stated with an ordeal verdict Thursday, prompting Sheeran to shaggy dog story later that he would possibly not must practice via on his danger to give up tune.

    The feelings of an epic copyright struggle that stretched throughout many of the final decade spilt out as quickly because the seven-person jury published its verdict after over two hours of deliberations.

    Sheeran, 32, in brief dropped his face into his palms in reduction ahead of status to hug his lawyer, Ilene Farkas. As jurors left the court docket in entrance of him, Sheeran smiled, nodded his head at a number of of them, and mouthed the phrases: “Thanks.” Later, he posed for a hallway {photograph} with a juror who lingered in the back of.

    He additionally approached plaintiff Kathryn Townsend Griffin, the daughter of Ed Townsend, who co-created the 1973 soul vintage with Gaye and had testified. They spoke for approximately 10 mins, hugging and smiling and, at one level, clasping their palms in combination.

    Sheeran later addressed journalists out of doors the courthouse, revisiting his declare made right through the trial that he would imagine quitting songwriting if he misplaced the case.

    “I’m clearly more than happy with the end result of this example, and it looks as if I am not going to must retire from my day activity, in any case. However on the identical time, I’m unbelievably pissed off that baseless claims like this are allowed to visit courtroom in any respect,” the singer stated, studying from a ready remark.

    He additionally stated he ignored his grandmother’s funeral in Eire as a result of the trial, and that he “won’t ever get that point again.”

    ALSO READ | Ed Sheeran broadcasts new album Subtract, finds spouse evolved tumour in being pregnant

    Within the courthouse after the decision, Griffin stated she was once relieved. “I am simply satisfied it is over,” she stated of the trial. “We will be buddies.”

    She stated she was once happy Sheeran approached her. “It confirmed me who he was once,” Griffin stated.

    She stated her copyright lawsuit wasn’t non-public however she sought after to practice via on a promise to her father to offer protection to his highbrow assets.

    A juror, Sophia Neis, instructed journalists in a while that there was once no instant consensus when deliberations started.

    “Everybody had critiques getting in. Either side had advocated, stated Neis, 23. “There was once numerous from side to side.”

    The decision capped a two-week trial that featured a court docket efficiency by way of Sheeran because the singer insisted, on occasion angrily, that the trial was once a danger to all musicians who create their very own tune.

    Sheeran sat together with his prison workforce all over the trial, protecting himself in opposition to the lawsuit by way of Townsend’s heirs, who had stated “Pondering Out Loud” had such a lot of similarities to “Let’s Get It On” that it violated the music’s copyright coverage.

    It was once now not the primary courtroom victory for a singer whose musical taste attracts from vintage soul, pop and R&B, making him a goal for copyright proceedings. A yr in the past, Sheeran received a U.Ok. copyright combat over his 2017 hit “Form of You” after which decried what he labelled a “tradition” of baseless proceedings that power settlements from artists desperate to keep away from an ordeal’s expense.

    Out of doors courtroom, Sheeran stated he does not wish to be taken good thing about.

    “I’m only a man with a guitar who loves writing tune for folks to experience,” he stated. “I’m really not and can by no means permit myself to be a piggy financial institution for any individual to shake.”

    On the trial’s get started, lawyer Ben Crump instructed jurors on behalf of the Townsend heirs that Sheeran himself on occasion carried out the 2 songs in combination. The jury noticed the video of a live performance in Switzerland by which Sheeran will also be heard segueing on degree between “Let’s Get It On” and “Pondering Out Loud.” Crump stated it was once “smoking gun” evidence Sheeran stole from the well-known music.

    In her remaining argument on Wednesday, Farkas stated Crump’s “smoking gun was once capturing blanks.”

    She stated the one commonplace parts between the 2 songs had been “fundamental to the instrument equipment of all songwriters” and “the scaffolding on which all songwriting is constructed.”

    “They didn’t replica it. No longer consciously. No longer unconsciously. On no account,” Farkas stated.

    When Sheeran testified over two days for the protection, he again and again picked up a guitar resting in the back of him at the witness stand to display how he seamlessly creates “mashups” of 2 or 3 songs right through concert events to “spice it up a little bit” for his sizeable crowds.

    The English pop superstar’s cheerful perspective on show below wondering from his lawyer all however vanished below cross-examination.

    “While you write songs, any person comes after you,” Sheeran testified, announcing the case was once being carefully watched by way of others within the trade.

    He insisted that he and the music’s co-writer — Amy Wadge — stole not anything from “Let’s Get it On.”

    Townsend’s heirs stated of their lawsuit that “Pondering Out Loud” had “hanging similarities” and “overt commonplace parts” that made it obtrusive that it had copied “Let’s Get It On,” a music that has been featured in a large number of motion pictures and ads and scored masses of hundreds of thousands of streams spins and radio performs prior to now half-century.

    Sheeran’s music, which got here out in 2014, was once successful, profitable a Grammy for Music of the 12 months.

    Sheeran’s label, Atlantic Information, and Sony/ATV Track Publishing had been additionally named as defendants within the “Pondering Out Loud” lawsuit, however the focal point of the trial was once Sheeran.

    Wadge, who was once now not a defendant, testified on his behalf and hugged Sheeran after the decision.

    Gaye was once killed in 1984 at age 44, shot by way of his father as he attempted to interfere in a struggle between his folks. He have been a Motown celebrity because the Sixties, even though his songs launched within the Seventies made him a generational musical large.

    Townsend, who additionally wrote the 1958 R&B doo-wop hit “For Your Love,” was once a singer, songwriter and legal professional who died in 2003. Griffin, his daughter, testified right through the trial that she idea Sheeran was once “an ideal artist with an ideal long term.”

    NEW YORK: British singer Ed Sheeran did not scouse borrow key elements of Marvin Gaye’s vintage Seventies music “Let’s Get It On” to create his hit music “Pondering Out Loud,” a jury stated with an ordeal verdict Thursday, prompting Sheeran to shaggy dog story later that he would possibly not must practice via on his danger to give up tune.

    The feelings of an epic copyright struggle that stretched throughout many of the final decade spilt out as quickly because the seven-person jury published its verdict after over two hours of deliberations.

    Sheeran, 32, in brief dropped his face into his palms in reduction ahead of status to hug his lawyer, Ilene Farkas. As jurors left the court docket in entrance of him, Sheeran smiled, nodded his head at a number of of them, and mouthed the phrases: “Thanks.” Later, he posed for a hallway {photograph} with a juror who lingered in the back of.googletag.cmd.push(serve as() googletag.show(‘div-gpt-ad-8052921-2’); );

    He additionally approached plaintiff Kathryn Townsend Griffin, the daughter of Ed Townsend, who co-created the 1973 soul vintage with Gaye and had testified. They spoke for approximately 10 mins, hugging and smiling and, at one level, clasping their palms in combination.

    Sheeran later addressed journalists out of doors the courthouse, revisiting his declare made right through the trial that he would imagine quitting songwriting if he misplaced the case.

    “I’m clearly more than happy with the end result of this example, and it looks as if I am not going to must retire from my day activity, in any case. However on the identical time, I’m unbelievably pissed off that baseless claims like this are allowed to visit courtroom in any respect,” the singer stated, studying from a ready remark.

    He additionally stated he ignored his grandmother’s funeral in Eire as a result of the trial, and that he “won’t ever get that point again.”

    ALSO READ | Ed Sheeran broadcasts new album Subtract, finds spouse evolved tumour in being pregnant

    Within the courthouse after the decision, Griffin stated she was once relieved. “I am simply satisfied it is over,” she stated of the trial. “We will be buddies.”

    She stated she was once happy Sheeran approached her. “It confirmed me who he was once,” Griffin stated.

    She stated her copyright lawsuit wasn’t non-public however she sought after to practice via on a promise to her father to offer protection to his highbrow assets.

    A juror, Sophia Neis, instructed journalists in a while that there was once no instant consensus when deliberations started.

    “Everybody had critiques getting in. Either side had advocated, stated Neis, 23. “There was once numerous from side to side.”

    The decision capped a two-week trial that featured a court docket efficiency by way of Sheeran because the singer insisted, on occasion angrily, that the trial was once a danger to all musicians who create their very own tune.

    Sheeran sat together with his prison workforce all over the trial, protecting himself in opposition to the lawsuit by way of Townsend’s heirs, who had stated “Pondering Out Loud” had such a lot of similarities to “Let’s Get It On” that it violated the music’s copyright coverage.

    It was once now not the primary courtroom victory for a singer whose musical taste attracts from vintage soul, pop and R&B, making him a goal for copyright proceedings. A yr in the past, Sheeran received a U.Ok. copyright combat over his 2017 hit “Form of You” after which decried what he labelled a “tradition” of baseless proceedings that power settlements from artists desperate to keep away from an ordeal’s expense.

    Out of doors courtroom, Sheeran stated he does not wish to be taken good thing about.

    “I’m only a man with a guitar who loves writing tune for folks to experience,” he stated. “I’m really not and can by no means permit myself to be a piggy financial institution for any individual to shake.”

    On the trial’s get started, lawyer Ben Crump instructed jurors on behalf of the Townsend heirs that Sheeran himself on occasion carried out the 2 songs in combination. The jury noticed the video of a live performance in Switzerland by which Sheeran will also be heard segueing on degree between “Let’s Get It On” and “Pondering Out Loud.” Crump stated it was once “smoking gun” evidence Sheeran stole from the well-known music.

    In her remaining argument on Wednesday, Farkas stated Crump’s “smoking gun was once capturing blanks.”

    She stated the one commonplace parts between the 2 songs had been “fundamental to the instrument equipment of all songwriters” and “the scaffolding on which all songwriting is constructed.”

    “They didn’t replica it. No longer consciously. No longer unconsciously. On no account,” Farkas stated.

    When Sheeran testified over two days for the protection, he again and again picked up a guitar resting in the back of him at the witness stand to display how he seamlessly creates “mashups” of 2 or 3 songs right through concert events to “spice it up a little bit” for his sizeable crowds.

    The English pop superstar’s cheerful perspective on show below wondering from his lawyer all however vanished below cross-examination.

    “While you write songs, any person comes after you,” Sheeran testified, announcing the case was once being carefully watched by way of others within the trade.

    He insisted that he and the music’s co-writer — Amy Wadge — stole not anything from “Let’s Get it On.”

    Townsend’s heirs stated of their lawsuit that “Pondering Out Loud” had “hanging similarities” and “overt commonplace parts” that made it obtrusive that it had copied “Let’s Get It On,” a music that has been featured in a large number of motion pictures and ads and scored masses of hundreds of thousands of streams spins and radio performs prior to now half-century.

    Sheeran’s music, which got here out in 2014, was once successful, profitable a Grammy for Music of the 12 months.

    Sheeran’s label, Atlantic Information, and Sony/ATV Track Publishing had been additionally named as defendants within the “Pondering Out Loud” lawsuit, however the focal point of the trial was once Sheeran.

    Wadge, who was once now not a defendant, testified on his behalf and hugged Sheeran after the decision.

    Gaye was once killed in 1984 at age 44, shot by way of his father as he attempted to interfere in a struggle between his folks. He have been a Motown celebrity because the Sixties, even though his songs launched within the Seventies made him a generational musical large.

    Townsend, who additionally wrote the 1958 R&B doo-wop hit “For Your Love,” was once a singer, songwriter and legal professional who died in 2003. Griffin, his daughter, testified right through the trial that she idea Sheeran was once “an ideal artist with an ideal long term.”

  • Ed Sheeran did not thieve from Marvin Gaye’s ‘Let’s Get It On,’ jury regulations

    Musician Ed Sheeran leaves federal courtroom in New York, US, on Wednesday, Would possibly 3, 2023.

    Stephanie Keith | Bloomberg | Getty Photographs

    A Ny federal jury dominated Thursday that pop famous person Ed Sheeran did not infringe at the copyright of Marvin Gaye’s “Let’s Get It On.”

    At query used to be whether or not Sheeran’s 2014 hit “Pondering Out Loud” cribbed from the 1973 vintage. Jurors determined that Sheeran, 32, independently created his tune and used to be now not responsible for copyright infringement.

    After a two-week trial, jurors reached a unanimous verdict after 3 hours of deliberation.

    Upon listening to the decision, Sheeran stood up and hugged his attorneys, consistent with NBC Information. His spouse and “Pondering Out Loud” co-writer Amy Wadge have been observed in tears.

    The lawsuit used to be introduced by means of the heirs of Ed Townsend, who co-wrote “Let’s Get It On” with Gaye. The plaintiffs first filed the civil swimsuit in 2017 and alleged that Sheeran, Warner Tune Team and Sony Tune Publishing stole from the soul vintage, violating federal copyright regulation.

    The trial noticed Sheeran take the stand in protection of his grammy-award profitable tune. Sheeran instructed jurors that he composed “Pondering Out Loud” independently with British songwriter Wadge, who used to be now not named within the lawsuit.

    When requested in regards to the toll of the case previous this week, Sheeran threatened to surrender tune if he have been discovered responsible. “If that occurs, I am performed, I am preventing,” Sheeran stated in courtroom Monday.

    Final April, Sheeran took the stand involving any other considered one of his hits, 2017′s “Form of You”. A London pass judgement on if that’s the case dominated in want of Sheeran and awarded him greater than $1.1 million in prison charges. 

    Gaye died in 1984, whilst Townsend died in 2003.

  • Did Ed Sheeran reproduction Marvin Gaye? Trial to start out in New York

    By means of Related Press

    NEW YORK: Jury variety and opening statements are set to start out in a while in a tribulation that mashes up Ed Sheeran’s “Pondering Out Loud” with Marvin Gaye’s “Let’s Get It On.”

    The heirs of Ed Townsend, Gaye’s co-writer of the 1973 soul vintage, sued Sheeran, alleging the English pop megastar’s hit 2014 song has “putting similarities” to “Let’s Get It On” and “overt not unusual parts” that violate their copyright.

    The lawsuit filed in 2017 has in spite of everything made it to a tribulation this is anticipated to ultimate per week within the Big apple federal court docket of 95-year-old Pass judgement on Louis L. Stanton.

    Sheeran, 32, is without doubt one of the witnesses anticipated to testify.

    “Let’s Get It On” is the quintessential, attractive sluggish jam that’s been heard in numerous motion pictures and ads and garnered masses of tens of millions of streams, spins and radio performs over the last 50 years. “Pondering Out Loud,” which received a Grammy for track of the yr, is a a lot more marital tackle love and intercourse.

    Whilst the jury will listen the recordings of each songs, most likely time and again, their lyrics — and vibes — are legally insignificant. Jurors are meant to best believe the uncooked parts of melody, unity and rhythm that make up the composition of “Let’s Get It On,” as documented on sheet song filed with america Patent and Trademark Place of work.

    Sheeran’s lawyers have stated the songs’ simple structural symmetry issues best to the principles of in style song.

    “The 2 songs proportion variations of a identical and unprotectable chord development that used to be freely to be had to all songwriters,” they stated in a court docket submitting.

    Townsend circle of relatives lawyers identified within the lawsuit that artists together with Boyz II Males have carried out seamless mashups of the 2 songs, and that even Sheeran himself has segued into “Let’s Get It On” right through are living performances of “Pondering Out Loud.”

    They sought to play a probably damning YouTube video of 1 such Sheeran efficiency for the jury at trial. Stanton denied their movement to incorporate it, however stated he would rethink it after he sees different proof that’s introduced.

    Gaye’s property isn’t concerned within the case, regardless that it is going to inevitably have echoes in their a success lawsuit in opposition to Robin Thicke, Pharrell Williams and T.I. over the resemblance in their 2013 hit “Blurred Traces” to Gaye’s 1977 “Were given to Give it Up.”

    A jury awarded Gaye’s heirs $7.4 million at trial — later trimmed by way of a pass judgement on to $5.3 million — making it a few of the most vital copyright instances in contemporary many years.

    Sheeran’s label Atlantic Information and Sony/ATV Tune Publishing also are named as defendants within the “Pondering Out Loud” lawsuit. Normally, plaintiffs in copyright proceedings solid a large web in naming defendants, regardless that a pass judgement on can do away with any names deemed beside the point. On this case, then again, Sheeran’s co-writer at the track, Amy Wadge, used to be by no means named.

    Townsend, who additionally wrote the 1958 R&B doo-wop hit “For Your Love,” used to be a singer, songwriter and attorney. He died in 2003. Kathryn Townsend Griffin, his daughter, is the plaintiff main the lawsuit.

    Already a Motown famous person within the Sixties earlier than his extra grownup Seventies output made him a generational musical large, Gaye used to be killed in 1984 at age 44, shot by way of his father as he attempted to intrude in a combat between his folks.

    Main artists are frequently hit with proceedings alleging song-stealing, however just about all settle earlier than trial — as Taylor Swift just lately did over “Shake it Off,” finishing a lawsuit that lasted years longer and got here nearer to trial than maximum different instances.

    However Sheeran — whose musical taste drawing from vintage soul, pop and R&B has made him a goal for copyright proceedings — has proven a willingness to visit trial earlier than. A yr in the past, he received a U.Okay. copyright struggle over his 2017 hit “Form of You,” then slammed what he described as a “tradition” of baseless proceedings supposed to squeeze cash out of artists desperate to steer clear of the expense of a tribulation.

    “I think like claims like this are method too not unusual now and feature transform a tradition the place a declare is made with the concept that a agreement will probably be inexpensive than taking it to court docket, although there’s no foundation for the declare,” Sheeran stated in a video posted on Twitter after the decision. “It’s in reality harmful to the songwriting business.”

    The “Pondering Out Loud” lawsuit additionally invokes probably the most not unusual tropes in American and British song for the reason that earliest days of rock ‘n’ roll, R&B and hip-hop: a tender white artist apparently appropriating the paintings of an older Black artist — accusations that had been additionally levied at Elvis Presley and The Beatles, whose song drew on that of Black forerunners.

    “Mr. Sheeran blatantly took a Black artist’s song who he doesn’t view as worthy as reimbursement,” Ben Crump, a civil rights legal professional who represents the Townsend circle of relatives however isn’t concerned within the trial, stated at a March 31 information convention.

    NEW YORK: Jury variety and opening statements are set to start out in a while in a tribulation that mashes up Ed Sheeran’s “Pondering Out Loud” with Marvin Gaye’s “Let’s Get It On.”

    The heirs of Ed Townsend, Gaye’s co-writer of the 1973 soul vintage, sued Sheeran, alleging the English pop megastar’s hit 2014 song has “putting similarities” to “Let’s Get It On” and “overt not unusual parts” that violate their copyright.

    The lawsuit filed in 2017 has in spite of everything made it to a tribulation this is anticipated to ultimate per week within the Big apple federal court docket of 95-year-old Pass judgement on Louis L. Stanton.googletag.cmd.push(serve as() googletag.show(‘div-gpt-ad-8052921-2’); );

    Sheeran, 32, is without doubt one of the witnesses anticipated to testify.

    “Let’s Get It On” is the quintessential, attractive sluggish jam that’s been heard in numerous motion pictures and ads and garnered masses of tens of millions of streams, spins and radio performs over the last 50 years. “Pondering Out Loud,” which received a Grammy for track of the yr, is a a lot more marital tackle love and intercourse.

    Whilst the jury will listen the recordings of each songs, most likely time and again, their lyrics — and vibes — are legally insignificant. Jurors are meant to best believe the uncooked parts of melody, unity and rhythm that make up the composition of “Let’s Get It On,” as documented on sheet song filed with america Patent and Trademark Place of work.

    Sheeran’s lawyers have stated the songs’ simple structural symmetry issues best to the principles of in style song.

    “The 2 songs proportion variations of a identical and unprotectable chord development that used to be freely to be had to all songwriters,” they stated in a court docket submitting.

    Townsend circle of relatives lawyers identified within the lawsuit that artists together with Boyz II Males have carried out seamless mashups of the 2 songs, and that even Sheeran himself has segued into “Let’s Get It On” right through are living performances of “Pondering Out Loud.”

    They sought to play a probably damning YouTube video of 1 such Sheeran efficiency for the jury at trial. Stanton denied their movement to incorporate it, however stated he would rethink it after he sees different proof that’s introduced.

    Gaye’s property isn’t concerned within the case, regardless that it is going to inevitably have echoes in their a success lawsuit in opposition to Robin Thicke, Pharrell Williams and T.I. over the resemblance in their 2013 hit “Blurred Traces” to Gaye’s 1977 “Were given to Give it Up.”

    A jury awarded Gaye’s heirs $7.4 million at trial — later trimmed by way of a pass judgement on to $5.3 million — making it a few of the most vital copyright instances in contemporary many years.

    Sheeran’s label Atlantic Information and Sony/ATV Tune Publishing also are named as defendants within the “Pondering Out Loud” lawsuit. Normally, plaintiffs in copyright proceedings solid a large web in naming defendants, regardless that a pass judgement on can do away with any names deemed beside the point. On this case, then again, Sheeran’s co-writer at the track, Amy Wadge, used to be by no means named.

    Townsend, who additionally wrote the 1958 R&B doo-wop hit “For Your Love,” used to be a singer, songwriter and attorney. He died in 2003. Kathryn Townsend Griffin, his daughter, is the plaintiff main the lawsuit.

    Already a Motown famous person within the Sixties earlier than his extra grownup Seventies output made him a generational musical large, Gaye used to be killed in 1984 at age 44, shot by way of his father as he attempted to intrude in a combat between his folks.

    Main artists are frequently hit with proceedings alleging song-stealing, however just about all settle earlier than trial — as Taylor Swift just lately did over “Shake it Off,” finishing a lawsuit that lasted years longer and got here nearer to trial than maximum different instances.

    However Sheeran — whose musical taste drawing from vintage soul, pop and R&B has made him a goal for copyright proceedings — has proven a willingness to visit trial earlier than. A yr in the past, he received a U.Okay. copyright struggle over his 2017 hit “Form of You,” then slammed what he described as a “tradition” of baseless proceedings supposed to squeeze cash out of artists desperate to steer clear of the expense of a tribulation.

    “I think like claims like this are method too not unusual now and feature transform a tradition the place a declare is made with the concept that a agreement will probably be inexpensive than taking it to court docket, although there’s no foundation for the declare,” Sheeran stated in a video posted on Twitter after the decision. “It’s in reality harmful to the songwriting business.”

    The “Pondering Out Loud” lawsuit additionally invokes probably the most not unusual tropes in American and British song for the reason that earliest days of rock ‘n’ roll, R&B and hip-hop: a tender white artist apparently appropriating the paintings of an older Black artist — accusations that had been additionally levied at Elvis Presley and The Beatles, whose song drew on that of Black forerunners.

    “Mr. Sheeran blatantly took a Black artist’s song who he doesn’t view as worthy as reimbursement,” Ben Crump, a civil rights legal professional who represents the Townsend circle of relatives however isn’t concerned within the trial, stated at a March 31 information convention.

  • Johnny Depp To Liberate Joint Album With Jeff Beck Subsequent Month

    NEW YORK (AP) — Recent off his prison combat along with his ex-wife, Johnny Depp has introduced that he and mythical guitarist Jeff Beck will free up an album of most commonly covers subsequent month.

    The duo’s 13-track album is titled “18” and can drop on July 15. They stated they titled the album after the ingenious outburst they felt running in combination. “We’d shaggy dog story about how we felt 18 once more, in order that simply was the album name, too,” Beck stated in a commentary.

    The album accommodates covers of The Velvet Underground’s “Venus In Furs,” the Everly Brothers’ ballad “Let It Be Me” and Marvin Gaye’s soul vintage “What’s Going On.” There are also variations of Davy Spillane’s “Middle of the night Walker” and two songs from the Seaside Boys’ masterpiece, “Puppy Sounds” — “Caroline, No” and “Don’t Communicate (Put Your Head On My Shoulder).”

    Depp equipped two originals, together with “This Is A Music For Omit Hedy Lamarr,” the set’s first unmarried. The duvet of the album — a cartoon of 2 younger males in white T-shirts — was once designed through Beck’s spouse, Sandra.

    Depp, lengthy a member of the rock workforce Hollywood Vampires with Alice Cooper and Joe Perry, began recording with Beck in 2019, and Depp has joined Beck’s present Eu excursion.

    Previous this month, a jury sided with Depp in his defamation lawsuit towards ex-wife Amber Heard, awarding the “Pirates of the Caribbean” actor greater than $10 million and vindicating his allegations that Heard defamed him through accusing him of abusing her ahead of and throughout their temporary marriage.

    However in a break up resolution, the jury additionally discovered that Heard was once defamed through one among Depp’s attorneys, who accused her of making an in depth hoax that incorporated roughing up the couple’s condo to seem worse for police. The jury awarded her $2 million.