Tag: Kerala high court

  • Kerala High Court Rejects Actor Siddique’s Anticipatory Bail Request In Sexual Assault Case. People News

    Kochi: The Kerala High Court on Tuesday dismissed the anticipatory bail application filed by actor Siddique, seeking bail in a case relating to sexual assault of a woman actor.

    The decision comes in the wake of an ongoing investigation by a Special Investigation Team (SIT) formed to address incidents of sexual misconduct within the industry.

    The allegations were brought to light by a woman actor, who filed a complaint leading to a First Information Report (FIR) being registered by the police in Thiruvananthapuram.

    Siddique has categorically denied the allegations, and a comprehensive court order is pending.

    This legal development follows Siddique’s request for anticipatory bail on September 2, in response to a rape case lodged against him.

    Malayalam film industry has recently been rocked by a “Me Too” movement exposing various allegations of sexual abuse.

    In light of the allegations, Siddique resigned from his position as general secretary of the Association of Malayalam Movie Artistes (AMMA), along with the entire 17-member executive committee.

    Serious allegations have been made by several women actors against prominent figures in the industry, including director Ranjith and actors Mukesh, Siddique and others.

    In addition to Siddique, other actors such as Mukesh, Jayasurya, Edavela Babu, and Maniyanpilla Raju have also been implicated in sexual assault cases.

    The surge in these allegations came in the wake of the release of the Justice Hema Committee report, which exposed disturbing accounts of harassment, exploitation, and the systematic mistreatment of women in the industry.

    The report, made public on August 19, after redacting the names of witnesses and the accused, noted that the Malayalam film industry is controlled by about 10 to 15 male producers, directors, and actors who dominate and exert control over the industry.

  • Kerala Top Court docket grants bail to Sharon homicide case accused

    KOCHI: The best to bail can’t be denied simply on account of the feelings of the group being in opposition to the accused, Kerala Top Court docket stated on Monday whilst granting bail to a girl who allegedly poisoned to demise a 23-year-old guy in October closing yr.

    Justice Mohammed Nias C P, granted bail to 22-year-old Greeshma, who’s accused of poisoning her pal, Sharon, through giving him some kashayam (Ayurvedic decoction) and expired juice.

    Whilst granting the bail, the court docket noticed that the accused had totally cooperated with the investigation and in addition took into account her younger age.

    Parassala local Sharon (23) passed on to the great beyond on October 25, 2022, after being admitted to the scientific faculty health center in Thiruvananthapuram for almost 11 days.

    His circle of relatives had alleged that he was once poisoned through his feminine pal, Greeshma, and her circle of relatives through giving him some kashayam and expired juice.

    “I additionally can’t lose sight of the truth that the accused is a girl elderly 22, within the mild of the proviso to S.437 Cr.P.C. I additionally observe that the accused has been in custody since October 31, 2022, and the prosecution raises no apprehension that if launched on bail, the petitioner is prone to abscond,” Justice Nias noticed.

    The court docket stated it was once “trite that there’s a presumption of innocence, which means an individual is thought to be blameless till discovered in charge”.

    “It is usually to be borne in thoughts that the primary is that bail is the guideline and prison is the exception, which is the touchstone of Article 21 of the Charter of India,” the court docket stated.

    It added that once the rate sheet was once filed, a robust case will have to be made for putting an individual in judicial custody.

    “The best to bail isn’t to be denied simply on account of the feelings of the group being in opposition to the accused, nor can bail be withheld as a punishment, pending trial. Accordingly, this utility is permitted, and the petitioner is granted bail,” the court docket stated.

    The court docket additionally regarded as Greeshma’s submission that her identify didn’t determine within the loss of life declaration of Sharon.

    It directed the accused to furnish a bond of Rs one lakh and two solvent sureties each and every for the like sum and to not intervene within the probe.

    In step with the prosecution, Sharon passed on to the great beyond because of more than one organ failure.

    His oldsters alleged that he had long past to his feminine pal’s space on October 14 and later evolved uneasiness together with vomiting.

    Sharon’s circle of relatives had claimed that the medical doctors advised them that some more or less acid substance had broken his inner organs.

    KOCHI: The best to bail can’t be denied simply on account of the feelings of the group being in opposition to the accused, Kerala Top Court docket stated on Monday whilst granting bail to a girl who allegedly poisoned to demise a 23-year-old guy in October closing yr.

    Justice Mohammed Nias C P, granted bail to 22-year-old Greeshma, who’s accused of poisoning her pal, Sharon, through giving him some kashayam (Ayurvedic decoction) and expired juice.

    Whilst granting the bail, the court docket noticed that the accused had totally cooperated with the investigation and in addition took into account her younger age.googletag.cmd.push(serve as() googletag.show(‘div-gpt-ad-8052921-2’); );

    Parassala local Sharon (23) passed on to the great beyond on October 25, 2022, after being admitted to the scientific faculty health center in Thiruvananthapuram for almost 11 days.

    His circle of relatives had alleged that he was once poisoned through his feminine pal, Greeshma, and her circle of relatives through giving him some kashayam and expired juice.

    “I additionally can’t lose sight of the truth that the accused is a girl elderly 22, within the mild of the proviso to S.437 Cr.P.C. I additionally observe that the accused has been in custody since October 31, 2022, and the prosecution raises no apprehension that if launched on bail, the petitioner is prone to abscond,” Justice Nias noticed.

    The court docket stated it was once “trite that there’s a presumption of innocence, which means an individual is thought to be blameless till discovered in charge”.

    “It is usually to be borne in thoughts that the primary is that bail is the guideline and prison is the exception, which is the touchstone of Article 21 of the Charter of India,” the court docket stated.

    It added that once the rate sheet was once filed, a robust case will have to be made for putting an individual in judicial custody.

    “The best to bail isn’t to be denied simply on account of the feelings of the group being in opposition to the accused, nor can bail be withheld as a punishment, pending trial. Accordingly, this utility is permitted, and the petitioner is granted bail,” the court docket stated.

    The court docket additionally regarded as Greeshma’s submission that her identify didn’t determine within the loss of life declaration of Sharon.

    It directed the accused to furnish a bond of Rs one lakh and two solvent sureties each and every for the like sum and to not intervene within the probe.

    In step with the prosecution, Sharon passed on to the great beyond because of more than one organ failure.

    His oldsters alleged that he had long past to his feminine pal’s space on October 14 and later evolved uneasiness together with vomiting.

    Sharon’s circle of relatives had claimed that the medical doctors advised them that some more or less acid substance had broken his inner organs.

  • Malayalam Actor Vijay Babu Arrested In Sexual Attack Case, Launched On Station Bail

    Kochi: Vijay Babu, the Malayalam actor-producer was once on Monday arrested in reference to an alleged sexual attack case. Vijay Babu was once arrested when he seemed sooner than the Ernakulam The city South Police Station for wondering. He’s anticipated to be launched on station bail very quickly as a result of he has been granted anticipatory bail via the Kerala Top Courtroom. Earlier than liberating him, police will accumulate the proof from the scene the place the alleged crime happened.Additionally Learn – Tip Tip Barsa Paani…! 6 Maximum Romantic Puts In India For Absolute best Honeymoon Throughout Monsoons

    Vijay Babu had previous within the day seemed sooner than the probe officers within the Ernakulam The city South Police Station at 9.00 am for interrogation as in line with the route of the Top Courtroom. Additionally Learn – Protests Erupt In Those Tamil Nadu Districts Over Dumping Of Rubbish From Kerala

    Vijay Babu has been directed via the court docket to cooperate with the investigation, chorus from tampering with the probe, and no longer have interaction via or with any social or different media. Additionally Learn – 5 Indian Vacationer Websites That Are Maximum Well-liked Amid Social Media Influencers

    There are two instances registered in opposition to him. One is the sexual attack case and the opposite one is for disclosing the id of the complainant via social media. The complainant alleged that she have been sexually assaulted via Vijay Babu in a flat in Kochi. The offence was once repeated via the accused greater than as soon as, she stated within the grievance.

    The grievance stated Babu dedicated the offence at the pretext of providing roles in films to the girl. The actor stated that he’s going to keep away from the Govt Committee of the group until he’s confirmed blameless within the sexual attack case to save lots of the affiliation from “shame”.

    In the meantime, the Affiliation of Malayalam Film Artistes (AMMA) on Sunday stated that any motion in opposition to actor-producer Vijay Babu can be taken “as in line with the judgment of the court docket”. Following the accusations, Vijay stepped down from the manager committee of the AMMA in Might.

    AMMA president Mohanlal, its basic secretary Edavela Babu, and its treasurer Siddique had been amongst those that addressed a press convention.

    “This can be a topic for the court docket to believe. Motion can be taken if essential as in line with the judgment of the court docket. We’re looking forward to the decision of the court docket to return. Everyone seems to be looking forward to the decision. He’s a member of 8 or 9 golf equipment in Kochi. He has no longer but been expelled from the ones golf equipment. AMMA is in truth a membership. AMMA will act in line with the court docket order,” stated Edavela Babu, Basic Secretary of AMMA on the press convention.

    Siddique stated that the manager committee of AMMA has determined to not take any motion in opposition to Vijay till the court docket makes a decision.

    (With company inputs)

  • SC seeks Centre’s answer on plea of Kerala newshounds’ frame towards TV channel ban

    Through PTI

    NEW DELHI: The Perfect Courtroom on Monday sought a reaction from the Centre on a plea by means of the Kerala Union of Running Newshounds difficult a Kerala Prime Courtroom order upholding a ban at the telecast of a Malayalam information channel.

    A bench of justices DY Chandrachud and Surya Kant issued understand and tagged it in conjunction with the plea filed by means of the channel itself, whilst directing {that a} reproduction be served to the central company.

    On March 15, the highest courtroom had stayed until additional orders the January 31 directive of the Centre revoking the licence of Malayalam information channel ‘MediaOne’ and banning its telecast on safety grounds.

    It had stated the inside track and present affairs channel will proceed its operations because it was once doing previous to the ban.

    “We’re of the view that the case of grant of meantime aid has been made out. We order and direct that order dated January 31, 2022 of the Union govt revoking the protection clearance of Madhyamam Broadcasting Ltd stands stayed pending additional orders”, the highest courtroom had ordered.

    “The petitioners (Madhyamam Broadcasting Ltd and Pramod Raman editor of the channel and others) will likely be authorized to proceed working the inside track and present affairs channel ‘MediaOne’ at the similar foundation because it was once working previous to the revocation of clearances,” it had stated.

    The highest courtroom had handed the order after perusing the information positioned earlier than it by means of the Centre at the foundation of which safety clearance was once revoked and the Kerala Prime Courtroom had handed the order upholding the ban at the telecast.

    It had left the query open on whether or not the content material of information at the foundation of which the ban order was once handed be given to the channel to allow it to shield itself.

    On March 10, the highest courtroom had sought the Centre’s reaction to the channel’s plea towards the Kerala Prime Courtroom order upholding the Centre’s determination to prohibit its telecast on safety grounds.

    It had requested the Centre to position on document the record which was once depended on by means of the prime courtroom.

    The Kerala Prime Courtroom had upheld the Centre’s determination to bar the telecast of the Malayalam information channel and pushed aside the plea of Madhyamam Broadcasting Ltd — which operates MediaOne — difficult the central govt’s January 31 determination.

    The prime courtroom had stated that the verdict of the Ministry of House Affairs (MHA) to disclaim safety clearance was once in line with intelligence inputs won from quite a lot of businesses.

    The channel had contended that MHA clearance was once simplest required on the time for contemporary permission/licence and now not on the time of renewal.

    It had additionally contended that consistent with the uplinking and downlinking tips, safety clearance was once simplest required on the time of utility for contemporary permission and now not on the time of renewal of licence.