The World Opinion

Tag: Karnataka hijab ban

  • Males must make stronger their minds, loose girls from hijab: Haryana minister Anil Vij

    By means of PTI

    CHANDIGARH: Haryana Minister Anil Vij on Thursday waded into the scarf factor announcing males must make stronger their minds and loose girls from the hijab.

    Vij’s tweet got here in a while earlier than the Very best Courtroom delivered a cut up verdict on a batch of pleas difficult the Karnataka Top Courtroom judgement refusing to raise the ban on hijab in tutorial establishments of the state.

    “The lads who may just now not keep an eye on their pleasure upon seeing girls pressured girls to put on hijab. The will used to be to make stronger their thoughts, however the punishment used to be given to the ladies, they have been lined from head to toe. This can be a grave injustice,” the Haryana House minister mentioned in a tweet in Hindi.

    जिन पुरुषों का महिलाओ को देखकर मन मचलता था उन्होंने ही महिलाओं को हिजाब डालने के लिए मजबूर किया । आवश्यकता तो अपने मन को मजबूत करने की थी परंतु सजा महिलाओं को दी गई उनको सिर से लेकर पांव तक डाक दिया। यह सरासर नाइंसाफी है । पुरुष अपना मन मजबूत करे और महिलाओ को हिजाब से मुक्ति दें

    — ANIL VIJ MINISTER HARYANA (@anilvijminister) October 13, 2022

    In the similar tweet, he advised, “Males must make stronger their minds and loose girls from hijab.”

    In February, amid a row over some scholars dressed in hijab in Karnataka, Vij had mentioned the present get dressed code in faculties and schools will have to be adopted.

    In view of the cut up verdict within the Very best Courtroom, the bench directed that the appeals towards the top courtroom verdict be positioned earlier than the Leader Justice of India for constituting an acceptable greater bench.

    CHANDIGARH: Haryana Minister Anil Vij on Thursday waded into the scarf factor announcing males must make stronger their minds and loose girls from the hijab.

    Vij’s tweet got here in a while earlier than the Very best Courtroom delivered a cut up verdict on a batch of pleas difficult the Karnataka Top Courtroom judgement refusing to raise the ban on hijab in tutorial establishments of the state.

    “The lads who may just now not keep an eye on their pleasure upon seeing girls pressured girls to put on hijab. The will used to be to make stronger their thoughts, however the punishment used to be given to the ladies, they have been lined from head to toe. This can be a grave injustice,” the Haryana House minister mentioned in a tweet in Hindi.

    जिन पुरुषों का महिलाओ को देखकर मन मचलता था उन्होंने ही महिलाओं को हिजाब डालने के लिए मजबूर किया । आवश्यकता तो अपने मन को मजबूत करने की थी परंतु सजा महिलाओं को दी गई उनको सिर से लेकर पांव तक डाक दिया। यह सरासर नाइंसाफी है । पुरुष अपना मन मजबूत करे और महिलाओ को हिजाब से मुक्ति दें
    — ANIL VIJ MINISTER HARYANA (@anilvijminister) October 13, 2022
    In the similar tweet, he advised, “Males must make stronger their minds and loose girls from hijab.”

    In February, amid a row over some scholars dressed in hijab in Karnataka, Vij had mentioned the present get dressed code in faculties and schools will have to be adopted.

    In view of the cut up verdict within the Very best Courtroom, the bench directed that the appeals towards the top courtroom verdict be positioned earlier than the Leader Justice of India for constituting an acceptable greater bench.

  • SC delivers break up verdict on Karnataka Hijab ban

    Through Specific Information Carrier

    NEW DELHI: The Perfect Court docket nowadays delivered a spilt verdict within the pleas difficult Karnataka HC’s ruling of upholding the ban on hijab in instructional establishments. 

    Justice Hemant Gupta disregarded the appeals difficult the HC’s order while Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia allowed the appeals.

    Justice Dhulia whilst permitting the appeals and quashing the GO dated February 5 stated, “Dressed in of hijab is in the end a question of her selection. The ratio laid down by way of SC in Bijoy Emanuel covers the problem. What weighed in my thoughts was once the training of a lady kid. A lady kid has numerous difficulties to stand. There are different difficulties as smartly and whether or not we’re making her lifestyles any higher by way of striking restrictions on training.” 

    Because of the divergence in opinion, the two-judge bench requested the pleas to be positioned earlier than the CJI for constituting a suitable bench. 

    A bench of Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia after an in depth listening to of ten days had reserved a verdict in September 2022. 

    The listening to had witnessed a battery of senior legal professionals corresponding to Kapil Sibal, Dushyant Dave, Salman Khurshid, Rajeev Dhawan, Sanjay Hegde, Devdutt Kamat arguing in opposition to the hijab ban. For the State, submissions had been made by way of Solicitor Basic Tushar Mehta, Karnataka AG Prabhuling Navadgi and ASG KM Nataraj.

    On March 15, 2022, the Karnataka HC held that dressed in of the hijab was once no longer part of very important non secular observe which may well be safe underneath article 25 (Proper to freedom of sense of right and wrong and loose career, observe and propagation of faith) of the Charter. The bench additional held that the prescription of a uniform get dressed code in instructional establishments was once no longer violative of the basic rights of the petitioners.

    The HC’s verdict got here at the petitions filed by way of a piece of Muslim scholars from the Govt Pre-College Women Faculty in Udupi. The scholars had challenged the state’s February 5 determination that didn’t permit scholars to put on the hijab, or commonplace Islamic scarf, to instructional establishments.

    NEW DELHI: The Perfect Court docket nowadays delivered a spilt verdict within the pleas difficult Karnataka HC’s ruling of upholding the ban on hijab in instructional establishments. 

    Justice Hemant Gupta disregarded the appeals difficult the HC’s order while Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia allowed the appeals.

    Justice Dhulia whilst permitting the appeals and quashing the GO dated February 5 stated, “Dressed in of hijab is in the end a question of her selection. The ratio laid down by way of SC in Bijoy Emanuel covers the problem. What weighed in my thoughts was once the training of a lady kid. A lady kid has numerous difficulties to stand. There are different difficulties as smartly and whether or not we’re making her lifestyles any higher by way of striking restrictions on training.” 

    Because of the divergence in opinion, the two-judge bench requested the pleas to be positioned earlier than the CJI for constituting a suitable bench. 

    A bench of Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia after an in depth listening to of ten days had reserved a verdict in September 2022. 

    The listening to had witnessed a battery of senior legal professionals corresponding to Kapil Sibal, Dushyant Dave, Salman Khurshid, Rajeev Dhawan, Sanjay Hegde, Devdutt Kamat arguing in opposition to the hijab ban. For the State, submissions had been made by way of Solicitor Basic Tushar Mehta, Karnataka AG Prabhuling Navadgi and ASG KM Nataraj.

    On March 15, 2022, the Karnataka HC held that dressed in of the hijab was once no longer part of very important non secular observe which may well be safe underneath article 25 (Proper to freedom of sense of right and wrong and loose career, observe and propagation of faith) of the Charter. The bench additional held that the prescription of a uniform get dressed code in instructional establishments was once no longer violative of the basic rights of the petitioners.

    The HC’s verdict got here at the petitions filed by way of a piece of Muslim scholars from the Govt Pre-College Women Faculty in Udupi. The scholars had challenged the state’s February 5 determination that didn’t permit scholars to put on the hijab, or commonplace Islamic scarf, to instructional establishments.

  • Hijab ban: Best Court docket concludes listening to, reserves judgment

    Through PTI

    NEW DELHI: The Best Court docket on Thursday reserved its verdict on a batch of petitions difficult the Karnataka Top Court docket judgement refusing to boost the ban on hijab in instructional establishments of the state.

    On March 15, the top court docket had brushed aside petitions filed through a piece of Muslim scholars from the Govt Pre-College Ladies Faculty in Udupi in quest of permission to put on hijab inside of the school room, pronouncing it isn’t part of the very important spiritual apply in Islamic religion.

    The state govt had, through its order of February 5, 2022, banned dressed in garments that disturb equality, integrity, and public order in colleges and faculties.

    A number of pleas were filed within the apex court docket difficult the top court docket verdict.

    A bench of Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia reserved its verdict within the subject.

    NEW DELHI: The Best Court docket on Thursday reserved its verdict on a batch of petitions difficult the Karnataka Top Court docket judgement refusing to boost the ban on hijab in instructional establishments of the state.

    On March 15, the top court docket had brushed aside petitions filed through a piece of Muslim scholars from the Govt Pre-College Ladies Faculty in Udupi in quest of permission to put on hijab inside of the school room, pronouncing it isn’t part of the very important spiritual apply in Islamic religion.

    The state govt had, through its order of February 5, 2022, banned dressed in garments that disturb equality, integrity, and public order in colleges and faculties.

    A number of pleas were filed within the apex court docket difficult the top court docket verdict.

    A bench of Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia reserved its verdict within the subject.