The World Opinion

Tag: K K Venugopal

  • Senior suggest KK Venugopal might get recent time period as A-G: Executive assets

    By means of PTI

    NEW DELHI: Senior suggest Okay Okay Venugopal might get a recent time period as Legal professional Common for India, assets within the govt stated on Tuesday.

    A last determination could be taken in an afternoon or two.

    Venugopal’s present 12 months tem ends on June 30.

    The legal professional common generally has a tenure of 3 years.

    When Venugopal’s first time period as AG was once to finish in 2020, he had asked the federal government to provide him a one-year tenure preserving in thoughts his complex age.

    He’s 91.

    Ultimate yr too, Venugopal was once reappointed for 12 months.

    In view of the high-profile circumstances Venugopal is dealing with within the Superb Court docket and his enjoy on the Bar, the federal government might reappoint him once more.

    There was once no phrase but at the length for which he may well be reappointed to the constitutional publish.

    The legislation ministry has knowledgeable the federal government that his time period ends on June 30 and the publish must be crammed.

    He first took over because the legal professional common, the highest legislation officer of the Union govt, on July 1, 2017, succeeding Mukul Rohatgi.

  • Chorus from wading into coverage problems, AG tells Ideally suited Court docket

    Through Categorical Information Carrier

    NEW DELHI:  The Ideally suited Court docket will have to “take into account separation of powers”, Lawyer Basic Ok Ok Venugopal on Wednesday stated whilst protecting the Tribunals Reforms Act of 2021, and identified that the highest court docket tended to wade “into the coverage area” thru its judgments many a time.

    “Most of the Ideally suited Court docket judgments have long gone past its judicial ambit. We’ve stated this can be a coverage determination; but the court docket went forward… Regularly the court docket has been laying coverage choices and telling the legislature to cross such and such regulations. There’s a separation of powers and it will have to be saved in thoughts,” Venugopal advised a bench of Justices D Y Chandrachud, Surya Kant, and Bela M Trivedi.

    The AG made the pointy feedback whilst responding to the submission made by way of senior suggest Arvind Datar, who stated that regardless of some provisions of the Ordinance being struck down by way of a bench headed by way of Justice LN Rao, the Centre had pop out with an Act that has an identical provisions. 

    Datar stated that on July 14, 2021, the highest court docket had, by way of a 2:1 verdict, upheld the Tribunals Reforms (Rationalisation and Prerequisites of Carrier) Ordinance, 2021, however held as unconstitutional sure provisions associated with phrases of services and products of the chairperson, vice-chairperson and different contributors of tribunals. 

    Inside days, on July 28, the federal government got here out with an Act with an identical provisions regardless of quite a lot of Ideally suited Court docket judgments pronouncing that “a regulation can’t be introduced with out taking out the foundation of the judgment”, Datar stated. 

    When the bench requested the AG if the Act would stay legitimate as it’s very similar to the Ordinance, he stated he would want time to argue at the benefit of the bigger factor, which is validity of the Act, as he used to be now not knowledgeable that the arguments shall be made on Wednesday.

    The SC stated that it could listen the arguments in July. The bench then handled some programs on the subject of the appointments within the tribunals. It sought to grasp from the Centre causes for now not appointing a member to Telecom Disputes and Agreement Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT) regardless of his identify being cleared by way of the choice committee.

    Tribunals Reforms Act  introduced after Ordinance provisions struck down

    Lawyer Basic Ok Ok Venugopal made the pointy feedback whilst responding to the submission made by way of senior suggest Arvind Datar, who stated that regardless of some provisions of the Ordinance being struck down by way of a bench headed by way of Justice LN Rao, the Centre had pop out with an Act that has an identical provisions.