The World Opinion

Tag: johnny depp

  • Johnny Depp, Jeff Beck Accused Of Stealing Lyrics From Black Poet Incarcerated In The ’60s

    Johnny Depp and Jeff Beck’s new album “18” gained little reward upon its mid-July unencumber, however critiques are actually taking a backseat to accusations of thievery — as their “Unhappy Motherf**kinfolk’ Parade” track stocks a number of strains with a Sixties poem left uncredited within the liner notes.

    The “Hobo Ben” poem in query used to be written by means of Narrow Wilson, a Black vagabond who used to be convicted for homicide and used to be later incarcerated for armed theft, in line with Rolling Stone. Wilson met American folklorist Bruce Jackson in 1964 whilst Wilson used to be within the Missouri State Prison.

    Even though Wilson’s actual title stays a thriller, Jackson stated he used to be “one of the most perfect narrators” he’d ever come throughout. Jackson featured “Hobo Ben,” amongst many different toasts and poems of Wilson’s, in his 1974 e book “Get Your Ass within the Water and Swim Like Me.”

    Wilson carried out his paintings for Jackson’s 1976 album of the similar title, just for “Hobo Ben” to make a stunning comeback a long time later. Jackson, now a prominent professor on the College of Buffalo, believes Depp and Beck fully “ripped” them off.

    Depp and Beck’s track contains a large number of strains of Wilson’s, together with “‘Purpose if the Guy come you’re making a tragic motherfuckin’ parade”; “I’m raggedy, I do know, however I don’t have any stink”; “God bless the woman that’ll purchase me a drink,” and “What that funky motherfucker in reality wishes, kid, is a tub.”

    “The one two strains I may in finding in the entire piece that [Depp and Beck] contributed are ‘Large time motherfucker’ and ‘Bust it right down to my stage,’” Jackson advised Rolling Stone. “The entirety else is from Narrow’s efficiency in my e book.”

    “I’ve by no means encountered anything else like this,” added Jackson. “I’ve been publishing stuff for fifty years, and that is the primary time anyone has simply ripped one thing off and put his personal title on it.”

    Whilst Jackson gave each particular person he interviewed in prison an alias to offer protection to them from possible strife with wardens, he believes Depp and Beck had a prison accountability to credit score him, Wilson, and the copyrighted works that the lyrics gave the impression in.

    His son, Michael Lee Jackson, stated the lining notes “don’t mirror the true authorship of the ones lyrics,” in line with The Mum or dad. The daddy and son are actually taking into consideration imaginable prison motion towards Depp and Beck.

    “It’s simply now not believable, personally, that Johnny Depp or anyone else will have sat down and crafted the ones lyrics with out virtually wholly taking them from some model of my father’s recording and/or e book the place they gave the impression,” stated Michael Lee Jackson.

    A spokesperson for the “18” album has since advised Rolling Stone that they’ve initiated an “enquiry in terms of the track ‘Unhappy Motherfuckin’ Parade’” to come to a decision if “further copyright credit will likely be added to all types of the album.

  • Find it irresistible or no longer, US bar provides Johnny Depp photographs to male consumers feeling ‘unsafe’

    By means of ANI

    NEW DELHI: There was a large number of make stronger for Johnny Depp on social media ever since he received the defamation trial towards Amber Heard.

    Now, a bar has pop out in make stronger of Johnny. An image of a bar’s signboard is being shared on social media, during which a drink is called after Johnny Depp. Additionally, this drink is for male consumers who’re ‘feeling unsafe or scared’.

    “Feeling unsafe or scared, simply come to the bar and order a Johnny Depp shot,” the signal reads.

    The menu additionally lists 3 kinds of photographs available- Neat, On The Rocks, and With Lime. When a buyer orders a ‘Neat Johnny Depp shot’, he’ll get safely escorted out of the bar with an worker. The opposite two variants, ‘On The Rocks’ and ‘With Lime’ will recommended the team of workers to both name a cab or name the police.

    The specific bar menu has insanely long past viral on social media.

    “Hahahah so cool,” a social media person commented.

    “Cannot wait to reserve my Johnny Depp photographs,” every other one wrote.

    Following the six-week trial in Fairfax County, Virginia, a seven-person jury reached a verdict on June 1, deciding that Depp, proved that Amber Heard defamed him within the 2018 op-ed, during which she described herself as a “public determine representing home abuse.” Depp has maintained that he by no means assaulted Heard and claimed she bodily harmed him.

    The jury awarded Depp USD 15 million in damages however Heard will simplest must pay USD 10.35 million because of a Virginia regulation restricting punitive damages (the pass judgement on lowered the quantity). In her countersuit, Heard received one of the most 3 defamation counts and was once awarded USD 2 million in damages, as in step with Folks mag.

    NEW DELHI: There was a large number of make stronger for Johnny Depp on social media ever since he received the defamation trial towards Amber Heard.

    Now, a bar has pop out in make stronger of Johnny. An image of a bar’s signboard is being shared on social media, during which a drink is called after Johnny Depp. Additionally, this drink is for male consumers who’re ‘feeling unsafe or scared’.

    “Feeling unsafe or scared, simply come to the bar and order a Johnny Depp shot,” the signal reads.

    The menu additionally lists 3 kinds of photographs available- Neat, On The Rocks, and With Lime. When a buyer orders a ‘Neat Johnny Depp shot’, he’ll get safely escorted out of the bar with an worker. The opposite two variants, ‘On The Rocks’ and ‘With Lime’ will recommended the team of workers to both name a cab or name the police.

    The specific bar menu has insanely long past viral on social media.

    “Hahahah so cool,” a social media person commented.

    “Cannot wait to reserve my Johnny Depp photographs,” every other one wrote.

    Following the six-week trial in Fairfax County, Virginia, a seven-person jury reached a verdict on June 1, deciding that Depp, proved that Amber Heard defamed him within the 2018 op-ed, during which she described herself as a “public determine representing home abuse.” Depp has maintained that he by no means assaulted Heard and claimed she bodily harmed him.

    The jury awarded Depp USD 15 million in damages however Heard will simplest must pay USD 10.35 million because of a Virginia regulation restricting punitive damages (the pass judgement on lowered the quantity). In her countersuit, Heard received one of the most 3 defamation counts and was once awarded USD 2 million in damages, as in step with Folks mag.

  • Amber Heard faces excessive criminal hurdles in search of to opposite Johnny Depp’s win

    The Johnny Depp-Amber Heard libel trial, which generated intense pastime for 2 months previous this yr as a livestreamed, no-holds-barred cleaning soap opera that includes considered one of Hollywood’s largest stars, isn’t fading away quietly.

    Previous this month, Heard’s legal professionals filed a 51-page movement asking Pass judgement on Penney Azcarate to put aside the jury’s verdict, which gave $10 million to Depp and $2 million to Heard on competing defamation claims.

    The movement cites a couple of causes that the decision is untenable, from the sudden choice to claim all sides victorious to at least one extent or any other, to a peculiar case of wrong identification with probably the most jurors.

    A few of the problems raised:

    Why $10 million?

    Depp sued for $25 million in Fairfax County after Heard wrote a 2018 op-ed piece in The Washington Submit about home violence through which she referred to herself as “a public determine representing home abuse.” The thing by no means discussed Depp through identify, however his legal professionals stated a number of passages within the article defamed him through implication through regarding extremely publicized abuse allegations she made in 2016 as she filed for divorce.

    Heard then filed a $50 million counterclaim, additionally for defamation. By the point the case went to trial, her counterclaim have been whittled right down to a couple of statements made through considered one of Depp’s legal professionals, who referred to as Heard’s abuse allegations a hoax.

    The jury awarded $15 million to Depp and $2 million to Heard on her counterclaim. The $15 million judgment was once diminished to $10.35 million as a result of Virginia regulation caps punitive damages at $350,000.

    Heard’s legal professionals say in court docket papers that the $10 million verdict is unsupported through the information, and turns out to exhibit that jurors failed to concentrate on the fallout from the 2018 op-ed piece — as they had been intended to do — and as an alternative simply seemed widely on the injury Depp’s popularity suffered on account of the alleged abuse.

    Depp’s legal professionals, regardless that, say the damages are supported through testimony from his agent and others. They are saying the precedents cited through Heard’s workforce to give a boost to her arguments “are many years outdated, and none comes to a global A-list famous person.”

    Johnny Depp and Amber Heard had been married from 2015-2017. (Photograph: AP/Report)

    Steve Cochran, a civil attorney in Virginia who was once appointed through a pass judgement on as a impartial conciliator within the case to take a look at to reduce pretrial discovery disputes, stated he all the time believed the weakest hyperlink in Depp’s case was once the damages, given proof that the actor’s popularity have been ruined in Hollywood smartly earlier than the newsletter of the op-ed. Nonetheless, he stated he’s skeptical that Heard can get the decision put aside.

    Scott Surovell, a attorney and Democratic state senator who practices regulation in Fairfax, additionally stated he sees little explanation why to put aside the damages.

    “What the pass judgement on seems to be for … is that the decision was once adequately supported at trial and wasn’t in accordance with hypothesis or conjecture. (Depp) makes some huge cash from motion pictures. That doesn’t sound to me just like the damages had been in accordance with hypothesis or conjecture, however on proof,” he stated.

    “Inconsistent and irreconcilable”

    Heard’s legal professionals argue that the verdicts for Depp on one hand and Heard at the different are essentially nonsensical.

    “The jury’s dueling verdicts are inconsistent and irreconcilable,” her legal professionals wrote.

    Depp’s legal professionals, regardless that, say the decision shape utilized by jurors allowed them to precise with specificity precisely which statements they discovered defamatory. While you take a look at the person statements, they are saying, the dueling verdicts make sense.

    Jeremiah Denton III, a Virginia Seaside lawyer with enjoy in defamation instances, stated he doesn’t view the verdicts as irreconcilable. If anything else, he stated, the award maximum in jeopardy is the $2 million given to Heard, as a result of he stated it’s legally doubtful that Depp will also be held responsible for statements made through his lawyer.

    “I don’t perceive why the pass judgement on even allowed that factor to visit the jury,” he stated.

    Camille Vasquez represented Johnny Depp within the case. (Photograph: AP/Report)

    Juror #15

    One of the vital extra extraordinary pieces within the dialogue is a case of obvious wrong identification with probably the most jurors. In keeping with court docket papers, a 77-year-old county resident gained a summons for the trial. However the guy’s son, who has the similar identify and lives on the similar cope with, replied to the summons and served in his stead.

    Heard’s legal professionals say Virginia regulation is strict about juror identities, and the case of wrong identification is grounds for a mistrial. They’ve introduced no proof that the 52-year-old son, known in court docket papers best as Juror #15, purposefully or insidiously sought to interchange his father, however they argue that chance will have to now not be discounted.

    “The Courtroom can not think, as Mr. Depp asks it to, that Juror 15’s it sounds as if flawed carrier was once an blameless mistake. It might had been an intentional try to serve at the jury of a high-profile case,” Heard’s legal professionals wrote.

    Paul Bekman, a Baltimore attorney who has additionally attempted instances in Virginia, stated Heard’s workforce had to elevate any problems in regards to the juror forward of time.

    “Anyone having a look at a 52-year-old and a 77-year-old would be capable to inform — expectantly — that there’s a distinction of 25 years, and they’d have the proper to inquire about that,” he stated. “I consider it’s too overdue to whinge in regards to the juror.”

    Cochran additionally stated he was once skeptical that the confusion may lead to a mistrial or the pass judgement on surroundings apart the decision, however he cautioned that it’s tricky to are expecting for the reason that factor is so uncommon.

    “I’ve been working towards for fifty years and not noticed that factor arise,” he stated.

  • Documentary on Johnny Depp-Amber Heard trial set for virtual debut

    Via IANS

    LOS ANGELES: A brand new documentary at the Johnny Depp vs Amber Heard trial by way of NBC Information is ready to make its debut at the virtual platform.

    Titled ‘A Marriage on Trial: Johnny Depp, Amber Heard and Reality within the Age of Social Media’, the documentary will debut on NBC Information Now and might be to be had for streaming on call for on NBCNews.com and Peacock, studies Selection.

    As in step with NBC Information’ description for the 30-minute documentary, “The Depp vs Heard defamation trial evoked two distinct reactions — those that could not get sufficient and those that gained greater than they sought after.

    “The brand new deep-dive documentary explores why the trial crushed social media, particularly TikTok, and what audience overlooked if social media protection used to be their simplest information supply. Within the wake of a verdict that shocked prison professionals, NBC Information examines how the trial developed right into a TikTok trial and what the decision approach for long run home abuse circumstances.”

    Featured interviews within the documentary come with that of Heard’s legal professional Elaine Bredehoft, Nationwide Coalition Towards Home Violence CEO Ruth Glenn, American College legislation professor and gender violence professional Jamie Abrams, NBC Information senior breaking information reporter Doha Madani, NBC Information tech and tradition reporter Kat Tenbarge, and Folks Mag’s Nigel Smith, amongst others.

    ‘A Marriage on Trial: Johnny Depp, Amber Heard, and Reality within the Age of Social Media’ is produced by way of the NBC Information Virtual Doctors unit.

  • Incorrect juror became up at Johnny Depp-Amber Heard trial?

    By way of IANS

    LOS ANGELES: The drama surrounding Johnny Depp’s multimillion-dollar defamation lawsuit in opposition to his ex-wife and ‘Aquaman’ big name Amber Heard, refuses to die. The issues have became judicially bizarre, as a improper juror took the chair throughout the felony lawsuits, experiences ‘Time limit’.

    A in part redacted new submitting by way of the Aquaman big name’s felony workforce, accessed by way of ‘Time limit’, learn, “Ms. Heard had a proper to depend at the elementary coverage, as prescribed by way of the Virginia Code, that the jurors on this trial could be people who have been in reality summoned for jury accountability.”

    “On this case, it sounds as if that Juror No. 15 used to be no longer, in truth, the similar particular person as indexed at the jury panel,” lawyer Elaine Bredehoft added in language very similar to a prior submitting of June 24.

    “Ms. Heard’s due procedure used to be due to this fact compromised. Below those instances, a mistrial must be declared, and a brand new trial ordered.”

    In keeping with ‘Time limit’, in contrast to the former movement and memorandum positioned within the Fairfax County courthouse docket overdue ultimate month to push aside the June 1 verdict and make allowance a brand new trial, nowadays’s supplemental memo has much more main points on what may seize victory from Depp in his lengthy felony combat along with his ex-wife.

    In keeping with the redacted submitting, accessed by way of ‘Time limit’, the summons for jury accountability used to be despatched out to a Virginia resident in April for the much-delayed $15 million defamation motion Depp had activate in March 2019 in opposition to Heard for a 2018 ‘Washington Put up’ op-ed she penned on being the “public face” of home abuse.

    Additionally, in keeping with the new submitting, it sort of feels that there are two folks living on the identical deal with with, on the very least, “the similar ultimate title” – one a 77-year-old and some other a 52-year-old.

    The previous used to be the only summoned, nevertheless it looks as if the latter used to be the person who confirmed up. “Thus, the 52-year-old [redacted] sitting at the jury for 6 weeks used to be by no means summoned for jury accountability on April 11 and didn’t ‘seem within the checklist’, as required,” the submitting asserts.

    Now not spotted by way of officials or clerks of the courtroom, the more youthful particular person made it all of the option to the jury with out it seems that ever being requested to supply any ID, or with possibly pretend ID, the submitting implies. Moreover, it looks as if anyone crammed out the desired on-line data shape both deliberately or by chance to mention that they have been born in 1945.

    Ignorant of this on the time and throughout the media-frenzied trial, Heard’s defence workforce now needs an evidence and to look some penalties, which might take the shine off Crew Depp.

  • Amber Heard Requests New Trial, Claiming Mistaken Juror Sat On Jury

    Amber Heard is asking for a brand new trial towards actor Johnny Depp, her ex-husband, one month after a Virginia jury determined most commonly in prefer of him in a defamation lawsuit.

    Heard’s prison crew, in a court docket submitting Friday, claims that an individual who seemed at the jury used to be now not the individual summoned for jury responsibility, Closing date reported.

    A pass judgement on ordered Heard to pay Depp more or less $10 million in damages following a 2018 opinion article by which the actor referred to herself as a sufferer of home abuse however didn’t identify her abuser.

    She used to be awarded $2 million in compensatory damages.

    Heard’s prison crew wrote that “Juror No. 15,” indexed as a 77-year-old at the jury panel listing, is registered to vote on the similar cope with as a 52-year-old with the similar identify, in line with the submitting.

    “The person who seemed for jury responsibility with this identify used to be clearly the more youthful one,” the prison crew wrote.

    “Thus, the 52-year-old … sitting at the jury for 6 weeks used to be by no means summoned for jury responsibility on April 11 and didn’t ‘seem within the listing.’”

    The prison crew detailed how jurors on trials are requested to make sure their id ahead of their court docket provider.

    Jurors also are requested to make sure their id on a juror questionnaire webpage in Fairfax County, a questionnaire that asks jurors to log in with their beginning date, the crew mentioned.

    “The ones safeguards are in position and relied upon by way of the events to make sure the id of the proper juror, to verify due procedure and a good trial for all litigants,” the prison crew wrote.

    “When those safeguards are circumvented or now not adopted, as seems to be the case right here, the proper to a jury trial and due procedure are undermined and compromised.”

    HuffPost reached out to each Heard’s and Depp’s prison groups in regards to the submitting on Friday.

    The submitting comes after a consultant of Heard mentioned she deliberate to attraction the decision of the multimillion-dollar lawsuit in June.

    Heard, in an interview with NBC Information closing month, mentioned she has feared long term defamation complaints for talking out about her dating with Depp.

  • Netflix will finance Johnny Depp’s King Louis XV movie, his comeback post-defamation trial

    Through IANS

    NEW DELHI: Streaming massive Netflix helps finance Hollywood big name Johnny Depp’s film comeback following his much-publicised defamation trial towards ex-wife and actress Amber Heard that he in the end gained.

    Consistent with aceshowbiz.com, the 59-year-old will painting King Louis XV within the French-language movie ‘L. a. Favourite’, which used to be up to now reported to be titled ‘Jeanne du Barry’. Netflix has obtained the rights to flow the movie in France, other folks acquainted with the deal inform Bloomberg.

    The purchase of the movie’s rights will probably be utilized by the manufacturers to assist finance the manufacturing. Beneath the deal, the length piece will probably be hitting the streamer 15 months following its theatrical free up. Netflix, then again, does no longer have the rights to flow the film in different territories and isn’t concerned within the making of the image.

    Directed by means of Maiwenn Le Besco, ‘L. a. Favourite’ will inform the tale of Jeanne Becu, an impoverished seamstress who rises during the ranks of Louis XV’s court docket to grow to be his reliable mistress. Le Besco additionally stars as Jeanne Becu. Even though the true Louis XV dominated over France for almost 59 years, he “died as an unpopular king…accused of corruption and debauchery,” Selection wrote in January.

    Filming is scheduled to begin later this summer time throughout France and can remaining for approximately 3 months. The film is anticipated to be able for theatrical free up within the nation in 2023.

    ‘L. a. Favourite’ will mark Depp’s first performing function since he gained the defamation case.

    ALSO READ | Amber Heard’s lawyer urges court docket to toss out defamation trial verdict

    ‘The Pirates of the Caribbean’ big name used to be awarded $10 million in compensatory damages and $350,000 in punitive damages after the jury discovered his ex-wife Heard in charge of defaming him. The similar jury awarded $2 million to the ‘Aquaman’ actress who made an identical claims towards Depp.

    Depp’s remaining movie used to be ‘Minamata’, which used to be launched within the U.S. overdue remaining 12 months. In November 2020, he withdrew from ‘Improbable Beasts: The Secrets and techniques of Dumbledore’, by which he used to be intended to reprise his function as Grindelwald, and used to be changed by means of Mads Mikkelsen after dropping his UK libel case towards The Solar.

  • Amber Heard’s legal professional urges courtroom to toss out defamation trial verdict

    By means of IANS

    LOS ANGELES: Amber Heard desires the decision of the defamation trial towards her ex-husband Johnny Depp to be tossed out. The ‘Aquaman’ actress’s legal professional filed a movement soliciting for that together with the $10.35 million in damages awarded to Depp through the jury, reviews Selection.

    Along with Heard’s lawyers arguing that the decision isn’t supported through proof, the 43-page report submitted to the Fairfax County Circuit Courtroom additionally calls “to analyze mistaken juror provider”, ‘Selection’ provides.

    It claimed that public knowledge signifies {that a} juror who served throughout the trial used to be born in 1970, regardless of courtroom officers list the individual’s start yr as 1945.

    Heard’s attorneys wrote, “This discrepancy raises the query whether or not Juror 15 in reality won a summons for jury accountability and used to be correctly vetted through the courtroom to serve at the jury.”

    Selection notes that Heard’s felony workforce additionally argues that the jurors’ $10.35 million award towards the actress is “inconsistent and irreconcilable” with the jury’s conclusion that each her and Depp had defamed one every other.

    Along with Depp’s $10 million in compensatory damages, plus $350,000 in punitive damages, the jury additionally awarded Heard $2 million in compensatory damages for her counterclaim.

    Heard’s lawyers additional wrote within the submitting that “Mr. Depp offered no proof that Ms. Heard didn’t imagine she used to be abused. Due to this fact, Mr. Depp didn’t meet the felony necessities for precise malice, and the decision must be put aside.”

    Depp’s lead legal professional, Ben Chunk, commented at the movement to toss the decision, disregarding it as “what we anticipated, simply longer, not more substantive” in a observation to ‘Courthouse Information’.

  • Disneyland’s Captain Jack Sparrow is again; standard journey reopens

    By way of IANS

    LOS ANGELES: Earlier than the enthusiasts get all excited, it is the Captain Jack Sparrow enchantment that has reopened at Disneyland for enthusiastic enthusiasts — after a couple of technical hiccups, studies ‘Time limit’.

    The journey, which was once put in on the theme park in 1967, was once closed for refurbishment on March 14 and was once at the beginning scheduled to reopen in “summer time 2022”, after which July 1.

    Disneyland dropped the rope, in step with ‘Time limit’, on Friday (Pacific Usual Time) and enthusiasts had been there en masse to revel in the revamp.

    The primary impressions are that little has modified past possibly some sound enhancements and somewhat of cleanup. That is notable because the enchantment’s major enchantment, Johnny Depp within the type of Captain Jack Sparrow, has been thru a couple of issues all the way through the closure.

    Representational Symbol for Disneyland. (Photograph | AP)

    Questions have swirled about Depp’s long run as a franchise megastar and, whilst the jury remains to be out on every other Pirates movie — or whether or not he’d even wish to do one — Disney may have simply taken this chance to excise the megastar from the vintage journey, nevertheless it did not.

    5 years in the past forward of the discharge of ‘Pirates of the Caribbean: Useless Males Inform No Stories’, Depp himself popped up in complete Captain Jack gown and make-up at a number of issues alongside the journey’s trail to wonder enthusiasts.

    ‘Time limit’ famous that the journey reportedly reopened an hour overdue as of late with a 45-minute wait. One reason why the journey reputedly closed was once for park officers to transform the realm round it for higher crowd waft across the enchantment, which regularly creates bottlenecks outdoor the gates.

    The reopening was once plagued, then again, through transient closures. Past the morning prolong, Pirates was once closed and reopened a minimum of two times ahead of 2 p.m. Enthusiasts reported 4 transient closures all the way through that point.

  • Disney’s reported USD 300 million be offering is ‘made up’, says Johnny Depp’s rep

    By way of IANS

    LOS ANGELES: Hollywood celebrity Johnny Depp has no longer been presented an apology deal value $300 million. One of the vital representatives of the ‘Pirates of the Caribbean’ celebrity has denied the life of this sort of deal announcing, “That is made up,” stories NBC Information.

    A media file had previous stated that once Depp gained his defamation swimsuit in opposition to Amber Heard, Disney presented the deal plus an apology letter to Depp with the request to go back to the ‘Pirates of the Caribbean’ franchise.

    ALSO READ | Johnny Depp celebrates Amber Heard trial win, spends Rs 48 lakhs at Indian eating place in Birmingham

    The NBC Information file additional states that Depp, who has performed Captain Jack Sparrow in all of the 5 ‘Pirates’ motion pictures, the most recent being the 2017 movie ‘Pirates of the Caribbean: Useless Males Inform No Stories’, has declined to be a part of the franchise regardless of how profitable the be offering is. The actor had made the commentary in courtroom.

    At one level all the way through the trial, Heard’s lawyer Ben Rottenborn requested the actor, “The reality is, Mr Depp, if Disney got here to you with $300 million and 1,000,000 alpacas, not anything in this earth would get you to return and paintings with Disney on a ‘Pirates of the Caribbean’ movie? Proper?”

    Depp responded within the affirmative, “This is true, Mr. Rottenborn.”

    ALSO READ | Pass judgement on makes jury’s USD 10.3 million award authentic in Depp-Heard trial

    A Virginia jury later dominated that Heard was once answerable for defaming Depp. The jury awarded $10 million to Depp in compensatory damages and $5 million in punitive damages.

    The Fairfax County Circuit Courtroom Pass judgement on Penney Azcarate later diminished the punitive damages to $350,000, which is the state’s statutory cap or felony restrict, making his general damages lower than $10.4 million.

    Again in Might, ‘Pirates’ manufacturer Jerry Bruckheimer, who’s now operating on two extra motion pictures, was once requested if Depp can be again for long term tasks. He informed ‘The Sunday Occasions’, “Now not at this level. The longer term is but to be made up our minds.”