Tag: IUML

  • Will SC Put Stay On CAA Implementation? Apex Court To Hear 237 Petitions Today |

    The Supreme Court is set to review several pleas on Tuesday requesting the government to suspend the enforcement of the 2024 Citizenship Amendment Rules. The stay is demanded until the court has resolved the challenges to the constitutionality of the 2019 Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA). The bench announced its intention to schedule all applications requesting a suspension of the Rules for a hearing on Tuesday. Additionally, the highest court mentioned that the entire set of 237 petitions will be included in the list alongside the most recent applications.

    The early hearing was warranted after Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, representing the Indian Union Muslim League (IUML) argued that once migrant Hindus are granted Indian citizenship, it cannot be revoked, thus suggesting the need for an expedited hearing. A panel consisting of Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud and justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra have acknowledged the arguments by Sibal.

    Apart from IUML, the Democratic Youth Federation of India (DYFI), Debabrata Saika, the Leader of the Opposition in the Assam Assembly, Abdul Khaleque, a Congress MP from Assam, and various others have also submitted applications requesting a suspension of the Rules.

    ‘Muslim Community Deprived Of CAA Benefits’ 

    One day after the government released the regulations under the CAA, the Kerala-based political party IUML filed a petition in the Supreme Court, requesting a stay to the enforcement of these regulations. The IUML urged for a suspension of the contested law and regulations, arguing that no punitive measures should be taken against members of the Muslim community who have been excluded from the benefits of this legislation, reported ANI. 

    PK Kunhalikutty, a leader of the Indian Union Muslim League (IUML), expressed solidarity with the Kerala government’s stance of abstaining from enforcing CAA. “Why should they implement a law that has not been welcomed by anyone in India? What is the need? Why are they taking a partisan stand in the matter of citizenship? ” Kunhalikutty told agency. 

    Kerala Government’s Plea Against CAA 

    On March 11, following the Union Home Ministry’s notification of the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) rules, Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan asserted that Kerala would not enforce the Act. Vijayan stated, “The LDF government approached the Supreme Court to confirm that Kerala would not implement the Citizenship Amendment Act. Kerala is the first state to move a plea against CAA in the Supreme Court. The state will initiate further legal action soon.”

    Mandate Under CAA 2019  

    The regulations of the CAA, brought by the Central government and ratified by Parliament in 2019, is designed to grant Indian citizenship to persecuted migrants belonging to Hindus, Sikhs, Jains, Buddhists, Parsis, and Christians community who fled from Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Afghanistan and entered India prior to December 31, 2014.

  • Congress, BJP business barbs over Rahul Gandhi’s ‘IUML utterly secular’ statement

    Via PTI

    NEW DELHI: Rahul Gandhi’s statement that IUML is a “utterly secular celebration” caused a political slugfest on Friday with the BJP alleging that the Kerala-based celebration is guided through the similar mindset which used to be in the back of the Muslim League and the Congress reminding the saffron celebration about its veteran chief LK Advani’s reward for Mohammad Ali Jinnah all the way through his 2005 Pakistan seek advice from.

    Gandhi, all the way through a media interplay on the Nationwide Press Membership in Washington, US, used to be requested about his celebration being in alliance with the Indian Union Muslim League (IUML) in Kerala whilst speaking about secularism, to which he replied “Muslim League is an absolutely secular celebration. There’s not anything non-secular in regards to the Muslim League.”

    Gandhi’s statement drew a pointy reaction from the BJP as its leaders alleged that the IUML is guided through the similar mindset which used to be in the back of Jinnah’s All India Muslim League.

    Launching a scathing assault towards Gandhi, Union minister Anurag Thakur stated, “those are the similar individuals who had stayed again after partition. They shaped the Muslim League hereafter partition and turned into MPs. They advocated for Sharia regulation and sought after separate seats reserved for Muslims. They’re the similar people who find themselves a part of the similar Muslim League. It’s Rahul Gandhi and the Congress that see Hindu terrorism however really feel Muslim League is secular. “

    In a counter-attack, the Congress stated the celebration Gandhi referred to used to be other from the Muslim League, for which the BJP has “extra love” and whose chief Jinnah used to be hailed through Advani.

    In a tweet, Congress basic secretary Jairam Ramesh stated, “Syama Prasad Mookerjee used to be in league with the Muslim League within the executive in Bengal when (Mahatma) Gandhiji introduced Surrender India motion. SPM used to be singularly chargeable for the partition of Bengal.”

    He additionally tagged a tweet through Congress chief Amitabh Dubey who had slammed BJP IT division head Amit Malviya for his grievance of Gandhi, pronouncing “You might be complicated the Kerala-based IUML he’s speaking about with Jinnah’s Muslim League that took Savarkar’s two-nation idea to its logical conclusion.”

    “The similar Muslim League with whom BJP founder SP Mookerjee and Hindu Mahasabha shaped coalition governments in Bengal, Sind, NWFP (North-West Frontier Province),” Dubey stated.

    Congress’ media division head Pawan Khera hit out on the BJP over its grievance and stated the BJP-RSS have extra wisdom of Pakistan’s politics and Jinnah’s Muslim League as they proportion a ancient ‘jugalbandi’. He stated the NDA executive led through Atal Bihari Vajpayee had despatched IUML chief E Ahamed to Geneva to constitute India.

    “IUML established the most important Sanskrit College in Kerala. The BJP additionally made an alliance with IUML for Nagpur Municipal Company. The omniscient Vishwaguru of WhatsApp nursery, please enrich your wisdom,” Khera claimed in a tweet in Hindi.

    In the meantime, the IUML welcomed Gandhi’s commentary that the Kerala-based celebration is totally secular, pronouncing the Congress chief’s statement got here from his celebration’s enjoy.

    “Rahul Gandhi’s commentary that the Muslim League is a mundane celebration is in response to his celebration’s enjoy. We have a look at it with nice duty. The Muslim League’s shut courting with Congress dates again to the times of Indira Gandhi,” IUML basic secretary P Ok Kunhalikutty stated in a Fb submit.

    BJP nationwide spokesperson and MP Sudhanshu Trivedi claimed a hyperlink between the regional celebration and Jinnah’s outfit, which spearheaded the partition stir amongst Muslims.

    “For the Congress, events reminiscent of AIMIM, Muslim League and Indian Secular Entrance, a West Bengal celebration shaped through a Muslim cleric, are secular and the PFI, a banned radical Islamic organisation, is a cultural frame,” he stated.

    Mocking Gandhi, the BJP chief stated his declare raises a query mark on his knowledge.

    Reacting to the BJP’s grievance, Congress spokesperson Gourav Vallabh stated the celebration Gandhi referred to is IUML which is a registered political celebration in India.

    “Is a registered celebration in India now not a mundane celebration? Does the Election Fee get ineligible events registered? I wish to remind the BJP that this isn’t the celebration with which Syama Prasad Mookerjee aligned to shape the federal government in Bengal,” Vallabh stated at a press convention on the AICC headquarters right here.

    “That Muslim League of Jinnah is other, with which you shaped the federal government. Rahul Gandhi has now not mentioned that Muslim League however the factor is that you’ve got extra love for that celebration, subsequently, you assume that the celebration being mentioned is the only whose chief used to be Jinnah,” he stated, slamming the BJP.

    Vallabh stated he wish to inform the BJP folks that the previous Congress leader used to be now not speaking in regards to the Muslim League of Jinnah on whose mausoleum in Pakistan, BJP co-founder Advani had hailed him and known as him “secular”.

    In 2005, Advani visited Pakistan and praised the neighbouring nation’s founder Jinnah, triggering grievance from inside of his personal celebration.

    Hitting out on the BJP leaders for his or her grievance, Vallabh stated, “so all those that nowadays are speaking about IUML must cross and ask Advani ji,” he stated.

    NEW DELHI: Rahul Gandhi’s statement that IUML is a “utterly secular celebration” caused a political slugfest on Friday with the BJP alleging that the Kerala-based celebration is guided through the similar mindset which used to be in the back of the Muslim League and the Congress reminding the saffron celebration about its veteran chief LK Advani’s reward for Mohammad Ali Jinnah all the way through his 2005 Pakistan seek advice from.

    Gandhi, all the way through a media interplay on the Nationwide Press Membership in Washington, US, used to be requested about his celebration being in alliance with the Indian Union Muslim League (IUML) in Kerala whilst speaking about secularism, to which he replied “Muslim League is an absolutely secular celebration. There’s not anything non-secular in regards to the Muslim League.”

    Gandhi’s statement drew a pointy reaction from the BJP as its leaders alleged that the IUML is guided through the similar mindset which used to be in the back of Jinnah’s All India Muslim League.googletag.cmd.push(serve as() googletag.show(‘div-gpt-ad-8052921-2′); );

    Launching a scathing assault towards Gandhi, Union minister Anurag Thakur stated, “those are the similar individuals who had stayed again after partition. They shaped the Muslim League hereafter partition and turned into MPs. They advocated for Sharia regulation and sought after separate seats reserved for Muslims. They’re the similar people who find themselves a part of the similar Muslim League. It’s Rahul Gandhi and the Congress that see Hindu terrorism however really feel Muslim League is secular. ”

    In a counter-attack, the Congress stated the celebration Gandhi referred to used to be other from the Muslim League, for which the BJP has “extra love” and whose chief Jinnah used to be hailed through Advani.

    In a tweet, Congress basic secretary Jairam Ramesh stated, “Syama Prasad Mookerjee used to be in league with the Muslim League within the executive in Bengal when (Mahatma) Gandhiji introduced Surrender India motion. SPM used to be singularly chargeable for the partition of Bengal.”

    He additionally tagged a tweet through Congress chief Amitabh Dubey who had slammed BJP IT division head Amit Malviya for his grievance of Gandhi, pronouncing “You might be complicated the Kerala-based IUML he’s speaking about with Jinnah’s Muslim League that took Savarkar’s two-nation idea to its logical conclusion.”

    “The similar Muslim League with whom BJP founder SP Mookerjee and Hindu Mahasabha shaped coalition governments in Bengal, Sind, NWFP (North-West Frontier Province),” Dubey stated.

    Congress’ media division head Pawan Khera hit out on the BJP over its grievance and stated the BJP-RSS have extra wisdom of Pakistan’s politics and Jinnah’s Muslim League as they proportion a ancient ‘jugalbandi’. He stated the NDA executive led through Atal Bihari Vajpayee had despatched IUML chief E Ahamed to Geneva to constitute India.

    “IUML established the most important Sanskrit College in Kerala. The BJP additionally made an alliance with IUML for Nagpur Municipal Company. The omniscient Vishwaguru of WhatsApp nursery, please enrich your wisdom,” Khera claimed in a tweet in Hindi.

    In the meantime, the IUML welcomed Gandhi’s commentary that the Kerala-based celebration is totally secular, pronouncing the Congress chief’s statement got here from his celebration’s enjoy.

    “Rahul Gandhi’s commentary that the Muslim League is a mundane celebration is in response to his celebration’s enjoy. We have a look at it with nice duty. The Muslim League’s shut courting with Congress dates again to the times of Indira Gandhi,” IUML basic secretary P Ok Kunhalikutty stated in a Fb submit.

    BJP nationwide spokesperson and MP Sudhanshu Trivedi claimed a hyperlink between the regional celebration and Jinnah’s outfit, which spearheaded the partition stir amongst Muslims.

    “For the Congress, events reminiscent of AIMIM, Muslim League and Indian Secular Entrance, a West Bengal celebration shaped through a Muslim cleric, are secular and the PFI, a banned radical Islamic organisation, is a cultural frame,” he stated.

    Mocking Gandhi, the BJP chief stated his declare raises a query mark on his knowledge.

    Reacting to the BJP’s grievance, Congress spokesperson Gourav Vallabh stated the celebration Gandhi referred to is IUML which is a registered political celebration in India.

    “Is a registered celebration in India now not a mundane celebration? Does the Election Fee get ineligible events registered? I wish to remind the BJP that this isn’t the celebration with which Syama Prasad Mookerjee aligned to shape the federal government in Bengal,” Vallabh stated at a press convention on the AICC headquarters right here.

    “That Muslim League of Jinnah is other, with which you shaped the federal government. Rahul Gandhi has now not mentioned that Muslim League however the factor is that you’ve got extra love for that celebration, subsequently, you assume that the celebration being mentioned is the only whose chief used to be Jinnah,” he stated, slamming the BJP.

    Vallabh stated he wish to inform the BJP folks that the previous Congress leader used to be now not speaking in regards to the Muslim League of Jinnah on whose mausoleum in Pakistan, BJP co-founder Advani had hailed him and known as him “secular”.

    In 2005, Advani visited Pakistan and praised the neighbouring nation’s founder Jinnah, triggering grievance from inside of his personal celebration.

    Hitting out on the BJP leaders for his or her grievance, Vallabh stated, “so all those that nowadays are speaking about IUML must cross and ask Advani ji,” he stated.