The World Opinion

Tag: Gyanvapi Masjid Shringar Gauri controversy

  • 33 years in the past, like Rajiv Gandhi was once caught at the Babri factor, lately Rahul and Priyanka are caught on Gyanvapi?

    Shreyansh Tripathi, Varanasi: Amidst the Gyanvapi Masjid-Shringar Gauri controversy in Varanasi, the entire topic has reached the court docket. Amidst all of the arguments of the legislation at the doorstep of the court docket, the political setting within the nation has additionally grow to be heated. On one hand all of the BJP leaders are observed status against Kashi Vishwanath temple and Hindu aspect. Alternatively, the leaders of the opposition have described this entire topic as propaganda to divert consideration from the core problems and a conspiracy to destroy the communal setting within the nation. Many political statements have come lately at the Gyanvapi factor. Probably the most tough scenario amongst a majority of these is in entrance of the Congress celebration, which has now not stated anything else overtly in this topic thus far.

    Priyanka Gandhi, who had come to discuss with Kashi Vishwanath temple all through the UP meeting elections, is silent at the entire factor. Priyanka’s silence could also be in query as a result of she could also be the overall secretary in-charge of Uttar Pradesh on behalf of her celebration. Mavens say that the Congress, which has been making rounds of temples earlier than the elections, does now not wish to take any possibility at the factor of Gyanvapi this time. The Congress background additionally comprises its stand on Babri, through which Rajiv Gandhi misplaced energy in UP in an alleged try to align each Hindu and Muslim facets. Now each Priyanka and Rahul don’t wish to give the sort of message at the factor of Gyanvapi, in order that their symbol is of anti-Hindu and it’s going to hurt them within the upcoming elections.

    Senior journalist Yogesh Mishra, who witnessed the Ayodhya temple motion within the 90s, says that the Congress celebration is these days fighting with fierce interior strife. The celebration is already at loggerheads over the insurgency of the G-23 faction, dissatisfaction with the management and the defeat of all of the elections. In this sort of scenario, this can be a giant problem for the Congress celebration, which is surrounded by way of interior protests, to make a observation at the factor of Gyanvapi and Kashi Vishwanath from one aspect. Secondly, the Congress has all the time projected itself as an alternative choice to the BJP. On this possibility recreation, he has all the time attempted to painting himself because the chief of the minorities and the backdoor Muslim electorate had been supporting the Congress in opposition to the BJP. In this sort of scenario, if the Congress makes a observation for anyone aspect, then it’s positive to undergo loss. With Muslims coming in combination, she will be unable to set at the pitch of Narendra Modi’s 80 vs 20 schedule. Alternatively, if he supported the folk of the Hindu aspect, then he would lose his conventional minority vote financial institution.

    Congress suffered loss because of Rajiv Gandhi’s confusion
    Journalist Aparajita Singh says that Rajiv Gandhi were given the lock of Ram Janmabhoomi opened. For this, the order of the court docket was once applied by way of his govt in 40 mins and it was once telecast continue to exist TV. After this, on the time of laying the root stone of Ram temple, Rajiv Gandhi agreed for it on the behest of Devraha Baba. At the moment Kamalapati Tripathi, Hemwanti Nandan Bahuguna and CM ND Tiwari additionally hostile it. The location was once such that Kamalapati Tripathi even stated that if the root stone is laid, the primary shovel will run on my again. However Rajiv Gandhi agreed to ship House Minister Buta Singh to put the root stone. However the VHP took all of the credit score as a result of Rajiv Gandhi may now not inform until the closing second whether or not he was once with the Hindu aspect or now not. On the similar time, Muslims without a doubt separated from the Congress taking into account him with the Hindus. It was once most effective after this that Mulayam Singh and Kanshi Ram emerged in UP.

    Akhilesh’s trail parted from Mulayam’s
    At the statements of Samajwadi Celebration Leader Akhilesh Yadav, Yogesh Mishra says that the observation of the SP leader is a ‘guarded observation’. Talking concerning the instances of Mulayam Singh Yadav, Yogesh Mishra says that after the generation of kar seva began, the then CM Mulayam Singh Yadav stated that even Parinda can not kill at the disputed construction. Mulayam was once observed with the Muslim aspect at the moment and the most important instance of this was once observed when the kar sevaks have been fired upon. However Akhilesh Yadav’s line is totally other from Mulayam Singh. The statements made by way of Akhilesh at the factor of Gyanvapi are balanced statements. He neither took the aspect of the Muslim aspect and stated that the mosque would stay a mosque and neither took the aspect of the Hindu aspect and stated that the a part of Gyanvapi is a part of the temple itself. Akhilesh Yadav most effective stated in his statements that this factor was once raised for the reason that elementary problems will have to now not be sorted. Mayawati additionally has the similar stand as Akhilesh and he or she has additionally given her opinion in balanced phrases.

    BJP’s stand is all the time transparent
    Journalist Arunveer Singh says that BJP’s stand has all the time been transparent. None of its giant leaders can have taken the aspect of the Hindu aspect, however it’s administratively serving to the Hindu aspect from at the back of. The cause of that is that the UP govt raised a large legal professional like Solicitor Normal Tushar Mehta within the Excellent Court docket. Aside from this, all of the backdoor assist was once additionally given by way of the management to put in force the order of the court docket, in order that the survey procedure may also be accomplished in a relaxed method. Arunveer Singh says that even supposing BJP isn’t overtly visual in this factor, however its fortify group Vishwa Hindu Parishad and RSS are in combination within the a part of Kashi Vishwanath temple. VHP has additionally put this schedule in its Kendriya Margdarshak Mandal assembly to be held subsequent month. BJP has given the slogan of Ayodhya tableau previously and Mathura Kashi Baaki Hai. So the stand is apparent for him. Because the BJP is within the central and state govt, it can not talk overtly on it.

  • Gyanvapi Masjid Verdict Reside: Videography in Gyanvapi Masjid… Choice on converting courtroom commissioner for survey shortly, pass judgement on were given the decision typed

    Varanasi: The district courtroom will give its verdict within the Gyanvapi Masjid and Shringar Gauri Temple dispute shortly. The courtroom has to make a decision on two issues. The courtroom has to reserve at the call for to interchange the courtroom commissioner appointed for the survey within the Gyanvapi mosque advanced. Aside from this, a call may also be taken on undertaking survey and videography within the basement of the mosque. Safety has been tightened within the courtroom premises. Most effective the events concerned within the case will cross to courtroom. LIVE Updates

    Court docket evacuated because of safety causes
    The courtroom has been vacated ahead of the decision. Heavy police power has been deployed within the premises.

    Hindu-Muslim aspect attorneys found in courtroom
    Court docket will pronounce its verdict on Gyanvapi Masjid shortly. In the meantime, the safety of the courtroom advanced has been tightened. Legal professionals for Hindu and Muslim facets are provide within the courtroom. In the meantime, Justice Ravi Kumar Diwakar, who’s listening to the case, has were given his order typed.

    Court docket had reserved the verdict
    Within the Gyanvapi Masjid and Shringar Gauri Temple dispute, the district courtroom had reserved the decision after 3 days of listening to. These days the courtroom will give its verdict on this topic. Will there be videography within the basement of the Gyanvapi Masjid advanced? Will the courtroom commissioner appointed for the survey be modified or now not? Court docket’s choice will come on all this. Numerous police forces had been deployed within the courtroom. Previous the verdict of the courtroom used to be to return by way of 12 o’clock however now the verdict will come after lunch. The pass judgement on is writing the decision now.

    Justice Ravi Kumar Diwakar will ship the decision
    The listening to used to be finished for the 3rd day on Wednesday within the courtroom of Civil Pass judgement on (Senior Department) for survey and videography within the basement of the premises between Shringar Gauri and Gyanvapi Masjid dispute. The courtroom had reserved the decision on Would possibly 12 i.e. for as of late. The courtroom advanced became a police cantonment all through the listening to at the utility of the Anjuman Prabandiya Masajid Committee to interchange Ajay Kumar Mishra, the courtroom commissioner appointed for the survey within the Gyanvapi campus by way of the order of the courtroom of Civil Pass judgement on Ravi Kumar Diwakar. Numerous safety forces had been deployed from the involved courtroom to all the advanced.

    Call for to modify courtroom commissioner Ajay Kumar Mishra
    Previous, within the listening to that lasted for 2 hours, suggest Sudhir Tripathi, with the objection to the trade of courtroom commissioner, insisted that survey and videography will have to even be achieved within the basement of Gyanvapi Masjid. For this, he had appealed up to now as neatly, in recognize of which the order of the Survey Fee is happening. He mentioned that simplest from the survey and videography of the basement of the mosque, it is going to be identified whether or not there’s a mosque inside of or whether or not there are different deities rather then the temple and adornment Gauri. In the sort of state of affairs, the courtroom will have to order the management to lend a hand the Survey Fee achieve the basement.

    Acharya’s declare on Shringar Gauri will trade the face of Gyanvapi case

    protest towards survey in mosque premises
    Then again, suggest Abhaynath Yadav and others of the opposition Anjuman Inaztiya Masajid Committee adverse the survey being carried out within the mosque premises, announcing that on March 19, at the utility of the plaintiff, the federal government suggest had filed an objection that the survey used to be now not of the mosque, however of Shringar Gauri. With reference to the proof in the case of the temple. It’s transparent from this that Masjid and Shringar Gauri are other. Even within the case, there is not any point out of survey of the mosque. So there is not any justification for videography in or throughout the Gyanvapi Masjid. He wondered that once the courtroom is agreeing that the mosque isn’t to be surveyed, then why is the mosque being mentioned? It’s alleged that the Court docket Commissioner has up to now achieved the survey complaints on the behest of the plaintiffs. In the sort of state of affairs, their purpose is extra about coming into the mosque than the survey.

    get the pass judgement on commissioned
    Within the listening to, the recommend for the Anjuman Abazniya Masajid Committee and the plaintiffs agreed that as an alternative of the courtroom commissioner, the courtroom itself (civil pass judgement on) will have to cross at the spot and get the fee complaints finished. Anjuman’s legal professional Abhay Nath Yadav mentioned that ‘this courtroom is a temple for me’. I see God within the pass judgement on.’ Arguing for the plaintiff Rakhi Singh, Shivam Gaur mentioned that the applying for trade of courtroom commissioner is an try to misinform the courtroom. The courtroom will have to order the district management to go into and survey the basement of the mosque by way of opening it. If the opposition does now not place confidence in the complaints of the courtroom commissioner, then get the complaints of the courtroom fee achieved. If vital, a coordination committee will have to be shaped.

    that is the entire controversy
    The litigants of this dispute, which began within the courtroom on 18 August 2021, say that there are statues of Maa Shringar Gauri, Lord Ganesha, Hanuman, Adi Vishweshwar, Nandiji and different gods and goddesses within the Gyanvapi mosque premises. Some of these deities are provide at plot quantity 9130 which is adjoining to Kashi Vishwanath Hall. The plaintiff has demanded from the courtroom that the arranging committee of the mosque will have to now not injury those idols. Additionally, Hindu other folks will have to be allowed to have darshan and worship right here.

    What did the Banarasi other folks say at the survey of Gyanvapi Masjid? See flooring file from Vishwanath Hall

    The petition of the Hindu aspect additionally demanded that the courtroom will have to be sure the presence of idols of deities within the mosque premises by way of putting in a fee. Referring to this, by way of appointing the courtroom commissioner, the courtroom had ordered for alleged videography of the mosque premises.

    What does the Muslim aspect say
    The Muslim aspect categorically rejects this declare of the Hindus. Abhay Yadav, recommend for the Muslim aspect mentioned that we imagine that Shringar is the statue of Gauri however it’s outdoor the western wall of the mosque. In the sort of state of affairs, there is not any want for survey by way of going to the mosque. He additionally says that the courtroom has now not ordered any survey to move throughout the mosque. He has additionally wondered the standing of plot quantity 9130 the place Shringar Gauri temple is situated and mentioned that the petitioners have now not submitted any map of the similar to the courtroom.

  • Namaz at 1 o’clock, then namaz at 5 o’clock… who’re the individuals who stopped the survey paintings in Gyanvapi Masjid? perceive the entire topic

    Varanasi: The problem of Gyanvapi Masjid in Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh is heating up. The courtroom has ordered videography of the mosque to analyze the declare that there’s a statue of Shringar Gauri at the western facet of the mosque. For this, groups underneath the management of Courtroom Commissioner Ajay Mishra move to the mosque for videography for 2 days however they don’t get the required luck for the survey. In line with the tips, because of heavy opposition from the folk of Muslim facet, the group isn’t in a position to head within the mosque and the survey paintings isn’t being finished.

    what’s courtroom order
    The litigants of this dispute, which began within the courtroom on 18 August 2021, say that there are statues of Maa Shringar Gauri, Lord Ganesha, Hanuman, Adi Vishweshwar, Nandiji and different gods and goddesses within the Gyanvapi mosque premises. A majority of these deities are provide at plot quantity 9130 which is adjoining to Kashi Vishwanath Hall. The plaintiff has demanded from the courtroom that the arranging committee of the mosque must now not injury those idols. Additionally, Hindu folks must be allowed to have darshan and worship right here. The petition of the Hindu facet additionally demanded that the courtroom must be sure the presence of idols of deities within the mosque premises via putting in a fee. Referring to this, via appointing the courtroom commissioner, the courtroom had ordered for alleged videography of the mosque premises.

    After the order of the courtroom, the survey group led via the Suggest Commissioner reached the Gyanvapi Masjid on Friday, however because of the opposition of the Muslim facet, the group may just now not input the mosque. After this, with the consent of each the events, the time of the following day used to be saved for the survey within the mosque. Day after today the survey used to be to be held at 3 o’clock within the afternoon however the scenario remained the similar as at the first day. The group had to go back to Barang because of heavy opposition.

    who’re the protestors
    The Hindu facet alleges that at the foundation of the gang, an try is being made to forestall them from following the order of the courtroom. Vishnu Jain, one of the most Hindu events, advised that Namaz is held within the mosque at 1 within the afternoon and at 5 within the night. In one of these scenario, the survey paintings can’t be completed sooner than 1 o’clock. Except this, Namaz may be presented within the mosque at 5 o’clock. The Muslim events additionally mentioned that he would now not have the ability to come sooner than 3 o’clock. On account of this, the survey paintings used to be scheduled from 3 o’clock to five o’clock, but if the survey group began making an attempt to go into the mosque at 3 o’clock, a lot of folks provide there protested towards the group coming inside of. .

    Jain advised that those had been the individuals who had come to supply prayers at 1 pm and didn’t return. He didn’t permit the survey group to go into. He termed it as contempt of courtroom order and alleged that one of the most events used to be obstructing the paintings of the courtroom at the foundation of mob lynching whilst the courtroom ordered that the mosque premises must be videographed to be sure that the declare of the Hindu facet isn’t revered. In line with whether or not there are indicators of deities or now not?

    The Gyanvapi-Shringar Gauri controversy began final yr when 5 Hindu ladies moved courtroom in search of permission to worship the idols of Shringar Gauri and different deities allegedly provide within the mosque. Hindus declare that there are statues of many gods and goddesses within the mosque situated on plot quantity 9130. Except this, there may be a Shivling within the basement, which used to be worshiped until the yr 1990. This proves that the mosque used to be as soon as a temple, which has been demolished to construct the present construction.

    What’s the declare of the Muslim facet
    The Association Committee of the Gyanvapi Masjid is opposing the videography within the mosque. The Committee notes that the courtroom has requested for videography best outdoor the barricading of the mosque. As in keeping with the courtroom order, the survey group has already videographed the outdoor of the mosque on the first actual day. Except the Masjid Committee, different Muslims also are opposing the videography within the mosque. AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi has additionally accused BJP of taking political benefit over this.