Enel CEO Francesco Starace photographed in 2019. In an interview with CNBC on Would possibly 24, 2022, Starace mentioned “you’ll be able to produce electrical energy higher, inexpensive, with out the usage of fuel.”
Giulio Napolitano | Bloomberg | Getty Pictures
The CEO of Italian energy company Enel has forged doubt at the endured good thing about the usage of fuel to provide electrical energy, telling CNBC it’s “silly” and that inexpensive and higher possible choices at the moment are to be had.
Talking to CNBC’s Steve Sedgwick on the Global Financial Discussion board, Francesco Starace mentioned the place Europe had sourced its fuel from over time, name-checking each Libya and Russia.
Russia was once the largest provider of petroleum oils and herbal fuel to the EU ultimate 12 months, in step with Eurostat. The bloc is now making an attempt to wean itself off Russian hydrocarbons following the rustic’s invasion of Ukraine.
“I feel this can be a large get up name,” Starace mentioned, including that “an excessive amount of fuel” was once getting used “in a silly manner, as a result of burning fuel to provide electrical energy is, these days, silly.”
As an alternative, Starace mentioned there have been extra horny possible choices.
“You’ll be able to produce electrical energy higher, inexpensive, with out the usage of fuel … Gasoline is a treasured molecule and also you must go away it for … packages the place this is wanted,” he added.
Those commercial makes use of come with chemical packages, the paper business and use within the manufacturing of ceramics and glass, he mentioned.
“Spare fuel for them,” Starace mentioned. “Forestall the usage of fuel for heating, prevent the usage of fuel for producing electrical energy when there are options which might be higher.”
Choice strategies of electrical energy technology come with wind and solar energy, amongst others.
In step with a contemporary file from Ember, a suppose tank concerned with shifting the planet clear of coal to what it calls “blank electrical energy,” fossil fuels have been chargeable for 37% of EU electrical energy technology in 2021.
Breaking down the above determine, Ember’s file — revealed in February — mentioned fossil fuel energy produced 18% of the EU’s electrical energy, a three-year low. Renewables have been chargeable for 37%, whilst nuclear produced 26% of the bloc’s electrical energy ultimate 12 months, Ember mentioned.
Around the Atlantic, initial figures from the U.S. Power Management display that herbal fuel was once utilized in 38.3% of software scale electrical energy technology in the USA in 2021.
Learn extra about power from CNBC Professional
In Starace’s opinion, exchange is coming to Europe, the place the EU has mentioned it needs to be carbon impartial by means of 2050. “General I feel there can be a discount of fuel intake in Europe around the board coming most commonly from the ones, like I mentioned, ‘silly’ makes use of,” he mentioned.
“So burning it to generate electrical energy isn’t sensible anymore, there’s a higher manner,” he mentioned. “Burning it to warmth our houses isn’t clever, there’s a higher manner.”
The Enel Crew — whose primary shareholder is the Italian Ministry of Financial system and Finance — has mentioned it’ll abandon fuel technology by means of 2040. It additionally plans to depart the retail fuel marketplace in 2040.
Starace was once requested if the transfer to net-zero and concentrate on the usage of extra renewables in Europe could be turbocharged by means of the present disaster.
“I feel sure, unquestionably,” he mentioned. “As a result of on best of the economics, on best of the local weather, there’s now [a] safety of provide factor.”
“So you might have a mix of 3 elements, no longer two, so unquestionably there’s an acceleration there,” he added.
He mentioned it might take two or 3 years however, “you’ll begin to see a dent in fuel intake going ahead, no query.”