The World Opinion

Tag: Donald Trump

  • New TikTok ban is poised to advance in Congress

    Rafael Henrique | Sopa Pictures | Lightrocket | Getty Pictures

    WASHINGTON — The U.S. Area International Affairs Committee plans to soak up law Tuesday that will give President Joe Biden the authority to prohibit TikTok, the Chinese language social media app utilized by greater than 100 million American citizens.

    The panel is scheduled to vote on a sequence of China-related expenses Tuesday afternoon, together with one that will revise the longstanding protections that experience shielded vendors of international ingenious content material like TikTok from U.S. sanctions for many years. Offered remaining Friday, H.R. 1153 is predicted to cross the committee on Tuesday.

    The invoice that might in the end ensnare TikTok, owned via China’s ByteDance, best has one sponsor, the committee’s newly seated Republican chairman, Texas Rep. Mike McCaul.

    In most cases, a invoice this new, with just one sponsor, would now not transfer to committee votes simply days after it used to be offered. However the selection of which expenses will advance via a committee is made via every committee’s chairman, so McCaul’s sponsorship is successfully all of the invoice wishes.

    If the measure is authorized via a majority of the committee individuals and referred to the entire Area for a vote, as anticipated, H.R. 1153 will successfully jump frog a number of different proposals to prohibit TikTok that had been in the past offered within the Area and Senate, however have not but complicated throughout the committee procedure.

    After that, McCaul’s invoice would most likely cross the Republican-controlled Area simply. However its destiny within the Democratic majority Senate is unclear.

    Regardless of the sour divisions between the 2 events on just about each main factor, there may be something each Democrats and Republicans overwhelmingly improve: proactive measures to stem China’s rising international affect. And H.R. 1153 may just do this.

    In sensible phrases, the invoice would revise a bunch of regulations referred to as the Berman amendments that had been first enacted close to the top of the Chilly Battle, meant to protect “informational fabrics” like books and magazines from sanctions-related import and export bans.

    Over the years, then again, the Berman amendments had been expanded right into a extensive rule that courts interpreted as prohibiting the federal government from the usage of sanctions powers to dam industry in any informational fabrics, together with virtual content material, to or from a international nation.

    In 2020, TikTok argued effectively in court docket that it used to be coated via the Berman amendments exemption when it beat again makes an attempt via the Trump management to prohibit its distribution via Apple and Google app shops.

    McCaul informed CNBC his invoice would exchange this. “Recently the courts have puzzled the management’s authority to sanction TikTok. My invoice empowers the management to prohibit TikTok or any tool packages that threaten U.S. nationwide safety,” McCaul mentioned in a observation Monday.

    Below McCaul’s invoice, the Berman amendments exemptions that experience secure TikTok previously would now not observe to corporations that interact within the switch of the “delicate non-public information” of American citizens to entities or people based totally in, or managed via, China.

    On first studying, McCaul’s law seems to be broader than probably the most different TikTok expenses which were offered to this point.

    Critics and TikTok lobbyists have argued that the ones prior expenses amounted to punishing the corporate for against the law outdoor the felony gadget. In addition they argue that any ban is tantamount to censorship of content material secure via the First Modification.

    “It could be unlucky if the Area International Affairs Committee had been to censor hundreds of thousands of American citizens,” TikTok spokeswoman Brooke Oberwetter informed CNBC in an e-mail Monday.

    TikTok isn’t any stranger to tough political waters, having been within the crosshairs of U.S. lawmakers since former President Donald Trump declared his goal to ban the app via govt motion in 2020.

    On the time, ByteDance used to be having a look to doubtlessly spin off TikTok to stay the app from being close down.

    In September 2020, Trump mentioned he would approve an association for TikTok to paintings with Oracle on a cloud deal and Walmart on a industrial partnership to stay it alive.

    The ones offers by no means materialized, then again, and two months later Trump used to be defeated via Biden within the 2020 presidential election.

    The Biden management stored up the power. Whilst Biden temporarily revoked the chief orders banning TikTok, he changed them together with his personal, surroundings out extra of a highway map for the way the federal government will have to overview the dangers of an app attached to international adversaries.

    CNBC Politics

    Learn extra of CNBC’s politics protection:

    TikTok has persevered to have interaction with the Committee on International Funding within the U.S., which is beneath the Treasury Division. CFIUS, which evaluates dangers related to international funding offers, is scrutinizing ByteDance’s acquire of Musical.ly, which used to be introduced in 2017.

    The CFIUS evaluation has reportedly stalled, however TikTok spokeswoman Oberwetter mentioned the corporate nonetheless favors the deal.

    “The swiftest and maximum thorough solution to cope with nationwide safety considerations is for CFIUS to undertake the proposed settlement that we labored with them on for almost two years,” she informed CNBC on Monday.

    Within the interim, authorities officers from the FBI and the Division of Justice have publicly warned concerning the risks of the usage of the app, and lots of states have imposed bans of their very own.

    On Monday, the Biden management launched new implementation regulations for a TikTok ban that applies best to federal government-owned gadgets, which used to be handed via Congress in December.

    Previous this month, Sens. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., chair of the Senate Judiciary subcommittee on privateness, and Jerry Moran, R-Kan., a member of the Senate Make a choice Committee on Intelligence, mentioned in a letter that CFIUS will have to “rapidly conclude its investigation and impose strict structural restrictions between TikTok’s American operations and its Chinese language dad or mum corporate, ByteDance, together with doubtlessly keeping apart the corporations.”

    However whilst the chief department scrutinizes TikTok via CFIUS, McCaul and the GOP-controlled Area don’t seem to be ready round for them to behave.

    “TikTok is a safety risk. It permits the CCP [Chinese Communist Party] to govern and observe its customers whilst it gobbles up American citizens’ information for use for his or her malign actions,” McCaul informed CNBC.

    If TikTok-related law seems to be find it irresistible’s transferring rapidly via Congress, that might spook traders, and paintings to the advantage of probably the most corporate’s greatest competition.

    TikTok has been taking marketplace proportion from Fb, Instagram and Google’s YouTube, that have all observed promoting sluggish dramatically over the last 12 months.

    In keeping with Insider Intelligence, TikTok controls 2.3% of the global virtual advert marketplace, striking it at the back of best Google (together with YouTube), Fb (together with Instagram), Amazon and Alibaba.

    — CNBC’s Ari Levy contributed to this tale from San Francisco.

  • Right here’s How Bryan Cranston Handles Other people Who Don’t Suppose Trump’s MAGA Slogan Is Racist

    Actor Bryan Cranston defined to CNN’s Chris Wallace on the weekend precisely why he believes Donald Trump’s “Make The usa Nice Once more” marketing campaign slogan can also be interpreted as racist.

    Cranston at first advised Wallace it was once “crucial” that crucial race principle is taught in the USA and “that we take a look at our historical past a lot the similar, I believe, that Germany has checked out their historical past and involvement within the wars, I and II, and embody.”

    It was once higher to mention, “That is the place we went incorrect. That is the way it went incorrect,” he recommended.

    Cranston then grew to become to Trump’s rallying cry.

    “After I see the ‘Make The usa Nice Once more,’ my remark is, ‘Do you settle for that that may be able to be construed as a racist commentary?’ And the general public, numerous other people, move, ‘How may that be racist? Make The usa Nice Once more?’”

    “I say, so, ‘Simply ask your self, from an African American enjoy, when was once it ever nice in The usa for the African American?’” he endured. ”‘When was once it nice?’ So, if you happen to’re making it nice once more, it’s now not together with them.’”

  • ‘Bombshell’: Rupert Murdoch Leaked Joe Biden 2020 Commercials To Jared Kushner

    Fox Information proprietor Rupert Murdoch passed Donald Trump’s son-in-law and White Space adviser Jared Kushner “confidential data” about then-Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden’s 2020 marketing campaign advertisements ahead of they aired at the conservative community, consistent with a brand new court docket submitting.

    The leaks equipped Kushner with “a preview of Biden’s advertisements ahead of they have been public,” consistent with court docket paperwork launched Monday as a part of the $1.6 billion defamation swimsuit through Dominion Balloting Techniques in opposition to Fox Information.

    “Throughout Trump’s marketing campaign, Rupert equipped Trump’s son-in-law and senior consultant, Jared Kushner, with Fox confidential details about Biden’s advertisements, together with debate technique,” learn the submitting.

    It’s unclear precisely how Murdoch assisted with “debate technique.”

    Dominion is suing Fox Information over the unfounded claims driven through a number of of the community’s hosts that the corporate’s vote casting machines have been used to turn the election in want of Biden.

    In other places within the submitting, Murdoch said Fox Information hosts “recommended” conspiracy theories about Donald Trump profitable the 2020 election.

    Critics described the Murdoch-Kushner information as a “bombshell.”

    “Those movements through Rupert Murdoch appear unlawful,” mentioned Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.). “On the very least, it might seem to be a marketing campaign contribution of vital price, neatly over federal marketing campaign limits.”

    “Trump falsely accused Biden of ‘spying on his marketing campaign,’” commented the innovative PAC MeidasTouch. “Nowadays, it used to be published that Trump and Fox Information colluded to *in fact* undercover agent on Biden’s marketing campaign. Each and every accusation is at all times a confession.”

    Fox has many times defended itself amid the lawsuit, claiming it’s “extra about what’s going to generate headlines than what can face up to prison and factual scrutiny.”

  • Trump Flips Out At ‘Faux’ Fox Information For ‘Selling’ Ron DeSantis

    Former President Donald Trump renewed his assaults on Fox Information on Monday, accusing the community of downplaying his recognition over Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R).

    “FoxNews is selling Ron DeSanctus so exhausting and such a lot that there’s now not a lot time left for Actual Information,” Trump wrote on Fact Social. “The brand new Fox Ballot, that have at all times been purposely horrible for me, has ‘TRUMP Crushing DeSanctimonious,’ however they slightly display it.”

    “Isn’t there a large, stunning, Community which needs to do neatly, and make a fortune but even so? FAKE NEWS!” he added.

    Trump was once relating to a Fox Information ballot revealed Sunday that confirmed him main DeSantis through 15 issues in a hypothetical 2024 presidential face-off. It seems that, the previous president feels the community didn’t give sufficient airtime to the ballot ― which was once discussed on air no less than two times, in line with Forbes.

    Trump has time and again lashed out at Fox Information in fresh months. Whilst most of the community’s hosts proceed to fortify him, some have turn out to be noticeably much less sycophantic within the wake of the midterm elections. Rupert Murdoch, the community’s proprietor, has reportedly sought to distance his media empire from Trump and is popping as an alternative to DeSantis, Trump’s possible rival for the 2024 Republican nomination.

    And in line with courtroom paperwork launched Monday, Murdoch admitted underneath oath all the way through a deposition for Dominion Balloting Programs’ lawsuit in opposition to the community ultimate month that a number of Fox Information hosts had counseled conspiracy theories that the 2020 election was once rigged in opposition to Trump.

    Trump lately referred to as Fox Information a “RINO Community” (Republican in title simplest), after courtroom filings from that case printed that celebrity hosts and managers had despatched textual content messages calling Trump’s 2020 election fraud lies “ludicrous,” “off the rails,” and “thoughts blowingly nuts” whilst publicly lending credence to them.

    DeSantis has now not introduced a 2024 presidential run however is extensively anticipated to take action. Fox Information’ hypothetical match-up confirmed Trump neatly forward of DeSantis, who, in flip, was once greater than 20 issues forward of Nikki Haley, the one Republican but even so Trump to throw her hat within the ring up to now.

  • Rupert Murdoch says some Fox Information anchors ‘recommended’ false election fraud claims in Dominion case

    Contributors of Upward thrust and Face up to take part of their weekly “Reality Tuesday” protest at Information Corp headquarters on February 21, 2023 in New York Town.

    Michael M. Santiago | Getty Photographs Information | Getty Photographs

    Fox Corp. Chairman Rupert Murdoch mentioned some anchors of the corporate’s TV networks parroted false fraud claims within the months following the 2020 election, consistent with new court docket papers out Monday.

    In new filings as a part of Dominion Vote casting Programs’ $1.6 billion defamation lawsuit in opposition to Fox and its networks, Murdoch mentioned he doubted the election fraud claims being aired on Fox Information and Fox Trade Community.

    Murdoch additionally stated that Fox’s TV hosts recommended the false election fraud claims. In unveiled query and solutions from Murdoch’s deposition, when Murdoch used to be requested if he used to be “now conscious that Fox recommended every now and then this false perception of a stolen election,” Murdoch answered, “No longer Fox, no. No longer Fox. However possibly Lou Dobbs, possibly Maria [Bartiromo] as commentators.”

    “A few of our commentators have been endorsing it,” Murdoch mentioned in his responses right through the deposition. “They recommended.”

    Dominion sued Fox and its right-wing cable networks, Fox Information and Fox Trade, arguing the networks and its personalities made false claims that its vote casting machines rigged the result of the 2020 election. Fox Information has constantly denied that it knowingly made false claims in regards to the election, and has mentioned “the core of this example stays about freedom of the click and freedom of speech.”

    In previous court docket papers, Fox mentioned that the previous yr of discovery has proven the corporate performed “no position within the introduction and e-newsletter of the challenged statements — all of which aired on both Fox Trade Community or Fox Information Channel.”

    Murdoch and his son, Fox CEO Lachlan Murdoch, in addition to Fox’s leader criminal and coverage officer Viet Dinh, have been wondered in reference to the lawsuit in contemporary months. Previous in February court docket papers have been launched that confirmed snippets of the proof Dominion collected in the course of the months-long means of discovery and depositions, which additionally incorporated Fox TV personalities.

    Textual content messages and testimony have proven Fox executives and Fox’s TV anchors have been skeptical about claims that the election between Joe Biden, a Democrat, and Trump, a Republican, used to be rigged.

    Dominion mentioned in court docket papers filed Monday that Fox’s protection that the statements made have been opinion “is going nowhere.”

    “Even supposing a few of Fox’s hosts’ statements may just qualify as ‘reviews,’ they’re nonetheless actionable if—as right here—they’re in keeping with false or undisclosed information,” Dominion mentioned.

    A consultant for Fox Information reiterated in a observation on Monday that Dominion mischaracterized the information by way of cherry-picking soundbites: “When Dominion isn’t mischaracterizing the legislation, it’s mischaracterizing the information.”

    Fox has additionally centered Dominion’s private-equity proprietor in court docket papers referring to Dominion’s request for $1.6 billion in damages, pronouncing the company “paid a small fraction of that quantity” to shop for Dominion. Fox has additionally mentioned in court docket papers the $1.6 billion determine has no connection to Dominion’s monetary worth.

    “Dominion’s lawsuit has at all times been extra about what is going to generate headlines than what can face up to criminal and factual scrutiny, as illustrated by way of them now being pressured to slash their fanciful damages call for by way of greater than part one thousand million bucks after their very own knowledgeable debunked its unbelievable claims,” mentioned a Fox spokesperson in a observation Monday. “Their abstract judgment movement took an excessive, unsupported view of defamation legislation that will save you reporters from fundamental reporting and their efforts to publicly smear FOX for protecting and commenting on allegations by way of a sitting President of america will have to be identified for what it’s: a blatant violation of the First Modification.”

    A Dominion spokesperson mentioned Monday, “The damages declare stays. As Fox neatly is aware of, our damages exceed $1.6 billion.”

    Dominion introduced its lawsuit now not simplest in opposition to the TV networks, however father or mother corporate Fox Corp., arguing the father or mother corporate and its most sensible executives performed a task within the unfold of incorrect information about voter fraud by way of Fox’s personalities. A Delaware pass judgement on had dominated Dominion’s case might be expanded past the networks to incorporate Fox Corp.

    Monday’s court docket filings display Murdoch and different Fox executives remained closed to Fox Information CEO Suzanne Scott right through the election protection.

    “I am a journalist at center. I love to be excited about this stuff,” Murdoch mentioned right through his deposition testimony, consistent with court docket papers.

    Tucker Carlson, host of “Tucker Carlson This night,” poses for pictures in a Fox Information Channel studio, in New York.

    Richard Drew | AP

    Previous court docket papers have proven most sensible anchors together with Sean Hannity, Tucker Carlson and Laura Ingraham expressed disbelief in Sidney Powell, a pro-Trump legal professional who aggressively promoted claims of election fraud, on the time.

    Paul Ryan, the previous Republican speaker of the Space and a Fox board member, additionally sat for wondering as a part of the lawsuit. Court docket papers out Monday display Ryan mentioned that “those conspiracy theories have been baseless,” and that the community “will have to exertions to dispel conspiracy theories if and once they pop up.”

    Ryan additionally instructed each Rupert and Lachlan Murdoch “that Fox Information will have to now not be spreading conspiracy theories,” consistent with the filings.

    Dominion alleges that Fox Information anchors have been feeling force from the target market and associated with rival right-wing networks like Newsmax, fueling on-air fraud claims.

    The court docket papers have additionally proven different glimpses of the community’s interior reaction to the occasions that took place on Jan. 6, 2021, the day a violent mob breached the U.S. Capitol in strengthen of then-President Donald Trump.

    Fox executives close down Trump’s try to seem at the community’s air that night time, after he dialed into on-air persona Lou Dobbs’ display within the afternoon, court docket filings display.

    That very same night time, Carlson texted his manufacturer calling Trump “a demonic drive. A destroyer. However he isn’t going to smash us,” relating to Fox’s community and its target market, court docket papers display.

    In the meantime, the night time ahead of Jan. 6, court docket papers confirmed, Murdoch instructed Fox Information CEO Suzanne Scott, “it is been recommended our top time 3 will have to independently or in combination say one thing like ‘the election is over and Joe Biden received.’”

    The lawsuit is being carefully monitored by way of First Modification watchdogs and professionals. Libel complaints are in most cases curious about one falsehood, however on this case Dominion cites a long checklist of examples of Fox TV hosts making false claims even once they have been confirmed to be unfaithful. Media firms are continuously widely safe by way of the First Modification.

    A standing convention within the case is slated for subsequent week, and the trial is about to start out in mid-April.

  • Trump Reportedly Ordered White Space To Try Crack Down On Jimmy Kimmel

    Donald Trump used to be reportedly so furious over Jimmy Kimmel’s TV jokes that White Space officers attempted to get the late-night host censored on orders of the then-president.

    Disney is the mum or dad corporate of ABC, which airs “Jimmy Kimmel Reside.”

    One unnamed former senior Trump management legitimate informed the mag that Trump felt Kimmel used to be being “very cheating and doing issues that [Trump] would have as soon as sued over.”

    Any other unnamed former legitimate informed Rolling Stone: “No one concept it used to be going to modify anything else however DJT used to be keen on it so we needed to do one thing…It used to be doing one thing, most commonly, to mention to [Trump], ‘Hello, we did this.’”

    “I simply stated, ‘Pay attention, if that’s what you need to do, I perceive and I don’t begrudge you for it, however I’m no longer going to do this,’” he informed the “Bare Lunch” podcast.

    It’s no longer transparent if that dialog got here on account of the White Space drive marketing campaign on Disney, however ABC officers relented to Kimmel, who continues to mock the previous president to at the moment.

    Trump, for his phase, has lengthy raged at comics making jokes about him, attacking Kimmel, “Saturday Night time Reside,” Stephen Colbert, Jon Stewart and extra.

    The Day-to-day Beast reported in 2021 that Trump all the way through his presidency requested the Justice Division to analyze late-night comics who made a laugh of him, and requested advisors if the FCC or courts may prevent the jokes.

  • Colin Jost Trashes Trump In ‘Weekend Replace’ Roast Of His East Palestine Seek advice from

    ″Donald Trump visited East Palestine, the website of the hot educate derailment, as a result of Trump generally tries to make himself glance higher via status subsequent to a educate smash,” quipped Jost as a photograph of Giuliani seemed via his facet.

    “The educate that derailed was once sporting extremely poisonous vinyl chloride which I feel is one thing Trump advisable as a treatment for COVID.”

    “What’s subsequent, is he going to seek advice from all of the migrant children he installed cages and provides them a present card to Dave & Buster’s?” requested Jost ahead of the “SNL” target audience groaned.

    You’ll be able to watch extra from Jost and Michael Che within the clip under.

  • Trump Makes An Exhaustive Rant For The Ages As ‘SNL’ Spoofs East Palestine Seek advice from

    Johnson’s Trump, who poked a laugh on the former president’s water bottle-laden talk over with this previous week, fired on all cylinders as he mocked President Joe Biden, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg.

    “I did so much for trains, I made them larger, sooner, much less secure, most likely,” Johnson mentioned.

    “I’m right here paying my respects as a result of your educate exploded and now your birds and fish are all useless, that’s were given not to be so nice – get up within the morning and no longer listen the gorgeous chirping of birds and as an alternative listen trains exploding and derailing in all places.”

    “She’s were given an excessively giant secret for the sort of kooky little girl,” Johnson mentioned.

    “Probably, I may, I don’t know, eeeeeeeeh,” mentioned Fineman as she made a sequence of faces.

    You’ll watch extra of the “SNL” bit underneath.

  • Pass judgement on Unearths Rep. Scott Perry’s Bid To Defend Hundreds Of Recordsdata From Jan. 6 Committee

    The criminal fight over Rep. Scott Perry’s (R-Pa.) telephone has transform clearer.

    In a December 51-page choice unsealed Friday, U.S. District Court docket Leader Pass judgement on Beryl Howell published Perry had asked to defend 2,219 recordsdata from the Jan. 6 committee investigating former President Donald Trump — and his makes an attempt to overturn the 2020 election.

    “The tough public passion in having access to those judicial information can’t be understated,” wrote Howell in her memorandum on Friday.

    Perry’s telephone used to be seized at some point after the FBI raid on Trump’s Mar-a-Lago house to recuperate categorized paperwork in August. Perry claimed it simply held private or work-related recordsdata that had been “none of…the federal government’s trade,” which Howell has since refuted.

    Perry, an in depth best friend of the previous president, sued the Division of Justice (DOJ) to forestall his telephone from being accessed. Then again, he quietly dropped that swimsuit in October whilst proceeding to claim that the Charter’s “speech or debate” clause will have to defend it from investigators.

    Whilst Howell allowed Perry to stay 161 of his information from investigators, she ordered him to divulge 2,055 recordsdata, which integrated 960 of his contacts with the chief department.

    Perry previously said the files on his phone were "none of...the government's business."
    Perry up to now stated the recordsdata on his telephone had been “none of…the federal government’s trade.”

    Tom Williams by the use of Getty Photographs

    “What is apparent is the clause does now not defend Rep. Perry’s…political discussions…with state legislators regarding hearings sooner than them about conceivable election fraud or movements they may just take to problem election leads to Pennsylvania,” she wrote in December.

    The Washington, D.C., decide added this “astonishing view of the scope of the legislative privilege” Perry claimed to be safe by way of “would actually cloak Individuals of Congress with an impressive twin non-disclosure and immunity defend for nearly any in their actions.”

    Perry now not best served as a liaison between the White Area and DOJ legitimate Jeffrey Clark within the days after Trump’s election loss however used to be additionally named as one in all no less than 5 Republicans who sought preemptive pardons sooner than the tip of Trump’s time period.

    Perry used to be up to now subpoenaed to testify by way of the Jan. 6 committee however refused to turn.

    Howell’s ruling that the recordsdata warrant investigation remains to be being debated by way of a three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit Court docket of Appeals, in line with Politico.

    Will have to they reject Perry’s argument that the “speech or debate” clause will have to offer protection to his communications, he must request the whole bench of D.C. Circuit Court docket judges — or the Excellent Court docket itself — to rethink.

  • Mike Pence Sun shades Donald Trump With Line About ‘Admire’

    Former Vice President Mike Pence on Friday reiterated his trust the GOP would have “higher alternatives than my previous operating mate” Donald Trump within the 2024 presidential election.

    “I feel the days name for various management,” Pence advised NBC Information’ Ali Vitali, in but some other transparent distancing of himself from his former boss.

    Citizens had advised Pence they need to “get again to the insurance policies of the Trump-Pence management,” he claimed.

    However “the following factor I pay attention … is that they need to see us and our politics go back to the type of civility and appreciate that American citizens display one some other on a daily basis,” he added, a transparent connection with Trump’s distinctly uncivil discourse.

    Trump declared his 3rd consecutive run for president in November.

    He’s since been joined within the race through former United International locations ambassador Nikki Haley and biotech entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy.

    Pence is but to formally release a marketing campaign.

    “We’re listening, we’re reflecting, we’re speaking to companies,” he advised Vitali. “Via the spring, our circle of relatives expects to have an excessively transparent sense of our calling.”

    Family members soured between Trump and Pence after the latter refused to overturn the 2020 election end result, prompting indignant Trump supporters who stormed the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, to name for Pence’s placing.

    Pence mentioned he hasn’t talked to Trump in recent years.

    The previous veep is lately combating a grand jury subpoena for the Justice Division investigation into Trump’s efforts to turn the election consequence.