The World Opinion

Tag: Delhi HC

  • ‘Whole World Will Come Over…’: Delhi HC Dismisses Plea Seeking Rohingya Children’s School Admission |

    New Delhi: The Delhi High Court on Tuesday refused to entertain the plea seeking directions to the authorities concerned to allow school admissions of Rohingya refugees’ children. A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Social Jurist, an NGO, claimed that denying school admissions to refugee children infringes on their fundamental right to education, as guaranteed by the Indian Constitution and the Right to Education Act, 2009. 

    The bench, led by Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, rejected the PIL, stating the court would not step in on this matter, reported The Hindu. The bench advised that the issue should instead be taken up with the Union Ministry of Home Affairs. 

    “Let’s not get carried away. Child doesn’t mean whole world will come over here. These are international issues, there are ramifications on security, nationality,” The Hindu cited the court’s proceeding. 

    The justices noted that, since the children in question are not Indian citizens, the issue carries international implications. 

    The petitioner argued that the Delhi government and the MCD were denying school admissions to Rohingya children from Myanmar due to their lack of Aadhaar cards, despite all of them residing in the Khajoori Chowk area.

  • Arvind Kejriwal Arrest LIVE Updates | Court Sends Delhi CM To 4-Day ED Remand |

    Arvind Kejriwal Arrest LIVE Updates: Delhi Chief Minister and Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader, Arvind Kejriwal, was today produced before the Rouse Avenue Court, following the conclusion of his custodial remand by the Enforcement Directorate (ED). This development comes in the wake of Kejriwal’s arrest in connection with an alleged excise policy-linked money laundering case. While the ED sought seven days remand of the Delhi CM, the court sent Kejriwal to four-day ED custody.

    On the other hand, the Delhi High Court also heard a public interest litigation (PIL) today, which sought Kejriwal’s removal from the post of Chief Minister of the Government of NCT of Delhi. The hearing was presided over by Justice Manmohan and Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora. The court rejected the PIL saying that there is no leagl bar in the case and Kejriwal can continue to function as the Delhi CM. In another case, the Delhi High Court has also issued a notice to the Enforcement Directorate in response to a petition filed by Kejriwal challenging his arrest and the ED remand granted by the trial court.

    Sunita Kejriwal, the wife of the embattled Chief Minister, asserted that her husband’s health is not well and he is being harrased by the ED. 

    CM Kejriwal’s arrest and court proceedings LIVE here:

    4.43 pm: ED while seeking remand stated that Data in one mobile phone (belonging to the arrestee’s wife) has been extracted and is being analyzed. However, data from the other 4 digital devices seized during search at Arvind Kejriwal’s premises on 21.03.2024 (belonging to the arrestee himself) are yet to be extracted as the arrestee has sought time to provide password/login credentials after consulting with his lawyers.

    3.50 pm: The Rouse Avenue Court sent the Delhi CM to four-day ED remand. Kejriwal’s ED remand will now end on April 1. 

    3.30 pm: Arvind Kejriwal said in court that the ED has only two missions – two crush him and finish Aam Aadmi Party. Kejriwal said that his name is mentioned only four times in the documents of the ED and CBI. Kejriwal told the court that he was arrested on behalf of some statements that are not enough to arrest even a thief.

    02:43: The ASG SV Raju, representing the Enforcement Directorate (ED), stated that Arvind Kejriwal’s statements have been documented, and he provided evasive responses. ASG remarked that Kejriwal is intentionally refusing to cooperate with their investigation. He informed the Rouse Avenue court that during custody, Arvind Kejriwal did not divulge the passwords, resulting in the lack of access to digital data. The ED further said that, “A CM is not above the law.” According to Zee News TV report, The court has reserved the order regarding Enforcement Directorate’s plea seeking 7 days extension of Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal’s custody remand.

    02:38: It is claimed that there was a scam worth Rs 100 crore… Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal asserted before the Rouse Avenue Court during his ED remand hearing that Justice Sanjiv Khanna stated the money trail has not been identified yet… Kejriwal submits that the motive of the ED is to dismantle the Aam Aadmi Party.

    02:31:  CM Kejriwal says in his defence,”The case was initiated by the CBI two years back…The ED submitted a report spanning 25 thousand pages…Numerous ministers have visited my residence over time… I question why the arrest is solely based on verbal statements.” He is speaking in the Rouse Avenue Court. 

    02:24: “He is not proven guilty in any court,” Arvind Kejriwal says in Rouse Avenue Court.

    02:19: Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal says, upon arrival at the Rouse Avenue court, “It is a political conspiracy and the people will give an answer to it.” 

    02:14: ED has requested an extension of seven additional days for the custody of the Delhi CM by remand, says he needs to be confronted with some people linked with excise policy case.

    02:05: Arvind Kejriwal has reached Rouse Avenue Court, and the court hearing has begun. His wife Sunita Kejriwal is also present in the proceeding.

    01:45: Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal being brought out of ED office; to be taken to Rouse Avenue Court. 

    VIDEO | “This is a political conspiracy, the public will give a befitting reply,” says Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal (@ArvindKejriwal) in response to a media query on Delhi L-G VK Saxena’s ‘government cannot run from jail’ remark.

    Kejriwal has been brought to Rouse Avenue Court in… pic.twitter.com/q7n2zYuHKb


    — Press Trust of India (@PTI_News) March 28, 2024

    01:30: Delhi High Court rejects PIL seeking removal of Arvind Kejriwal from the post of Chief Minister of Delhi.

    01:00 PM: Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal will be produced before Rouse Avenue Court at 2 pm today on the expiry of his six days of ED custody.

     

  • Arvind Kejriwal To Be Removed As Delhi CM? High Court To Hear PIL Tomorrow |

    Following the arrest of Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal in the alleged excise policy money laundering case, the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) is refuting any plans to depose Kejriwal from his position. They express their intention to ask permission from the court and continue operating the Chief Minister’s office even from the prison. On Thursday, the Delhi High Court is scheduled to review a public interest litigation (PIL) aiming to remove Arvind Kejriwal from his role as Chief Minister of the Delhi government. Justices Manmohan and Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora will hear the case. 

    Surjit Singh Yadav, represented by lawyer Shashi Ranjan Kumar Singh, submitted the plea after the arrest of Delhi CM, asserting that the retention of Arvind Kejriwal as the Chief Minister of the Government of NCT of Delhi following his arrest by the Enforcement Directorate in connection with the alleged liquor policy scam and money laundering case has diminished the trustworthiness and reputation of the Government of NCT of Delhi among the general populace. 

    What Does The PIL Imply? 

    The PIL is based on the statement of Atishi, a Minister in the Government of Delhi, who conducted interviews with the media on March 21 after Kejriwal’s arrest. In these interviews, she asserted that Arvind Kejriwal would not step down from his position and, if required, would continue to govern from the prison. Before the ED’s arrest of Arvind Kejriwal, the Delhi High Court had declined to issue orders offering temporary safeguards against coercive measures in the case. 

    The plea asserts that if Kejriwal remains as Chief Minister of the Government of NCT of Delhi, it will disrupt due process of justice, and potentially cause a breakdown of the state’s constitutional machinery. 

    Kejriwal was apprehended by the ED on March 21 in relation to the Delhi Excise Policy case associated with money laundering. He was then remanded to the ED custody until March 28. On Wednesday the remand was further increased till 3 April. The case involves suspected irregularities and money laundering concerning the formulation and execution of the 2022 Delhi excise policy, which was later annulled.

  • Delhi Prime Courtroom Upholds Motion Towards TVF Sequence ‘School Romance’ For Obscenity

    House EntertainmentDelhi Prime Courtroom Upholds Motion Towards TVF Sequence ‘School Romance’ For Obscenity

    The Delhi HC has dominated that the language utilized in internet sequence “School Romance,” which is streaming on OTT platform TVF, is filthy, profane, and vulgar and can corrupt the brains of younger folks.

    Delhi Prime Courtroom Upholds Motion Towards TVF Sequence ‘School Romance’ For Obscenity

    Delhi HC Upholds Motion Towards ‘School Romance’: The Delhi Prime Courtroom has dominated that the language utilized in internet sequence “School Romance,” which is streaming at the over-the-top (OTT) platform TVF, is filthy, profane, and vulgar and can deprave and corrupt the brains of younger folks. The obscenity of the language used within the episodes, in keeping with single-judge bench of Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma, was once so excessive that it was once unimaginable for her to listen to within the chamber with out surprising others within the neighborhood. “This court docket notes that this isn’t the language that country’s adolescence or another way voters of this nation use, and this language can’t be known as the ceaselessly spoken language utilized in our nation,” the judgment famous.

    The choose dominated that TVF, the display’s director Simarpreet Singh, and actor Apoorva Arora are vulnerable to face motion below Data Generation (IT) Act’s Sections 67 (publishing or transmitting any subject matter this is lascivious in digital shape) and 67A (punishment for publishing or transmitting subject matter that accommodates sexually particular act). Justice Sharma was once coping with the petitions filed by means of TVF, Singh and Arora towards order of Further Classes Pass judgement on and the Further Leader Metropolitan Justice of the Peace. The ACMM had directed the police to sign in FIRs towards the petitioner below Sections 292 and 294 of the Indian Penal Code and Phase 67 and 67A of the IT Act and the she upheld the ACMM’s order.

    Within the identify of particular person freedom, she stated, such language can’t be equipped to most people or portrayed to the arena as though that is the language our country and younger folks at instructional establishments talk. “Preserving so, will quantity to a perilous development and can be towards public passion,” the choose stated. The court docket stated that the language does no longer go check of morality, decency, and neighborhood check of a not unusual guy.

    “The language which is being lately known as standard faculty tradition and way of life is certain to percolate to university going youngsters since it’s unclassified and the next day could also be known as standard faculty tradition, for the reason that new technology will be told from the older technology. It’s going to be a tragic day for society in case the similar vulgar and obscene language is spoken in colleges, streets and homes within the identify of latest tradition of the scholars,” the order learn.

    With the exception of for the heading, the content material is attributed to IANS.

    Printed Date: March 7, 2023 8:08 PM IST

  • Freedom of selection in marriage essence of private liberty: Delhi HC

    By way of PTI

    NEW DELHI: Watching that freedom of selection in marriage is an “intrinsic phase” of the Charter and questions of religion have “no bearing” at the freedom to select a lifestyles spouse, the Delhi Prime Courtroom has mentioned the police are anticipated to “act expeditiously and with sensitivity” for cover of {couples} apprehending hostility from others together with members of the family.

    The court docket’s statement got here whilst coping with bail pleas coming up from a case involving an alleged try to homicide and bodily attack at the complainant guy by way of the circle of relatives of the girl, who married him towards the needs of her circle of relatives.

    The members of the family of the spouse of the complainant kidnapped them and brutally beat him up, amputated his personal phase with an awl and in addition inflicted stab accidents, consistent with the grievance.

    The court docket mentioned it used to be “unlucky” that important steps for making sure the security and safety of the couple weren’t initiated by way of the police station involved on their grievance after they had been anticipated to behave with promptitude and such a lapse can’t be permitted and thus referred to as for motion towards the ones accountable.

    The court docket additionally requested the Delhi Police Commissioner for taking important measures for sensitising police officers in coping with such court cases.

    “The liberty of selection in marriage based on the regulation is an intrinsic a part of Article 21 of the Charter of India. Even the questions of religion don’t have any referring to a person’s freedom to select a lifestyles spouse and are the essence of private liberty,” mentioned Justice Anoop Kumar Mendiratta in a contemporary order.

    “Anywhere the lifestyles and liberty of any person is anxious, particularly in instances of {couples} legally marrying out of their very own loose will and volition, the police are anticipated to behave expeditiously and with sensitivity based on the regulation and take important measures for the security and protection of candidates involved, in the event that they apprehend hostility and considerations for his or her protection from other quarters together with their very own members of the family,” the court docket mentioned.

    “The behavior of the police officers involved on this regard (on this case) is depreciable and must be regarded into and important motion taken. This type of lapse can’t be permitted on behalf of the police. A duplicate of this order be accordingly forwarded to the Commissioner of Police, Delhi Police for taking important measures for sensitising police officers in coping with such court cases, below intimation to this Courtroom, inside a duration of 4 weeks,” ordered the court docket.

    Making an allowance for the grave nature of the offence and the “ghastly way during which the attack used to be made,” the court docket refused to grant bail to the mum and the grandmother of the spouse who allegedly participated within the attack.

    The court docket, then again, granted bail to the sister of the spouse on a non-public bond of Rs 25,000 and one surety of the like quantity, noting that “no energetic position seems to were attributed to her.”

    NEW DELHI: Watching that freedom of selection in marriage is an “intrinsic phase” of the Charter and questions of religion have “no bearing” at the freedom to select a lifestyles spouse, the Delhi Prime Courtroom has mentioned the police are anticipated to “act expeditiously and with sensitivity” for cover of {couples} apprehending hostility from others together with members of the family.

    The court docket’s statement got here whilst coping with bail pleas coming up from a case involving an alleged try to homicide and bodily attack at the complainant guy by way of the circle of relatives of the girl, who married him towards the needs of her circle of relatives.

    The members of the family of the spouse of the complainant kidnapped them and brutally beat him up, amputated his personal phase with an awl and in addition inflicted stab accidents, consistent with the grievance.

    The court docket mentioned it used to be “unlucky” that important steps for making sure the security and safety of the couple weren’t initiated by way of the police station involved on their grievance after they had been anticipated to behave with promptitude and such a lapse can’t be permitted and thus referred to as for motion towards the ones accountable.

    The court docket additionally requested the Delhi Police Commissioner for taking important measures for sensitising police officers in coping with such court cases.

    “The liberty of selection in marriage based on the regulation is an intrinsic a part of Article 21 of the Charter of India. Even the questions of religion don’t have any referring to a person’s freedom to select a lifestyles spouse and are the essence of private liberty,” mentioned Justice Anoop Kumar Mendiratta in a contemporary order.

    “Anywhere the lifestyles and liberty of any person is anxious, particularly in instances of {couples} legally marrying out of their very own loose will and volition, the police are anticipated to behave expeditiously and with sensitivity based on the regulation and take important measures for the security and protection of candidates involved, in the event that they apprehend hostility and considerations for his or her protection from other quarters together with their very own members of the family,” the court docket mentioned.

    “The behavior of the police officers involved on this regard (on this case) is depreciable and must be regarded into and important motion taken. This type of lapse can’t be permitted on behalf of the police. A duplicate of this order be accordingly forwarded to the Commissioner of Police, Delhi Police for taking important measures for sensitising police officers in coping with such court cases, below intimation to this Courtroom, inside a duration of 4 weeks,” ordered the court docket.

    Making an allowance for the grave nature of the offence and the “ghastly way during which the attack used to be made,” the court docket refused to grant bail to the mum and the grandmother of the spouse who allegedly participated within the attack.

    The court docket, then again, granted bail to the sister of the spouse on a non-public bond of Rs 25,000 and one surety of the like quantity, noting that “no energetic position seems to were attributed to her.”

  • Bengaluru girl means Delhi HC to forestall her good friend from going in another country to go through euthanasia

    Via On-line Table

    CHENNAI: A 49-year-old Bengaluru girl approached the Delhi Prime Courtroom on Wednesday in search of to forestall her male good friend from travelling to Switzerland to go through euthanasia.

    Consistent with Bar and Bench, the HC has been knowledgeable that the 48-year-old guy from Noida used to be identified with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Power Fatigue Syndrome – a posh, debilitating, long-term neuro inflammatory illness – in 2014, and because then, his situation has worsened such a lot so that he’s now totally bed-ridden.

    The petitioner has stated that the affected person used to be present process Fecal Microbiota Transplantation remedy in All India Institute of Scientific Sciences (AIIMS) for his situation, however confronted “donor availability problems” throughout the pandemic, because of which he may just now not proceed the similar.

    The good friend in her writ petition to the top courtroom claims that the 42-year-old affected person is allegedly making plans to go through euthanasia thru Zurich-based organisation Dignitas, which supplies help to international nationals, The Quint studies.

    The petition, Bar and Bench added,  thus sought a course to the Union Minister of Exterior Affairs (MEA) to reject emigration clearance to the person since he has made false claims prior to Indian in addition to international government for buying go back and forth clearance.

    The petitioner additionally sought a course to the Union Ministry of Well being and Circle of relatives Welfare (MoHFW) to represent a clinical board to inspect the person’s well being and supply important help, making an allowance for his odd well being situation, the file stated.

    The petition filed thru Recommend Subhash Chandran KR might be heard subsequent week.

    CHENNAI: A 49-year-old Bengaluru girl approached the Delhi Prime Courtroom on Wednesday in search of to forestall her male good friend from travelling to Switzerland to go through euthanasia.

    Consistent with Bar and Bench, the HC has been knowledgeable that the 48-year-old guy from Noida used to be identified with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Power Fatigue Syndrome – a posh, debilitating, long-term neuro inflammatory illness – in 2014, and because then, his situation has worsened such a lot so that he’s now totally bed-ridden.

    The petitioner has stated that the affected person used to be present process Fecal Microbiota Transplantation remedy in All India Institute of Scientific Sciences (AIIMS) for his situation, however confronted “donor availability problems” throughout the pandemic, because of which he may just now not proceed the similar.

    The good friend in her writ petition to the top courtroom claims that the 42-year-old affected person is allegedly making plans to go through euthanasia thru Zurich-based organisation Dignitas, which supplies help to international nationals, The Quint studies.

    The petition, Bar and Bench added,  thus sought a course to the Union Minister of Exterior Affairs (MEA) to reject emigration clearance to the person since he has made false claims prior to Indian in addition to international government for buying go back and forth clearance.

    The petitioner additionally sought a course to the Union Ministry of Well being and Circle of relatives Welfare (MoHFW) to represent a clinical board to inspect the person’s well being and supply important help, making an allowance for his odd well being situation, the file stated.

    The petition filed thru Recommend Subhash Chandran KR might be heard subsequent week.

  • Delhi HC seeks police stand on Alt Information co-founder Mohammed Zubair’s plea in opposition to police remand

    By means of PTI

    NEW DELHI: The Delhi Top Courtroom on Friday sought the stand of Delhi police on a plea through Alt Information co-founder Mohammed Zubair difficult the legality of his police remand in a case associated with an alleged objectionable tweet he had posted in 2018 in opposition to a Hindu deity.

    Justice Sanjeev Narula issued realize at the petition and granted two weeks to the investigating company to report its reaction to the petition which demanding situations the legality and proprietary of the trial courtroom’s June 28 order granting 4 days of custody of Zubair to the police.

    The pass judgement on indexed the case for additional listening to on July 27 and mentioned that lawsuits prior to the trial courtroom would proceed with out being influenced through the existing lawsuits.

    The courtroom famous that the remand order would expire on July 2 and mentioned, “The police remand order is for 4 days. I will be able to have to listen to the opposite aspect. I will be able to factor realize”.

    Zubair was once arrested through the Delhi Police on June 27 for allegedly hurting non secular sentiments thru one among his tweets and was once despatched to one-day police custody through the trial courtroom at the identical day.

    After being produced at the expiry of his one-day custodial interrogation, his custody was once prolonged through some other 4 days through Leader Metropolitan Justice of the Peace Snigdha Sarvaria.

    As in line with the trial courtroom’s order, Zubair could be subsequent produced prior to it on July 2 upon the expiry of the 4 days of police remand.

    Previous this month, a case in opposition to Zubair was once registered below sections 153A (selling enmity between other teams on grounds of faith, race, native land, language, and so on.) and 295A (planned and malicious act supposed to outrage non secular emotions) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

    Police mentioned the case was once registered at the criticism of a Twitter person who accused him of wounding non secular sentiments.

    Police, whilst in the hunt for an extension of Zubair’s custody through 5 days, had advised the trial courtroom that the accused was once allegedly following a development the place he used non secular tweets so that you could get well-known and that there was once a planned effort to create social disharmony and harm non secular emotions.

    The investigating company had additionally mentioned that the accused joined the probe however didn’t cooperate and more than a few subject matter from his telephone was once deleted.

    Suggest Vrinda Grover, showing for the accused, had adverse the police plea alleging that the company had referred to as Zubair for wondering in another case however he was once arrested within the provide case in haste.

    Zubair’s recommend had additionally mentioned that the picture which the accused used within the tweets is of an outdated Hindi movie from 1983 through Hrishikesh Mukherjee, ‘Kissi Se Na Kehna’, and that the movie was once now not banned.

    The trial courtroom had, alternatively, rejected the submission announcing it was once of no help to the accused at this degree.

    “Taking into consideration that cell phone/computer of accused utilized by him for posting the tweet in query is to be recovered on the example of accused Mohammed Zubair from his Bangalore place of abode and that accused has remained non-cooperative and the disclosure remark on document, 4 days PC (police custody) remand of accused is granted since accused is to be taken to Bangalore,” the trial courtroom had mentioned in a 3-page order.

  • Insert disclaimers on illegality of intercourse choice: Delhi HC tells Jayeshbhai Jordaar makers

    Through PTI

    NEW DELHI: The Delhi Prime Courtroom Tuesday requested the makers of Jayeshbhai Jordaar to insert in sure scenes a disclaimer regarding the illegality of the follow of intercourse choice of a foetus and gave its nod to the discharge of the Ranveer Singh-starrer movie.

    A bench headed by means of Justice Navin Chawla, whilst listening to a PIL in the hunt for deletion of a undeniable scene from the film which purportedly denounces feminine foeticide, requested Yash Raj Motion pictures to insert a outstanding disclaimer in two scenes and mentioned, “if you’re sending a message, ship it loud”.

    “We respect the message however it’s important to inform those that it’s an offence,” mentioned the bench — additionally comprising Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri — which took on document the filmmakers endeavor to insert the related warnings.

    “Make certain that the disclaimer seems at each the days,” it informed the filmmakers.

    The related portion of the movie which is scheduled to be launched on Would possibly 13 used to be additionally performed for the court docket all through the process the listening to.

    Senior suggest Jayant Mehta, showing for the filmmaker, mentioned that the movie does now not violate any regulation and the disclaimer can be inserted prominently within the relating to scenes in English in addition to Hindi.

    “Senior recommend for respondent no.4 (Yash Raj Motion pictures), with out prejudice to his submissions, has agreed to depict additional caution/disclaimer all through the working of each the scenes. Respondent no.4 is made sure to the observation made on behalf of its senior recommend,” the court docket recorded.

    The court docket additionally granted one week to the filmmakers so as to add the disclaimer to the opposite codecs of the scene as smartly, together with YouTube.

    The senior recommend for the filmmaker knowledgeable the court docket that the film starts with a disclaimer which takes all of the display and the tale is “a couple of social evil and blind religion in sure practices” and its message needs to be observed from its context.

    Central executive attorney Anurag Ahluwalia mentioned that the movie has been qualified by means of the CBFC matter to the insertion of a disclaimer.

    Attorney Pawan Prakash Pathak, showing for petitioner ‘Early life In opposition to Crime’, contended that sure scenes within the movie promoted intercourse variety tactics which can be a contravention of the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Ways Act.

    The court docket informed the petitioner that even though his reason used to be just right, not anything remained in mild of the opposite birthday party agreeing to insert a disclaimer.

    “The article of the Act is prohibition. However that doesn’t imply that the sick from society has disappeared. In poor health remains to be there.. Take a look at the context during which it’s coming. It’s appearing to what extent other people move to resolve all this. There’s not anything on this now. They’re creating a shaggy dog story of the people who find themselves doing all this. Respect the message this is despatched,” the court docket mentioned.

    The petitioner didn’t press the petition any longer.

    On Would possibly 9, the prime court docket had expressed its worry over the scene appearing the intercourse choice of a foetus within the trailer of the movie and informed its makers that the unlawful follow cannot be trivialised or proven to be performed in a regimen approach.

    It had then requested the display the related parts of the film to it and mentioned that the “general message” is also just right nevertheless it can’t be projected {that a} pregnant girl can also be taken to any sanatorium with a sonogram device to seek out the intercourse of the foetus.

    “You’re taking directions differently we will be able to have to stick,” it had mentioned.

    In its petition, the petitioner had mentioned that the scene within the trailer appearing the “use of ultrasound generation in a sanatorium to resolve the intercourse of the foetus and abortion method in case of the woman kid” is illegitimate which restricts commercial of ultrasound method for intercourse choice.

    “Segment 3, 3A, 3B, 4, 6 & 22 of The Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Ways Act, 1994 (PC & PNDT Act) squarely prohibit the commercial of ultrasound method for intercourse choice and the target of the act additionally negates such practises, what’s being contested is the one deletion of the sanatorium scene and promotion of the ultrasound method”, the petition said.

    The petition mentioned that whilst the petitioner appreciates the problem of feminine foeticide being raised and consciousness being created some of the public however the issue is that the ultrasound scene is proven overtly with none censor.

  • Delhi HC seeks Centre’s stand on ex-Bengal secretary Alapan Bandyopadhyay’s assessment plea regarding CAT court cases

    By way of PTI

    NEW DELHI: The Delhi Top Courtroom on Friday sought the Centre’s stand on a plea via former West Bengal leader secretary Alapan Bandyopadhyay in the hunt for a assessment of the order disregarding his problem to the switch of his software regarding court cases in opposition to him from Kolkata to New Delhi via the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT).

    A bench of Justices Rajiv Shakdher and Jyoti Singh issued realize at the assessment petition and requested the central executive to document its reaction to Bandyopadhyay’s stand that he didn’t obtain an excellent alternative to provide his case ahead of it was once reserved for orders.

    The subject can be heard subsequent on Might 20.

    Senior suggest Abhishek Manu Singhvi, showing for the previous leader secretary of West Bengal, argued that he didn’t get a complete crack of the whip as their request to the court docket to grant a ‘passover’ i.e. to absorb the case after a while at the similar day because of unavailability of the senior suggest was once denied and in consequence, a junior legal professional needed to make submissions and oppose the senior legislation officials who seemed for the Centre.

    Further Solicitor Basic Vikramjit Banerjee mentioned that he was once opposing the assessment petition and knowledgeable the court docket that the subject was once argued at duration via the legal professional showing on behalf of the petitioner.

    Justice Shakdher noticed it was once a tradition of the court docket to grant the primary request for a passover and advised the senior legal professional that he expects him to provide honest suggest within the subject.

    On March 7, a bench of then Leader Justice DN Patel and Justice Singh disregarded Bandyopadhyay’s problem to the switch of his software regarding court cases in opposition to him from Kolkata to New Delhi and mentioned that the switch order was once handed throughout the 4 corners of the legislation.

    The top court docket had mentioned that the reason for motion arose in New Delhi because the disciplinary court cases, in addition to the inquiry court cases, had been initiated and happening right here.

    Bandyopadhyay had first moved the Kolkata bench of the CAT to problem the court cases initiated in opposition to him in an issue comparable not to attending a gathering chaired via Top Minister Narendra Modi to talk about the consequences of cyclone ‘Yaas’ on the Kalaikunda Air Power Station on Might 28 ultimate yr.

    The court cases in opposition to the petitioner had been initiated via the Ministry of Staff and Public Complaint and Pensions.

    Bandyopadhyay, who was once no longer launched via the state executive, selected to retire on Might 31, 2021, his authentic date of superannuation ahead of having been given an extension of 3 months from that date.

    The Union executive had filed a switch petition ahead of the main bench of CAT, which on October 22 ultimate yr allowed the switch of Bandyopadhyay’s software to itself in New Delhi.

    On January 6, the Ideally suited Courtroom had put aside a Calcutta Top Courtroom order which quashed the CAT switch order and granted Bandyopadhyay the freedom to assail the similar ahead of the jurisdictional top court docket.

    The apex court docket had delivered its verdict on a plea filed via the Centre difficult the October 29, 2021 order of the Calcutta Top Courtroom.

  • Delhi HC moves down Centre’s memorandum requiring political nod for non-public overseas visits through judges

    Via PTI

    NEW DELHI: The Delhi Prime Court docket has struck down a central executive workplace memorandum requiring the judges of the Very best Court docket and Prime Courts to procure political clearance for personal visits in another country, announcing that the sort of situation is “uncalled for” in view of the prime workplaces the judges cling.

    A bench headed through Justice Rajiv Shakdher, whilst coping with a problem to the mandate, famous that after sure tips have been issued through the central executive in 2011 in terms of the overseas visits through judges of the Very best Court docket and the Prime Courts, it had “disbursed with the requirement of acquiring political clearance for personal overseas visits” and the similar method should had been adopted this time as smartly.

    “In our view, within the immediate O.M (Workplace Memorandum), the similar regime should had been adopted. Due to this fact, insofar as the moment O.M. dated July 13, 2021, calls for judges of the Very best Court docket and the Prime Courts to hunt political clearance for personal overseas visits, it’s uncalled for, given the prime workplaces they’re conserving, particularly given the truth that not anything has modified for the reason that 2011 tips have been issued,” mentioned the bench, additionally comprising Justice Jasmeet Singh, in its order handed on April 1.

    The Centre, represented through Solicitor Normal Tushar Mehta, defended the OM issued through the Central executive during the Ministry of Exterior Affairs and informed the court docket that data relating to judges travelling in another country is needed in order that in case of any emergency needful help may also be prolonged in another country.

    The prime court docket opined that the stand overlooks the truth that details about judges’ shuttle plans is understood the instant a request is made to the Consular, Passport, and Visa Department of the Ministry of Exterior Affairs for issuance of a “Visa Improve Notes Verbale”.

    In the end, if an Indian citizen, which incorporates a pass judgement on, is stuck in a disaster, Indian embassies/Missions are duty-bound to increase help to the level conceivable as and once they obtain data of such an prevalence, the court docket added.

    “Accordingly, the OM dated July 13, 2021, to the level it calls for the judges of the Very best Court docket and the Prime Courts to hunt political clearance qua non-public visits in another country, is struck down,” the prime court docket ordered.

    The petitioner Aman Vachar challenged the situation at the floor that requiring judges of Constitutional Courts i.e., the Very best Court docket and the Prime Courts to hunt political clearance qua non-public visits to overseas international locations infringed their proper of privateness and in addition degraded and reduced the prime workplace that they cling.