Tag: Cyberbullying

  • What Is The Right Age To Let Children Use Social Media? Check 3-Step Parenting Guide In Digital Age | Parenting News

    We live in a world dominated by screens, and the mantra for survival is consumption without overindulgence. However, striking the right balance may not be as easy as it seems, especially in the case of children. Here is where the role of parents becomes immensely important. Parents need to help their children navigate the tremulous landscape of social media without getting lost in its dangerous twists and turns.

    “The internet, while a powerful tool for information and connectivity, has been implicated in contributing to anxiety among children. One prominent factor is the pervasive influence of social media. Kids are exposed to curated versions of others’ lives, fostering unrealistic standards and a constant sense of comparison. Cyberbullying on these platforms further adds to the stress, creating an environment where online interactions can be a source of anxiety,” shares Dr Munia Bhattacharya, Consultant Psychologist with Marengo Asia Hospitals, Gurgaon.

    Risks and Benefits of a Social Media Presence

    The dangers extend to severe body image issues, threats to the sense of identity, the risk of physical harm, a distraction from life goals, and, contrary to popular belief, isolation. All of these can cause significant psychological damage, which may be difficult to come back from.

    On the other hand, social media can enhance your child’s learning by extending and sharing school lessons. It’s a platform for exploring hobbies, fostering creativity, and improving mental health through connections with family and friends.

    Mr Sandeep Kumar, Founder and Managing Director – Baatu Technologies further emphasizes, “At this juncture, the most important question seems to be, ‘What is age-appropriate exposure and how can it help mitigate the mentioned ill effects?’ Unfortunately, there is no right answer to this. It depends on the maturity level and cognitive abilities of the child. However, the general rule of thumb is that it is only after the age of 13 that children should be allowed on social media. Even then, parents need to monitor their children and be a part of their virtual lives.”

    Tips for Parents For Navigating Social Media In Kids’ Lives

    Set clear boundaries

    When it comes to parenting in the digital age, the number one decree is to set clear boundaries and parameters of usage in terms of the hours of use, banned sites, and the kind of content that can be accessed. Announcing mandates, however, may do more harm than good. A better way of going about this would be to talk to your child about your concerns and come up with these limits together.

    mindful monitoring

    The second step is to ensure that the rules that you have come up with are being followed. The best way to do this is to be in regular communication with your child about their social media presence. Along with this, gadgets that allow parents to monitor virtual activity are very helpful. Such devices enable carers to stay abreast of any challenges that their wards may be facing and help them deal with them effectively.

    Leading by example

    Highlighting your own mistakes and their consequences is also helpful, as that would help them see you as fallible humans who are making an effort to improve their lives. It would also enable them to look more kindly at their mistakes and give them the courage to start again with the rules in mind.

  • Seattle Colleges Sue Tech Giants Over Social Media Hurt

    SEATTLE (AP) — The general public college district in Seattle has filed a unique lawsuit towards the tech giants at the back of TikTok, Instagram, Fb, YouTube and Snapchat, searching for to carry them in control of the psychological well being disaster amongst formative years.

    Seattle Public Colleges filed the lawsuit Friday in U.S. District Court docket. The 91-page grievance says the social media firms have created a public nuisance by way of concentrated on their merchandise to kids.

    It blames them for worsening psychological well being and behavioral issues together with nervousness, despair, disordered consuming and cyberbullying; making it harder to teach scholars; and forcing colleges to take steps reminiscent of hiring further psychological well being execs, creating lesson plans concerning the results of social media, and offering further coaching to academics.

    “Defendants have effectively exploited the prone brains of teenybopper, hooking tens of tens of millions of scholars around the nation into certain comments loops of over the top use and abuse of Defendants’ social media platforms,” the grievance stated. “Worse, the content material Defendants curate and direct to formative years is simply too incessantly damaging and exploitive ….”

    Meta, Google, Snap and TikTok didn’t in an instant reply to requests for remark Saturday.

    Whilst federal legislation — Phase 230 of the Communications Decency Act — is helping offer protection to on-line firms from legal responsibility bobbing up from what third-party customers submit on their platforms, the lawsuit argues that provision does no longer offer protection to the tech giants’ habits on this case.

    Whilst masses of households are pursuing complaints towards the corporations over harms they allege their kids have suffered from social media, it’s no longer transparent if another college districts have filed a grievance like Seattle’s.

    Inner research printed by way of Fb whistleblower Frances Haugen in 2021 confirmed that the corporate knew that Instagram negatively affected youngsters by way of harming their frame symbol and making consuming issues and ideas of suicide worse. She alleged that the platform prioritized earnings over protection and concealed its personal analysis from traders and the general public.

    “Plaintiff isn’t alleging Defendants are answerable for what third-parties have stated on Defendants’ platforms however, somewhat, for Defendants’ personal habits,” the lawsuit stated. “Defendants affirmatively suggest and advertise damaging content material to formative years, reminiscent of pro-anorexia and consuming dysfunction content material.”

    The lawsuit says that from 2009 to 2019, there was once on reasonable a 30% build up within the choice of Seattle Public Colleges scholars who reported feeling “so unhappy or hopeless virtually on a daily basis for 2 weeks or extra in a row” that they stopped doing a little standard actions.

    The varsity district is looking the courtroom to reserve the corporations to forestall growing the general public nuisance, to award damages, and to pay for prevention training and remedy for over the top and problematic use of social media.

  • Fortnite maker Epic Video games to pay $520 million in fines in FTC agreement

    Basic view of the primary level all through the Fortnite Global Cup Finals e-sports tournament at Arthur Ashe Stadium, Flushing, New York, July 26, 2019.

    Catalina Fragoso | USA TODAY Sports activities | Reuters

    Epic Video games, the developer and writer of the online game Fornite, pays $520 million in fines to settle with the FTC over violations of the Youngsters’s On-line Privateness Coverage Act (COPPA).

    The FTC had alleged that Epic paired kids and youths “with strangers,” uncovered them to “bad and psychologically traumatizing problems,” and did not introduce good enough parental regulate techniques.

    “Protective the general public, and particularly kids, from on-line privateness invasions and darkish patterns is a most sensible precedence for the Fee, and those enforcement movements shed light on to companies that the FTC is cracking down on those illegal practices,” FTC chair Lina Khan stated in a commentary.

    Epic pays two fines, together with a $245 million advantageous towards Fortnite’s in-game retailer and refund techniques, and any other $275 million advantageous to deal with kid privateness issues.

    On the core of the agreement used to be the FTC’s argument that Epic made planned choices to attraction to kids, bringing up “track, famous person, and emblem partnerships,” which integrated offers with Travis Scott, Ariana Grande, and an in depth selection of Fortnite-themed products.

    Regardless of the planned choice to marketplace to kids, the FTC stated Epic did not “remedy,” or cope with, COPPA violations. The FTC known as Epic’s makes an attempt to deal with the harassment factor on-platform as “weak-willed,” noting that it took two years after release for Epic to “in any case [introduce] parental controls to the sport.”

    Epic allegedly did not make choices that may safeguard kids and meet federal rules, regardless of having analysis that indicated that some options, together with voice chat, introduced “a possibility in relation to detrimental social conduct,” in step with Epic inner stories cited by means of the FTC.

    “All of the whilst, children were bullied, threatened, and burdened, together with sexually, thru Fortnite,” the FTC criticism learn.

    The agreement is huge, even by means of the FTC’s requirements, however nowhere close to the $5 billion advantageous that Meta, previously referred to as Fb, used to be ordered to pay in 2019.

    However, it represents a large rap for an organization that accumulated $5.5 billion in benefit between 2018 and 2019, in step with court docket paperwork reviewed by means of The Verge.

    “In fact, to permit parental controls, folks would first wish to know they existed,” the FTC criticism famous. Most effective in 2019, “lengthy after Epic got empirical proof pointing to very large numbers of Fortnite avid gamers” below the age of 13, did Epic introduce an age verification machine.

    “The rules have no longer modified, however their software has developed and long-standing trade practices are not sufficient. We approved this settlement as a result of we wish Epic to be at the vanguard of shopper coverage and give you the highest revel in for our avid gamers,” Epic stated in a commentary.