Tag: Badruddin Ajmal

  • AIUDF Chief Badruddin Ajmal Claims Parliament Building Built On Waqf Land, Sparks Row |

    AIUDF (All India United Democratic Front) Chief Badruddin Ajmal stirred controversy on Wednesday, alleging that the Parliament building and surrounding areas in Delhi, including Vasant Vihar and even the airport, have been built on Waqf property. Speaking to reporters, Ajmal stated that using Waqf land without permission is a serious issue, warning that the government might lose their Ministry due to the ongoing Waqf Board controversy.
    AIUDF Chief’s remarks came after Union Minister Kiren Rijiju’s appeal on Wednesday for all MPs to back the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2024. Rijiju emphasized that India holds the largest number of Waqf properties, which should be leveraged for the welfare of the Muslim community.

    Rijiju wrote in a post on X (formerly Twitter) “We appeal to all MPs to support the Waqf Amendment Bill. Parliament & Municipal buildings, Airports, cities & villages need protection. India has largest Waqf properties in the world. We must use them for the welfare of women, children & backward groups within Muslim community.” 

    BJP Slams AIUDF Chief 

    Slamming Badruddin Ajmal’s claims, BJP national spokesperson Pradeep Bhandari said, “Badruddin Ajmal is doing the politics of appeasement because his entire vote bank voted for Congress in this Lok Sabha election and he lost the polls. But I would like to tell these leaders – do not insult the Constitution of the country while indulging in your appeasement politics. Constitution speaks of secularism and secularism states that we cannot lease out the sovereignty of the country to any private body. If it is up to them, they would call every land, Waqf land. That is why, the Government is trying to bring Waqf Amendment Act, so that poor Muslims benefit…”

    #WATCH | Delhi: On AIUDF Chief Badruddin Ajmal’s “Parliament building built on Waqf property” statement, BJP national spokesperson Pradeep Bhandari says, “Badruddin Ajmal is doing the politics of appeasement because his entire vote bank voted for Congress in this Lok Sabha… pic.twitter.com/gVJ25xQlqS
    — ANI (@ANI) October 16, 2024

    Opposition MPs Protest Bias in Waqf Committee Meeting

    In a related development, opposition MPs have accused the Chairperson of the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) on the Waqf (Amendment) Bill 2024 of violating parliamentary procedures. In a letter addressed to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla, the MPs claimed that the Committee’s Chairperson, Jagdambika Pal, conducted proceedings in a biased and partisan manner during a meeting held on October 14 in New Delhi.
     

  • Assam MP Badruddin Ajmal asks Hindus to undertake ‘Muslim formulation’ of early marriage, FIRs filed

    Through Categorical Information Provider

    GUWAHATI: Assam MP Maulana Badruddin Ajmal stirred a hornet’s nest together with his remarks that the Hindus must marry at a tender age, so they are able to have extra youngsters just like the Muslims.

    “Muslim boys get married at 22 whilst Muslim ladies do it at 18. The Hindus stay one to a few unlawful other halves until the age of 40 years and they don’t permit small children to be born. They get monetary savings and revel in,” Ajmal advised a information channel in Assam’s Karimganj on Friday. 

    The All India United Democratic Entrance (AIUDF) leader persevered in the similar vein, “They marry after 40 years when pressured by means of the oldsters or for different causes. How are you able to be expecting to have extra youngsters in case you marry at such an age? Whilst you plough a fertile land and on time, you get a just right harvest.”

    Suggesting that the Hindus undertake the “Muslim formulation”, the Dhubri MP stated they must organize the wedding in their little children after they reach the age of 20-22 years and 18-Two decades respectively. 

    Within the wake of the protests, Ajmal withdrew his observation. “If what I stated has harm the emotions of any one, I take again my observation,” he advised reporters on Saturday.

    No less than two FIRs have been filed towards him in Guwahati and Hailakandi.

    Ajmal additionally made some alleged offensive remarks on “love jihad” focused on Leader Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma. The ruling BJP and opposition events at the moment are going for his jugular.

    ALSO READ | Headmaster in Assam wields machete in class, despatched on go away

    “Ajmal is a modern version of the harem tradition of the Mughals, the Sultans and the Khiljis. Within the medieval generation, the Muslim aggressors constructed harems after killing Hindu males. Ajmal is making an attempt to proceed that tradition,” BJP Assam spokesman Ranjib Kumar Sarma stated.

    BJP MLA Diganta Kalita likened Ajmal to the Mughal emperor Aurangzeb and stated the Assamese society would by no means settle for the Arabic tradition. 

    The AIUDF leader made the remarks quickly after the CM had gained an period in-between file from the Fee for Evaluate & Overview of Issues of Satra Land. Satras are Vaishnavite prayer centres and their lands are below encroachment.

    Kalita discovered a hyperlink between Ajmal’s observation and the latter’s vote-bank politics. “Everyone knows that the Satra lands had been encroached upon by means of the migrant Muslims. Ajmal focused the CM to give protection to his vote banks,” Kalita stated.

    The Congress stated the police must suo moto sign up a case towards Ajmal for his try to destroy legislation and order.

    “I’m stunned why organisations, which champion the reason for the Hindus, have no longer but filed a case towards him. We can’t tolerate the sort of communal observation that he made to counter our CM’s remarks on love jihad all over the Gujarat election marketing campaign,” Congress MLA and chief of the Opposition Debabrata Saikia stated.

    The Trinamool Congress registered its protest by means of burning Ajmal’s effigy in Guwahati. Calling him an agent of the BJP, the Trinamool demanded his arrest for insulting the Hindus and making an attempt to incite violence.

    GUWAHATI: Assam MP Maulana Badruddin Ajmal stirred a hornet’s nest together with his remarks that the Hindus must marry at a tender age, so they are able to have extra youngsters just like the Muslims.

    “Muslim boys get married at 22 whilst Muslim ladies do it at 18. The Hindus stay one to a few unlawful other halves until the age of 40 years and they don’t permit small children to be born. They get monetary savings and revel in,” Ajmal advised a information channel in Assam’s Karimganj on Friday. 

    The All India United Democratic Entrance (AIUDF) leader persevered in the similar vein, “They marry after 40 years when pressured by means of the oldsters or for different causes. How are you able to be expecting to have extra youngsters in case you marry at such an age? Whilst you plough a fertile land and on time, you get a just right harvest.”

    Suggesting that the Hindus undertake the “Muslim formulation”, the Dhubri MP stated they must organize the wedding in their little children after they reach the age of 20-22 years and 18-Two decades respectively. 

    Within the wake of the protests, Ajmal withdrew his observation. “If what I stated has harm the emotions of any one, I take again my observation,” he advised reporters on Saturday.

    No less than two FIRs have been filed towards him in Guwahati and Hailakandi.

    Ajmal additionally made some alleged offensive remarks on “love jihad” focused on Leader Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma. The ruling BJP and opposition events at the moment are going for his jugular.

    ALSO READ | Headmaster in Assam wields machete in class, despatched on go away

    “Ajmal is a modern version of the harem tradition of the Mughals, the Sultans and the Khiljis. Within the medieval generation, the Muslim aggressors constructed harems after killing Hindu males. Ajmal is making an attempt to proceed that tradition,” BJP Assam spokesman Ranjib Kumar Sarma stated.

    BJP MLA Diganta Kalita likened Ajmal to the Mughal emperor Aurangzeb and stated the Assamese society would by no means settle for the Arabic tradition. 

    The AIUDF leader made the remarks quickly after the CM had gained an period in-between file from the Fee for Evaluate & Overview of Issues of Satra Land. Satras are Vaishnavite prayer centres and their lands are below encroachment.

    Kalita discovered a hyperlink between Ajmal’s observation and the latter’s vote-bank politics. “Everyone knows that the Satra lands had been encroached upon by means of the migrant Muslims. Ajmal focused the CM to give protection to his vote banks,” Kalita stated.

    The Congress stated the police must suo moto sign up a case towards Ajmal for his try to destroy legislation and order.

    “I’m stunned why organisations, which champion the reason for the Hindus, have no longer but filed a case towards him. We can’t tolerate the sort of communal observation that he made to counter our CM’s remarks on love jihad all over the Gujarat election marketing campaign,” Congress MLA and chief of the Opposition Debabrata Saikia stated.

    The Trinamool Congress registered its protest by means of burning Ajmal’s effigy in Guwahati. Calling him an agent of the BJP, the Trinamool demanded his arrest for insulting the Hindus and making an attempt to incite violence.