The World Opinion

Tag: amber heard news

  • Amber Heard faces excessive criminal hurdles in search of to opposite Johnny Depp’s win

    The Johnny Depp-Amber Heard libel trial, which generated intense pastime for 2 months previous this yr as a livestreamed, no-holds-barred cleaning soap opera that includes considered one of Hollywood’s largest stars, isn’t fading away quietly.

    Previous this month, Heard’s legal professionals filed a 51-page movement asking Pass judgement on Penney Azcarate to put aside the jury’s verdict, which gave $10 million to Depp and $2 million to Heard on competing defamation claims.

    The movement cites a couple of causes that the decision is untenable, from the sudden choice to claim all sides victorious to at least one extent or any other, to a peculiar case of wrong identification with probably the most jurors.

    A few of the problems raised:

    Why $10 million?

    Depp sued for $25 million in Fairfax County after Heard wrote a 2018 op-ed piece in The Washington Submit about home violence through which she referred to herself as “a public determine representing home abuse.” The thing by no means discussed Depp through identify, however his legal professionals stated a number of passages within the article defamed him through implication through regarding extremely publicized abuse allegations she made in 2016 as she filed for divorce.

    Heard then filed a $50 million counterclaim, additionally for defamation. By the point the case went to trial, her counterclaim have been whittled right down to a couple of statements made through considered one of Depp’s legal professionals, who referred to as Heard’s abuse allegations a hoax.

    The jury awarded $15 million to Depp and $2 million to Heard on her counterclaim. The $15 million judgment was once diminished to $10.35 million as a result of Virginia regulation caps punitive damages at $350,000.

    Heard’s legal professionals say in court docket papers that the $10 million verdict is unsupported through the information, and turns out to exhibit that jurors failed to concentrate on the fallout from the 2018 op-ed piece — as they had been intended to do — and as an alternative simply seemed widely on the injury Depp’s popularity suffered on account of the alleged abuse.

    Depp’s legal professionals, regardless that, say the damages are supported through testimony from his agent and others. They are saying the precedents cited through Heard’s workforce to give a boost to her arguments “are many years outdated, and none comes to a global A-list famous person.”

    Johnny Depp and Amber Heard had been married from 2015-2017. (Photograph: AP/Report)

    Steve Cochran, a civil attorney in Virginia who was once appointed through a pass judgement on as a impartial conciliator within the case to take a look at to reduce pretrial discovery disputes, stated he all the time believed the weakest hyperlink in Depp’s case was once the damages, given proof that the actor’s popularity have been ruined in Hollywood smartly earlier than the newsletter of the op-ed. Nonetheless, he stated he’s skeptical that Heard can get the decision put aside.

    Scott Surovell, a attorney and Democratic state senator who practices regulation in Fairfax, additionally stated he sees little explanation why to put aside the damages.

    “What the pass judgement on seems to be for … is that the decision was once adequately supported at trial and wasn’t in accordance with hypothesis or conjecture. (Depp) makes some huge cash from motion pictures. That doesn’t sound to me just like the damages had been in accordance with hypothesis or conjecture, however on proof,” he stated.

    “Inconsistent and irreconcilable”

    Heard’s legal professionals argue that the verdicts for Depp on one hand and Heard at the different are essentially nonsensical.

    “The jury’s dueling verdicts are inconsistent and irreconcilable,” her legal professionals wrote.

    Depp’s legal professionals, regardless that, say the decision shape utilized by jurors allowed them to precise with specificity precisely which statements they discovered defamatory. While you take a look at the person statements, they are saying, the dueling verdicts make sense.

    Jeremiah Denton III, a Virginia Seaside lawyer with enjoy in defamation instances, stated he doesn’t view the verdicts as irreconcilable. If anything else, he stated, the award maximum in jeopardy is the $2 million given to Heard, as a result of he stated it’s legally doubtful that Depp will also be held responsible for statements made through his lawyer.

    “I don’t perceive why the pass judgement on even allowed that factor to visit the jury,” he stated.

    Camille Vasquez represented Johnny Depp within the case. (Photograph: AP/Report)

    Juror #15

    One of the vital extra extraordinary pieces within the dialogue is a case of obvious wrong identification with probably the most jurors. In keeping with court docket papers, a 77-year-old county resident gained a summons for the trial. However the guy’s son, who has the similar identify and lives on the similar cope with, replied to the summons and served in his stead.

    Heard’s legal professionals say Virginia regulation is strict about juror identities, and the case of wrong identification is grounds for a mistrial. They’ve introduced no proof that the 52-year-old son, known in court docket papers best as Juror #15, purposefully or insidiously sought to interchange his father, however they argue that chance will have to now not be discounted.

    “The Courtroom can not think, as Mr. Depp asks it to, that Juror 15’s it sounds as if flawed carrier was once an blameless mistake. It might had been an intentional try to serve at the jury of a high-profile case,” Heard’s legal professionals wrote.

    Paul Bekman, a Baltimore attorney who has additionally attempted instances in Virginia, stated Heard’s workforce had to elevate any problems in regards to the juror forward of time.

    “Anyone having a look at a 52-year-old and a 77-year-old would be capable to inform — expectantly — that there’s a distinction of 25 years, and they’d have the proper to inquire about that,” he stated. “I consider it’s too overdue to whinge in regards to the juror.”

    Cochran additionally stated he was once skeptical that the confusion may lead to a mistrial or the pass judgement on surroundings apart the decision, however he cautioned that it’s tricky to are expecting for the reason that factor is so uncommon.

    “I’ve been working towards for fifty years and not noticed that factor arise,” he stated.

  • Amber Heard’s Insurance coverage Corporate Refuses to Quilt Her Felony Damages

    Amber Heard’s Insurance coverage Corporate Refuses to Quilt Her Damages: Johnny Depp-Amber Heard trial appears to be a by no means finishing saga even after the decision has been handed via the courtroom in Johnny’s favour. Amber’s insurance coverage corporate has reportedly refused to pay the prison damages the Aquaman actor owes to her ex-husband Pirates of the Carribean big name Johnny Depp in regards to the high-profile defamation trial. The insurance coverage corporate has mentioned that Johnny was once ‘willfully’ and ‘maliciously’ defamed via Amber. Amber was once ordered via a US Courtroom to pay $10 million in compensatory damages and $5 million in punitive damages in a June 1 verdict. Johnny, then again was once directed to pay  $2 million total to Amber.Additionally Learn – Amber Heard Strikes Courtroom Tough Mistrial in Johnny Depp Defamation Case, Says Fallacious Juror Sat in Jury

    Insurance coverage Corporate Refuses to Pay For Felony Damages

    Amber is being sued via the insurance coverage corporate  in order that it may be absolved of any responsibility to pay for her protection within the contemporary defamation case in opposition to ex-husband Johnny in keeping with contemporary media experiences. Amber may be being sued via america primarily based insurance coverage corporate in order that it does no longer must pay any prices of ongoing litigation, if the actor makes any longer appeals in courtroom or be required to pay the damages. The courtroom had ordered Amber to pay Johnny after the trial’s verdict was once declared. Additionally Learn – Amber Heard Strikes Courtroom to Brush aside Defamation Case Towards Her, Alleges No Proof to Again Johnny Depp Declare

    Insurance coverage Corporate Sues Amber

    New York Marine and Basic Insurance coverage Corporate filed the go well with in opposition to Amber on Friday in america District Courtroom for the Central District of California, in keeping with a record via the portal Legislation and Crime. Amber had a $1 million legal responsibility coverage with the corporate, with which she may have paid a portion of the damages she owes Johnny, the record claims. The insurance coverage corporate, on the other hand, may just refuse the payout, if Amber was once discovered to have dedicated ‘willful’ and ‘malicious’ misconduct. Amber’s insurance policy was once from July 2018 to July 2019. All through that period of time, Amber wrote an op-ed in The Washington Submit, wherein she mentioned she was once ‘a public determine representing home abuse’. Additionally Learn – Amber Heard Noticed Buying groceries At Bargain Division Retailer Submit Defamation Verdict, Pics Viral

    Insurance coverage Corporate Accuses Amber of Malice

    New York Marine and Basic Insurance coverage Corporate, within the case filed in opposition to Amber mentioned that California insurance coverage regulation supplies that even if an insurance coverage corporate is also responsible for an insured birthday celebration’s negligence, ‘an insurer isn’t responsible for a loss brought about via the willful act of the insured’. The insurance coverage corporate opined that Amber was once discovered to have acted with precise malice, in different phrases, willfully. Therefore, it must no longer must compensate her.

    Amber-Johnny’s By no means Finishing Saga

    Amber’s prison staff had previous sought after a Virginia courtroom to reserve a recent trial within the defamation case in opposition to Johnny, as a fallacious juror was once seated within the jury all through the trial. Johnny and Amber have each accused every different of home abuse. Whilst Johnny sued Amber for defamation on account of her 2018 op-ed, Amber countersued him for $100 million in 2021.

    For extra updates on Johnny Depp-Amber Heard defamation trial, take a look at this house at India.com.

  • Amber Heard Strikes Courtroom to Push aside Defamation Case, Says Depp Declare Have No Proof

    Amber Heard Strikes Courtroom to Push aside Defamation Case: Amber Heard’s attorneys have moved the Fairfax courtroom to put aside the defamation trial verdict in opposition to her after she misplaced the case in opposition to ex-husband Johnny Depp. Amber’s criminal group has moved courtroom to reserve a contemporary trial and claimed there may be ‘no proof’ to verify the $10 million in damages the Aquaman actor has been ordered to pay Johnny. Amber’s attorneys have argued within the transient submitted on the courtroom that Johnny’s group “proceeded only on a defamation via implication concept, leaving behind any claims that Ms Heard’s statements have been in fact false,” in step with Courtroom Area Information. Amber used to be ignorant of the headline of her 2018 article in step with Amber’s attorneys. Amber’s criminal group additionally claimed within the transient that, “Ms Heard by no means even was conscious about the headline till Mr. Depp filed the lawsuit in opposition to her.”Additionally Learn – Amber Heard Noticed Buying groceries At Cut price Division Retailer Publish Defamation Verdict, Pics Viral

    Amber Heard’s Workforce Strikes Courtroom

    Amber’s group has moved the movement within the Fairfax courtroom wondering the damages awarded within the case, declaring that the volume is over the top. Amber used to be ordered to pay $10 million and $5 million in compensatory and punitive damages respectively. The pass judgement on, on the other hand, decreased it to the statutory most of $350,000. Johnny, however, used to be ordered to pay $2 million total to Amber. Johnny’s criminal group disregarded the enchantment as in line with Courtroom Area Information. Johnny’s legal professional, Ben Chunk, in an e-mail known as it “what we anticipated, simply longer, not more substantive.” Additionally Learn – Amber Heard Says She ‘Nonetheless Loves’ Johnny Depp, Days After Dropping The Defamation Path

    Amber Had Referred to as Herself a Home Abuse Survivor

    Amber had written a piece of writing for Washington Publish claiming herself to be a survivor of home abuse in 2018. Johnny had sued her for a similar whilst Amber countersued him claiming that he defamed her, when he known as her a liar. Amber and Johnny, each imagined to have suffered home abuse all over their two-year marriage.  Amber used to be discovered accountable of defamation on all 3 counts within the trial, which lasted six weeks. Johnny used to be exonerated on two counts however used to be discovered accountable on one rely. Additionally Learn – Higher Than That Outdated Guy…: Amber Heard Receives Marriage Proposal From Saudi Guy After Dropping In opposition to Johnny Depp

    Johnny Misplaced Case in UK Courtroom

    Amber and Johnny began relationship whilst filming The Rum Diaries in 2010 and were given married in 2015 simplest to phase tactics within the following 12 months. Amber and Johnny’s divorce used to be finalised in 2017 whilst the latter had previous misplaced a libel case in the United Kingdom when he sued a e-newsletter for calling him a ‘wife-beater’. The courtroom had discovered the allegations considerably true.

    For extra updates on Amber Heard and Johnny Depp trial verdict, take a look at this area at India.com.

  • Johnny Depp’s agent says Amber Heard’s op-ed piece alleging abuse broken actor’s occupation: ‘Catastrophic’

    Johnny Depp’s agent testified Monday that his ex-wife’s 2018 op-ed piece in The Washington Submit describing herself as a sufferer of home abuse was once “catastrophic” to his occupation and coincided with the lack of a $23 million deal for a Pirates of the Caribbean sequel.

    Amber Heard’s legal professionals driven again aggressively in opposition to the agent’s statement on cross-examination, suggesting that the item was once inconsequential amid a flow of unhealthy exposure for Depp attributable to his personal unhealthy behaviour.

    Depp is suing Heard for libel in Fairfax County Circuit Courtroom, pronouncing her article defamed him when she described herself as “a public determine representing home abuse.” The item by no means mentions Depp by means of title, however Depp’s legal professionals say he was once defamed however as it’s a transparent connection with abuse allegations Heard levied in 2016.

    In testimony Monday, agent Jack Whigham mentioned Depp was once nonetheless ready to paintings after the preliminary allegations made in opposition to him in 2016. He was once paid $8 million for Town Of Lies, $10 million for Homicide at the Orient Categorical and $13.5 million for Implausible Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald, all of that have been shot in 2017, albeit underneath contracts reached previous to the allegations made in opposition to him.

    However he mentioned The Washington Submit piece was once uniquely destructive to Depp’s occupation.

    “It was once a first-person account, extraordinarily impactful,” Whigham mentioned of the op-ed.

    After that, he mentioned Depp struggled to get any roughly paintings. He needed to take a pay lower — right down to $3 million — to do the impartial movie Minimata, and a $22.5 million verbal deal he had with Disney for a 6th Pirates movie was once scuttled, Whigham mentioned.

    On cross-examination, regardless that, Heard’s legal professionals requested whether or not the Pirates deal had already long gone south by the point Heard’s article was once revealed. Whigham stated he by no means had a written deal for Depp to look in a 6th Pirates movie. And whilst he mentioned Pirates manufacturer Jerry Bruckheimer talked favourably during 2018 about Depp coming again to the franchise, Disney executives had been noncommittal at best possible.

    By way of early 2019 — weeks after Heard’s op-ed — Whigham mentioned it was once transparent that Depp’s position in any Pirates movie was once scuttled and that manufacturers had been as a substitute taking a look to transport forward with Margot Robbie in a lead position.

    Heard’s legal professionals have cited quite a few components — together with reviews of heavy drug and alcohol use, a lawsuit by means of a workforce member in July 2018 who says he was once punched on set by means of Depp, and a separate libel lawsuit Depp filed in opposition to a British newspaper in 2018 — as issues that broken Depp’s symbol greater than the Submit article.

    For Depp’s Virginia lawsuit to achieve success, he now not best wishes to turn that he was once falsely accused, however he should also display that the op-ed piece — now not Heard’s abuse allegations in 2016 when she filed for divorce and bought a brief restraining order — is what brought about the wear.

    Depp’s legal professionals additionally introduced testimony from an highbrow belongings knowledgeable who testified concerning the destructive flip in Depp’s popularity. However his personal information, appearing development strains from Google searches, confirmed destructive spikes going on after the 2016 abuse allegations, however negligible or nonexistent adjustments after the Submit article.

    The trial has now entered its fourth week. A lot of the testimony right through the primary 3 weeks focused at the unstable dating between Depp and Heard. Depp says he hasn’t ever struck Heard. Her legal professionals mentioned right through the trial’s opening statements that she was once bodily and sexually abused by means of Depp on a couple of events.

    Heard is anticipated to testify later this week.

  • Johnny Depp forgets names of his motion pictures in courtroom: How his defamation case in opposition to ex-wife Amber Heard was amusing rebel

    Out of all of the movies Johnny Depp has performed, he handiest recollects Alice in Wonderland. Johnny, who’s lately preventing a defamation case in opposition to ex-wife Amber Heard, left the court docket in splits on Monday when he used to be requested to call his motion pictures. The actor used to be attesting at the court cases’ fourth day in a Virginia courtroom.

    His prison staff used to be endeavor a follow-up wondering put up a cross-examination spherical. It used to be then that Johnny Depp used to be requested to call his Hollywood tasks, when all he may recall used to be the aforementioned movie.

    Folks reported that Johnny had a grin on his face as he mentioned, “I’m so pathetic in terms of understanding what motion pictures I’ve performed. I’m sorry. I simply, I don’t watch them. I think higher no longer looking at them. What used to be the query once more?” This left everybody provide within the room, in loud laughter, forcing Pass judgement on Azcarate to ship out a caution. He mentioned, “Order within the courtroom or I can have you ever got rid of. Understood? Thanks.”

    Johnny Depp in a nonetheless from Alice in Wonderland.

    Johnny Depp is embroiled in a sour libel lawsuit in opposition to Aquaman actor Amber Heard. His former spouse has accused Johnny of bodily and sexually assaulting her on a couple of events prior to and all the way through their temporary marriage. The Pirates of the Caribbean superstar used to be sued after Amber made an oblique referrence to these accusations in an op-ed piece she wrote for The Washington Put up in 2018.

    Johnny Depp says the Put up article contributed to an unfairly ruined popularity that made him a Hollywood outcast and price him his position within the profitable Pirates of the Caribbean film franchise. Amber Heard’s legal professionals say handiest Johnny is guilty for his marred profession.

    The trial has via now was a public spectacle with Johnny attesting about the whole thing – from taking drugs as a kid to a close to psychological breakdown.