The World Opinion

Tag: Amber Heard

  • Amber Heard to pay USD 1 million to Johnny Depp in felony agreement

    Via IANS

    LOS ANGELES: Actress Amber Heard pays Hollywood megastar and previous husband Johnny Depp $1 million to settle their long-running felony fight, during which each and every accused the opposite of home violence.

    The sum is a vital relief from the $8.35 million she was once ordered to pay after a six-week trial in Virginia previous this yr. The cost is anticipated to come back from her insurance coverage service, experiences ‘Selection’.

    In a observation, Depp’s legal professionals mentioned that he would donate the cash to charity. His legal professionals have in the past mentioned that the case was once “by no means concerning the cash” for Depp. In her personal observation, Heard mentioned she had “misplaced religion within the American felony gadget.”

    She additionally mentioned that the agreement spares her the ordeal of additional litigation and lets in her to in any case “emancipate” herself from their marriage.

    Depp at the beginning filed a $50 million defamation declare towards Heard in March 2019 after she printed an op-ed within the ‘Washington Submit’ during which she described herself as a “public determine representing home abuse”.

    On the trial, each and every actor testified for a number of days, revealing lurid main points of drug abuse and screaming suits. Their testimony was once streamed survive YouTube and remixed ceaselessly on TikTok and Fb.

    Heard alleged that Depp again and again assaulted her, choked her and as soon as raped her with a liquor bottle. She continuously broke down in sobs right through her testimony.

    Depp, in the meantime, alleged that Heard was once the aggressor within the courting, and that he would attempt to retreat on every occasion she turned into violent. The couple had made audio recordings in their arguments right through their marriage, and each and every facet performed clips that they had decided on to take a look at to corroborate their accounts.

    The seven-person jury dominated in Depp’s choose on 3 separate claims of defamation, awarding him $10 million in compensatory damages and $5 million in punitive damages. The latter sum was once knocked all the way down to $350,000 to agree to a statutory cap.

    In a small comfort to Heard, the jury additionally present in her favour in one in all her 3 counterclaims, discovering Depp chargeable for a observation made by way of his lawyer during which Heard was once accused of perpetrating a “hoax”. Depp was once ordered to pay Heard $2 million, leaving a web judgment of $8.35 million in Depp’s favour.

    The next month, Heard filed a understand of enchantment, along with her lawyer mentioning “mistakes” made by way of the courtroom. On the other hand, the “Aquaman” actor has now agreed to withdraw her enchantment.

    In a observation posted on Instagram pronouncing the verdict, Heard made transparent that “There are not any restrictions or gags with appreciate to my voice shifting ahead” and blasted america felony gadget for turning her testimony into “leisure and social media fodder”.

    She additionally in comparison her revel in of america felony gadget to the United Kingdom, the place Depp sued British tabloid The Solar in 2020 for calling him a “spouse beater” in an editorial. Heard was once a prime witness for The Solar.

    If so, the pass judgement on known as the allegations “considerably true” and located in favour of The Solar.

    In a observation, representatives for Depp mentioned they had been proud of the result, and emphasised that the jury’s verdict nonetheless stands.

    “We’re happy to officially shut the door in this painful bankruptcy for Mr. Depp, who made transparent all through this procedure that his precedence was once about bringing the reality to gentle,” mentioned Depp’s legal professionals Benjamin Bite and Camille Vasquez. “The jury’s unanimous choice and the ensuing judgement in Mr. Depp’s favour towards Ms. Heard stays absolutely in position. The cost of $1 million – which Mr. Depp is pledging and can (in truth) donate to charities – reinforces Ms. Heard’s acknowledgement of the belief of the felony gadget’s rigorous pursuit for justice.”

    Heard first levelled her abuse allegations towards Depp in 2016, throughout her divorce from the ‘Pirates of the Caribbean’ megastar. She later gained $7 million in a agreement and the couple agreed to not talk of the subject once more, signing non-disparagement and non-disclosure agreements.

    LOS ANGELES: Actress Amber Heard pays Hollywood megastar and previous husband Johnny Depp $1 million to settle their long-running felony fight, during which each and every accused the opposite of home violence.

    The sum is a vital relief from the $8.35 million she was once ordered to pay after a six-week trial in Virginia previous this yr. The cost is anticipated to come back from her insurance coverage service, experiences ‘Selection’.

    In a observation, Depp’s legal professionals mentioned that he would donate the cash to charity. His legal professionals have in the past mentioned that the case was once “by no means concerning the cash” for Depp. In her personal observation, Heard mentioned she had “misplaced religion within the American felony gadget.”

    She additionally mentioned that the agreement spares her the ordeal of additional litigation and lets in her to in any case “emancipate” herself from their marriage.

    Depp at the beginning filed a $50 million defamation declare towards Heard in March 2019 after she printed an op-ed within the ‘Washington Submit’ during which she described herself as a “public determine representing home abuse”.

    On the trial, each and every actor testified for a number of days, revealing lurid main points of drug abuse and screaming suits. Their testimony was once streamed survive YouTube and remixed ceaselessly on TikTok and Fb.

    Heard alleged that Depp again and again assaulted her, choked her and as soon as raped her with a liquor bottle. She continuously broke down in sobs right through her testimony.

    Depp, in the meantime, alleged that Heard was once the aggressor within the courting, and that he would attempt to retreat on every occasion she turned into violent. The couple had made audio recordings in their arguments right through their marriage, and each and every facet performed clips that they had decided on to take a look at to corroborate their accounts.

    The seven-person jury dominated in Depp’s choose on 3 separate claims of defamation, awarding him $10 million in compensatory damages and $5 million in punitive damages. The latter sum was once knocked all the way down to $350,000 to agree to a statutory cap.

    In a small comfort to Heard, the jury additionally present in her favour in one in all her 3 counterclaims, discovering Depp chargeable for a observation made by way of his lawyer during which Heard was once accused of perpetrating a “hoax”. Depp was once ordered to pay Heard $2 million, leaving a web judgment of $8.35 million in Depp’s favour.

    The next month, Heard filed a understand of enchantment, along with her lawyer mentioning “mistakes” made by way of the courtroom. On the other hand, the “Aquaman” actor has now agreed to withdraw her enchantment.

    In a observation posted on Instagram pronouncing the verdict, Heard made transparent that “There are not any restrictions or gags with appreciate to my voice shifting ahead” and blasted america felony gadget for turning her testimony into “leisure and social media fodder”.

    She additionally in comparison her revel in of america felony gadget to the United Kingdom, the place Depp sued British tabloid The Solar in 2020 for calling him a “spouse beater” in an editorial. Heard was once a prime witness for The Solar.

    If so, the pass judgement on known as the allegations “considerably true” and located in favour of The Solar.

    In a observation, representatives for Depp mentioned they had been proud of the result, and emphasised that the jury’s verdict nonetheless stands.

    “We’re happy to officially shut the door in this painful bankruptcy for Mr. Depp, who made transparent all through this procedure that his precedence was once about bringing the reality to gentle,” mentioned Depp’s legal professionals Benjamin Bite and Camille Vasquez. “The jury’s unanimous choice and the ensuing judgement in Mr. Depp’s favour towards Ms. Heard stays absolutely in position. The cost of $1 million – which Mr. Depp is pledging and can (in truth) donate to charities – reinforces Ms. Heard’s acknowledgement of the belief of the felony gadget’s rigorous pursuit for justice.”

    Heard first levelled her abuse allegations towards Depp in 2016, throughout her divorce from the ‘Pirates of the Caribbean’ megastar. She later gained $7 million in a agreement and the couple agreed to not talk of the subject once more, signing non-disparagement and non-disclosure agreements.

  • Amber Heard Settles Defamation Case With Johnny Depp, Will Pay $1 Million: Legal professionals

    Actors Amber Heard and Johnny Depp have settled their defamation case, which Heard summed up as “an overly tricky choice” and a results of her having “misplaced religion within the American felony machine.”

    Heard agreed to pay her former husband $1 million within the agreement, in step with Depp’s felony crew ― an important drop from the $15 million in damages {that a} Virginia court docket dominated in opposition to the actor in June.

    “It’s essential for me to mention that I by no means selected this. I defended my fact and in doing so my existence as I knew it was once destroyed,” Heard wrote in a message posted to Instagram Monday.

    Legal professionals for Depp advised HuffPost in a remark that they’re happy with the case’s closure and that the judgment in opposition to Heard stays “totally in position.” This fee “reinforces Ms. Heard’s acknowledgement of the belief of the felony machine’s rigorous pursuit for justice,” stated legal professionals Benjamin Bite and Camille Vasquez.

    The $1 million can be donated to charity, in step with Depp’s legal professionals.

    A supply with reference to Depp advised HuffPost the finances can be paid via Heard’s insurance coverage.

    Depp sued Heard for defamation over a 2018 Washington Submit opinion article wherein she recognized herself as a home abuse sufferer. The “Pirates of the Caribbean” superstar has denied Heard’s allegations of abuse.

    Whilst Heard was once ordered to pay damages to her ex-husband ― which her legal professionals lately appealed ― she was once additionally awarded $2 million in compensatory damages for a remark made via an legal professional for Depp that she stated was once defamatory.

    Heard stated Monday that the agreement does no longer save you her from having the ability to discuss freely, although the Depp supply advised HuffPost that the judgment can nonetheless be used in opposition to her if she continues to copy her abuse allegations.

    “I’ve made no admission. This isn’t an act of concession. There are not any restrictions or gags with recognize to my voice shifting ahead,” Heard wrote.

    Heard is seen exiting the courthouse beside her sister, Whitney Heard, in June. Heard said Monday that her settlement with Depp "is not an act of concession."
    Heard is noticed exiting the courthouse beside her sister, Whitney Heard, in June. Heard stated Monday that her agreement with Depp “isn’t an act of concession.”

    Consolidated Information Footage by the use of Getty Pictures

    The “Aquaman” actor stated that settling the case was once a type of final lodge; although she have been in a position to effectively enchantment, she stated she wouldn’t wish to matter herself to a re-trial.

    “I will not have the funds for to possibility an not possible invoice — one that isn’t simply monetary, but in addition mental, bodily and emotional,” she wrote. “Girls shouldn’t have to stand abuse or chapter for talking her fact, however sadly it’s not unusual.”

    The previous couple confronted a sensational weekslong trial that noticed their private lives splayed throughout world tv displays, ridiculed on social media and broadly used as leisure.

    Heard when compared the revel in to a prior trial that came about within the U.Ok. over a tabloid headline calling Depp a “spouse beater.” That trial led to 2020 with the court docket figuring out that Heard were abused via Depp, as she claimed.

    “Once I stood earlier than a pass judgement on in the United Kingdom, I used to be vindicated via a powerful, unbiased and truthful machine, the place I used to be secure from having to present the worst moments of my testimony in entrance of the sector’s media, and the place the court docket discovered that I used to be subjected to home and sexual violence,” she wrote.

    Heard stated that her revel in within the U.S., via comparability, left her shattered and distrusting of her nation’s felony machine.

    Now that the felony fight is in the back of her, she stated she needs to spend her time “productively and purposefully.” Heard didn’t be offering any further information about her plans however stated that she’s going to flip consideration “to the paintings that helped me heal after my divorce,” which she stated makes her “really feel noticed, heard and believed, and wherein I do know I will impact exchange.”

  • Amber Heard appeals Johnny Depp defamation verdict six months after trial

    Through ANI

    WASHINGTON: Hollywood actor Amber Heard has appealed the USD 10 million Johnny Depp defamation verdict within the Virginia courtroom, not up to a month after the ‘Pirates of the Caribbean’ actor filed his personal enchantment.

    In step with Time limit, a web based leisure information web site, Amber has changed maximum of her felony group and the brand new group is flying the flag of the First Modification and taking trial courtroom Pass judgement on Penney Azcarate to process six months after a jury dominated that Heard was once liable of defaming her ex-husband.

    In paperwork bought by way of E! Information, a USA-based leisure information outlet, Heard said that the decision “unquestionably can have a chilling impact on different ladies who want to discuss abuse involving tough males.”

    The report additionally famous that “even though this Court docket had been to disagree with all the foregoing, the jury’s award to Depp of USD 10 million in compensatory damages and USD 5 million in punitive damages (statutorily lowered to USD 350,000) obviously is over the top given the slim time frame for which Depp may get better.”

    Depp’s 2020 libel case towards The Solar was once additionally referenced in Heard’s enchantment. He had sued the British tabloid newspaper over an editorial by which he was once labelled a “spouse beater.”

    ALSO READ | Mistaken juror became up at Johnny Depp-Amber Heard trial?

    The ‘Aquaman’ actor states that their defamation case must’ve by no means made it to the court as a result of a Prime Court docket pass judgement on dominated towards Depp.

    “Every other courtroom had already concluded that Depp abused Heard on a couple of events… After Depp filed this example, the UK Prime Court docket of Justice dominated in a separate defamation motion introduced by way of Depp that Heard’s abuse allegations had been true,” the report learn, reported E! Information.

    The United States lawsuit happened in a court in Fairfax, Virginia, all over the process April and Might of 2022. It was once in response to the allegation that Heard had defamed Depp by way of relating to herself as a “public determine representing home abuse” in a 2018 op-ed for the Washington Submit.

    Even supposing the op-ed didn’t particularly check with Depp, the actor claimed it harmed his popularity and wrecked his occupation. Heard and Depp separated a 12 months earlier than the op-ed was once printed, following two years of marriage, with Heard mentioning that Depp had subjected her to emotional, bodily, and sexual abuse all over their courting.

    Heard’s legal professionals had prior to now requested Pass judgement on Penney Azcarate to put aside america trial’s verdict for a number of causes, together with the allegation that one of the vital jurors confirmed as much as the trial regardless of by no means receiving a summons, reported Selection. That request were denied by way of the pass judgement on.

    WASHINGTON: Hollywood actor Amber Heard has appealed the USD 10 million Johnny Depp defamation verdict within the Virginia courtroom, not up to a month after the ‘Pirates of the Caribbean’ actor filed his personal enchantment.

    In step with Time limit, a web based leisure information web site, Amber has changed maximum of her felony group and the brand new group is flying the flag of the First Modification and taking trial courtroom Pass judgement on Penney Azcarate to process six months after a jury dominated that Heard was once liable of defaming her ex-husband.

    In paperwork bought by way of E! Information, a USA-based leisure information outlet, Heard said that the decision “unquestionably can have a chilling impact on different ladies who want to discuss abuse involving tough males.”

    The report additionally famous that “even though this Court docket had been to disagree with all the foregoing, the jury’s award to Depp of USD 10 million in compensatory damages and USD 5 million in punitive damages (statutorily lowered to USD 350,000) obviously is over the top given the slim time frame for which Depp may get better.”

    Depp’s 2020 libel case towards The Solar was once additionally referenced in Heard’s enchantment. He had sued the British tabloid newspaper over an editorial by which he was once labelled a “spouse beater.”

    ALSO READ | Mistaken juror became up at Johnny Depp-Amber Heard trial?

    The ‘Aquaman’ actor states that their defamation case must’ve by no means made it to the court as a result of a Prime Court docket pass judgement on dominated towards Depp.

    “Every other courtroom had already concluded that Depp abused Heard on a couple of events… After Depp filed this example, the UK Prime Court docket of Justice dominated in a separate defamation motion introduced by way of Depp that Heard’s abuse allegations had been true,” the report learn, reported E! Information.

    The United States lawsuit happened in a court in Fairfax, Virginia, all over the process April and Might of 2022. It was once in response to the allegation that Heard had defamed Depp by way of relating to herself as a “public determine representing home abuse” in a 2018 op-ed for the Washington Submit.

    Even supposing the op-ed didn’t particularly check with Depp, the actor claimed it harmed his popularity and wrecked his occupation. Heard and Depp separated a 12 months earlier than the op-ed was once printed, following two years of marriage, with Heard mentioning that Depp had subjected her to emotional, bodily, and sexual abuse all over their courting.

    Heard’s legal professionals had prior to now requested Pass judgement on Penney Azcarate to put aside america trial’s verdict for a number of causes, together with the allegation that one of the vital jurors confirmed as much as the trial regardless of by no means receiving a summons, reported Selection. That request were denied by way of the pass judgement on.

  • Johnny Depp-Amber Heard defamation trial film to air on streaming platform

    By means of IANS

    LOS ANGELES: The arguable defamation case between Johnny Depp and Amber Heard is the topic of a brand new film, ‘Scorching Take: The Depp/Heard Trial’, set to debut completely at the unfastened Tubi streaming carrier.

    The movie stars Mark Hapka (Parallels’, ‘Days of Our Lives’) as Depp and Megan Davis (‘On my own within the Darkish’) as Heard. It’s set to premiere on Friday, September 30, on Fox’s Tubi.

    In keeping with a record through Selection, Melissa Marty will sign up for Hapka and Davis as Depp’s attorney Camille Vasquez and Mary Carrig will painting Heard’s attorney, Elaine Bredehoft.

    ‘Scorching Take’ follows the tumultuous courting — out and in of courtroom — of Depp and Heard, dramatizing the two-month defamation trial that concluded on June 1, with the jury discovering that Heard had defamed Depp through alluding to home violence allegations towards him in a December 2018 op-ed piece.

    The jury additionally held Depp chargeable for a defamatory observation made about Heard through his attorney

    ‘Scorching Take’ comes from Fox Leisure’s MarVista Leisure. The movie is written through Man Nicolucci and directed through Sara Lohman.

    The film was once fast-tracked into manufacturing through Tubi and MarVista “to seize a well timed tackle a tale that turned into a part of the cultural zeitgeist, portray a singular image of what thousands and thousands watched play out within the headlines over the summer season,” Adam Lewinson, Tubia’s leader content material officer, stated in a observation.

    ‘Scorching Take: The Depp/Heard Trial’ is one of the well timed, culturally related authentic motion pictures to come back from our increasing partnership and slate of flicks being produced in collaboration with Tubi,” stated Hannah Pillemer, EVP ingenious of affairs for MarVista.

    “Connecting audience to tales with this type of social forex and topicality make gazing them a will have to for any fan of popular culture or superstar drama.”

    The movie is govt produced through Brittany Clemons, Angie Day, Marianne C. Wunch, Hannah Pillemer and Fernando Szew. Autumn Federici and Kristifor Cvijetic function manufacturers beneath their 9th Space banner.

    LOS ANGELES: The arguable defamation case between Johnny Depp and Amber Heard is the topic of a brand new film, ‘Scorching Take: The Depp/Heard Trial’, set to debut completely at the unfastened Tubi streaming carrier.

    The movie stars Mark Hapka (Parallels’, ‘Days of Our Lives’) as Depp and Megan Davis (‘On my own within the Darkish’) as Heard. It’s set to premiere on Friday, September 30, on Fox’s Tubi.

    In keeping with a record through Selection, Melissa Marty will sign up for Hapka and Davis as Depp’s attorney Camille Vasquez and Mary Carrig will painting Heard’s attorney, Elaine Bredehoft.

    ‘Scorching Take’ follows the tumultuous courting — out and in of courtroom — of Depp and Heard, dramatizing the two-month defamation trial that concluded on June 1, with the jury discovering that Heard had defamed Depp through alluding to home violence allegations towards him in a December 2018 op-ed piece.

    The jury additionally held Depp chargeable for a defamatory observation made about Heard through his attorney

    ‘Scorching Take’ comes from Fox Leisure’s MarVista Leisure. The movie is written through Man Nicolucci and directed through Sara Lohman.

    The film was once fast-tracked into manufacturing through Tubi and MarVista “to seize a well timed tackle a tale that turned into a part of the cultural zeitgeist, portray a singular image of what thousands and thousands watched play out within the headlines over the summer season,” Adam Lewinson, Tubia’s leader content material officer, stated in a observation.

    ‘Scorching Take: The Depp/Heard Trial’ is one of the well timed, culturally related authentic motion pictures to come back from our increasing partnership and slate of flicks being produced in collaboration with Tubi,” stated Hannah Pillemer, EVP ingenious of affairs for MarVista.

    “Connecting audience to tales with this type of social forex and topicality make gazing them a will have to for any fan of popular culture or superstar drama.”

    The movie is govt produced through Brittany Clemons, Angie Day, Marianne C. Wunch, Hannah Pillemer and Fernando Szew. Autumn Federici and Kristifor Cvijetic function manufacturers beneath their 9th Space banner.

  • Amber Heard faces excessive criminal hurdles in search of to opposite Johnny Depp’s win

    The Johnny Depp-Amber Heard libel trial, which generated intense pastime for 2 months previous this yr as a livestreamed, no-holds-barred cleaning soap opera that includes considered one of Hollywood’s largest stars, isn’t fading away quietly.

    Previous this month, Heard’s legal professionals filed a 51-page movement asking Pass judgement on Penney Azcarate to put aside the jury’s verdict, which gave $10 million to Depp and $2 million to Heard on competing defamation claims.

    The movement cites a couple of causes that the decision is untenable, from the sudden choice to claim all sides victorious to at least one extent or any other, to a peculiar case of wrong identification with probably the most jurors.

    A few of the problems raised:

    Why $10 million?

    Depp sued for $25 million in Fairfax County after Heard wrote a 2018 op-ed piece in The Washington Submit about home violence through which she referred to herself as “a public determine representing home abuse.” The thing by no means discussed Depp through identify, however his legal professionals stated a number of passages within the article defamed him through implication through regarding extremely publicized abuse allegations she made in 2016 as she filed for divorce.

    Heard then filed a $50 million counterclaim, additionally for defamation. By the point the case went to trial, her counterclaim have been whittled right down to a couple of statements made through considered one of Depp’s legal professionals, who referred to as Heard’s abuse allegations a hoax.

    The jury awarded $15 million to Depp and $2 million to Heard on her counterclaim. The $15 million judgment was once diminished to $10.35 million as a result of Virginia regulation caps punitive damages at $350,000.

    Heard’s legal professionals say in court docket papers that the $10 million verdict is unsupported through the information, and turns out to exhibit that jurors failed to concentrate on the fallout from the 2018 op-ed piece — as they had been intended to do — and as an alternative simply seemed widely on the injury Depp’s popularity suffered on account of the alleged abuse.

    Depp’s legal professionals, regardless that, say the damages are supported through testimony from his agent and others. They are saying the precedents cited through Heard’s workforce to give a boost to her arguments “are many years outdated, and none comes to a global A-list famous person.”

    Johnny Depp and Amber Heard had been married from 2015-2017. (Photograph: AP/Report)

    Steve Cochran, a civil attorney in Virginia who was once appointed through a pass judgement on as a impartial conciliator within the case to take a look at to reduce pretrial discovery disputes, stated he all the time believed the weakest hyperlink in Depp’s case was once the damages, given proof that the actor’s popularity have been ruined in Hollywood smartly earlier than the newsletter of the op-ed. Nonetheless, he stated he’s skeptical that Heard can get the decision put aside.

    Scott Surovell, a attorney and Democratic state senator who practices regulation in Fairfax, additionally stated he sees little explanation why to put aside the damages.

    “What the pass judgement on seems to be for … is that the decision was once adequately supported at trial and wasn’t in accordance with hypothesis or conjecture. (Depp) makes some huge cash from motion pictures. That doesn’t sound to me just like the damages had been in accordance with hypothesis or conjecture, however on proof,” he stated.

    “Inconsistent and irreconcilable”

    Heard’s legal professionals argue that the verdicts for Depp on one hand and Heard at the different are essentially nonsensical.

    “The jury’s dueling verdicts are inconsistent and irreconcilable,” her legal professionals wrote.

    Depp’s legal professionals, regardless that, say the decision shape utilized by jurors allowed them to precise with specificity precisely which statements they discovered defamatory. While you take a look at the person statements, they are saying, the dueling verdicts make sense.

    Jeremiah Denton III, a Virginia Seaside lawyer with enjoy in defamation instances, stated he doesn’t view the verdicts as irreconcilable. If anything else, he stated, the award maximum in jeopardy is the $2 million given to Heard, as a result of he stated it’s legally doubtful that Depp will also be held responsible for statements made through his lawyer.

    “I don’t perceive why the pass judgement on even allowed that factor to visit the jury,” he stated.

    Camille Vasquez represented Johnny Depp within the case. (Photograph: AP/Report)

    Juror #15

    One of the vital extra extraordinary pieces within the dialogue is a case of obvious wrong identification with probably the most jurors. In keeping with court docket papers, a 77-year-old county resident gained a summons for the trial. However the guy’s son, who has the similar identify and lives on the similar cope with, replied to the summons and served in his stead.

    Heard’s legal professionals say Virginia regulation is strict about juror identities, and the case of wrong identification is grounds for a mistrial. They’ve introduced no proof that the 52-year-old son, known in court docket papers best as Juror #15, purposefully or insidiously sought to interchange his father, however they argue that chance will have to now not be discounted.

    “The Courtroom can not think, as Mr. Depp asks it to, that Juror 15’s it sounds as if flawed carrier was once an blameless mistake. It might had been an intentional try to serve at the jury of a high-profile case,” Heard’s legal professionals wrote.

    Paul Bekman, a Baltimore attorney who has additionally attempted instances in Virginia, stated Heard’s workforce had to elevate any problems in regards to the juror forward of time.

    “Anyone having a look at a 52-year-old and a 77-year-old would be capable to inform — expectantly — that there’s a distinction of 25 years, and they’d have the proper to inquire about that,” he stated. “I consider it’s too overdue to whinge in regards to the juror.”

    Cochran additionally stated he was once skeptical that the confusion may lead to a mistrial or the pass judgement on surroundings apart the decision, however he cautioned that it’s tricky to are expecting for the reason that factor is so uncommon.

    “I’ve been working towards for fifty years and not noticed that factor arise,” he stated.

  • Documentary on Johnny Depp-Amber Heard trial set for virtual debut

    Via IANS

    LOS ANGELES: A brand new documentary at the Johnny Depp vs Amber Heard trial by way of NBC Information is ready to make its debut at the virtual platform.

    Titled ‘A Marriage on Trial: Johnny Depp, Amber Heard and Reality within the Age of Social Media’, the documentary will debut on NBC Information Now and might be to be had for streaming on call for on NBCNews.com and Peacock, studies Selection.

    As in step with NBC Information’ description for the 30-minute documentary, “The Depp vs Heard defamation trial evoked two distinct reactions — those that could not get sufficient and those that gained greater than they sought after.

    “The brand new deep-dive documentary explores why the trial crushed social media, particularly TikTok, and what audience overlooked if social media protection used to be their simplest information supply. Within the wake of a verdict that shocked prison professionals, NBC Information examines how the trial developed right into a TikTok trial and what the decision approach for long run home abuse circumstances.”

    Featured interviews within the documentary come with that of Heard’s legal professional Elaine Bredehoft, Nationwide Coalition Towards Home Violence CEO Ruth Glenn, American College legislation professor and gender violence professional Jamie Abrams, NBC Information senior breaking information reporter Doha Madani, NBC Information tech and tradition reporter Kat Tenbarge, and Folks Mag’s Nigel Smith, amongst others.

    ‘A Marriage on Trial: Johnny Depp, Amber Heard, and Reality within the Age of Social Media’ is produced by way of the NBC Information Virtual Doctors unit.

  • Amber Heard’s Insurance coverage Corporate Refuses to Quilt Her Felony Damages

    Amber Heard’s Insurance coverage Corporate Refuses to Quilt Her Damages: Johnny Depp-Amber Heard trial appears to be a by no means finishing saga even after the decision has been handed via the courtroom in Johnny’s favour. Amber’s insurance coverage corporate has reportedly refused to pay the prison damages the Aquaman actor owes to her ex-husband Pirates of the Carribean big name Johnny Depp in regards to the high-profile defamation trial. The insurance coverage corporate has mentioned that Johnny was once ‘willfully’ and ‘maliciously’ defamed via Amber. Amber was once ordered via a US Courtroom to pay $10 million in compensatory damages and $5 million in punitive damages in a June 1 verdict. Johnny, then again was once directed to pay  $2 million total to Amber.Additionally Learn – Amber Heard Strikes Courtroom Tough Mistrial in Johnny Depp Defamation Case, Says Fallacious Juror Sat in Jury

    Insurance coverage Corporate Refuses to Pay For Felony Damages

    Amber is being sued via the insurance coverage corporate  in order that it may be absolved of any responsibility to pay for her protection within the contemporary defamation case in opposition to ex-husband Johnny in keeping with contemporary media experiences. Amber may be being sued via america primarily based insurance coverage corporate in order that it does no longer must pay any prices of ongoing litigation, if the actor makes any longer appeals in courtroom or be required to pay the damages. The courtroom had ordered Amber to pay Johnny after the trial’s verdict was once declared. Additionally Learn – Amber Heard Strikes Courtroom to Brush aside Defamation Case Towards Her, Alleges No Proof to Again Johnny Depp Declare

    Insurance coverage Corporate Sues Amber

    New York Marine and Basic Insurance coverage Corporate filed the go well with in opposition to Amber on Friday in america District Courtroom for the Central District of California, in keeping with a record via the portal Legislation and Crime. Amber had a $1 million legal responsibility coverage with the corporate, with which she may have paid a portion of the damages she owes Johnny, the record claims. The insurance coverage corporate, on the other hand, may just refuse the payout, if Amber was once discovered to have dedicated ‘willful’ and ‘malicious’ misconduct. Amber’s insurance policy was once from July 2018 to July 2019. All through that period of time, Amber wrote an op-ed in The Washington Submit, wherein she mentioned she was once ‘a public determine representing home abuse’. Additionally Learn – Amber Heard Noticed Buying groceries At Bargain Division Retailer Submit Defamation Verdict, Pics Viral

    Insurance coverage Corporate Accuses Amber of Malice

    New York Marine and Basic Insurance coverage Corporate, within the case filed in opposition to Amber mentioned that California insurance coverage regulation supplies that even if an insurance coverage corporate is also responsible for an insured birthday celebration’s negligence, ‘an insurer isn’t responsible for a loss brought about via the willful act of the insured’. The insurance coverage corporate opined that Amber was once discovered to have acted with precise malice, in different phrases, willfully. Therefore, it must no longer must compensate her.

    Amber-Johnny’s By no means Finishing Saga

    Amber’s prison staff had previous sought after a Virginia courtroom to reserve a recent trial within the defamation case in opposition to Johnny, as a fallacious juror was once seated within the jury all through the trial. Johnny and Amber have each accused every different of home abuse. Whilst Johnny sued Amber for defamation on account of her 2018 op-ed, Amber countersued him for $100 million in 2021.

    For extra updates on Johnny Depp-Amber Heard defamation trial, take a look at this house at India.com.

  • Incorrect juror became up at Johnny Depp-Amber Heard trial?

    By way of IANS

    LOS ANGELES: The drama surrounding Johnny Depp’s multimillion-dollar defamation lawsuit in opposition to his ex-wife and ‘Aquaman’ big name Amber Heard, refuses to die. The issues have became judicially bizarre, as a improper juror took the chair throughout the felony lawsuits, experiences ‘Time limit’.

    A in part redacted new submitting by way of the Aquaman big name’s felony workforce, accessed by way of ‘Time limit’, learn, “Ms. Heard had a proper to depend at the elementary coverage, as prescribed by way of the Virginia Code, that the jurors on this trial could be people who have been in reality summoned for jury accountability.”

    “On this case, it sounds as if that Juror No. 15 used to be no longer, in truth, the similar particular person as indexed at the jury panel,” lawyer Elaine Bredehoft added in language very similar to a prior submitting of June 24.

    “Ms. Heard’s due procedure used to be due to this fact compromised. Below those instances, a mistrial must be declared, and a brand new trial ordered.”

    In keeping with ‘Time limit’, in contrast to the former movement and memorandum positioned within the Fairfax County courthouse docket overdue ultimate month to push aside the June 1 verdict and make allowance a brand new trial, nowadays’s supplemental memo has much more main points on what may seize victory from Depp in his lengthy felony combat along with his ex-wife.

    In keeping with the redacted submitting, accessed by way of ‘Time limit’, the summons for jury accountability used to be despatched out to a Virginia resident in April for the much-delayed $15 million defamation motion Depp had activate in March 2019 in opposition to Heard for a 2018 ‘Washington Put up’ op-ed she penned on being the “public face” of home abuse.

    Additionally, in keeping with the new submitting, it sort of feels that there are two folks living on the identical deal with with, on the very least, “the similar ultimate title” – one a 77-year-old and some other a 52-year-old.

    The previous used to be the only summoned, nevertheless it looks as if the latter used to be the person who confirmed up. “Thus, the 52-year-old [redacted] sitting at the jury for 6 weeks used to be by no means summoned for jury accountability on April 11 and didn’t ‘seem within the checklist’, as required,” the submitting asserts.

    Now not spotted by way of officials or clerks of the courtroom, the more youthful particular person made it all of the option to the jury with out it seems that ever being requested to supply any ID, or with possibly pretend ID, the submitting implies. Moreover, it looks as if anyone crammed out the desired on-line data shape both deliberately or by chance to mention that they have been born in 1945.

    Ignorant of this on the time and throughout the media-frenzied trial, Heard’s defence workforce now needs an evidence and to look some penalties, which might take the shine off Crew Depp.

  • Amber Heard Requests New Trial, Claiming Mistaken Juror Sat On Jury

    Amber Heard is asking for a brand new trial towards actor Johnny Depp, her ex-husband, one month after a Virginia jury determined most commonly in prefer of him in a defamation lawsuit.

    Heard’s prison crew, in a court docket submitting Friday, claims that an individual who seemed at the jury used to be now not the individual summoned for jury responsibility, Closing date reported.

    A pass judgement on ordered Heard to pay Depp more or less $10 million in damages following a 2018 opinion article by which the actor referred to herself as a sufferer of home abuse however didn’t identify her abuser.

    She used to be awarded $2 million in compensatory damages.

    Heard’s prison crew wrote that “Juror No. 15,” indexed as a 77-year-old at the jury panel listing, is registered to vote on the similar cope with as a 52-year-old with the similar identify, in line with the submitting.

    “The person who seemed for jury responsibility with this identify used to be clearly the more youthful one,” the prison crew wrote.

    “Thus, the 52-year-old … sitting at the jury for 6 weeks used to be by no means summoned for jury responsibility on April 11 and didn’t ‘seem within the listing.’”

    The prison crew detailed how jurors on trials are requested to make sure their id ahead of their court docket provider.

    Jurors also are requested to make sure their id on a juror questionnaire webpage in Fairfax County, a questionnaire that asks jurors to log in with their beginning date, the crew mentioned.

    “The ones safeguards are in position and relied upon by way of the events to make sure the id of the proper juror, to verify due procedure and a good trial for all litigants,” the prison crew wrote.

    “When those safeguards are circumvented or now not adopted, as seems to be the case right here, the proper to a jury trial and due procedure are undermined and compromised.”

    HuffPost reached out to each Heard’s and Depp’s prison groups in regards to the submitting on Friday.

    The submitting comes after a consultant of Heard mentioned she deliberate to attraction the decision of the multimillion-dollar lawsuit in June.

    Heard, in an interview with NBC Information closing month, mentioned she has feared long term defamation complaints for talking out about her dating with Depp.

  • Netflix will finance Johnny Depp’s King Louis XV movie, his comeback post-defamation trial

    Through IANS

    NEW DELHI: Streaming massive Netflix helps finance Hollywood big name Johnny Depp’s film comeback following his much-publicised defamation trial towards ex-wife and actress Amber Heard that he in the end gained.

    Consistent with aceshowbiz.com, the 59-year-old will painting King Louis XV within the French-language movie ‘L. a. Favourite’, which used to be up to now reported to be titled ‘Jeanne du Barry’. Netflix has obtained the rights to flow the movie in France, other folks acquainted with the deal inform Bloomberg.

    The purchase of the movie’s rights will probably be utilized by the manufacturers to assist finance the manufacturing. Beneath the deal, the length piece will probably be hitting the streamer 15 months following its theatrical free up. Netflix, then again, does no longer have the rights to flow the film in different territories and isn’t concerned within the making of the image.

    Directed by means of Maiwenn Le Besco, ‘L. a. Favourite’ will inform the tale of Jeanne Becu, an impoverished seamstress who rises during the ranks of Louis XV’s court docket to grow to be his reliable mistress. Le Besco additionally stars as Jeanne Becu. Even though the true Louis XV dominated over France for almost 59 years, he “died as an unpopular king…accused of corruption and debauchery,” Selection wrote in January.

    Filming is scheduled to begin later this summer time throughout France and can remaining for approximately 3 months. The film is anticipated to be able for theatrical free up within the nation in 2023.

    ‘L. a. Favourite’ will mark Depp’s first performing function since he gained the defamation case.

    ALSO READ | Amber Heard’s lawyer urges court docket to toss out defamation trial verdict

    ‘The Pirates of the Caribbean’ big name used to be awarded $10 million in compensatory damages and $350,000 in punitive damages after the jury discovered his ex-wife Heard in charge of defaming him. The similar jury awarded $2 million to the ‘Aquaman’ actress who made an identical claims towards Depp.

    Depp’s remaining movie used to be ‘Minamata’, which used to be launched within the U.S. overdue remaining 12 months. In November 2020, he withdrew from ‘Improbable Beasts: The Secrets and techniques of Dumbledore’, by which he used to be intended to reprise his function as Grindelwald, and used to be changed by means of Mads Mikkelsen after dropping his UK libel case towards The Solar.