The World Opinion

Tag: allahabad high court

  • Ban on Meat Liquor: The petition towards the ban on sale of meat-liquor close to Mathura-Vrindavan Krishna Janmabhoomi used to be rejected through the UP Top Court docket.

    Prayagraj: Allahabad Top Court docket (allahabad hc information) has brushed aside a PIL filed towards the state govt’s ban on sale of liquor and meat close to krishna janmbhoomi in 22 wards of Mathura-Vrindavan. The courtroom brushed aside the petition announcing that India is a rustic of diversities. If solidarity is to be maintained within the nation, then appreciate for all communities and religions is essential. Cohesion is the wonderful thing about our nation in spite of the range.

    This order has been given through a department bench of Justice Pritinkar Diwakar and Justice Ashutosh Srivastava on a public pastime litigation filed through Shahida, a social activist from Mathura. The petition used to be filed announcing that the native police is harassing the folk. They must be stopped from doing so and the ban on sale of liquor and meat must be got rid of. It used to be mentioned that it is a part of the basic proper of the folk to devour the meals in their selection.

    The courtroom mentioned that it isn’t making an allowance for the legality of such restrictions imposed through the federal government. The petitioner has no longer challenged the order of ban within the petition. The courtroom mentioned that Mathura-Vrindavan is a holy position and numerous pilgrims come there.

    On September 10, 2021, the state govt has banned the sale of liquor and meat inside of 10 sq. kilometer radius of Mathura-Vrindavan Krishna Janmabhoomi. Mathura’s Meals Processing Officer, Meals Protection and Medication had handed an order canceling the registration of stores promoting meat with rapid impact. Saddened through this order of the native management, the petitioner had filed a public pastime litigation within the capability of a social employee.

  • Azam Khan Information: Excellent information for Azam Khan from the Best Courtroom, keep at the order of the Prime Courtroom of Jauhar College land takeover

    Rampur: The Best Courtroom has given aid to Maulana Jauhar College Consider of Rampur in Uttar Pradesh. The Best Courtroom has stayed the order of the Jauhar College land takeover of the Prime Courtroom. Now the topic might be heard in August. In this kind of scenario, Samajwadi Birthday celebration MLA Azam Khan, lately lodged in Sitapur Prison, has were given aid within the Jauhar College land takeover case.

    The Allahabad Prime Courtroom had given a significant setback to the Jauhar College Consider. The court docket had ordered to carry greater than 450 acres of land beneath the keep watch over of the federal government, aside from 12.5 acres of college land. The received land used to be to be returned to the federal government beneath the order of the court docket. The Jauhar College Consider had moved the Best Courtroom in opposition to the order of the Prime Courtroom. A large resolution has pop out in this on Monday.

    Reduction until August
    Jauhar College Consider has were given aid until August. In reality, after the formation of Yogi Adityanath’s executive within the yr 2017 in UP, tightening the noose on Azam Khan began. Jauhar College had additionally come at the goal of the federal government. Within the investigation of the topic on behalf of the federal government, it used to be discovered that the land of the farmers used to be wrongly received and given to the Jauhar College Consider.

    This land of Maulana Jauhar College is in Rampur district. Azam Khan and his members of the family are trustees on this college. Relating to wrongful acquisition of land, many FIRs were registered in opposition to Azam.

  • Varanasi Information: Allahabad Top Court docket’s determination when it comes to lacking pupil from BHU nowadays…

    Abhishek Jha, Varanasi: A call would possibly come on Monday when it comes to the lacking pupil of the Banaras Hindu College (BHU) of Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh. The listening to of this situation is occurring within the Allahabad Top Court docket. The verdict of the case is being mentioned on Monday. In the sort of state of affairs, the difficulty of the accused policemen appears to be expanding. Actually, in February 2020, BHU pupil Shiv Kumar Trivedi went lacking from the police custody of the Lanka police station. On this topic, the fogeys had moved the Top Court docket.

    Pupil Shiv Kumar Trivedi used to be picked up by way of PRV from BHU campus. The legal professional showing for the case has made a giant disclosure that the frame of Shiv Kumar Trivedi, who went lacking from the Lanka campus police station, has been recovered. It’s been matched with the DNA of the daddy. Now on this case, the Allahabad Top Court docket can pronounce the decision towards the policemen concerned within the incident of Lanka police station. The CBCID may additionally provide the development document of the investigation all over the listening to within the Top Court docket. The duty of investigating this topic used to be entrusted to CBCID itself. The group headed by way of IPS Sunita Singh is investigating.

    Pupil’s frame used to be recovered from Ramnagar pond
    The frame of the coed who used to be picked up from the BHU campus has been recovered from the pond in Ramnagar. On this case, it’s been feared that the useless frame used to be thrown into the pond after killing the coed. The court docket can go strict orders within the listening to to be hung on Monday. The deceased pupil Shivkumar Trivedi used to be finding out in B.Sc 3rd 12 months. He used to be a resident of Panna district of Madhya Pradesh. He went lacking from the Lanka police station at the evening of 13-14 February 2020. Suggest Saurabh Tiwari has filed a public pastime litigation on this topic. The topic will likely be heard within the Department Bench headed by way of the Leader Justice.

  • UP government opposes same-sex marriage; Allahabad HC rejects plea of lesbian couple 

    Specific Information Provider

    LUCKNOW: Opposing the rage of same-sex marriage, the Uttar Pradesh executive termed such marriages in opposition to Indian tradition and quite a lot of different religions co-existing within the nation.

    Making such submissions in Allahabad Prime Courtroom just lately, the state executive mentioned that such marriages will have to be deemed invalid beneath Indian rules that have been designed on the concept that associated with the lifestyles of a person and a girl.

    Within the wake of the state executive’s submission, HC’s Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav, whilst listening to a petition of habeas corpus, delivered his order dated April 7 rejecting a request to acknowledge same-sex marriage. The petition was once filed by means of one Anju Devi, the mummy of one of the crucial ladies in a lesbian courting.

    Anju Devi had advised the court docket to make sure the custody of her daughter, 23, alleging that she were illegally detained by means of every other 22-year-old lady (Reverse birthday celebration No 4 within the case).

    Previous, at the mom’s plea, the court docket had on April 6, 2022, issued directives to provide each the women within the court docket. 

    On April 7, 2022, each got here to the court docket and submitted that they had been primary and had been in love. They claimed that they’d entered right into a same-sex marriage with mutual consent. On this regard, additionally they produced a matrimonial contract letter within the court docket for the perusal of the pass judgement on.

    Additional, they advised the court docket to accord acknowledgment to their marriage as they had been adults and had entered right into a gay marriage. Of their arguments, they’d referred to the Very best Courtroom’s order decriminalizing consensual intercourse amongst all adults, together with gay intercourse in its ruling with regards to Navtej Singh Johar & Ors. v. Union of India thr. Secretary Ministry of Legislation and Justice AIR 2018 SC 4321.

    Each the women additionally argued that although the Hindu Marriage Act talks concerning the marriage of 2 folks, it didn’t oppose gay marriage.

    In the meantime, the extra executive advocates (AGA), representing the Uttar Pradesh executive, adverse the submission by means of the women arguing that during India, marriage was once regarded as to be a sacred ‘sanskara’ and that the rustic was once being run on cultural and spiritual values and Indian legislation, in contrast to different international locations the place marriage was once a freelance.

    Regarding the Hindu Marriage Act, the AGAs additional submitted that it mentioned marriage between a girl and a person and within the absence of both of the 2, marriage may just now not be authorised in any respect, because it defied the Indian circle of relatives thought. 

    Additional stressing that the Hindu Marriage Act 1955, Particular Marriage Act 1954, or even the Overseas Marriage Act 1969 additionally didn’t permit gay marriage, the State of UP argued that even Muslim, Buddhist, Jain, Sikh, and so forth. religions had now not known gay marriage.

    The federal government suggest additional submitted that in keeping with the Indian Sanatan Vidhi, 16 ‘sanskars’ had been there together with the rituals associated with particular person proper from his/her presence within the mom’s womb to ultimate rites and in all 16 rituals, a person and a girl had a definitive function to play. Of their absence, such rituals may just now not be finished, argued the advocates.

    “As in line with the Indian legislation and tradition, a organic husband and organic spouse were mentioned to be crucial for marriage and most effective their marriage has been known. Of their absence, gay marriage can’t be known because it lacks female and male, and neither can they produce kids. Marriage is thought of as essential in Hindu legislation, beneath which each women and men are living in combination and elevate ahead the human chain by means of generating kids,” it was once additional submitted.

  • Kashi Vishwanath-Gyanvapi Masjid Case: The listening to of Vishwanath-Gyanvapi Masjid may now not be finished, now the following debate can be on April 28

    Prayagraj: The listening to within the Allahabad Top Court docket in regards to the Kashi Vishweshwar Nath Temple-Gyanvapi Masjid dispute has now not been finished even on Wednesday. Arguing on behalf of Lord Vishwanath temple, recommend Vijay Shankar Rastogi mentioned that harm to the temple does now not alternate the spiritual nature of the valuables. The life of the disputed Lord Vishweshwar temple has been happening since Satyuga until now. Lord Vishweshwar is provide within the disputed construction. It used to be mentioned that harmful the temple does now not alternate its spiritual nature. It’s argued that the temple is historic and that its development dates again to the fifteenth century.

    Suggest Prakash Padia, who’s listening to the topic, mentioned that the non-Muslim folks can’t be disadvantaged of the fitting to that assets simply through registering the valuables underneath the Waqf Act. The suitable of non-Muslim folks in such homes does now not finish with the valuables. It used to be mentioned that by which regulation and by which yr the valuables used to be registered underneath the Waqf Act, even the respondent petitioner does now not know. Waqf is claimed to be registered underneath the 1954 Act. Then it used to be mentioned that the 1960 Act is registered. They’re additionally pronouncing that once the federal government survey in 1944, the mosque is registered with the Waqf Board.

    It used to be additionally mentioned that the Muslim society does now not get any proper if any a part of the valuables is registered with the Waqf Board. Waqf Board can make a decision disputes of Muslim neighborhood simplest. Waqf Board has no authority on disputes between non-Muslims. Now the following debate will happen on April 28.

  • Prayagraj information: Choice of age of stripling by means of DL or Voter ID is mistaken, Allahabad Top Court docket’s determination in POCSO case

    Prayagraj: The Allahabad Top Court docket has stated in crucial determination that riding license and voter ID will have to no longer be taken under consideration whilst figuring out the age of a juvenile. Justice Rahul Chaturvedi put aside the order of the Particular Pass judgement on (POCSO Act), Bulandshahr, which had pushed aside the appliance filed by means of Naushad Ali to claim himself a juvenile. Naushal Ali has been booked beneath POCSO Act. The trial court docket had stated that Naushad Ali was once an grownup on the time of the incident as his date of beginning is April 7, 1994.

    Naushad Ali’s suggest argued that Naushad had handed the highschool exam from the UP Board in 2015 and his date of beginning within the certificates is March 4, 2001, however the court docket didn’t imagine it. The Top Court docket, after listening to the arguments of the events involved on Friday, noticed that the Particular Pass judgement on (POCSO Act) has dedicated a prison error by means of depending at the appellant’s studying riding license and voter ID card as any of those whilst figuring out the age of a juvenile. The file will have to no longer be regarded as.

    wrongly rejected certificates
    The Top Court docket held that once the highschool certificates mentions the age of the appellant, which is to be had prior to the Particular Pass judgement on (POCSO Act), they will have to resolve the age after allowing for the highschool certificates. However they didn’t accomplish that and wrongly rejected the juvenile’s declare, depending on paperwork that aren’t labeled within the Juvenile Justice Act.

  • Prayagraj Information: Reduction to Sakshi Maharaj in gangrape and kidnapping case, Allahabad Top Courtroom brushed aside the petition

    Prayagraj: Allahabad Top Courtroom has given nice reduction to MP Sakshi Maharaj and different accused. The court docket refused to intrude with the trial court docket’s order to abduct the girl and abduct her for 9 days along with her accomplices. The felony revision petition of the state executive difficult the release order has been brushed aside.

    The entire case is of Kotwali Nagar, Etah the place an FIR used to be lodged, during which a girl accused the witness and colleagues of gang-rape by means of kidnapping her from the scientific health facility at the side of the guard. The lady mentioned that she used to be attacked within the Udaipur ashram.

    What is the topic?
    Police filed rate sheet on this case. On which Sakshi and others carried out for discharge. He mentioned that he has been falsely implicated. The sufferer additionally didn’t settle for the remark given in her court docket by means of submitting a testimony. After this, the jurisdictional officer of Firozabad, Tundla mentioned. The allegations weren’t discovered to be true.

    No proof of scientific exam – HC
    The court docket mentioned that there’s no proof of scientific exam at the allegation of misconduct. Dr. Nathu Singh Baghel, who has been informed to be kidnapped from the health facility, has denied such an incident. No eyewitness has taken the identify of the witness. While the allegation is on Sakshi of kidnapping and gang-rape along with her accomplices. The allegations weren’t discovered to be true within the investigation of the CO. The Courtroom brushed aside the revision petition, refusing to intrude.

    Subsequent articlePrayagraj Information: The homicide used to be dedicated 12 years in the past by means of coming into the home, the court docket sentenced the 4 accused to existence imprisonment

  • SC directs Uttar Pradesh to answer SIT experiences in quest of cancellation of bail to Ashish Mishra

    Via PTI

    NEW DELHI: The Splendid Court docket on Wednesday directed the Uttar Pradesh executive to reply by way of April 4 to the 2 experiences of a retired pass judgement on, tracking the SIT probe into the Lakhimpur Kheri violence case, which had sought cancellation of bail to Ashish Mishra, son of Union minister Ajay Mishra.

    A bench headed by way of Leader Justice NV Ramana mentioned that the tracking pass judgement on had written to the state for cancellation of bail granted by way of the Allahabad Prime Court docket to Ashish Mishra in reference to the case.

    “There are two letters despatched by way of the SIT to the Further leader secretary (House) of the Uttar Pradesh executive by way of the tracking pass judgement on who had written to state to record attraction in SC to cancel bail of major accused Ashish Mishra,” the bench additionally comprising Justices Surya Kant and Hima Kohli mentioned.

    Senior suggest Mahesh Jethmalani, showing for the state executive, took directions and knowledgeable the apex courtroom that the Further Secretary, House, has said now to us that he didn’t obtain the letters. The bench then requested him to head in the course of the experiences submitted by way of the SIT and reply to it by way of April 4.

    Senior suggest Dushyant Dave, showing for the petitioners, submitted that the Uttar Pradesh executive has submitted that that they had hostile the bail within the Prime Court docket. “It’s forthcoming that the bail be cancelled or put aside in those cases because the HC verdict suffers from non software of thoughts,” he mentioned.

    The highest courtroom had appointed Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain, former pass judgement on of the Punjab and Haryana Prime Court docket to oversee on day by day foundation the Uttar Pradesh SIT’s probe into the Lakhimpur Kheri violence.

    On October 3 remaining 12 months, 8 other folks have been killed in Lakhimpur Kheri all over violence that erupted when farmers have been protesting in opposition to Uttar Pradesh Deputy Leader Minister Keshav Prasad Maurya’s consult with to the realm.

    4 farmers have been mowed down by way of an SUV following which the driving force and two BJP staff have been allegedly lynched by way of indignant farmers. A journalist additionally died within the violence that prompted outrage amongst opposition events and farmer teams agitating over the Centre’s now-repealed agri regulations.

  • HC grants Abbas Ansari coverage from arrest until April 27 over speech threatening officers

    By means of PTI

    ALLAHABAD: The Allahabad Top Courtroom on Tuesday gave Abbas Ansari, the son of jailed gangster-turned-politician Mukhtar Ansari, meantime coverage from arrest over his speech all through an election assembly threatening to “settle the account” with govt officers.

    A bench of Justices Sunita Agarwal and Vikas Kunvar Srivastav ordered that the petitioner, Abbas Ansari, shall no longer be arrested until April 27 and he’ll be underneath legal responsibility to cooperate within the investigation.

    “In case of any act of the petitioner of non-cooperation within the ongoing investigation, it could be open for the respondents to way this court docket for holiday of this meantime order,” the bench mentioned.

    The case used to be registered on March 4 in opposition to Ansari, who received the Uttar Pradesh Meeting polls from Mau at the price tag of the Suheldev Bharatiya Samaj Birthday celebration (SBSP), which used to be in a tie-up with the Akhilesh Yadav-led Samajwadi Birthday celebration.

    Ansari moved the court docket difficult the FIR and in addition sought coverage from arrest within the subject.

    His suggest submitted that the native police used to be seeking to arrest him within the case by means of including extra grave fees.

    The petitioner is an elected MLA of Mau and he’s being focused not to permit him to take oath of place of job, the suggest mentioned.

    The Election Fee had then barred Ansari from campaigning for twenty-four hours for his speech.

    In a purported video clip of his speech, Ansari is noticed telling a crowd all through an election tournament that he has talked to Yadav to ensure that no switch or posting takes position within the six months after the celebration involves energy within the state.

    “Jo yahan hai wo yahan hello rahega, pehle hisaab-kitab hoga uske baad unke jaane ke certificates par mohar lagaya jaega (Those that are right here, will stay right here. First account might be settled with them and best after that their departure papers might be stamped,” Ansari is purportedly noticed pronouncing within the video.

    The SP-led alliance misplaced the election held over February and March to the BJP.

  • Come to a decision on inclusion of Rajbhar neighborhood in ST record: HC to Yogi executive

    A two-judge bench of Justices Siddhartha Varma and Dinesh Pathak gave the order on a writ petition filed through the Jago Rajbhar Jago Samiti and any other on March 11.