The World Opinion

Tag: Alison J. Nathan

  • Ghislaine Maxwell denied new trial in Jeffrey Epstein intercourse crime case

    Ghislaine Maxwell seems by the use of video hyperlink all the way through her arraignment listening to the place she used to be denied bail for her function assisting Jeffrey Epstein to recruit and sooner or later abuse of youth ladies, in Big apple Federal Courtroom, in New York, July 14, 2020 on this court docket comic strip.

    Jane Rosenberg | Reuters

    A federal pass judgement on Friday denied granting a brand new trial to British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell, who argued that her conviction for purchasing underage ladies to be sexually abused through Jeffrey Epstein used to be tainted through the presence of a juror who didn’t divulge he himself have been sexually abused as a kid.

    Pass judgement on Alison Nathan stated Maxwell’s attorneys had failed to meet the necessities for granting a brand new trial in a legal case.

    Nathan wrote in her ruling that the juror had credibly testified all the way through a listening to in March that he “skimmed method too speedy” over a questionnaire prior to Maxwell’s trial closing iciness that requested potential jurors if they’d been the sufferers of sexual abuse.

    Maxwell’s attorneys stated that Juror 50’s failure to respond to that with a sure, as an alternative of the no, as he did, violated her proper to have an even trial.

    However Nathan wrote that in response to Juror 50’s testimony closing month, she believed that “Juror 50 used to be no longer biased and do not have been afflicted for reason” from serving at the jury “despite the fact that he had responded every query at the questionnaire correctly.”

    Maxwell, 60, used to be convicted Dec. 29 in U.S. District Courtroom in Big apple of 5 legal counts, together with conspiracy to lure minors to go back and forth to interact in unlawful sexual acts.

    She faces many years in jail when she is sentenced for the ones crimes, which relate to the abuse of underage ladies through her and Epstein within the Nineties.

    The accusers within the case have been youngsters once they have been allegedly abused through Epstein at his houses in the USA and London.

    Maxwell, who at one time have been Epstein’s female friend and his assets supervisor, has been held with out bail since her arrest in July 2020 in New Hampshire.

    That arrest got here 12 months after Epstein himself used to be arrested on federal kid intercourse trafficking fees for abusing dozens of underage ladies.

    The 66-year-old cash supervisor died in a federal prison in Big apple in August 2019 whilst expecting trial, from what has formally been dominated a suicide through placing in his mobile.

    Epstein in the past have been buddies with quite a lot of wealthy and well-known other people, amongst them two former presidents, Donald Trump and Invoice Clinton, and Prince Andrew of Britain.

    That is breaking information. Please test again for updates.

  • Ghislaine Maxwell juror will take 5th to steer clear of answering if he lied on questionnaire in intercourse crime trial

    Ghislaine Maxwell listens as Lisa Rocchio sits within the witness field as she is puzzled by means of Assistant U.S. Lawyer Lara Pomerantz throughout a listening to to speak about which professional witnesses will be capable to testify at Maxwell’s upcoming intercourse crimes trial in New York, U.S., on this court docket cartoon on November 10, 2021.

    Jane Rosenberg | Reuters

    The juror accused of mendacity on a questionnaire sooner than he used to be seated within the trial that convicted Ghislaine Maxwell for intercourse crimes associated with Jeffrey Epstein will workout his 5th Modification proper towards self-incrimination at an upcoming courtroom listening to, his legal professional says.

    Federal prosecutors in flip stated they’re going to search an order compelling Juror 50, who’s refusing to reply to questions, to testify at that listening to, consistent with a brand new courtroom submitting.

    Juror 50 allegedly didn’t reveal at the questionnaire that he used to be a sufferer of sexual abuse as a kid at the questionnaire for Maxwell’s trial.

    However the guy, whose title CNBC isn’t publishing, later informed journalists he had disclosed that truth to fellow jurors throughout deliberations within the case.

    Maxwell’s legal professionals are looking for to have her conviction in December for shopping underage women to be sexually abused by means of Epstein tossed out and for the British socialite to be granted a brand new trial in accordance with Juror 50’s movements.

    The ones legal professionals argue that if Juror 50 had honestly spoke back the questionnaire, which requested if potential jurors if they’d ever been sexually abused, protection lawyers would have challenged his variety for the trial, which can have saved him off the jury.

    CNBC Politics

    Learn extra of CNBC’s politics protection:

    Ny federal courtroom Pass judgement on Alison Nathan has set a listening to Tuesday to query the juror below oath.

    However in a letter disclosed Wednesday, Juror 50’s legal professional Todd Spodek wrote Nathan, pronouncing, “I write to tell the Courtroom that Juror 50 will invoke his 5th Modification privilege towards self-incrimination on the listening to.”

    The prosecutors who treated Maxwell’s case informed the pass judgement on, “The Govt writes to inform the Courtroom that it’s within the technique of looking for inner approval to hunt an order, pursuant to [federal law] compelling Juror 50’s testimony on the listening to.”

    “The Govt will, matter to inner approval, post a proposed order to the Courtroom upfront of the listening to,” prosecutors wrote.

    Maxwell has been held with out bail since her arrest in mid-2020.

    Epstein, a cash supervisor who were pals with former Presidents Donald Trump and Invoice Clinton, in addition to with Britain’s Prince Andrew, died from suicide in a Ny prison in August 2019 whilst watching for trial on federal kid intercourse trafficking fees.

    That is breaking information. Take a look at again for updates.

  • Pass judgement on Limits Inquiry Into Juror At Ghislaine Maxwell Trial

    NEW YORK (AP) — An inquiry into conceivable juror misconduct at British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell’s intercourse trafficking trial shall be restricted to his solutions to 2 responses on a long questionnaire right through jury variety to stop an “intrusive fishing expedition” by means of protection legal professionals, a pass judgement on mentioned in an opinion launched Friday.

    U.S. District Pass judgement on Alison J. Nathan mentioned within the partly redacted choice dated Thursday that she’ll query a juror on March 8 about his solutions to 2 questions about a 50-question questionnaire to be told why he mentioned he’d by no means been a sufferer of sexual abuse or a sufferer of a criminal offense despite the fact that he printed after the trial that he had.

    Maxwell, 60, was once convicted in past due December of intercourse trafficking and different fees alleging that she recruited teenage ladies from 1994 to 2004 for financier Jeffrey Epstein to sexually abuse. She awaits a June sentencing. Epstein, 66, killed himself in a Long island federal prison cellular in August 2019 whilst watching for a intercourse trafficking trial.

    The juror forged doubt at the Maxwell trial verdict when he informed information shops in January that he had disclosed to fellow jurors right through a weeklong deliberation that he was once a kid intercourse abuse sufferer and satisfied different jurors {that a} sufferer’s imperfect reminiscence of intercourse abuse doesn’t imply it didn’t occur.

    Nathan rejected requests by means of Maxwell’s legal professionals to straight away order a brand new trial or to let protection lawyers collect proof corresponding to communications the juror had via social media or by means of electronic mail with alleged sufferers or witnesses, different jurors or media representatives. In addition they sought proof of bills he would possibly have won for any interview or knowledge he gave about his jury provider.

    “The Courtroom denies those requests as vexatious, intrusive, unjustified, and a fishing expedition,” the pass judgement on wrote.

    She mentioned it was once “procedurally flawed” for Maxwell’s lawyers to subpoena social media firms for data.

    “The Courtroom concludes that the Defendant has now not made a appearing that any pre-hearing discovery is acceptable, and the request to have interaction in an intrusive fishing expedition is denied,” Nathan mentioned.

    A legal professional for Maxwell didn’t straight away reply to a request for remark.

    Nathan cited earlier instances and rulings by means of appeals courts to turn that the inquiry into the habits of a juror recognized in paperwork most effective as “Juror No. 50” will have to be restricted and that different jurors might not be wondered.

    However she additionally wrote that his “direct, unambiguous statements to a couple of media shops” supply considerable and incontrovertible proof that an impropriety — a false observation — right through jury variety has came about.

    “To be transparent, the prospective impropriety isn’t that any individual with a historical past of sexual abuse can have served at the jury. Fairly, it’s the attainable failure to reply honestly to questions right through the jury variety procedure that requested for that subject matter knowledge in order that any attainable bias may well be explored,” she mentioned.

    She mentioned her choice, introduced Thursday, to reserve an evidentiary public listening to the place she is going to query the juror was once made vital as a result of he checked the “No” field as his resolution to Query 48.

    The query requested: Have you ever or a pal or circle of relatives member ever been the sufferer of sexual harassment, sexual abuse, or sexual attack? (This comprises exact or tried sexual attack or different undesirable sexual advance, together with by means of a stranger, acquaintance, manager, instructor, or circle of relatives member.)

    Nathan mentioned she may also query the juror about why he checked “No” to Query 25, which requested: Have you ever, or any of your kinfolk or shut buddies, ever been a sufferer of a criminal offense?

    She mentioned the aim of her questions for the juror shall be to decide if he has engaged in any misconduct warranting a brand new trial.

  • Tesla CEO Elon Musk accuses SEC of leaking data from federal probe

    Maja Hitij | Getty Pictures Information | Getty Pictures

    Tesla CEO Elon Musk, by way of his legal professional, accused the Securities and Trade Fee of leaking details about a federal investigation in an effort to retaliate towards him for public grievance of the federal monetary regulators.

    In a letter on Monday to U.S. District Pass judgement on Alison Nathan, Musk legal professional Alex Spiro wrote: “It has turn into clearer and clearer that the Fee is out to retaliate towards my purchasers for exercising their First Modification rights—maximum just lately by means of criticizing the Fee at the public docket and by means of petitioning this Court docket for aid.”

    The letter comes 4 days after Musk to start with alleged that the SEC used to be engaged in harassment by means of frequently investigating him, that the company used to be seeking to sit back his proper to unfastened speech, and had overlooked their tasks to remit $40 million to shareholders that Tesla and Musk up to now paid in fines to settle securities fraud fees.

    Spiro didn’t specify which investigation or what form of data will have been leaked by means of the SEC, and to whom. Within the letter, he alleged that no less than one member of the SEC had leaked “positive data referring to its investigation” with out offering any supporting proof.

    Spiro may just now not be in an instant reached for remark. The SEC didn’t in an instant reply for remark.

    The warfare between Musk and the SEC started in September 2018 when the SEC charged Musk with making “false and deceptive” statements to traders after he wrote on Twitter that August that he had secured sufficient investment for a large non-public buyout of Tesla at $420 a proportion. The inventory seesawed all month and the deal Musk alluded to by no means materialized.

    Musk and Tesla needed to pay $20 million in fines every, and Musk used to be pressured to step down as chairman for a minimum of 3 years as a part of a revised agreement settlement the company reached with the automaker and CEO in 2019. Tesla additionally needed to installed position a machine for tracking Musk’s statements to the general public concerning the corporate — whether or not on Twitter, in a weblog publish or some other medium.

    The SEC’s Steven Buchholz spoke back to the sooner allegations on Friday, pronouncing the company used to be in reality making growth at the job of disbursing the $40 million to shareholders. He characterised the duty as complicated and famous that Tesla and Musk had by no means expressed any fear about remittance sooner than. SEC team of workers expects to publish a “proposed plan of distribution” to the court docket for approval by means of the top of March 2022, he wrote.

    Buchholz additionally wrote that ongoing verbal exchange with Tesla used to be what Nathan and the revised agreement settlement had referred to as for, and that if Musk objected to any subpoena his legal professionals will have to cope with that during a special movement. There is a other federal statutory scheme for objecting to a subpoena.

    Tesla disclosed in a 2021 fourth-quarter profits file that the SEC issued a subpoena to the corporate in November 2021. In keeping with Tesla’s quarterly submitting, the company is looking for data on its “governance processes round compliance with the SEC agreement, as amended.”

    Spiro printed within the letter on Monday some information about that subpoena. He wrote, “the Fee in particular demanded paperwork regarding my purchasers’ ‘compliance or non-compliance with Tesla’s disclosure controls and procedures, government communications coverage, exterior communications coverage, different insurance policies or procedures when it comes to public statements or communications by means of Tesla executives, or the general judgment or amended ultimate judgment in SEC v. Musk, 1:18-cv-8865-AJN (S.D.N.Y.).’

    He additionally mentioned the SEC issued a separate, however identical subpoena to Musk.

    The November subpoena got here in a while after Musk polled his tens of thousands and thousands of Twitter fans in asking if he will have to promote 10% of his stake in Tesla. They voted sure. However a big portion of the gross sales that adopted the Twitter ballot had been a part of a plan that Musk followed in September 2021.

  • Convicted Jeffrey Epstein procurer Ghislaine Maxwell information sealed movement arguing for brand spanking new trial after bombshell juror disclosure

    Ghislaine Maxwell watches as witness Eva Andersson is puzzled through protection lawyer Jeffrey Pagliuca all over the trial of Maxwell, the Jeffrey Epstein affiliate accused of intercourse trafficking, in a court docket cartoon in New York Town, December 17, 2021.

    Jane Rosenberg | Reuters

    Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell, the British socialite lately convicted of purchasing underage ladies to be sexually abused through Jeffrey Epstein, filed a movement supporting her bid for a brand new trial on Wednesday.

    The submitting comes weeks after Maxwell’s conviction used to be put in danger with disclosures that no less than one juror would possibly no longer have published all over jury variety that they themselves have been sufferers of sexual abuse.

    Maxwell’s attorney Bobbi Sternheim filed the brand new trial request, which might element the arguments supporting the movement, and its accompanying shows beneath seal in Long island federal district court docket.

    In a letter, Sternheim requested Pass judgement on Alison Nathan “that each one submissions touching on Juror 50 stay beneath seal till the Court docket regulations at the Movement.”

    Maxwell, 60, used to be convicted Dec. 29 of more than one felonies associated with the abuse of underage ladies through Epstein, her former boyfriend, who had fatally hung himself in a federal prison in August 2019 whilst looking forward to trial in a federal kid intercourse trafficking case.

    Days later, a 35-year-old juror within the case, Juror 50, in media interviews mentioned he have been sexually abused as a kid, and mentioned that truth along with his fellow jurors all over their deliberations.

    The juror used to be quoted as pronouncing he didn’t recall being requested on a jury variety questionnaire whether or not he have been a sufferer of sexual abuse, however mentioned he would have responded truthfully if he noticed that query.

    That query used to be on that questionnaire.

    CNBC Politics

    Learn extra of CNBC’s politics protection:

    Not one of the publicly viewable parts of filings through Maxwell’s legal professionals explicitly say that Juror 50 did not appropriately reveal his abuse historical past at the questionnaire.

    However the ones legal professionals previous this month, after the juror’s feedback have been printed, referred to as on Nathan to reserve a brand new trial with out even keeping a listening to at the factor.

    Protection legal professionals on the time famous that the U.S. Ideally suited Court docket has dominated {that a} new trial will also be granted if it may be proven {that a} “juror failed to reply to truthfully a subject material query” all over jury variety and {that a} proper reaction would had been grounds to disqualify the juror from being seated.

    Ghislaine Maxwell speaks on the Arctic Circle Discussion board in Reykjavik, Iceland October 2013.

    The Arctic Circle by means of Reuters

    Nathan is looking forward to arguments from each prosecutors and protection legal professionals at the query of whether or not she will have to behavior an inquiry into the juror’s questionnaire and his conceivable impact on fellow jurors all over deliberations.

    Within the intervening time, she has set a June 28 sentencing date for Maxwell. That sentencing could be canceled if the pass judgement on finally ends up ordering a brand new trial for her.

    Maxwell stays held with out bail in a federal prison in Brooklyn.

  • Ghislaine Maxwell attorneys search new trial after juror tells media he used to be sexually abused

    U.S. marshalls (no longer observed) block Ghislaine Maxwell from talking along with her sister Isabel all the way through jury deliberations within the trial of Jeffrey Epstein affiliate Maxwell in a court comic strip in New York Town, December 29, 2021.

    Jane Rosenberg | Reuters

    Legal professionals for Ghislaine Maxwell requested a pass judgement on Wednesday to put aside her conviction for abetting Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual abuse of underage ladies, bringing up a juror’s contemporary disclosure to newshounds that he used to be sexually abused as a kid and mentioned that truth with different jurors all the way through their deliberations.

    The bombshell building got here after prosecutors notified the pass judgement on of 3 media interviews with the 35-year-old juror that had been performed after Maxwell used to be convicted of a couple of felonies on Dec. 29 in Long island federal courtroom.

    Hours later, The New York Instances reported {that a} 2nd juror informed that newspaper that they mentioned their very own revel in of sexual abuse with different jurors all the way through deliberations in Maxwell’s case.

    The British socialite’s attorneys strongly implied in publicly disclosed portions of 2 letters to Pass judgement on Alison Nathan that the primary juror failed to expose all the way through the jury variety procedure that he used to be a sexual abuse sufferer, regardless of having been requested to take action on a written questionnaire.

    Maxwell’s attorneys requested Nathan for a brand new trial at the fees, pronouncing “we imagine the regulation and info are obviously on our facet,” and that there are “incontrovertible grounds” for tossing out the conviction.

    Prosecutors in their very own letter to Nathan inquiring for an inquiry into the juror’s feedback famous that he’s quoted in reviews as pronouncing he “flew thru” the jury questionnaire, and didn’t recall being requested whether or not he have been a sufferer of sexual abuse.

    However the Long island resident additionally informed newshounds he would have replied in truth if requested that query, the prosecutors’ letter famous. That letter cited interviews with the juror printed through Reuters, DailyMail.com and The Impartial.

    In his letter to Nathan, Maxwell’s legal professional Christian Everdell famous that in step with the juror’s statements to newshounds, his disclosure of getting been sexually abused “influenced the deliberations and satisfied different individuals of the jury to convict Ms. Maxwell.”

    The juror, recognized in interviews through his first and center names, Scotty David, informed The Impartial that he informed fellow jury individuals all the way through their deliberations about his abuse to provide an explanation for why a few of Maxwell’s accusers may misremember positive main points associated with their very own abuse.

    “I do know what came about when I used to be sexually abused. I take into account the color of the carpet, the partitions. A few of it may be replayed like a video,” he informed The Impartial.

    “However I will’t take into account the entire main points, there are a few things that run in combination.”

    The newspaper additionally reported that some jurors puzzled why Maxwell’s accusers didn’t come ahead previous with their allegations.

    David informed The Impartial that he had no longer disclosed his personal abuse “till I used to be in highschool,” and mentioned the jury room went totally silent when he shared the tale of that abuse.

    CNBC Politics

    Learn extra of CNBC’s politics protection:

    In a 2nd letter to Nathan, Maxwell’s complete protection staff argued that courtroom listening to at the juror’s feedback is vital to decide whether or not a brand new trial must be granted, objected to a request through prosecutors that the pass judgement on appoint a legal professional for the primary juror for any listening to.

    “In accordance with undisputed, publicly to be had data, the Courtroom can and must order a brand new trial with out
    any evidentiary listening to,” the letter mentioned.

    That letter additionally famous that the U.S. Excellent Courtroom has dominated {that a} new trial can also be granted if it may be proven {that a} “juror failed to respond to in truth a subject matter query” all the way through jury variety and {that a} right kind reaction would had been grounds to disqualify the juror from being seated.

    “This usual applies despite the fact that juror’s behavior used to be simply inadvertent and no longer intentional,” the protection attorneys wrote.

    Nathan later Wednesday set a briefing agenda at the factor, telling protection attorneys to record a movement through Jan. 19, and prosecutors to respond through Feb. 2.

    Nathan additionally mentioned she would appoint a legal professional for the primary juror if he sought after one.

    Maxwell, 60, faces a long time in jail when she is sentenced for the 5 counts for which she used to be convicted.

    She has been held in a federal prison with out bail since her arrest in July 2020, after Nathan discovered she used to be a major flight possibility.

    Maxwell used to be discovered accountable of shopping a number of underage ladies to be abused through Epstein, an eccentric cash supervisor who in the past have been buddies with high-profile folks reminiscent of former Presidents Donald Trump and Invoice Clinton, and Prince Andrew of Britain.

    Epstein, 66, died in August 2019 from what has formally been dominated a suicide through putting whilst in a Long island federal prison as he awaited his personal trial on kid intercourse trafficking fees.