Tag: Adani Ports

  • Gautam Adani’s 2024 Salary Revealed – Less Than Some Of His Own Employees! Find Out Here | Companies News

    New Delhi: Gautam Adani, who is a leading industrialist who frequently ranks among the top 2 or 3 on India’s and Asia’s rich list has earned a total of Rs 9.26 crore for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2024. However, his pay was lower than that of key executives within the Adani group and his industry peers. At the age of 61, Adani received a salary from just two of the ten companies in his ports-to-energy conglomerate, according to annual reports from the group’s listed entities.

    Adani’s pay from the group’s main company in 2023-24, Adani Enterprises Ltd (AEL) consisted of a Rs2.19 crore salary with Rs 27 lakh in perks, allowances and other benefits. This brought his total remuneration to Rs 2.46 crore was 3 per cent more than previous financial year, according to AEL’s 2023-24 annual report. (Also Read: GST Council Meeting: FM Sitharaman Announces Nationwide Biometric Authentication- Key Highlights)

    Further, Adani received a salary of Rs 6.8 crore from Adani Ports and SEZ Ltd (APSEZ). Although some of his top executives earned more than him last year, his salary was still lower than that of the heads of nearly all major family-owned conglomerates in India. (Also Read: Central Govt Sets 9:15 AM Deadline, Warns Of Casual Leave Deductions For Latecomers: Report)

    Gautam Adani is currently worth USD 106 billion, according to the Bloomberg Billionaire Index. Adani became Asia’s richest man in 2022 but his net worth dropped notably after a report by the US short-seller Hindenburg Research accused his firm of financial irregularities.

    Adani’s younger brother Rajesh received Rs 8.37 crore which included a Rs 4.71 crore commission on profit from AEL, according to the annual report. Meanwhile his nephew Pranav Adani earned Rs 6.46 crore including a Rs 4.5 crore commission.

  • Deloitte flags issues, might hand over as Adani Ports auditor

    By way of Categorical Information Provider

    NEW DELHI:  Deloitte & Haskins LLP is prone to surrender because the auditor of Adani Ports and SEZ (APSEZ) over issues in regards to the high quality of accounts of the corporate, assets mentioned. Deloitte, which has been auditing the books of APSEZ since FY18, has raised severe issues over the allegations made by means of US-based Hindenburg in its record.

    The transactions flagged by means of Deloitte incorporated engineering, procurement and development (PEC) acquire contracts with a subsidiary of a birthday celebration recognized within the Hindenburg record.

    When contacted, the Adani Team dominated out this sort of chance. An organization spokesperson mentioned there’s a procedure to be adopted for resignation, including that they don’t seem to be conscious about the sort of procedure being initiated. Deloitte declined to remark.

    Within the not too long ago introduced first quarter effects, Deloitte highlighted some transactions flagged by means of Hindenburg as comparable birthday celebration transactions. It mentioned the corporate didn’t imagine it vital to have an unbiased exterior exam of those allegations. However, within the absence of an unbiased analysis, it isn’t ready to make a conclusive remark on such transactions.

    “The analysis carried out by means of the Team does no longer represent enough suitable audit proof for the needs of our audit,” Deloitte had mentioned in notes to APSEZ’s monetary remark.

    Hindenburg Analysis in its January 24 record that levelled allegations of fraud, inventory manipulation, and cash laundering towards the Adani workforce, had additionally flagged insufficient disclosures of comparable birthday celebration transactions. Adani workforce has denied all allegations.

    Two fishy offers

    In Would possibly, Deloitte had flagged 3 transactions, together with recoveries from a contractor recognized within the Hindenburg record, because it issued a professional opinion at the accounts of Adani Ports & Particular Financial Zone. Within the auditors’ record at the audit of the fourth quarter and 2022-23 financials, Deloitte highlighted transactions with 3 entities, which the corporate mentioned had been unrelated events.

    Deloitte on the other hand mentioned it might no longer attest to the corporate’s remark as no unbiased exterior exam has been achieved to end up the claims.

    Deloitte additionally flagged two transactions in its record – an EPC acquire contract with an entity that Hindenburg recognized as a comparable birthday celebration, and the renegotiated phrases of sale of its container terminal beneath development in Myanmar to Anguilla-incorporated  Sun Power Ltd

    The sale attention used to be revised from Rs 2,015 crore to Rs 246.51 crore and an impairment rate used to be taken. The gang informed the auditor those don’t seem to be comparable events.

    (With further inputs from PTI)

    NEW DELHI:  Deloitte & Haskins LLP is prone to surrender because the auditor of Adani Ports and SEZ (APSEZ) over issues in regards to the high quality of accounts of the corporate, assets mentioned. Deloitte, which has been auditing the books of APSEZ since FY18, has raised severe issues over the allegations made by means of US-based Hindenburg in its record.

    The transactions flagged by means of Deloitte incorporated engineering, procurement and development (PEC) acquire contracts with a subsidiary of a birthday celebration recognized within the Hindenburg record.

    When contacted, the Adani Team dominated out this sort of chance. An organization spokesperson mentioned there’s a procedure to be adopted for resignation, including that they don’t seem to be conscious about the sort of procedure being initiated. Deloitte declined to remark.googletag.cmd.push(serve as() googletag.show(‘div-gpt-ad-8052921-2′); );

    Within the not too long ago introduced first quarter effects, Deloitte highlighted some transactions flagged by means of Hindenburg as comparable birthday celebration transactions. It mentioned the corporate didn’t imagine it vital to have an unbiased exterior exam of those allegations. However, within the absence of an unbiased analysis, it isn’t ready to make a conclusive remark on such transactions.

    “The analysis carried out by means of the Team does no longer represent enough suitable audit proof for the needs of our audit,” Deloitte had mentioned in notes to APSEZ’s monetary remark.

    Hindenburg Analysis in its January 24 record that levelled allegations of fraud, inventory manipulation, and cash laundering towards the Adani workforce, had additionally flagged insufficient disclosures of comparable birthday celebration transactions. Adani workforce has denied all allegations.

    Two fishy offers

    In Would possibly, Deloitte had flagged 3 transactions, together with recoveries from a contractor recognized within the Hindenburg record, because it issued a professional opinion at the accounts of Adani Ports & Particular Financial Zone. Within the auditors’ record at the audit of the fourth quarter and 2022-23 financials, Deloitte highlighted transactions with 3 entities, which the corporate mentioned had been unrelated events.

    Deloitte on the other hand mentioned it might no longer attest to the corporate’s remark as no unbiased exterior exam has been achieved to end up the claims.

    Deloitte additionally flagged two transactions in its record – an EPC acquire contract with an entity that Hindenburg recognized as a comparable birthday celebration, and the renegotiated phrases of sale of its container terminal beneath development in Myanmar to Anguilla-incorporated  Sun Power Ltd

    The sale attention used to be revised from Rs 2,015 crore to Rs 246.51 crore and an impairment rate used to be taken. The gang informed the auditor those don’t seem to be comparable events.

    (With further inputs from PTI)

  • Congress accuses Centre of ‘foisting’ Adani Team on Sri Lanka

    Through PTI

    NEW DELHI: The Congress accused the Centre on Sunday of “lobbying” in favour of the Adani Team for tasks in Sri Lanka and “foisting” the industry conglomerate at the vital neighbour of India.

    The opposition birthday party has been power with its assault at the authorities, weeks after Adani Team shares took a beating at the bourses within the wake of US-based quick vendor Hindenburg Analysis creating a litany of allegations, together with fraudulent transactions and share-price manipulation, at the conglomerate headed via industrialist Gautam Adani.

    The Adani Team has disregarded the costs as lies, pronouncing it complies with all regulations and disclosure necessities.

    ALSO READ | Vinod Adani running shell corporations in ‘collusion with Chinese language nationals’: Congress

    Posing a collection of 3 inquiries to Top Minister Narendra Modi as a part of the birthday party’s “Hum Adani ke Hain Kaun” sequence, Congress common secretary Jairam Ramesh mentioned that they had prior to now requested Modi on his “obvious haste” to “enrich the Adani Team on the expense of Bangladesh and now, need solutions on how he has been “foisting” the industry crew on some other vital neighbour, Sri Lanka.

    “Parliament resumes on March 13. We’re getting ready for our interventions to be expunged. However what can’t be erased out is ‘Hum Adani ke Hain Kaun’-26 bringing the full of direct questions of the PM to this point to 78,” Ramesh tweeted.

    13 मार्च को संसद फिर शुरू होगी।हम जनहित के सवाल पूछना जारी रखेंगे।हो सकता है उन्हें भी रिकॉर्ड से हटा दिया जाए,लेकिन जिन्हें हटाया या मिटाया नहीं जा सकता,वो हैं “HAHK-हम अडानी के हैं कौन” श्रृंखला के तहत PM से पूछे गए सवाल,जिनकी संख्या 78 हो गई है।

    चुप्पी तोड़िए प्रधानमंत्री जी। %.twitter.com/OpUdWiXciM

    — Jairam Ramesh (@Jairam_Ramesh) March 10, 2023

    He mentioned the governments of India, Japan and Sri Lanka (then headed via Top Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe) signed a memorandum on Would possibly 28, 2019 to increase the East Container Terminal within the Colombo South port.

    A 12 months later, on June 9, 2020, the Sri Lankan cupboard headed via Top Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa introduced that India had “decided on” Adani Ports as its overseas terminal operator, Ramesh mentioned.

    He added that following the sudden cancellation of the deal, the Rajapaksa authorities as a substitute introduced Colombo’s West Container Terminal to India and Japan beneath a 35-year construct, function and switch hire, which used to be finalised on September 30, 2021.

    “A Sri Lankan cupboard spokesperson mentioned that India had ‘nominated’ Adani Ports because the spouse. Sri Lankan Overseas Minister Ali Sabry described it as a ‘government-to-government’ port venture in a 5 March 2023 interview. On what foundation did you ‘choose’ and ‘nominate’ Adani Ports for this government-to-government deal?” Ramesh requested in his observation addressed to Modi.

    “Did another Indian corporations have the ability to believe making an investment or did you merely reserve the deal in your shut pals?” he requested.

    The Atal Bihari Vajpayee authorities’s 2002 resolution to not put money into the strategic Hambantota port paved the way for Chinese language corporations to go into Sri Lanka’s ports sector, he alleged.

    ALSO READ | Executive desires to ‘give up’ India’s meals grain logistics to Adani Team, alleges Congress

    Ramesh mentioned India’s funding in Colombo is partially pushed via the want to counter China’s growth within the fast neighbourhood. “On the other hand, as we identified on March 3, 2023, the Adani Team has demanding connections with Chinese language nationals such because the Adani circle of relatives confidant Chang Chung-Ling (aka Lingo-Chang) who has been concerned, amongst different issues, in violating UN sanctions towards China and Pakistan’s best friend North Korea,” he mentioned.

    Are those connections now not worthy of investigation via “ordinarily hyperactive investigative companies”, the previous Union minister requested.

    He accused the high minister of indulging in “tense lobbying for his cronies”, together with for a 500-megawatt wind energy venture in Sri Lanka’s Mannar district. “The previous head of the Ceylon Electrical energy Board, MMC Ferdinando, testified on June 10, 2022 ahead of the Parliament of Sri Lanka that on October 24, 2021, ‘the President (Gotabaya Rajapaksa) summoned me after a gathering and mentioned that India’s Top Minister Modi is pressuring him handy over the venture to the Adani Team’,” the Congress chief alleged.

    Despite the fact that he retracted the feedback beneath force, Ferdinando’s remarks had utterly uncovered the nexus of crony capitalism, he mentioned.

    “Are you beneath the impact that your major activity is to protected contracts in your good friend Gautam Adani, in India and outdoor, reasonably than paintings for the folks of India?” Ramesh requested the high minister and steered him to damage his “silence” at the factor.

    OPINION | Hindenburg impact on the way forward for Adani shares: Phase I

    OPINION | Hindenburg impact on long run of Adani Companies: Phase II

    NEW DELHI: The Congress accused the Centre on Sunday of “lobbying” in favour of the Adani Team for tasks in Sri Lanka and “foisting” the industry conglomerate at the vital neighbour of India.

    The opposition birthday party has been power with its assault at the authorities, weeks after Adani Team shares took a beating at the bourses within the wake of US-based quick vendor Hindenburg Analysis creating a litany of allegations, together with fraudulent transactions and share-price manipulation, at the conglomerate headed via industrialist Gautam Adani.

    The Adani Team has disregarded the costs as lies, pronouncing it complies with all regulations and disclosure necessities.googletag.cmd.push(serve as() googletag.show(‘div-gpt-ad-8052921-2’); );

    ALSO READ | Vinod Adani running shell corporations in ‘collusion with Chinese language nationals’: Congress

    Posing a collection of 3 inquiries to Top Minister Narendra Modi as a part of the birthday party’s “Hum Adani ke Hain Kaun” sequence, Congress common secretary Jairam Ramesh mentioned that they had prior to now requested Modi on his “obvious haste” to “enrich the Adani Team on the expense of Bangladesh and now, need solutions on how he has been “foisting” the industry crew on some other vital neighbour, Sri Lanka.

    “Parliament resumes on March 13. We’re getting ready for our interventions to be expunged. However what can’t be erased out is ‘Hum Adani ke Hain Kaun’-26 bringing the full of direct questions of the PM to this point to 78,” Ramesh tweeted.

    13 मार्च को संसद फिर शुरू होगी।हम जनहित के सवाल पूछना जारी रखेंगे।हो सकता है उन्हें भी रिकॉर्ड से हटा दिया जाए,लेकिन जिन्हें हटाया या मिटाया नहीं जा सकता,वो हैं “HAHK-हम अडानी के हैं कौन” श्रृंखला के तहत PM से पूछे गए सवाल,जिनकी संख्या 78 हो गई है।
    चुप्पी तोड़िए प्रधानमंत्री जी। %.twitter.com/OpUdWiXciM
    — Jairam Ramesh (@Jairam_Ramesh) March 10, 2023
    He mentioned the governments of India, Japan and Sri Lanka (then headed via Top Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe) signed a memorandum on Would possibly 28, 2019 to increase the East Container Terminal within the Colombo South port.

    A 12 months later, on June 9, 2020, the Sri Lankan cupboard headed via Top Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa introduced that India had “decided on” Adani Ports as its overseas terminal operator, Ramesh mentioned.

    He added that following the sudden cancellation of the deal, the Rajapaksa authorities as a substitute introduced Colombo’s West Container Terminal to India and Japan beneath a 35-year construct, function and switch hire, which used to be finalised on September 30, 2021.

    “A Sri Lankan cupboard spokesperson mentioned that India had ‘nominated’ Adani Ports because the spouse. Sri Lankan Overseas Minister Ali Sabry described it as a ‘government-to-government’ port venture in a 5 March 2023 interview. On what foundation did you ‘choose’ and ‘nominate’ Adani Ports for this government-to-government deal?” Ramesh requested in his observation addressed to Modi.

    “Did another Indian corporations have the ability to believe making an investment or did you merely reserve the deal in your shut pals?” he requested.

    The Atal Bihari Vajpayee authorities’s 2002 resolution to not put money into the strategic Hambantota port paved the way for Chinese language corporations to go into Sri Lanka’s ports sector, he alleged.

    ALSO READ | Executive desires to ‘give up’ India’s meals grain logistics to Adani Team, alleges Congress

    Ramesh mentioned India’s funding in Colombo is partially pushed via the want to counter China’s growth within the fast neighbourhood. “On the other hand, as we identified on March 3, 2023, the Adani Team has demanding connections with Chinese language nationals such because the Adani circle of relatives confidant Chang Chung-Ling (aka Lingo-Chang) who has been concerned, amongst different issues, in violating UN sanctions towards China and Pakistan’s best friend North Korea,” he mentioned.

    Are those connections now not worthy of investigation via “ordinarily hyperactive investigative companies”, the previous Union minister requested.

    He accused the high minister of indulging in “tense lobbying for his cronies”, together with for a 500-megawatt wind energy venture in Sri Lanka’s Mannar district. “The previous head of the Ceylon Electrical energy Board, MMC Ferdinando, testified on June 10, 2022 ahead of the Parliament of Sri Lanka that on October 24, 2021, ‘the President (Gotabaya Rajapaksa) summoned me after a gathering and mentioned that India’s Top Minister Modi is pressuring him handy over the venture to the Adani Team’,” the Congress chief alleged.

    Despite the fact that he retracted the feedback beneath force, Ferdinando’s remarks had utterly uncovered the nexus of crony capitalism, he mentioned.

    “Are you beneath the impact that your major activity is to protected contracts in your good friend Gautam Adani, in India and outdoor, reasonably than paintings for the folks of India?” Ramesh requested the high minister and steered him to damage his “silence” at the factor.

    OPINION | Hindenburg impact on the way forward for Adani shares: Phase I

    OPINION | Hindenburg impact on long run of Adani Companies: Phase II