Will expel Atiq Ahmed’s spouse from BSP if discovered concerned about attorney’s homicide, says Mayawati

By way of PTI

LUCKNOW: Bahujan Samaj Birthday celebration supremo Mayawati on Monday stated her celebration would expel mafia-turned flesh presser Atiq Ahmed’s spouse Shahista Praveen, named in an FIR within the killing of a major witness within the BSP MLA Raju Friend homicide case, if she used to be discovered responsible right through probe.

She additionally charged on the Samajwadi Birthday celebration, terming Atiq Ahmed its “product”.

“There are experiences in regards to the registration of an FIR in opposition to Atiq Ahmed’s son and his spouse in reference to the homicide of attorney Umesh Friend, a very powerful witness within the Raju Friend homicide case in Prayagraj, and his gunner. The BSP has taken severe cognisance of this. The BSP has determined that Shaista Parveen, spouse of Atiq Ahmed, will probably be expelled from the celebration once she is proved responsible within the ongoing investigation of this topic,” Mayawati stated in a tweet in Hindi.

“It’s also widely recognized that Atiq Ahmed is the made from Samajwadi Birthday celebration, the celebration the place he turned into MP and MLA, and so forth. And now Raju Friend’s spouse has additionally long gone from the BSP to the SP, the celebration she used accountable previous. Subsequently, below this guise, it’s not proper to do any politics below,” she stated.

“It’s also identified that the BSP does now not punish any blameless particular person for the crime dedicated by way of his or her circle of relatives or neighborhood. It’s also true that the celebration does now not advertise prison parts of any caste or faith,” Mayawati added.

Umesh Friend, the high witness within the 2005 BSP MLA Raju Friend homicide case, used to be shot useless in Prayagraj on February 24.

One in all his gunners, who too used to be hit right through the firing, died later.

The primary accused within the Raju Friend homicide case is mafia-turned-politician Atiq Ahmed, recently lodged in a Gujarat prison.

At the foundation of a grievance lodged by way of Umesh Friend’s spouse Jaya Friend, a case used to be registered at Dhoomanganj police station (in Prayagraj) in opposition to Atiq Ahmed, his brother Ashraf, spouse Shaista Parveen, two sons, aides Guddu Muslim and Gulam and 9 others.

They had been booked below sections 147 (rioting), 148 (rioting, armed with fatal weapon), 149 (each member of illegal meeting responsible of offence dedicated in prosecution of commonplace object), 302 (homicide), 307 (try to homicide), 506 (prison intimidation) and 120B (prison conspiracy) of the Indian Penal Code and provisions of the Explosive Ingredients Act and the Felony Legislation Modification Act.

Jaya Friend had alleged that her husband used to be the high witness within the Raju Friend homicide case.

In 2006, Atiq Ahmed and his aides had allegedly kidnapped him and compelled him to offer a commentary in court docket of their favour.

Umesh Friend had registered a grievance on this regard and the case used to be occurring within the court docket.

LUCKNOW: Bahujan Samaj Birthday celebration supremo Mayawati on Monday stated her celebration would expel mafia-turned flesh presser Atiq Ahmed’s spouse Shahista Praveen, named in an FIR within the killing of a major witness within the BSP MLA Raju Friend homicide case, if she used to be discovered responsible right through probe.

She additionally charged on the Samajwadi Birthday celebration, terming Atiq Ahmed its “product”.

“There are experiences in regards to the registration of an FIR in opposition to Atiq Ahmed’s son and his spouse in reference to the homicide of attorney Umesh Friend, a very powerful witness within the Raju Friend homicide case in Prayagraj, and his gunner. The BSP has taken severe cognisance of this. The BSP has determined that Shaista Parveen, spouse of Atiq Ahmed, will probably be expelled from the celebration once she is proved responsible within the ongoing investigation of this topic,” Mayawati stated in a tweet in Hindi.

“It’s also widely recognized that Atiq Ahmed is the made from Samajwadi Birthday celebration, the celebration the place he turned into MP and MLA, and so forth. And now Raju Friend’s spouse has additionally long gone from the BSP to the SP, the celebration she used accountable previous. Subsequently, below this guise, it’s not proper to do any politics below,” she stated.

“It’s also identified that the BSP does now not punish any blameless particular person for the crime dedicated by way of his or her circle of relatives or neighborhood. It’s also true that the celebration does now not advertise prison parts of any caste or faith,” Mayawati added.

Umesh Friend, the high witness within the 2005 BSP MLA Raju Friend homicide case, used to be shot useless in Prayagraj on February 24.

One in all his gunners, who too used to be hit right through the firing, died later.

The primary accused within the Raju Friend homicide case is mafia-turned-politician Atiq Ahmed, recently lodged in a Gujarat prison.

At the foundation of a grievance lodged by way of Umesh Friend’s spouse Jaya Friend, a case used to be registered at Dhoomanganj police station (in Prayagraj) in opposition to Atiq Ahmed, his brother Ashraf, spouse Shaista Parveen, two sons, aides Guddu Muslim and Gulam and 9 others.

They had been booked below sections 147 (rioting), 148 (rioting, armed with fatal weapon), 149 (each member of illegal meeting responsible of offence dedicated in prosecution of commonplace object), 302 (homicide), 307 (try to homicide), 506 (prison intimidation) and 120B (prison conspiracy) of the Indian Penal Code and provisions of the Explosive Ingredients Act and the Felony Legislation Modification Act.

Jaya Friend had alleged that her husband used to be the high witness within the Raju Friend homicide case.

In 2006, Atiq Ahmed and his aides had allegedly kidnapped him and compelled him to offer a commentary in court docket of their favour.

Umesh Friend had registered a grievance on this regard and the case used to be occurring within the court docket.