Lucknow: In Uttar Pradesh, Thursday was once filled with pleasure over the court docket and temple-mosque dispute. On one hand, the court docket these days gave crucial choice in regards to the adornment of Gauri survey within the Kashi Vishwanath-Gyanvapi mosque dispute in Varanasi. However, the Allahabad Top Courtroom gave its verdict in regards to the petitions associated with the Krishna Janmabhoomi dispute of Mathura. No longer best this, a public passion litigation in regards to the Taj Mahal was once additionally heard within the Lucknow Bench of the Top Courtroom, wherein the court docket has made an overly robust commentary. Impulsively the discussions have intensified in the entire of UP referring to those 3 issues. Questions are being raised whether or not after the Ram Janmabhoomi motion, a brand new temple motion is coming up in Uttar Pradesh?
‘Building of grand temple in Kashi is happening, preparation for Mathura’
In reality, those questions are being raised by means of including a string of statements, which have been given once in a while by means of the leaders of the BJP starting from Leader Minister Yogi Adityanath to the Leader Minister after the Splendid Courtroom’s choice at the Ram Janmabhoomi dispute. In reality, ahead of the UP elections, the Deputy CM of UP had additionally given a remark ahead of the UP elections that the development of a grand temple is happening in Ayodhya, Kashi, arrangements are on for Mathura. After this, throughout the elections ahead of the election, Leader Minister Yogi Adityanath had mentioned in public conferences that we had promised that the paintings of Ram temple in Ayodhya would get started. Now Kashi Vishwanath Dham may be being constructed. So how can Mathura-Vrindavan be deserted? Paintings has began there too.
Let’s get started with the Kashi Vishwanath-Gyanvapi Masjid dispute in Varanasi. A petition was once filed within the Civil Courtroom in 1991. It was once mentioned within the petition that during 1669, the Mughal ruler Aurangzeb broke the temple right here and constructed a mosque. This petition was once filed by means of the descendants of the monks of Kashi Vishwanath temple. The subject remained pending within the court docket for a number of years, and then the court docket ordered a survey in two months. However the subject went to the Top Courtroom and the Top Courtroom stayed it. This subject remains to be pending.
Kashi, Mathura, Agra, Dhar… Someplace a setback to the Muslim facet, a reprimand to the Hindu facet, know the choices associated with 4 non secular disputes that got here from the court docket these days
In the meantime, in August 2021 remaining yr itself, any other petition was once filed within the Varanasi Courtroom. On this, the litigants say that there are statues of Maa Shringar Gauri, Lord Ganesha, Hanuman, Adi Vishweshwar, Nandiji and different gods and goddesses within the Gyanvapi mosque advanced. A majority of these deities are provide at plot quantity 9130 which is adjoining to Kashi Vishwanath Hall. The plaintiff has demanded from the court docket that the arranging committee of the mosque will have to no longer harm those idols. Additionally, Hindu other folks will have to be allowed to have darshan and worship right here. The petition of the Hindu facet additionally demanded that the court docket will have to be certain that the presence of idols of deities within the mosque premises by means of putting in place a fee. Relating to this, by means of appointing the court docket commissioner, the court docket had ordered for alleged videography of the mosque premises. However the opposition began from the Muslim facet referring to this survey.
Gyanvapi Masjid Verdict: Surprise to the Muslim facet in Gyanvapi: There shall be a survey of each nook of the mosque, the court docket commissioner won’t transfer
In reality the Muslim facet says that we consider that Shringar is the statue of Gauri however it’s out of doors the western wall of the mosque. In any such scenario, there’s no want for survey by means of going to the mosque. He additionally says that the court docket has no longer ordered any survey to move throughout the mosque. He has additionally puzzled the standing of plot quantity 9130 the place Shringar Gauri temple is positioned and mentioned that the petitioners have no longer submitted any map of the similar to the court docket. Except for this, the Muslim facet additionally accused the court docket commissioner of favoritism.
Within the case on Thursday, the court docket didn’t settle for the call for of the Muslim facet and made it transparent that the survey would happen. Additionally, with regards to Courtroom Commissioner, the court docket has engaged two extra Courtroom Commissioners within the survey paintings. Along side this, it’s been strictly mentioned that the District Justice of the Peace will have to make sure that if any person obstructs the paintings of the survey, then a case will have to be registered towards him.
Tajmahal Vivad: What’s the name of the game of the ones 22 rooms closed to the Taj Mahal? Know the tale in the back of all the controversy
This is the case of Kashi, allow us to now take you in opposition to the Krishna Janmabhoomi dispute of Mathura by means of Prayagraj. In reality, these days a listening to was once held within the Allahabad Top Courtroom referring to this subject, on which the court docket gave vital directions. The Top Courtroom has directed to eliminate all of the packages associated with the unique case in a most of four months. No longer best this, the court docket has mentioned that the Sunni Waqf Board and different events will have to factor ex-parte orders if they don’t attend the listening to.
In reality, the Allahabad Top Courtroom has given this route whilst listening to the applying of Manish Yadav, the go well with pal of Shri Krishna Virajman. All of the subject was once heard in one bench of Justice Salil Kumar Rai. In reality, an software was once filed within the Mathura court docket not easy the of entirety of the listening to of all of the instances associated with the delivery land dispute and their disposal on the earliest. It was once demanded that all of the instances will have to be clubbed in combination and heard.
Who were given the Taj Mahal constructed, do PhD first, then come to court docket… Top Courtroom reprimanded and brushed aside the petition in the hunt for to open 22 rooms
Except for Kashi-Mathura, the Taj Mahal has been within the information for the previous few days. Many Hindu organizations declare that this isn’t the Taj Mahal, it’s in reality Tejo Mahalaya. Every so often claims of getting a pagoda had been made right here. On this collection, the saint Paramhansdas of Ayodhya reached Agra just lately. He mentioned that he had come to consult with the pagoda within the Taj Mahal. However Sant Paraham Hans Das, the successor of the ascetic camp, who arrived with Brahmadand, was once no longer allowed to go into the Taj Mahal. After this all of the Hindu organizations protested. The subject was once simply getting settled that the declare of Diya Kumari, MP from Rajsamand, Rajasthan, changed into an issue of debate. He mentioned that the Taj Mahal was once constructed at the land of the Jaipur royal circle of relatives. He has alleged that the Mughal emperor Shah Jahan had occupied the land of the Jaipur royal circle of relatives, on which the Taj Mahal has been constructed.
Krishna Janmbhumi Case: If the Muslim facet does no longer come, we will be able to give the decision at once … know why the Top Courtroom were given offended
After the remark of Diya Kumari, a petition got here up for dialogue within the Lucknow Bench of the Top Courtroom these days. In reality, a petition to open the closed rooms of the Taj Mahal got here ahead of the Top Courtroom, which was once rejected by means of the court docket. All over this, the reprimand given by means of the Top Courtroom to the petitioner has no doubt change into an issue of debate. The Top Courtroom mentioned that the petition will have to be filed best after doing analysis in regards to the Taj Mahal. Do not make amusing of PIL. The court docket mentioned who constructed the Taj Mahal? Cross do analysis first. Cross to college, do PhD then come to court docket. If any individual stops you from analysis, then come to us. Now historical past might not be taught consistent with you.
Taj Mahal Vivad: The ambience of the rustic will have to no longer become worse, so the reality of the Taj will have to come to the fore… what did the BJP leaders who did the case say
In reality, Ayodhya media in-charge of Bharatiya Janata Birthday party, Dr Rajneesh Singh had filed a public passion litigation within the court docket. On this, he demanded that the 22 rooms of the Taj Mahal be opened in order that the secrets and techniques locked within the rooms will also be printed to the arena. The petitioner says that whilst Hindu non secular gurus and Hindu organizations describe the Taj Mahal web site as a temple of Lord Shiva, Muslims are calling it a spot of worship. To finish this dispute, I’ve filed a petition within the Top Courtroom not easy the hole of twenty-two closed rooms within the Taj Mahal and videography of it. He mentioned that what was once the carbon information record ahead of the Taj Mahal was once constructed? It offers a distinct reality. This has raised doubts in regards to the subject. He had demanded that the ASI open the doorways of greater than 20 rooms throughout the Taj Mahal advanced. The federal government will have to represent a reality discovering committee on this subject. Directions will have to be given to search for vital historic evidences like statues and inscriptions throughout the Taj Mahal. Within the petition, the Taj Mahal has been described as an outdated Shiva temple.
