Prayagraj: Listening to within the Vishweshwar Nath Temple-Gyanvapi Masjid dispute case of Varanasi persevered within the Prime Courtroom on Wednesday. Throughout this, information and information have been offered on behalf of the temple facet. It’s stated that within the medieval length, Aurangzeb had ordered the demolition of Vishwanath temple however had now not given any decree to construct a mosque there. So it was once unsuitable to construct a mosque there. A unmarried bench of Justice Prakash Padia is listening to the petitions filed by means of the Anjuman-e-Araiyaniyaan Masjid Committee and the Sunni Waqf Board.
Throughout the listening to on Wednesday, recommend Vijay Shankar Rastogi, showing for handiest the temple facet, offered his arguments. Rastogi stated that the mosque was once constructed by means of demolishing the Adi Vishweshwar Nath temple by means of order of Aurangzeb, however the possession of the land remained with the temple. There’s no documentary proof to mention that the waqf was once constituted. The legal professional stated, Aurangzeb by no means took possession of the land.
‘Boundary hundreds of years outdated, temple from time immemorial’
He stated that, taking a look on the outdated information, it’s transparent that the temple is from time immemorial. The boundary constructed round it’s also hundreds of years outdated. Suggest Rastogi stated that errors had been made within the former empire. Vishwanath temple has been forcibly demolished. If the prevailing govt acknowledges him, then the courts can take cognizance of the ones errors and order treatments.
‘Abnormal Muslims do not need the fitting to Namaz’
Rastogi additionally stated that extraordinary Muslims do not need the fitting to provide Namaz within the mosque. Within the 12 months 1936, Din Mohammad and others filed a declare within the Banaras Civil Courtroom, through which they didn’t get reduction from the courtroom. Within the written commentary given by means of the British relating to Din Mohammad within the 12 months 1936, the rights of Hindus have been identified and Vishwanath temple has been stored within the class of Temple Act. After this, in 1942, the Prime Courtroom has allowed the litigants to provide the prayers of Juma, in that civil go well with, the Waqf Board or Anjuman Inaztiya Masajid has now not been a birthday party.
‘The king isn’t the landlord of the land’
Rastogi stated that all the complicated belongs to the Gyanvapi temple, Akbar had additionally purchased land to construct the Allahabad Fortress, Aurangzeb additionally purchased land in South India and constructed a mosque. Strengthening his argument, Rastogi stated, the king isn’t the landlord of the land, he collects the tax. Within the British govt, Lord Curzon had cooked Lord Vishweshwar Nath Naubat Khana on the Chatta Gate, there’s no Naubatkhana for providing Namaz within the mosque.
Diya Ram Janmabhoomi dispute
It was once stated on behalf of Rastogi that, on this regard, the Excellent Courtroom has additionally stated within the orders of its complete bench that if the prevailing govt understands and accepts the errors made within the time of the previous empire, then it may be rectified. The Excellent Courtroom had given a equivalent advice within the Ram Janmabhoomi dispute case as smartly, and the similar would possibly occur on this case, he stated.
After listening to the arguments of the temple facet, the courtroom has made up our minds to proceed the listening to on July 15 for listening to the topic. The talk might be hung on that day on behalf of the Anjuman-e Association Masjid Committee and the Sunni Waqf Board. The courtroom has already prolonged the keep at the order of the subordinate courtroom to habits the survey from the Archaeological Division until July 31.
