In a significant development in the high-profile Turkman Gate stone-pelting case, a Delhi court has issued notices to the Delhi Police on bail applications filed by five accused individuals. The incident, which unfolded amid tensions in the Old Delhi neighborhood, has drawn widespread attention due to its political undertones and the involvement of local residents.
The stone-pelting episode occurred recently when a group allegedly hurled stones at security personnel and vehicles during a routine patrol. Eyewitnesses reported chaos as protesters clashed with law enforcement, leading to multiple injuries and damage to public property. Delhi Police swiftly registered FIRs against several persons, accusing them of rioting, assault on public servants, and promoting enmity.
The five accused, identified as key participants in the melee, approached the court seeking interim bail, arguing that they have been falsely implicated and that their continued detention violates their fundamental rights. Their counsels submitted that the police lacked concrete evidence, relying primarily on CCTV footage that allegedly does not clearly identify the petitioners.
Responding to the pleas, the court directed the Delhi Police to file a detailed reply within a specified timeframe. The bench emphasized the need for a thorough investigation to ascertain the facts, while cautioning against any undue delay in the judicial process. The matter has been listed for further hearing next week.
This case highlights ongoing friction between residents of Turkman Gate, a historic area known for its dense population and socio-economic challenges, and law enforcement agencies. Community leaders have called for dialogue to address underlying grievances, such as eviction fears and inadequate civic amenities, which they claim fueled the unrest.
Legal experts view the court’s intervention as a balanced approach, ensuring that the right to liberty is not compromised without due process. As the hearing progresses, all eyes are on how the police will counter the bail applications with substantive proof. The outcome could set precedents for similar cases arising from public disturbances in the national capital.