Categorical Information Provider
NEW DELHI: The Superb Court docket lately disapproved the observe of HC calling for resolution scripts and directing for revaluation within the absence of a selected provision.
A bench Justices MR Shah and MM Sundresh of their order stated, “We’re of the opinion that the Top Court docket was once certainly not justified in calling the report of the solution scripts after which to fulfill whether or not there was once a necessity for re-examination or now not. As reported, the Top Courts are calling for the solution scripts/sheets for pleasing whether or not there’s a want for re-examination or now not and thereafter orders/directs re-examination, which is wholly impermissible.”
The court docket additional stated, “This type of observe of calling for resolution scripts/resolution sheets and thereafter to reserve re-examination and that too in absence of any explicit provision within the related laws for re-examination and that too whilst exercising powers underneath Article 226 of the Charter of India is disapproved.”
Court docket’s statement got here in a plea which was once filed via Dr NTR College of Well being Sciences towards Andhra Pradesh HC’s order asking the college to reevaluate the solution scripts of the scholars who seemed within the PG degree route.
A College’s recommend contended that HC’s order was once now not justified since there wasn’t any provision for re-examination and it was once now not justified for the court docket to direct the college underneath Article 226.
Informing the bench of the brand new mode followed via the college for introducing virtual assessment for resolution scripts of PG Level/Degree Examinations, the recommend additional argued that the solutions have been evaluated digitally for each and every examination and there was once no guide assessment pursuant to answer for virtual assessment.
NEW DELHI: The Superb Court docket lately disapproved the observe of HC calling for resolution scripts and directing for revaluation within the absence of a selected provision.
A bench Justices MR Shah and MM Sundresh of their order stated, “We’re of the opinion that the Top Court docket was once certainly not justified in calling the report of the solution scripts after which to fulfill whether or not there was once a necessity for re-examination or now not. As reported, the Top Courts are calling for the solution scripts/sheets for pleasing whether or not there’s a want for re-examination or now not and thereafter orders/directs re-examination, which is wholly impermissible.”
The court docket additional stated, “This type of observe of calling for resolution scripts/resolution sheets and thereafter to reserve re-examination and that too in absence of any explicit provision within the related laws for re-examination and that too whilst exercising powers underneath Article 226 of the Charter of India is disapproved.”
Court docket’s statement got here in a plea which was once filed via Dr NTR College of Well being Sciences towards Andhra Pradesh HC’s order asking the college to reevaluate the solution scripts of the scholars who seemed within the PG degree route.
A College’s recommend contended that HC’s order was once now not justified since there wasn’t any provision for re-examination and it was once now not justified for the court docket to direct the college underneath Article 226.
Informing the bench of the brand new mode followed via the college for introducing virtual assessment for resolution scripts of PG Level/Degree Examinations, the recommend additional argued that the solutions have been evaluated digitally for each and every examination and there was once no guide assessment pursuant to answer for virtual assessment.
