In a bold statement that has sparked widespread debate, AIMIM leader ST Hasan has condemned both the controversial bulldozer action near a mosque in Delhi and the subsequent stone-pelting by protesters. Speaking to reporters on Wednesday, Hasan emphasized that neither approach serves justice nor maintains law and order in the national capital.
The incident unfolded last week when authorities deployed bulldozers to raze illegal structures in the vicinity of a prominent mosque in northwest Delhi. Eyewitnesses reported tense moments as locals gathered, leading to clashes where stones were hurled at security forces. Several police personnel were injured, and the situation was brought under control only after reinforcements arrived.
Hasan, a key figure in Asaduddin Owaisi’s party, argued that while encroachment removal is necessary, the timing and manner of the operation raised serious questions about administrative intent. ‘Bulldozing without prior notice is high-handed, and responding with violence is equally condemnable,’ he said. He urged the Delhi government to adopt transparent policies for urban planning and avoid actions that inflame communal tensions.
This development comes amid a series of similar enforcement drives across India, where bulldozers have become a symbol of cracking down on illegal constructions. Critics, including human rights groups, have labeled these as ‘bulldozer justice,’ alleging selective targeting of minority communities. Supporters, however, defend them as essential for reclaiming public land.
Hasan’s remarks have drawn mixed reactions. Political rivals accuse him of double standards, pointing to past instances where AIMIM leaders have supported aggressive protests. Meanwhile, his supporters hail the statement as a call for balanced governance. As Delhi braces for more such operations, the debate over methods versus madness continues to rage.
The Aam Aadmi Party-led administration has defended the action, stating it was part of a routine anti-encroachment drive planned months in advance. Official records show notices were issued, though residents claim they were inadequate. With municipal elections on the horizon, this episode underscores the delicate balance between enforcement and public sentiment in India’s bustling capital.