Specific Information Provider
NEW DELHI: The Excellent Court docket on Wednesday reserved a verdict in pleas difficult the Centre’s 2016 determination to demonetise Rs 500 and 1000 notes.
A five-judge bench led by way of Justice S Abdul Nazeer additionally directed the central executive and RBI to put prior to it information touching on the verdict in a sealed envelope for its perusal.
The plea had additionally challenged the validity of the notification dated November 8, 2016, issued below the Reserve Financial institution of India Act, 1934 at the flooring that it violated Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300A of the Charter of India. On December 16, 2016, a three-judge bench of the SC refused to grant period in-between aid towards the verdict of demonetisation however had framed inquiries to be made up our minds by way of a bigger bench.
Showing for the petitioners, Senior Recommend Shyam Divan in his rejoinder submissions had contended that demonetisation should were performed by way of the legislature and no longer by way of the chief. It was once additionally his rivalry that the advice by way of the central board was once a situation precedent.
Stressing on RBIs authority to advise the Union on issues of foreign money legislation, he added that the union’s demonetisation notification to which the RBI “meekly agreed” degraded RBI’s undisputed experience. “Statutory ensure can’t be decreased on the subject of government motion,” he additional added.
Laying emphasis on SC’s order of shifting all petitions prior to the decrease courts to itself, he advised the court docket to cross common order granting aid to electorate because it was once tricky for the electorate to personally means SC.
Senior Recommend and previous Finance Minister P Chidambaram had mentioned the centre may just act best pursuant to the suggestions made by way of the RBI central board.
“PM’s assurance mentioned should you observe directions, your cash will stay yours. He has discussed 50 days. Even supposing he had mentioned that extra time could be granted, no case was once made out that promissory estoppel operates,” mentioned Senior Recommend Jaideep Gupta on behalf of the RBI.
The submissions had been additionally made by way of AG R Venkataramani for Central Govt. The day past, Lawyer Basic for India, R Venkataramani contended that the verdict of demonetisation was once taken to handle 3 evils associated with social coverage.
NEW DELHI: The Excellent Court docket on Wednesday reserved a verdict in pleas difficult the Centre’s 2016 determination to demonetise Rs 500 and 1000 notes.
A five-judge bench led by way of Justice S Abdul Nazeer additionally directed the central executive and RBI to put prior to it information touching on the verdict in a sealed envelope for its perusal.
The plea had additionally challenged the validity of the notification dated November 8, 2016, issued below the Reserve Financial institution of India Act, 1934 at the flooring that it violated Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300A of the Charter of India. On December 16, 2016, a three-judge bench of the SC refused to grant period in-between aid towards the verdict of demonetisation however had framed inquiries to be made up our minds by way of a bigger bench.
Showing for the petitioners, Senior Recommend Shyam Divan in his rejoinder submissions had contended that demonetisation should were performed by way of the legislature and no longer by way of the chief. It was once additionally his rivalry that the advice by way of the central board was once a situation precedent.
Stressing on RBIs authority to advise the Union on issues of foreign money legislation, he added that the union’s demonetisation notification to which the RBI “meekly agreed” degraded RBI’s undisputed experience. “Statutory ensure can’t be decreased on the subject of government motion,” he additional added.
Laying emphasis on SC’s order of shifting all petitions prior to the decrease courts to itself, he advised the court docket to cross common order granting aid to electorate because it was once tricky for the electorate to personally means SC.
Senior Recommend and previous Finance Minister P Chidambaram had mentioned the centre may just act best pursuant to the suggestions made by way of the RBI central board.
“PM’s assurance mentioned should you observe directions, your cash will stay yours. He has discussed 50 days. Even supposing he had mentioned that extra time could be granted, no case was once made out that promissory estoppel operates,” mentioned Senior Recommend Jaideep Gupta on behalf of the RBI.
The submissions had been additionally made by way of AG R Venkataramani for Central Govt. The day past, Lawyer Basic for India, R Venkataramani contended that the verdict of demonetisation was once taken to handle 3 evils associated with social coverage.
