In a bold statement that has sparked widespread debate, Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma asserted that India’s Prime Minister remains ‘Hindu’ not due to the Constitution, but through the unbroken thread of civilizational tradition. Sarma’s remarks, delivered during a public address, underscore a deeper cultural narrative that transcends legal definitions.
Sarma emphasized that Hinduism in India is not merely a religion but a living civilization inherited over millennia. ‘The Prime Minister is Hindu by virtue of our samskriti, our ancient traditions, not because some document says so,’ he declared, drawing cheers from the audience. This perspective positions Hindu identity as an intrinsic part of India’s historical continuum, from the Vedic period to modern times.
The statement comes amid ongoing political discussions on secularism and national identity. Critics argue it blurs the line between personal faith and constitutional office, potentially challenging India’s secular fabric. Supporters, however, see it as a reaffirmation of cultural pride in a nation often accused of diluting its heritage.
Sarma elaborated on historical precedents, referencing ancient texts and rulers who embodied dharma without needing constitutional sanction. He contrasted this with Western models of identity, which he claims are overly legalistic. ‘Our PM carries the legacy of countless Hindu forebears – that’s the real constitution of our rashtra,’ Sarma added.
Political analysts note that such rhetoric could energize the BJP’s base ahead of elections, while opposition leaders have already condemned it as divisive. As the discourse intensifies, Sarma’s words highlight the enduring tension between India’s constitutional ideals and its civilizational ethos, prompting voters to reflect on what truly defines leadership in the world’s largest democracy.