By way of Categorical Information Carrier
Maharashtra and state legislators had been witnessing traditionally extraordinary eventualities, says Speaker of the Maharashtra Legislative Meeting Rahul Narwekar, an suggest, on this unique interview with TNIE correspondent Sudhir Suryawanshi. Narwekar says the disqualification of MLAs can be determined via the Speaker of the Space and now not the Splendid Court docket. He says the Shiv Sena is the ruling occasion within the Decrease Space, but in addition the primary opposition occasion within the Higher Space. The participants say that the occasion is divided, however there is not any such declare within the Space.
What’s your view at the petitions and hearings within the Splendid Court docket at the disqualification of 16 Shiv Sena MLAs?
The problem sooner than the apex courtroom is easy methods to interpret the provisions and articles given within the Charter, Agenda 10 and raised problems. Probably the most problems is whether or not disqualification must be at once determined via the SC. However the legislation is obvious. Disqualification of elected participants is the prerogative of the Meeting Speaker. I believe, in hearings within the Splendid Court docket, the similar perspectives had been expressed. As soon as the Speaker comes to a decision, the opposite occasion can workout its remedial choices given within the Charter.
There was once additionally an issue within the courtroom whether or not we will rewind the clock and produce again the Uddhav Thackeray govt and erstwhile presiding officer Narhari Zirwal as Deputy Speaker within the Meeting…
Sure, there was once a requirement that the Deputy Speaker, who was once the presiding officer, must be allowed to listen to the petitions and take selections over the disqualification of 16 MLAs, however as in keeping with my wisdom, it’s not legally tenable. The Deputy Speaker simplest plays the obligation of presiding officer when the Speaker’s put up is vacant. You can not retrospectively ask any person and make a decision just because when a question was once filed, he was once the presiding officer. There are a number of events when the subject is filed sooner than any person and the petitions are held via different one that was once within the presiding officer’s chair.
There aren’t any data of this type of complicated and extraordinary state of affairs within the Maharashtra Meeting…
The location we’re witnessing within the legislature is more or less extraordinary. Shiv Sena is the ruling occasion within the Decrease Space, however additionally it is the primary opposition within the Higher Space. Then, there may be the declare of a cut up within the occasion out of doors the Space. However there is not any such document at the lawsuits of the Space. Neither factions nor any people have claimed that there’s a cut up within the occasion. However having mentioned that, parliamentary democracy and the techniques are robust and ever-evolving. Many a time, we see eventualities as first-time occurrences and this can be a roughly studying that ends up in just right rules and strengthens our device. So, legislation and, for that subject, higher legislation all the time evolves.
The Splendid Court docket has requested to not take selections over disqualification of MLAs of the Uddhav Thackeray faction which were got rid of via the Eknath Shinde faction over anti-party actions. Now, the funds consultation is on and the whip via the Shinde faction has already been issued. In the event that they transfer disqualification petitions towards MLAs of the Uddhav faction, how do you care for the location?
I as a Speaker have now not won any letter or intimation. Even the state regulation has now not were given one of these paper, pronouncing the injunctive order has been handed via the Splendid Court docket. Alternatively, I learn in media stories that the occasion that represents the faction has made an assurance that they wouldn’t factor the whip and start up the disqualification movements for a definite time frame. However I’m really not conscious in regards to the factual positions on the subject of this building.
Maharashtra and state legislators had been witnessing traditionally extraordinary eventualities, says Speaker of the Maharashtra Legislative Meeting Rahul Narwekar, an suggest, on this unique interview with TNIE correspondent Sudhir Suryawanshi. Narwekar says the disqualification of MLAs can be determined via the Speaker of the Space and now not the Splendid Court docket. He says the Shiv Sena is the ruling occasion within the Decrease Space, but in addition the primary opposition occasion within the Higher Space. The participants say that the occasion is divided, however there is not any such declare within the Space.
What’s your view at the petitions and hearings within the Splendid Court docket at the disqualification of 16 Shiv Sena MLAs?
The problem sooner than the apex courtroom is easy methods to interpret the provisions and articles given within the Charter, Agenda 10 and raised problems. Probably the most problems is whether or not disqualification must be at once determined via the SC. However the legislation is obvious. Disqualification of elected participants is the prerogative of the Meeting Speaker. I believe, in hearings within the Splendid Court docket, the similar perspectives had been expressed. As soon as the Speaker comes to a decision, the opposite occasion can workout its remedial choices given within the Charter.
There was once additionally an issue within the courtroom whether or not we will rewind the clock and produce again the Uddhav Thackeray govt and erstwhile presiding officer Narhari Zirwal as Deputy Speaker within the Meeting…
Sure, there was once a requirement that the Deputy Speaker, who was once the presiding officer, must be allowed to listen to the petitions and take selections over the disqualification of 16 MLAs, however as in keeping with my wisdom, it’s not legally tenable. The Deputy Speaker simplest plays the obligation of presiding officer when the Speaker’s put up is vacant. You can not retrospectively ask any person and make a decision just because when a question was once filed, he was once the presiding officer. There are a number of events when the subject is filed sooner than any person and the petitions are held via different one that was once within the presiding officer’s chair. googletag.cmd.push(serve as() googletag.show(‘div-gpt-ad-8052921-2’); );
There aren’t any data of this type of complicated and extraordinary state of affairs within the Maharashtra Meeting…
The location we’re witnessing within the legislature is more or less extraordinary. Shiv Sena is the ruling occasion within the Decrease Space, however additionally it is the primary opposition within the Higher Space. Then, there may be the declare of a cut up within the occasion out of doors the Space. However there is not any such document at the lawsuits of the Space. Neither factions nor any people have claimed that there’s a cut up within the occasion. However having mentioned that, parliamentary democracy and the techniques are robust and ever-evolving. Many a time, we see eventualities as first-time occurrences and this can be a roughly studying that ends up in just right rules and strengthens our device. So, legislation and, for that subject, higher legislation all the time evolves.
The Splendid Court docket has requested to not take selections over disqualification of MLAs of the Uddhav Thackeray faction which were got rid of via the Eknath Shinde faction over anti-party actions. Now, the funds consultation is on and the whip via the Shinde faction has already been issued. In the event that they transfer disqualification petitions towards MLAs of the Uddhav faction, how do you care for the location?
I as a Speaker have now not won any letter or intimation. Even the state regulation has now not were given one of these paper, pronouncing the injunctive order has been handed via the Splendid Court docket. Alternatively, I learn in media stories that the occasion that represents the faction has made an assurance that they wouldn’t factor the whip and start up the disqualification movements for a definite time frame. However I’m really not conscious in regards to the factual positions on the subject of this building.