Specific Information Provider
LUCKNOW: The Allahabad prime court docket has held that mere ownership of meat isn’t an offence below the UP Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act except it’s proven by means of cogent and enough proof that the substance recovered is red meat.
The Top Courtroom, in its Would possibly 25 order, which used to be uploaded not too long ago, had granted bail to an accused booked below the UP Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act announcing that the prosecution may now not produce cogent proof that the substance recovered from the ownership of the accused used to be red meat or red meat product.
Accused Ibran used to be held in March this yr in reference to the restoration of 30.5kg of meat from his ownership and booked below the UP Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955.
Justice Vikram D Chauhan granted bail to Ibran alias ‘Sheru’ of Pilibhit district. The court docket stated on this case, the prosecution had now not demonstrated with cogent proof that the substance recovered used to be red meat or red meat product.
“Mere sporting of meat by means of somebody on its own can not quantity to sale or shipping of red meat or red meat merchandise except is proven by means of cogent and enough proof that the substance recovered is red meat,” said the court docket.
Whilst granting the bail, the court docket (in its order dated Would possibly 25) added: “No subject matter has been proven by means of the state suggest to show that the applicant has slaughtered or brought about to be slaughtered or introduced and motive to be introduced for slaughter a cow, bull or bullock in anywhere in Uttar Pradesh.”
“The alleged act can’t be said to come back throughout the ambit of the UP Cow Slaughter Act. Additional, no file of the competent authority or licensed laboratory has been proven to show that the beef recovered is red meat,” noticed the court docket.
LUCKNOW: The Allahabad prime court docket has held that mere ownership of meat isn’t an offence below the UP Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act except it’s proven by means of cogent and enough proof that the substance recovered is red meat.
The Top Courtroom, in its Would possibly 25 order, which used to be uploaded not too long ago, had granted bail to an accused booked below the UP Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act announcing that the prosecution may now not produce cogent proof that the substance recovered from the ownership of the accused used to be red meat or red meat product.
Accused Ibran used to be held in March this yr in reference to the restoration of 30.5kg of meat from his ownership and booked below the UP Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955.googletag.cmd.push(serve as() googletag.show(‘div-gpt-ad-8052921-2’); );
Justice Vikram D Chauhan granted bail to Ibran alias ‘Sheru’ of Pilibhit district. The court docket stated on this case, the prosecution had now not demonstrated with cogent proof that the substance recovered used to be red meat or red meat product.
“Mere sporting of meat by means of somebody on its own can not quantity to sale or shipping of red meat or red meat merchandise except is proven by means of cogent and enough proof that the substance recovered is red meat,” said the court docket.
Whilst granting the bail, the court docket (in its order dated Would possibly 25) added: “No subject matter has been proven by means of the state suggest to show that the applicant has slaughtered or brought about to be slaughtered or introduced and motive to be introduced for slaughter a cow, bull or bullock in anywhere in Uttar Pradesh.”
“The alleged act can’t be said to come back throughout the ambit of the UP Cow Slaughter Act. Additional, no file of the competent authority or licensed laboratory has been proven to show that the beef recovered is red meat,” noticed the court docket.