Specific Information Carrier
LUCKNOW: In a vital order, the Allahabad Top Courtroom, on Monday, mentioned that if a lady was once discovered facilitating the act of rape with a gaggle of fellows, she could also be prosecuted for the offence of ‘gang rape’ below Segment 376D of IPC in view of the amended provisions. The courtroom mentioned that undoubtedly a lady may no longer devote the offence of rape herself however she may all the time facilitate it on others.
Elaborating at the provisions of Sections 375 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) when it comes to the offence of rape, as amended in 2013, the bench comprising Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav rejected the plea {that a} girl may no longer be prosecuted for the alleged fee of the offence of gang rape.
With those observations, the courtroom disregarded an software filed via one Suneeta Pandey, who had challenged a summon handed via further district and classes pass judgement on to stand the trial below Segment 376-D (gang rape), 212 (harbouring culprit) of IPC in reference to the alleged rape case of a 15-year-old lady.
The Top Courtroom, on the outset famous that the argument {that a} girl may no longer be prosecuted for gang rape was once no longer right kind as in keeping with the amended provisions of Segment 375 to 376E of IPC, which associated with the offence of rape.
LUCKNOW: In a vital order, the Allahabad Top Courtroom, on Monday, mentioned that if a lady was once discovered facilitating the act of rape with a gaggle of fellows, she could also be prosecuted for the offence of ‘gang rape’ below Segment 376D of IPC in view of the amended provisions. The courtroom mentioned that undoubtedly a lady may no longer devote the offence of rape herself however she may all the time facilitate it on others.
Elaborating at the provisions of Sections 375 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) when it comes to the offence of rape, as amended in 2013, the bench comprising Justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav rejected the plea {that a} girl may no longer be prosecuted for the alleged fee of the offence of gang rape.
With those observations, the courtroom disregarded an software filed via one Suneeta Pandey, who had challenged a summon handed via further district and classes pass judgement on to stand the trial below Segment 376-D (gang rape), 212 (harbouring culprit) of IPC in reference to the alleged rape case of a 15-year-old lady.
The Top Courtroom, on the outset famous that the argument {that a} girl may no longer be prosecuted for gang rape was once no longer right kind as in keeping with the amended provisions of Segment 375 to 376E of IPC, which associated with the offence of rape.