Govt device perplexed referring to govt land in Mahagama, Godda. CM’s directions: Nonetheless the grievance has no longer been carried out. One land, two claimants, each have govt paperwork.
Pravin Kumar/Amit Singh
Ranchi: The federal government device itself has turn out to be perplexed referring to govt land below Mahagama zone of Godda district. Officials don’t seem to be in a position to make a decision whose land it’s. While govt paperwork display that the land belongs to the federal government. Even after this, there are lots of folks together with Kailash Kumar Tibdewal, who were given govt land of their title illegally. Such folks even have govt paperwork, however their declare at the land is incorrect. No longer us, the federal government investigation record is announcing so.
Many such circumstances have come to mild in Mahagama, in which there’s one land, however there are lots of claimants to the land. The entire claimants have govt paperwork for the land. Such persons are attaining Anchal and Godda DC with paperwork. Two other persons are claiming the similar land as their very own. A equivalent case additionally got here within the Leader Minister’s Jan Samvad Kendra (grievance no. 2017-49928 dated 11.10.2017). Figuring out the seriousness of the topic, the then CM Raghuvar Das had ordered investigation and execution. Godda district management additionally began motion in regards to the execution of the case, however abruptly the motion used to be placed on hang.
If Kamat is the landlord, then that land is govt land.
Mauza-Khera, Police Station No. 512, J-23, Rakwa-36 Bigha 14 Decmil 2 Dhoor Bhoomi of Mahagama space, Laxman Bhagat Bald, Shivvalak Bhagat, Kaum Kalwar, Shakin- Mahamama Corridor, Mokam Ghat are recorded in Deori survey. The kind of mentioned Jamabandi is recorded in Kamat Parcha. Within the Santhal area, lands like Kamat, Chowkidari, Godait, Pradhani, South-North-West, and many others. had been tax-free. If Kamat is the landlord of the land in Kamat Parcha, then it’s utterly govt and best Kamat and if Kamat’s title is written on it, then the ryots were the use of that land as their private land.
One land, two claimants, each have paperwork
Complainant Neeraj Kumar Jaiswal is a descendant of Khariyani Jamabandi Raiyat. He says that the title of his ancestors is at the land. Because of non-payment of hire, the hire at the mentioned land used to be made up our minds thru Hire Fixation (No. 71/60-61) Tejnarayan Bhagat vs. Govt and in this foundation his title must be recorded in Sign in-II.
Opposition Sunder Ram Tibdewal says that the mentioned land used to be bought to his ancestor Govind Ram Marwari by means of Shivshankar Jaiswal, descendant of complainant Neeraj Kumar Jaiswal, to Govind Ram Marwari thru registry quantity 20 of twenty-two.02.1933. Their charge has additionally been made up our minds below charge fixation 71/60-61. In this foundation his mutation has came about. They have got been paying taxes since 1997-98. In addition they have keep an eye on over the land. And his title has additionally gave the impression within the checklist of new surveys.
Within the record, the CO mentioned that each have verified copies.
Mahagama CO has mentioned in his record that in this foundation, papers had been demanded from each the individuals, the similar case quantity 0-71/60-61 has been discussed by means of either one of them. Attested copies of each got to the archives place of business. When it used to be investigated by means of the archives, they informed thru letter quantity 29.01.2019 that the paper of (RF71/60-61) Tej Narayan Bhagat vs. Govt is proper. The title of the opposition Ram Avtaar Ram has gave the impression in Sign in-2, however the foundation of registration isn’t discussed within the Proper to Alternate column, and the tax is recorded from the yr 1997-98. At this time the interference is of Ram Avtaar Ram Marwari.
For the reason that dispute relates to non-public land, each the individuals have submitted verified affidavits. The names of the descendants of the complainant are in Khatian. However the interference is from the opposition (descendants of Ram Avtaar Ram). Even after this kind of lengthy duration has handed, until date the complainant has no longer filed any case in any court docket in regards to the opposition’s interference at the land. Until date, no utility has been made referring to rejection of the mentioned land, which raises doubts. In this kind of state of affairs, it sort of feels suitable to check in the mentioned dispute best after the verdict of the competent court docket.
