By means of PTI
NEW DELHI: India is an earthly nation and everyone has a proper to their faith, the Best Court docket mentioned on Monday whilst brushing aside a PIL looking for to claim overdue non secular determine Sri Sri Thakur Anukul Chandra as ‘Paramatma’.
A bench of Justices M R Shah and C T Ravikumar imposed a price of Rs 1 lakh at the petitioner for submitting a “exposure pastime litigation”.
Because the petitioner Upendra Nath Dalai began to learn from his petition, the bench mentioned, “Suno hum ye lecture sunne ke liye nahi aaye hain (Concentrate, we don’t seem to be right here to pay attention for your lecture). Is that this a public pastime litigation? Aisa kaise ho sakta hai? Jisko jo manna hai wo mane. Apni nation me sabko non secular adhikar hai. Hum kaise keh sakte hain ki specific sect ko him maane. (How can this be imaginable? Everyone is unfastened to practice his or her faith. How are we able to ask folks to practice a selected faith) “If you wish to have you’ll be able to imagine him as ‘Paramatma’ (ideally suited being). Why put in force it on others?” the bench seen.
The highest court docket was once listening to a plea filed through Dalai looking for to claim Chandra as ‘Paramatma’.
Whilst brushing aside the plea, the apex court docket mentioned in its order, “India is an earthly nation and the petitioner can’t be authorized to wish that the voters of India might settle for Sri Sri Thakur Anukul Chandra as ‘Paramatma’. This appears to be a exposure pastime litigation which merits to be disregarded with prices.”
Chandra was once born on September 14, 1888 in Pabna in Bangladesh.
NEW DELHI: India is an earthly nation and everyone has a proper to their faith, the Best Court docket mentioned on Monday whilst brushing aside a PIL looking for to claim overdue non secular determine Sri Sri Thakur Anukul Chandra as ‘Paramatma’.
A bench of Justices M R Shah and C T Ravikumar imposed a price of Rs 1 lakh at the petitioner for submitting a “exposure pastime litigation”.
Because the petitioner Upendra Nath Dalai began to learn from his petition, the bench mentioned, “Suno hum ye lecture sunne ke liye nahi aaye hain (Concentrate, we don’t seem to be right here to pay attention for your lecture). Is that this a public pastime litigation? Aisa kaise ho sakta hai? Jisko jo manna hai wo mane. Apni nation me sabko non secular adhikar hai. Hum kaise keh sakte hain ki specific sect ko him maane. (How can this be imaginable? Everyone is unfastened to practice his or her faith. How are we able to ask folks to practice a selected faith) “If you wish to have you’ll be able to imagine him as ‘Paramatma’ (ideally suited being). Why put in force it on others?” the bench seen.
The highest court docket was once listening to a plea filed through Dalai looking for to claim Chandra as ‘Paramatma’.
Whilst brushing aside the plea, the apex court docket mentioned in its order, “India is an earthly nation and the petitioner can’t be authorized to wish that the voters of India might settle for Sri Sri Thakur Anukul Chandra as ‘Paramatma’. This appears to be a exposure pastime litigation which merits to be disregarded with prices.”
Chandra was once born on September 14, 1888 in Pabna in Bangladesh.