Delhi HC dismisses Satyendar Jain’s plea difficult switch of cash laundering case 

Via PTI

NEW DELHI: The Delhi Top Courtroom on Saturday disregarded a plea via Delhi minister Satyendar Jain difficult a decrease court docket order to switch the cash laundering case towards him to any other court docket.

Justice Yogesh stated all details had been duly regarded as via the Essential District and Consultation’s Pass judgement on whilst shifting the case, which is being probed via the Enforcement Directorate (ED), and it can’t be held that the verdict suffered from any illegality or wanted interference.

“The query isn’t of an integrity or uprightness of the pass judgement on however is of a fear within the thoughts of a birthday party,” the court docket mentioned.

“The petition is subsequently, disregarded,” the court docket stated in its order.

Jain had moved the prime court docket final month difficult the September 23 order of the Essential District and Periods Pass judgement on Vinay Kumar Gupta, who transferred the cash laundering case to Particular Pass judgement on Vikas Dhull from Particular Pass judgement on Geetanjali Goel, who was once listening to his bail plea.

The district pass judgement on’s order was once handed on an utility for switch moved via the investigating company.

The company, in its switch utility earlier than the district pass judgement on, had argued that whilst there was once no grievance towards the pass judgement on listening to the topic, it was once “a case of possible bias” in favour of the Delhi minister and there was once a fear that it would now not get an unbiased and unbiased listening to.

The AAP chief argued earlier than the prime court docket that the ED can’t be allowed to “forehead beat” a pass judgement on and search switch of the case mentioning “bias” with none foundation.

The ED had arrested Jain and two others within the cash laundering case in accordance with a Central Bureau of Investigation FIR lodged towards the AAP chief in 2017 below the Prevention of Corruption Act.

Jain is accused of getting laundered cash via 4 corporations connected to him.

NEW DELHI: The Delhi Top Courtroom on Saturday disregarded a plea via Delhi minister Satyendar Jain difficult a decrease court docket order to switch the cash laundering case towards him to any other court docket.

Justice Yogesh stated all details had been duly regarded as via the Essential District and Consultation’s Pass judgement on whilst shifting the case, which is being probed via the Enforcement Directorate (ED), and it can’t be held that the verdict suffered from any illegality or wanted interference.

“The query isn’t of an integrity or uprightness of the pass judgement on however is of a fear within the thoughts of a birthday party,” the court docket mentioned.

“The petition is subsequently, disregarded,” the court docket stated in its order.

Jain had moved the prime court docket final month difficult the September 23 order of the Essential District and Periods Pass judgement on Vinay Kumar Gupta, who transferred the cash laundering case to Particular Pass judgement on Vikas Dhull from Particular Pass judgement on Geetanjali Goel, who was once listening to his bail plea.

The district pass judgement on’s order was once handed on an utility for switch moved via the investigating company.

The company, in its switch utility earlier than the district pass judgement on, had argued that whilst there was once no grievance towards the pass judgement on listening to the topic, it was once “a case of possible bias” in favour of the Delhi minister and there was once a fear that it would now not get an unbiased and unbiased listening to.

The AAP chief argued earlier than the prime court docket that the ED can’t be allowed to “forehead beat” a pass judgement on and search switch of the case mentioning “bias” with none foundation.

The ED had arrested Jain and two others within the cash laundering case in accordance with a Central Bureau of Investigation FIR lodged towards the AAP chief in 2017 below the Prevention of Corruption Act.

Jain is accused of getting laundered cash via 4 corporations connected to him.