Crowdfunding ‘misuse’ case: SC understand to Gujarat government on Saket Gokhale’s bail plea

Via PTI

NEW DELHI: The Preferrred Court docket on Monday sought a reaction from the Gujarat govt on a plea filed by way of Trinamool Congress spokesperson Saket Gokhale searching for bail in a case associated with alleged misuse of cash accumulated thru crowdfunding.

A bench of Justices BR Gavai and Vikram Nath issued a understand to the state govt and sought its answer inside of two weeks.

Senior recommend AM Singhvi, showing for Gokhale, had previous submitted that the petitioner has at all times maintained that he has accumulated cash from crowdfunding.

The Gujarat Top Court docket on January 23 had refused bail to Gokhale and requested him to manner the courtroom handiest after a price sheet is filed.

Gokhale was once arrested by way of the Ahmedabad Cyber Crime Department from Delhi on December 30, 2022, in a case of alleged misuse of cash he had accumulated thru crowdfunding.

He’s dealing with fees below sections 420 (dishonest), 406 (prison breach of agree with) and 467 (forgery) of the IPC.

NEW DELHI: The Preferrred Court docket on Monday sought a reaction from the Gujarat govt on a plea filed by way of Trinamool Congress spokesperson Saket Gokhale searching for bail in a case associated with alleged misuse of cash accumulated thru crowdfunding.

A bench of Justices BR Gavai and Vikram Nath issued a understand to the state govt and sought its answer inside of two weeks.

Senior recommend AM Singhvi, showing for Gokhale, had previous submitted that the petitioner has at all times maintained that he has accumulated cash from crowdfunding.googletag.cmd.push(serve as() googletag.show(‘div-gpt-ad-8052921-2’); );

The Gujarat Top Court docket on January 23 had refused bail to Gokhale and requested him to manner the courtroom handiest after a price sheet is filed.

Gokhale was once arrested by way of the Ahmedabad Cyber Crime Department from Delhi on December 30, 2022, in a case of alleged misuse of cash he had accumulated thru crowdfunding.

He’s dealing with fees below sections 420 (dishonest), 406 (prison breach of agree with) and 467 (forgery) of the IPC.