September 23, 2024

The World Opinion

Your Global Perspective

Proper to Knowledge Act 2005, fantastic of Rs 25,000 each and every to three Public Knowledge Officials who denied data

State Knowledge Commissioner of Chhattisgarh State Knowledge Fee Mr. Manoj Trivedi has imposed a fantastic of Rs. He has suggested the involved to gather the fantastic quantity from the involved and deposit it within the govt fund and tell the fee.

It’s noteworthy that during a democracy, this is a signal of clear governance, that each one its voters have the basic proper to get details about the entire actions of the governance gadget. The primary purpose of Proper to Knowledge is to make to be had the specified data simply to each conscious citizen. If any division or group refuses to present data, a criticism may also be filed towards them within the Knowledge Fee. With the assistance of this Act, the entire voters must be knowledgeable, the functioning of the federal government must be taken in opposition to a clear and extra responsible governance gadget. Knowledge may also be in any shape, print media, mass media, internet media, e mail, opinion polls, reviews, papers, dialogues, reviews and statistics, promoting.

Beneath the Proper to Knowledge Act, the applicant Shri Mohitram Village Kharwani Tehsil Kartla District Korba submitted an utility to the Public Knowledge Officer, District Panchayat Kartla on July 18, 2016 and gained a letter from the Panchayat Kharwani from February 1, 2015, for refusing to just accept the appliance through the Secretary, Gram Panchayat Kharwani Construction Block, Kartla. Until June 2016, photocopy of money sign up, invoice vouchers and main points of predominant quantity and expenditure of 14th finance had been demanded. On no longer receiving well timed data from the Leader Government Officer, District Panchayat Kartla, submitted the primary attraction utility on August 22, 2016, however being disillusioned because of no longer passing any determination of the primary appellate officer, made a 2nd attraction within the Fee on October 10, 2016.

State Knowledge Commissioner Mr. Trivedi noticed the appliance and after being attentive to the appellant and the Public Knowledge Officer underneath the Act, didn’t supply data to the appellant inside the point in time and didn’t post any respond to the fee in addition to didn’t reply to the letters of the fee. Taking it critically, a fantastic of Rs 25,000 was once imposed underneath Segment 20 (1) towards the (then Public Knowledge Officer) of District Panchayat Kartla. The Leader Government Officer, District Panchayat Panchayat Korba has advisable disciplinary motion to the Further Leader Secretary, Executive of Chhattisgarh, Panchayat and Rural Construction Division for no longer discharging the primary attraction case legally and responsibly.

In a similar way, Mr. Hariprasad Shukla, a resident of Durg, had sought data from the Public Knowledge Officer, Collectorate Korba, on 5 issues in regards to the allotment of 1200 MW thermal energy plant to BALCO on rent for 30 years, by which on June 1, 2019, BALCO had given relinquishment in desire of the federal government. And authorized replica of the order of acceptance of relinquishment through the Tehsildar, The city and Nation Funding, Municipal Company Korba, Chhattisgarh. The Housing and Surroundings Division had demanded a photocopy of the no-objection certificates gained from the involved division underneath the Wooded area Conservation Act and the separate permission letter for felling of timber underneath phase 214 of the Chhattisgarh Land Income Code, 1959. Because of non-receipt of data from the Public Knowledge Officer, implemented to the First Appellate Officer on July 29, 2019, however being disillusioned with the verdict no longer taken through the First Appellate Officer, submitted a 2nd attraction to the Fee on September 13, 2019.

State Knowledge Commissioner Mr. Manoj Trivedi studied the case intently and equipped enough alternative of listening to to the applicant and the Public Knowledge Officer and the First Appellate Officer. The then Public Knowledge Officer and Sub-Divisional Officer Income Korba didn’t give data to the applicant inside the point in time and Mr. Trivedi was once fined Rs. Imposed and Collector Korba was once directed to recuperate the volume of imposed fantastic from the involved and deposit it within the govt fund and tell the fee.

Mr. Upendra Rathore, a resident of Rampur Korba, submitted an utility to the Public Knowledge Officer and Secretary, Gram Panchayat Cachar on 22 September 2016, for a photocopy of the allotment order gained from January 2016 to August 2016 to Gram Panchayat Cachar underneath more than a few schemes of the Executive of Chhattisgarh and the Central Executive, on this regard Demanded an attested replica of the sign up of the Gram Sabha assembly held with the approval of the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Cachar at the side of the date of graduation and crowning glory of the paintings. On no longer receiving the guidelines desired through the applicant, he implemented to the First Appellate Officer on 9 November 2016, however being disillusioned with the verdict no longer taken through the First Appellate Officer, submitted a 2nd attraction to the Fee on 01 July 2016.

State Knowledge Commissioner Mr. Trivedi despatched notices from the Fee to the then Public Knowledge Officer, Gram Panchayat Cachar 6 instances, however no reaction was once gained, because of which the Leader Government Officer, District Panchayat Korba was once requested to tell the Fee through serving Netis. Because of non-receipt of any reaction from the then Public Knowledge Officer, Gram Panchayat Cachar even after the awareness was once served, a fantastic of Rs 25,000 was once imposed underneath Segment 20 (1) of the Proper to Knowledge Act and the Leader Government Officer, District Panchayat Korba Directed that when improving the volume of imposed penalty from the involved and depositing it within the govt fund, tell the fee. Together with this, it was once additionally mentioned that the primary appellate officer, District Panchayat Korba attraction case must be certain motion as according to the directions of the federal government.

Like this:

Like Loading…

Proceed Studying