Lucknow’s political landscape heated up today as BJP leader Aparna Yadav leveled explosive charges against King George’s Medical University (KGMU). In a bold public statement, she claimed a dangerous syndicate involving religious conversions and love jihad is operating within the prestigious institution’s premises.
Aparna, daughter of Mulayam Singh Yadav and a prominent BJP figure, addressed a gathering of supporters and media personnel. She painted a grim picture of systematic efforts to lure vulnerable students and staff into conversions under the guise of romantic relationships. ‘This is not isolated incidents; it’s an organized racket thriving right under the university’s nose,’ she asserted emphatically.
Drawing from multiple complaints received by her office, Aparna detailed how young Hindu girls are targeted by a network allegedly backed by certain radical elements. Promises of love, marriage, and a better future are used as bait, only to reveal a darker agenda of forced religious conversion later. She highlighted cases where families were threatened and coerced into silence.
KGMU, one of Uttar Pradesh’s oldest and most reputed medical colleges, has long been a symbol of academic excellence. However, Aparna warned that its reputation is now at stake due to administrative negligence. ‘The authorities must wake up and investigate these serious allegations thoroughly,’ she demanded, calling for a high-level probe committee involving state intelligence agencies.
The accusations come at a sensitive time, with ongoing debates across India about love jihad and illegal conversions. Aparna linked this syndicate to broader patterns seen in other states, urging the Yogi Adityanath government to act decisively. Her speech resonated with the audience, many of whom shared personal anecdotes of similar experiences.
As news spreads, KGMU administration remains silent, neither confirming nor denying the claims. Political rivals have dismissed Aparna’s statements as election rhetoric, but she stands firm, vowing to pursue the matter legally. This development could trigger wider scrutiny of educational institutions in the region, potentially reshaping campus safety policies.
In conclusion, Aparna Yadav’s revelations have ignited a firestorm of discussion on protecting cultural identities in academic environments. Whether these allegations hold water will depend on forthcoming investigations, but one thing is clear: the issue demands immediate attention from all stakeholders.