Categorical Information Provider
AHMEDABAD: A metropolitan courtroom in Ahmedabad on Friday issued a summons to Bihar Deputy Leader Minister Tejashwi Yadav for the second one time in a felony defamation case after finding out that the primary summons may now not be served to him because of some confusion.
As in step with the most recent summons, Yadav is needed to seem prior to the courtroom on October 13. On August 28, the courtroom of Further Metropolitan Justice of the Peace D J Parmar issued a summons to Yadav in a felony defamation case filed in opposition to him over his reported remarks that “handiest Gujaratis will also be thugs (fraudsters)”.
The courtroom issued a summons to the senior RJD chief to seem prior to it on September 22 within the case registered beneath Sections 499 and 500 of the IPC. When the courtroom started the listening to, it was once published that the summons was once nonetheless mendacity within the courtroom and it was once by no means dropped at Yadav. Whilst the complainant Haresh Mehta (69) was once beneath the influence that the courtroom would surrender the summons to Yadav, the courtroom was once beneath the influence that Mehta’s legal professional had delivered it to Yadav.
AHMEDABAD: A metropolitan courtroom in Ahmedabad on Friday issued a summons to Bihar Deputy Leader Minister Tejashwi Yadav for the second one time in a felony defamation case after finding out that the primary summons may now not be served to him because of some confusion.
As in step with the most recent summons, Yadav is needed to seem prior to the courtroom on October 13. On August 28, the courtroom of Further Metropolitan Justice of the Peace D J Parmar issued a summons to Yadav in a felony defamation case filed in opposition to him over his reported remarks that “handiest Gujaratis will also be thugs (fraudsters)”.
The courtroom issued a summons to the senior RJD chief to seem prior to it on September 22 within the case registered beneath Sections 499 and 500 of the IPC. When the courtroom started the listening to, it was once published that the summons was once nonetheless mendacity within the courtroom and it was once by no means dropped at Yadav. Whilst the complainant Haresh Mehta (69) was once beneath the influence that the courtroom would surrender the summons to Yadav, the courtroom was once beneath the influence that Mehta’s legal professional had delivered it to Yadav.googletag.cmd.push(serve as() googletag.show(‘div-gpt-ad-8052921-2’); );