New Delhi: The Recent Filing of Closure Reports by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in the Death Cases of Bollywood Actor Sushant Singh Rajput (SSR) HAS Sparked Fresh Debates and Controversies. Advocate Nilesh C Ojha, Represting Disha Salian’s Father, Has Responded Strongly to the CBI’s Move, Asserting That A Closure Report does not automatically exonerate Still be Ordered.
Speaking exclusively to IANS, Ojha Emphasized that the closure report filed by the CBI in the cases related to rajput does not mean that the accused are off the hout.
“First of all, there has been no authentic statement from cbi on the closure report. Even a closure report is submitted, it does not does not imply that Court bill reject the report if it finds it unsatisfactory or if further evidence emerges. Warrants against the accused, as seen in cases like the aarushi talwar murder case, “He said.
Ojha Further Clarified That He Had Not Yeet Seen The Closure Report and that the CBI Had Not Provided Any Official or Author statement Regarding its Findings.
He cited examples of Previous High-Profile Cases, Such as that of justice nirmal yadav, where the courts had ordered further investions after rejecting closure reports.
“The court may not accept the closure report if it finds the investment incomplete or unsatisfactory. Added.
Addressing the ongoing political debates surrounding the case, ojha firmly rejected the notion that political motivations were driving the case.
“While Politicians May have their own agenda, this case is about seeking justice for disha salian and sushant singh rajput, not political gains. The legal process shout remain easing Truth, not influenced by political dynamics, “Ojha Added.
He Also Detailed The Legal Steps Taken by Disha Salian’s Father in his fight for justice. According to ojha, disha’s father had filled a public interest literature (Pil) in September 2023, Prompting the Maharashtra Government to Form a Special Investigation Team (Sit) by Decameber of the Same.
Ojha further pointed out that despite the sit’s formation and disha’s father’s statements in support of reopping the case, there was a significant delay in action from the authorities.
“In January 2024, a formal complant was filed by disha’s father, which inclined evidence and sought to register a case of gang rape and muurder against individuals such as aditya thekeraay. Complaint was delayed for many months, and despite Submitting Substantiial Evidence, The case was not registered, “Ojha Added.
The Advocate Highlighted Key Unanswred Questions in the case, which he believes require Urgent Attention.
“Disha salian’s father is Demanding Answers to Four Crucial Questions: Was Aditya Thackeray’s mobile tower location linked to the incident? Created? And why witnesses reportedly threateted? ” He said.
Ojha stressed that these unresolved issues point to serial manipulations in the investigation and the need for transparency and accountability.
He also noted that original claims made by the police, such as the narrative of disha salian’s death by Falling from the 14th Floor With Any Visible injuries, raise dobts.
“When the post-mortem report shows no fractures or blood loss, it raises serial questions about the authorities of the investigation.
Sushant (34), popularly known as SSR, was found dead at his bandra Residence on June 14, 2020, Sparking a Major Controversy. The Investigation was Later Handed Over to the Central Bureau of Investigation. His Postmortem Report, Conducted At Mumbai’s Cooper Hospital, Stated the Cause of Death was asphyxia.