New Delhi erupted in political drama after Congress leader Rahul Gandhi referenced an unpublished book by a former army chief during his Lok Sabha speech on national security. The government swiftly challenged him, demanding the book’s name and questioning its publication status, leading to chaos and the adjournment of proceedings.
Post-session, Congress MP Pramod Tiwari defended Gandhi robustly. ‘Rahul Gandhi highlighted a critical issue on India’s security, drawn from a top general’s insights,’ Tiwari stated. ‘The nation deserves answers on why the government appears submissive to China. This was echoed in Rajya Sabha, so why silence it in Lok Sabha? He spoke purely in the country’s interest.’
Tiwari drew historical parallels, noting how Pandit Nehru addressed the 1959-60 events openly in Parliament, allowing full debate. ‘Today, they stop us before even naming the book. The government dodges discussion—not just on this, but even on the President’s address. If General Naravane has spoken, it warrants debate. We can’t compromise national security. Proud of Rahul for raising it,’ he added, questioning why other books and newspapers are freely cited without interruption.
MP Manish Tewari emphasized parliamentary traditions. ‘Rules are being flouted,’ he said. ‘Post-1947 Pakistan conflict, 1962 China war discussions lasted a week in both houses. In 1965, the President informed Parliament on the Pakistan war. National security demands open debate.’
On the BJP side, MP Madan Rathod rebuked Digvijay Singh’s ‘democracy in danger’ remark. ‘A senior leader like him shouldn’t indulge in undignified statements. His party imposed Emergency, killing democracy. With his Rajya Sabha term ending, this is just posturing for favors,’ Rathod fired back.
BJP MP Mayank Kumar Naik dismissed opposition rhetoric. ‘The people entrusted BJP-NDA with democracy’s safety. The public’s court is supreme, and it placed us in Parliament. Their words lack gravity.’ On Gandhi, Naik said the Speaker intervened as the reference aimed to demoralize the nation during the President’s address debate.
This clash underscores deepening divides over security discussions, with opposition pushing for transparency amid government resistance.