Knowledge Commissioner, Chhattisgarh State Knowledge Fee, Shri A.Okay. As a way to make sure that transparency and responsibility within the functioning of the management, Agrawal has imposed consequences beneath Segment 20(1) of the Proper to Knowledge Act 2005 to public data officials who don’t supply data inside the prescribed point in time. Taking main motion, Shri Agrawal has directed the senior officials to get better it and deposit it within the govt’s treasury whilst enforcing a nice of Rs 25,000 on 4 public data officials.
Proper to Knowledge is the fundamental pillar of any democracy. India may be a democratic nation, in any democracy the true energy lies in its voters. Voters have a elementary proper to query the federal government, what’s the govt which has been created for its provider is doing. How a lot quantity is being spent for construction works, the place is the volume of tax of voters going. As well as, there are lots of different essential questions. Thus, the precise to data is that tough medium wherein the general public can at once query and solution the federal government. This legislation additionally turns into essential since the data sought from the Public Knowledge Officer needs to be equipped inside 30 days. If the Public Knowledge Officer offers incomplete data or destroys the paperwork to keep away from giving the ideas, the Commissioner of the State Knowledge Fee can impose a nice at the involved Public Knowledge Officer.
Underneath the Proper to Knowledge Act, the applicant Shri Gajendra Kumar Sahu, Gram Ranitarai, has submitted and withdrawn the volume gained from the 14th Finance Fee from the yr 2017 until June 14, 2019, from the Secretary, Gram Panchayat (Public Knowledge Officer) Silhatikala Janpad Panchayat Daundilohara, District Balod. The unique reproduction of the involved proposal was once demanded. Because of non-receipt of data and paperwork via the applicant at the closing date, the primary enchantment utility was once submitted on 22 August 2019 within the place of work of Leader Government Officer, Janpad Panchayat Daundilohara. Being aggrieved via no longer giving the verdict via the primary appellate authority, he made a 2nd enchantment within the Chhattisgarh State Knowledge Fee on 5 November 2019.
State Knowledge Commissioner Mr. Agrawal took it critically. The State Knowledge Commissioner equipped a possibility to the Secretary, Gram Panchayat (Public Knowledge Officer) Silhatikala, Shri Jitendra Kumar Malekar, Janpad Panchayat, Daundilohara, to provide his case sooner than the Fee, however the answer of the Public Knowledge Officer was once no longer adequate and he clarified his clarification referring to the cause of the lengthen. may no longer post. Underneath Segment 20(1) of the Proper to Knowledge Act 2005, at the foundation of deserves and demerits, Mr. Aggarwal has imposed a nice of Rs.25 thousand at the then Public Knowledge Officer, Silhatikala, Mr. Jitendra Kumar Malekar, Janpad Panchayat Dundilohara and for taking strict disciplinary motion. Leader Government Officer, District Panchayat Balod, has been advisable to District Balod.
In a similar way, in every other case, Vivek Tandon, Raipur, on 16 October 2018, submitted an utility to the Public Knowledge Officer, Police Station Khursipar, District Durg, and filed an utility with the mum of L. Appal. Okay Pratima died on thirteenth January 2018, whose course no. is 65/18. When is the general police investigation document of the deceased more likely to be gained. Attested reproduction of Ultimate Take a look at Record with signed signature was once demanded via the SDM. Public Knowledge Officer Shri Gopal Vaish (Inspector Police Station Khursipar District Durg) informed the applicant that the order was once no longer discovered to be registered. Towards the answer of the Public Knowledge Officer, the applicant made the primary enchantment on 26 November 2018. The Public Knowledge Officer equipped unsuitable data to the applicant. The applicant filed 2nd enchantment within the fee on 26 February 2019.
Within the Fee, the State Knowledge Commissioner Mr. Agrawal, after taking note of the applying and argument of the applicant and the Public Knowledge Officer, equipped the Public Knowledge Officer many alternatives to offer paperwork in his want, however the Public Knowledge Officer didn’t post any solution sooner than the Fee. Commissioner Shri Agrawal imposed a nice of 25 thousand rupees at the then Public Knowledge Officer and Inspector Shri Gopal Vaisha police station in-charge Vaishalinagar District Durg beneath segment 20(1) of the Proper to Knowledge Act 2005 and picked up the nice and deposited it within the govt fund. Superintendent of Police Bhilai has been directed.
Applicant Okay. Monika Suggest Baranbazar Raipur implemented on November 15, 2018 to offer attested photocopy of the quarterly document ready via the Juvenile Justice Board from September 1, 2017 to September 2018 via Public Knowledge Officer and District Kid Coverage Officer, District Raipur (Shri Navneet Swarnakar). On non-receipt of data, first enchantment was once filed on twenty first December 2018. Because of no longer giving the verdict via the primary appellate authority, the second one enchantment was once filed sooner than the fee on 26 April 2019.
The State Knowledge Commissioner, whilst listening to this example, wrote to the First Appellate Officer to take disciplinary motion because of laxity in tasks. No longer offering well timed data at the utility of the applicant and Commissioner Mr. Agrawal discovered that the lawful agreement was once no longer finished inside the time equipped beneath segment 7(1) of the Act and the appellant was once no longer knowledgeable. Public Knowledge Officer Shri Navneet Swarnakar didn’t post a adequate respond to the Fee, because of which the Commissioner imposed a nice of Rs.25 thousand at the Public Knowledge Officer beneath Segment 20(1) of the Proper to Knowledge Act 2005 and Information Analyst Shri Karan Sahu gained a proof. Tax disciplinary motion was once advisable.
Applicant Krishna Kumar Singh Domanhil, Chirmiri had implemented to the Public Knowledge Officer, Malaria Division, District Korea on 24 November 2017 and demanded a photocopy of the certificates and money ebook bought via the Malaria Division from the yr 2012, 2014 to 2016. On non-receipt of data, the applicant filed the primary enchantment on 09 January 2018. The second one enchantment was once filed sooner than the Fee on 6 April 2018 because of non-compliance of the verdict via the First Appellate Authority. State Knowledge Commissioner Mr. Aggarwal, after taking note of the applying and argument of the applicant, equipped alternatives to the Public Knowledge Officer a number of instances to offer paperwork in his want, however beneath Segment 20(1) of the Proper to Knowledge Act, 2005, the Public Knowledge Officer Dr. Ashishkaran was once given the fee’s request. A display reason understand was once issued on behalf of them, however no answer was once given via them to the awareness letter nor did they post any answer sooner than the fee. Commissioner Mr. Aggarwal imposed a nice of Rs.25 thousand at the then Public Knowledge Officer Dr. Ashishkaran and disciplinary motion for no longer well timed disposal of programs gained via the First Appellate Officer (Leader Scientific and Well being Officer Baikunthpur) beneath Segment 19(6). It’s been advisable to the Director Well being Products and services.
Like this:
Like Loading…
Proceed Studying
