Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    The World Opinion
    • World
    • India
      • Jharkhand
      • Chhattisgarh
      • Bihar
    • Sports
    • Tech
    • Entertainment
    • Business
    • Health
    • Magazine
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    The World Opinion
    Home»World»Two popular brands clashed over the removal of sunscreen ad camp, dispute to Delhi High Court

    Two popular brands clashed over the removal of sunscreen ad camp, dispute to Delhi High Court

    World April 16, 20252 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest Copy Link LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Two popular brands clashed over the removal of sunscreen ad camp, dispute to Delhi High Court
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Copy Link

    Controversy has arisen between two major brands over sunscreen advertisements. Hanasa Consumer has filed a petition in the Delhi High Court demanding a change in an advertisement of Hindustan Unilever (HUL). According to sources associated with the case, Hanasa has alleged that HUL’s advertisement is derogatory. In addition, he has appealed to the court to intervene to remove or amend this advertisement. It is noteworthy that Hanasa is the original company of Consumer, Beauty and Personal Care Brand MamArth.

    SC refuses to ban new Waqf law, objected to non-Muslim entry, said- Bengal violence harassment

    What is the matter

    An advertisement by the Lakme brand of Hindustan Unilever has been accused that his “online Bestseller” sunscreen is giving false information about its SPF, which can cause stains on the skin. SPF means Sun Protection Factor, and Honasa Consumer objects to it. On behalf of Hanasa Consumer, senior advocate Amit Sibal presented the company’s arguments in the Delhi High Court and demanded relief from alleged derogatory and false advertisements made by HUL.

    Good news for workers in Delhi, Rekha Gupta government increased minimum wages of workers, know when it will be implemented

    What did the court say

    Justice Amit Bansal’s single-judge bench made a remark that advertisements appear to be derogatory in the initial point of view. Nevertheless, Hindustan Unilever has been allowed to present its arguments. Subsequently, Hanasa Consumer demanded intervention from the court to prevent Hindustan Unilever from publication of such advertisements on newspapers, hoardings or social media until the next hearing, but Justice Bansal did not accept the petition.

    Hanasa consumer objection to co-founder

    The controversy arose when Honasa Consumer’s co-founder Ghazal Alagh expressed his objection through a post on social media. Alagh congratulated HUL’s Lakme product for adopting the Sun Protection Factor Standards. It is noteworthy that the Sun Protection Factor is already being followed by the brand The Derma Company of Honasa. SPF, or sun protection factor, shows how effectively a sunscreen protects the skin from harmful UVB rays.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related News

    Canada PM Carney’s India Visit Signals New Era in Ties

    World February 12, 2026

    Two Pakistanis Indicted in $10M US Healthcare Fraud

    World February 12, 2026

    Pakistan’s Afghan Wars Driven by Global Backing, Not Faith: Asif

    World February 12, 2026
    -Advertisement-
    The World Opinion
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    © 2026 The World Opinion. All Rights Reserved

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.