This story is of a woman who first faced rape and then made rounds of courts in search of justice. The incident took place in 1986, when she was a minor, and the age of the accused was 21 years at that time. Now, in 2025, the apex court has ordered the accused to be sent to jail, retaining the conviction. In this case in Rajasthan, the Supreme Court regretted the delay in justice. A bench of Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Sanjay Karol said that the decision of the decision in four decades is very sad.
Daroga saheb fell in love: Forcibly entered the girl’s house to get married, the policeman lost, video viral
The Supreme Court rejected the Rajasthan High Court’s decision of July 2013, acquitting the accused. The court also expressed that it is extremely sad that this minor girl and her family had to spend about four decades to wait for this terrible chapter of their life to end.
Supreme Court overturns Rajasthan HC decision
The Supreme Court has upheld the 7 -year sentence set by the lower court, rejecting the decision of the Rajasthan High Court. Along with this, the convict has been instructed to surrender within 4 weeks. The apex court made it clear in its decision that the silence of the girl could not be taken in the form that no crime happened to her.
After the Mohalla clinic in Delhi, the name of Mohalla bus will also change, this name can be made by Delhi government
What happened in Supreme Court
According to media reports, the Supreme Court said that it is very sad that this minor girl and her family had to wait for about four decades to end this difficult chapter of their lives. The court also mentioned that it is true that the victim did not give any information about the crime with her. It is recorded in the trial court records that when asked about the incident, ‘V’ (the victim) remained silent, and he only shed tears when asked.
The judges hearing the case clarified that this fact cannot be considered in favor of the accused. He also told that the reason for the silence of the girl was shock. In the context of the victim, the judges said that it would not be appropriate to put the entire burden of prosecution on him. The bench also mentioned that even if there are no condemnic statements, there is no rule to maintain conviction, especially when other evidence is available.
Good news for Delhi MLAs, ‘Best MLA’ will be chosen every year, Speaker Gupta told the conditions required to win it
There was a rape with a minor in 1986
The incident took place in 1986, when a minor was raped. A person named Gulab Chand found the girl unconscious, and was bleeding from her private part. The trial court sentenced the accused to seven years in 1987. However, in 2013, the Rajasthan High Court acquitted the accused. After this, the victim’s family challenged the matter in the Supreme Court.